Right ventricular function and thrombus load in patients with pulmonary embolism and diagnostic delay

INTRODUCTION

It has been reported that the time between symptom onset and objective diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) does not affect patients' prognosis with regard to re-thrombosis and mortality risk. However, this observation is contra-intuitive and poorly understood. We further elaborated on this paradox by evaluating thrombus load and right ventricular function in patients with and without diagnostic delay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a post hoc analysis of a previously published observational prospective outcome study in 113 consecutive PE patients. Qanadli-score and RV/LV ratio were scored in all patients, as was the duration from symptom onset to clinical presentation and diagnosis. Diagnostic delay was defined as a period of more than 7 days between symptom onset and clinical presentation. Further endpoints were mortality and hospital readmission in a 6-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with and 93 patients without delay were studied, who had comparable baseline characteristics and co-morbidities. In linear analyses, Qanadli-score (R² of 0.021; P = 0.130) and RV/LV ratio (R² < 0.001; P = 0.991) were not associated with diagnostic delay. Likewise, longer delay was not predictive of 6-week mortality (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.08-5.57) or hospital readmission (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.15-3.65).

CONCLUSION

In our patient cohort, diagnostic delay was not associated with higher thrombus load or right ventricular dysfunction. This provides a possible explanation for the lack of prognostic relevance of diagnostic delay.

Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The Wells clinical decision rule (CDR) and D-dimer tests can be used to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). We performed a meta-analysis to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of an "unlikely" CDR (<or=4 points) combined with a normal D-dimer test and the safety of withholding anti-coagulants based on these criteria.

METHODS

Prospective studies that withheld anti-coagulant treatment from patients with clinically suspected PE and an "unlikely" CDR in combination with a normal D-dimer concentration without performing further tests were searched for in Medline, Cochrane and Embase. Primary endpoints were the recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and PE-related mortality during 3-months follow-up.

RESULTS

Four studies including 1660 consecutive patients were identified. The pooled incidence of VTE after initial exclusion of acute PE based on an "unlikely" CDR and normal D-dimer was 0.34% (95%CI 0.036-0.96%), resulting in a NPV of 99.7% (95%CI: 99.0-99.9%, random effects-model). The risk for PE related mortality was very low: 1/1660 patients had fatal PE (0.06%, 95%CI 0.0017-0.46%).

CONCLUSION

Acute PE can be safely excluded in patients with clinically suspected acute PE who have an "unlikely" probability and a negative D-dimer test and anticoagulant treatment can be withheld. There is no need for additional radiological tests in these patients to rule out PE.

Comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy at Prince Abdulrahman Al Sudairy Hospital, Saudi Arabia

The initial 300 patients whose symptomatic cholelithiasis was managed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were matched to and compared with 300 patients managed by open cholecystectomy (OC) during the 30 months prior to the introduction of LC. Of the 300 LC attempted 292 (97.3%) were successful with conversion to OC rate of 2.7%. Besides the obviously better cosmetic results, LC patients had less post operative pain, mean doses of opiates needed 0.01 versus 5 for OC (p < 0.0001), were discharged earlier from the hospital, mean 3.1 days versus 8 days for OC (p < 0.001) and had less postoperative complications 4% versus 11% for OC. We conclude that not only is LC a better operation than OC, but also that in the regional referral centres such as ours, LC can safely supplant OC as the preferred modality for the management of symptomatic cholelithiasis.