1
|
P108 IMPROVEMENTS IN SGRQ TOTAL AND DOMAIN SCORES WITH BENRALIZUMAB TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH ASTHMA. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.08.250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
2
|
RESCUE MEDICATION USE REDUCTION WITH BENRALIZUMAB FOR PATIENTS WITH SEVERE, UNCONTROLLED EOSINOPHILIC ASTHMA. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.09.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
3
|
Asthma Symptom Improvements with Benralizumab are Associated with Improvements in Activity Function and Quality of Life for Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma. Pneumologie 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
4
|
Patient-Reported Activity Impairment, Stress, and Tiredness Improvement in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma with Eosinophilic Inflammation: Pooled Results from Two Phase III Trials of Benralizumab. Pneumologie 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
5
|
Impact of Asthma Control Status on Lung Function and Patient Well-Being Assessments in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma. Pneumologie 2018. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1619158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
6
|
|
7
|
The industry's perspective partnership: advancing the care of persons with headache. Headache 2001; 41:946-7. [PMID: 11903519 DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.01186.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine measures of cognitive function during acute migraine, before and after treatment with sumatriptan nasal spray, 20 mg. BACKGROUND Migraineurs frequently report symptoms of cognitive impairment during migraine. The efficacy of sumatriptan for treatment of migraine-related cognitive impairment is undocumented. METHODS This open-label, single-attack study of 28 subjects used the Headache Care Center-Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics, a computerized neuropsychological assessment battery, to measure cognitive function under three patient conditions: migraine-free, untreated migraine, and following sumatriptan (primary outcome). Headache response and pain-free response, percent effectiveness, and clinical disability were measured. RESULTS Cognitive function (simple reaction time, sustained attention/concentration, working memory, visual-spatial processing) and alertness/fatigue were adversely affected during migraine compared with migraine-free performance (P<.05), and rapidly restored following sumatriptan nasal spray, 20 mg (P<.05). Headache and pain-free response were 86% and 68%, respectively, at 135 minutes postdose. Changes in migraine pain severity, clinical disability, and percent effectiveness following treatment with sumatriptan nasal spray, 20 mg, were significantly correlated with cognitive function measures across all subtests (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Sumatriptan nasal spray, 20 mg, restored migraine-related cognitive function and clinical disability.
Collapse
|
9
|
Naratriptan as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache 2001; 41:248-56. [PMID: 11264684 DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.111006248.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of naratriptan 1-mg and 2.5-mg tablets twice daily compared with placebo as short-term prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine. BACKGROUND Approximately 60% of women with migraine report headaches associated with their menstrual cycles. Results from an open-label study suggest that short-term administration of sumatriptan is useful in the prophylaxis of menstrually associated migraine. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study was conducted in women aged 18 years or older with a history of migraine with or without aura, as defined by the International Headache Society, of at least 6 months. Two dose strengths of naratriptan (1 mg, 2.5 mg) or identical-appearing placebo tablets (1:1:1) were administered twice daily for 5 days starting 2 days prior to the expected onset of menses across four perimenstrual periods. End points included the number of menstrually associated migraines, total migraine days, peak headache severity, lost work/activity time, migraine-related quality of life, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS Overall, the intent-to-treat population comprised 206 women (naratriptan 1 mg, n = 70; naratriptan 2.5 mg, n = 70, and placebo, n = 66); 171 women treated four perimenstrual periods. Significantly more perimenstrual periods per subject treated with naratriptan, 1 mg, were headache-free compared with placebo (50% versus 25%, P =.003). Naratriptan, 1 mg, significantly reduced the number of menstrually associated migraines (2.0 versus 4.0, P <.05) and menstrually associated migraine days (4.2 versus 7.0, P <.01) compared with placebo. More patients treated with naratriptan, 1 mg, were headache-free across all treated perimenstrual periods compared with placebo (23% versus 8%). No difference in headache severity was observed in breakthrough headaches. The incidence and severity of adverse events was similar across treatment groups. Naratriptan, 2.5 mg, was not statistically superior to placebo for any measure. CONCLUSIONS Naratriptan, 1 mg, with tolerability similar to placebo, is an effective, short-term, prophylactic treatment for menstrually associated migraine.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early treatment of migraine with sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg, while pain is mild, has been reported to enhance pain-free response 2 hours and 4 hours postdose and sustained pain-free response 2 to 24 hours postdose compared with treatment when pain has become moderate to severe. Early treatment with sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg also resulted in less redosing, which translated to a reduction in the mean number of doses used per migraine episode. OBJECTIVE We examined the economic implications of early treatment with sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg while pain is mild versus treatment when pain has become moderate to severe. METHODS Using data from retrospective analyses of a dose-ranging clinical trial of sumatriptan (protocol S2CM09) involving 1003 patients, we estimated the mean cost per treatment success for a hypothetical population of 1000 migraine patients who received treatment with sumatriptan 50-mg or 100-mg tablets early while pain was mild versus treatment when pain had become moderate to severe. RESULTS With a conservative estimate of migraine frequency of 1.5 episodes per month, the total cost of early migraine treatment with sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg was reduced by $31.68 and $20.16, respectively, per patient per year. The average cost per pain-free treatment success was reduced by 32% to 57% with sumatriptan 50 mg and 100 mg if migraines were treated while pain was mild in intensity versus when pain had become moderate to severe. CONCLUSIONS Treatment of migraine with sumatriptan 50-mg and 100-mg tablets is effective regardless of whether pain is mild, moderate, or severe. However, initiating treatment while pain is mild may be more cost-effective than delaying treatment until pain has become moderate to severe.
Collapse
|
11
|
Effect of encapsulation on absorption of sumatriptan tablets: data from healthy volunteers and patients during a migraine. Clin Ther 2001; 23:242-51. [PMID: 11293557 DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80006-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some comparative trials of selective serotonin 1B/ID-agonists in migraine have reported -15% lower efficacy for sumatriptan tablets than that reported in placebo-controlled trials. OBJECTIVE This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the encapsulation methods used to mask active drug may delay absorption of sumatriptan from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (the traditional end point in clinical trials of migraine treatment), an effect that may be enhanced by migraine-associated gastric stasis. METHODS Two randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover trials were conducted to evaluate the absorption and bioequivalence of conventional 50-mg sumatriptan tablets and encapsulated 50-mg sumatriptan tablets in supine, fasted, healthy volunteers (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40270) and supine patients experiencing a migraine (Glaxo Wellcome protocol SUM40268). Absorption was assessed by calculating the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from dosing to 2 hours after dosing (AUC2) and the times to first measurable plasma concentration, 10 ng/mL, 20 ng/mL, and maximum plasma concentration. Data for the AUC from time zero to infinity and maximum plasma concentration were used to assess standard bioequivalence, which is considered to occur when the 90% CIs for the geometric mean treatment ratios (test/reference) fall between 0.8 and 1.25. RESULTS Study 1 included 26 healthy subjects (73% men, 27% women; mean age, 39.1 years), and study 2 included 30 patients with migraine (67% women, 33% men; mean age, 42.7 years). Sumatriptan absorption was delayed with the encapsulated tablet compared with the conventional tablet 0 to 2 hours after dosing, particularly during a migraine. AUC2 values with encapsulated sumatriptan compared with the conventional tablet were 21% lower in healthy volunteers (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.79; 90% CI, 0.588-1.050) and 27% lower in patients experiencing a migraine (ratio of capsule/tablet, 0.73; 90% CI, 0.519-1.023). Standard bioequivalence was demonstrated in both healthy volunteers and patients experiencing a migraine. CONCLUSIONS Encapsulation delayed absorption of sumatriptan 0 to 2 hours after dosing, particularly during a migraine. This delay in absorption of the encapsulated form may account for the lower efficacy of sumatriptan in some comparative studies.
Collapse
|
12
|
2000 Wolfe Award. Sumatriptan for the range of headaches in migraine sufferers: results of the Spectrum Study. Headache 2000; 40:783-91. [PMID: 11135021 DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.00143.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraineurs experience a spectrum of headaches: migraine, migrainous, and episodic tension-type as defined by the International Headache Society (IHS). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of sumatriptan, 50-mg tablets, in treating the spectrum of headaches in IHS-diagnosed migraineurs. DESIGN/METHODS Migraineurs with severe disability (Headache Impact Questionnaire score 250 or greater) were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Patients treated up to 10 headaches with sumatriptan, 50 mg, or placebo (4:1). Headache features, recorded prior to treatment, were used to classify each headache using IHS criteria. Headache response (moderate or severe pain reduced to mild or no pain) and pain-free response were recorded at 2 and 4 hours postdose (primary endpoint). Because patients treated multiple attacks, statistical methods controlling for within-subject correlation were used. RESULTS Two hundred forty-nine migraineurs treated 1576 moderate or severe headaches: migraine (n = 1110), migrainous (n = 103), and tension-type (n = 363). Sumatriptan was superior to placebo for headache response 4 hours postdose (primary endpoint) across all headache types (migraine, 66% versus 48%; P<.001; migrainous, 71% versus 39%; P<.01; tension-type, 78% versus 50%, P<.001). Sumatriptan was also superior to placebo for pain-free response 4 hours postdose for migraine (41% versus 24%, P<.001) and tension-type headaches (56% versus 36%, P =.001). Sumatriptan provided superior pain-free response 2 hours postdose for migraine (18% versus 7%, P<.0001) and tension-type headache (28% versus 14%, P =.0005) compared with placebo. CONCLUSION Sumatriptan, 50-mg tablets, are effective for the full spectrum of headaches experienced by patients with disabling migraine due to a sumatriptan-responsive mechanism.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of sumatriptan, 50-mg tablets, versus placebo for early intervention while head pain was mild in patients with disabling migraine. METHODS A post hoc analysis was performed in a subgroup of patients from a large, randomized, placebo-controlled study of patients with disabling headache who treated while pain was mild. Pain-free response 2 and 4 hours postdose, headache recurrence, and safety were examined. Significance tests were performed only for the first-treated attacks. RESULTS Twenty-six patients with disabling headache treated 46 mild and 166 moderate or severe headaches. For the first-treated headaches while pain was mild, pain-free rates were significantly higher for sumatriptan than placebo 4 hours postdose (78% versus 0%, P =.02), but not 2 hours postdose (52% versus 0%, P =.22). Across all headaches treated while pain was mild, pain-free responses were higher for sumatriptan than placebo 4 hours (85% versus 17%) and 2 hours (50% versus 0%) postdose compared with placebo. When the same patients treated headaches while pain was moderate or severe, pain-free rates were lower than that reported for treatment during mild pain. There was a trend toward lower headache recurrence in headaches treated while pain was mild compared with moderate or severe pain (13% versus 18%). No drug-related adverse events were reported in the headaches treated while pain was mild. CONCLUSIONS Patients with disabling migraine may benefit from early intervention with sumatriptan, 50 mg, while pain is mild.
Collapse
|
14
|
Effect of early intervention with sumatriptan on migraine pain: retrospective analyses of data from three clinical trials. Clin Ther 2000; 22:1035-48. [PMID: 11048903 DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)80083-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 173] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the efficacy of sumatriptan 50- and 100-mg tablets in the treatment of migraine attacks while the pain is mild rather than moderate/severe. BACKGROUND Results from The Spectrum Study suggested that early treatment of migraine attacks with sumatriptan 50-mg tablets while the pain is mild might enhance pain-free response and reduce headache recurrence. METHODS Retrospective analyses of headaches treated during mild pain were performed using data from 3 studies of sumatriptan tablets (protocols S2CM09, S2BT25, and S2BT26). Our primary interest was pain-free response 2 and 4 hours after dosing; secondary interests were use of a second dose of medication, clinical disability (as measured on a 4-point disability scale), migraine-associated symptoms, meaningful pain relief (patient defined), time to meaningful relief, sustained pain-free response, and proportion of attacks in which pain had worsened 2 and 4 hours after dosing, all of which were compared in headaches treated during mild versus moderate/severe pain. RESULTS In S2CM09, 92 patients treated 118 headaches during mild pain. Rates of pain-free response were higher 2 hours after dosing with sumatriptan 50 mg (51%) or 100 mg (67%; P < 0.05) compared with placebo (28%), and were higher with early treatment of mild pain compared with treatment of moderate/severe pain at 2 hours (sumatriptan 50 mg: mild pain, 51%; moderate/severe pain, 31%; P < 0.05; sumatriptan 100 mg: mild pain, 67%; moderate/severe pain, 36%) and 4 hours (50 mg: 75% vs 56%; 100 mg: 90% vs 61%; P < 0.05). Early intervention also resulted in less redosing than when moderate/severe pain was treated (50 mg: 21% vs 32%; 100 mg: 20% vs 29%). More attacks treated early with sumatriptan 50 or 100 mg were associated with normal function 4 hours after dosing compared with placebo (70% and 93% vs 46%, respectively). Sustained pain-free response rates 2 to 24 hours after early dosing with sumatriptan 50 or 100 mg were also higher (34% and 53%, respectively) compared with treatment of moderate/severe pain (19% and 24%, respectively). Early treatment with sumatriptan 100 mg produced significantly higher pain-free rates at 2 hours after dosing (P < 0.001) than did ergotamine plus caffeine (S2BT25: 69% vs 34%, respectively) or aspirin plus metoclopramide (S2BT26: 73% vs 25%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Sumatriptan 50- and 100-mg tablets are effective whether pain is mild or moderate/severe. However, treatment with sumatriptan while pain is mild provides high pain-free response rates while reducing the need for redosing, benefits not seen with ergotamine plus caffeine or aspirin plus metoclopramide.
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether 347 patients would respond to a 50-mg oral dose of sumatriptan, even though they considered themselves poor responders to this acute therapy for migraine, and to investigate whether oral naratriptan can be an effective acute therapy for migraine in the subset of patients who did not respond to sumatriptan under double-blind, well-controlled conditions. BACKGROUND Although most migraineurs respond to sumatriptan, there remains a need for an effective alternative for those who do not respond. Naratriptan is a more potent and more lipophilic member of this class of agent and could prove beneficial in such patients. This is the first well-controlled study to assess the value of another 5-HT1B/1D agonist in this difficult patient subset. METHODS This study comprised two migraine attacks. The first (attack 1) was a single-blind assessment of the efficacy of sumatriptan (50 mg orally) in patients with a history of poor response to the drug. The second (attack 2) was a randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naratriptan (2.5 mg orally) in nonresponders to oral sumatriptan. RESULTS Attack 1: About two thirds of this selected migraine population did not respond to sumatriptan. Attack 2: Naratriptan was statistically superior to placebo for headache relief at 2 hours and 4 hours, as well as for most other features of migraine attacks. These data suggest an intrinsic efficacy of naratriptan in this patient subset and not a coincidental response. No unexpected tolerability issues arose. CONCLUSIONS Naratriptan is an alternative therapy for migraineurs who respond poorly to oral sumatriptan. No response to one "triptan" does not necessarily predict no response to them all.
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical parameters that may affect the incidence of headache recurrence or the time to headache recurrence, or both, in migraineurs treated with naratriptan, 2.5-mg tablets. BACKGROUND The incidence of headache recurrence within 24 hours of treatment with naratriptan, 2.5-mg tablets (17%-28%), is lower than that reported for other currently available selective serotonin agonists. Identifying clinical parameters that influence headache recurrence may further reduce the incidence of headache recurrence or prolong the time to recurrence, or both, for naratriptan-treated patients. METHODS We examined the effects of three clinical parameters (predose pain severity, headache duration prior to treatment, and relief status 4 hours post dose) on the incidence of and time to headache recurrence across four placebo-controlled naratriptan clinical trials. The impact of these parameters on headache recurrence was examined individually and in combination. RESULTS Predose pain severity had no effect on the incidence of headache recurrence (overall 23%; moderate 22%, severe 23%). The median time to recurrence was longer for patients with moderate pain before treatment compared with patients with severe pain before treatment (14.5 hours versus 9.3 hours, respectively). Overall time to headache recurrence was 11.8 hours. Patients with headache recurrence reported a longer time until they treated the headache compared with patients without headache recurrence (median, 145 minutes versus 97.5 minutes). Patients who treated headache pain within 3 hours of onset had a lower incidence of headache recurrence (20%) than patients who treated their headache more than 3 hours after onset (28%). Patients with no pain 4 hours post dose had a lower incidence of and a longer time to headache recurrence compared with patients with mild pain 4 hours post dose (17% versus 32%; median, 17.8 hours versus 8.1 hours, respectively). The interaction of all three clinical parameters was significant in predicting headache recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The overall incidence of headache recurrence is low after naratriptan, 2.5 mg, compared with other currently available selective serotonin agonists. Predose pain severity, time to treatment, and 4-hour relief status appear related to the incidence of or time to headache recurrence, or both. Treating less severe migraine attacks, treating earlier within an attack, and obtaining complete relief post dose may enhance the low incidence of headache recurrence and achieve longer times to recurrence with naratriptan, 2.5 mg.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sumatriptan is an acute treatment for migraine which is often used by women in their child-bearing years, and who become unexpectedly pregnant. Within the context of the post-marketing use of sumatriptan injection for the acute treatment of migraine, and in compliance with approved labeling, we wished to compare perinatal pregnancy outcomes in women who did and did not use the drug after conception. METHODS Open-label, prospective study conducted in 12,339 migraineurs (including 9,861 women) whose demography and consumption pattern of sumatriptan injections were typical, and were predicted to include 150 pregnancies. Outcome of pregnancy was the end-point. RESULTS There were 168 of 173 pregnancies that were well-documented. Sumatriptan was only used prior to conception in 92 cases. There were 76 first trimester exposures to sumatriptan. There were no differences in pregnancy outcome between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Perinatal and pregnancy outcome did not differ between patients who had and had not used sumatriptan after conception, at the resolution of these sample sizes. This study design complements the ongoing pregnancy registry, which is now widened to patients exposed to all formulations of sumatriptan.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Polypharmacy (the prescription of more than one therapy for a single patient) and subcutaneous (s.c.) sumatriptan tolerability were prospectively studied in 12,339 migraineurs, each followed for up to 1 year. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were minimal and mirrored United States Imitrex labeling. Drug usage and compliance monitoring were automatically interfaced with prescription refill. Concomitant drugs were used by 79% of patients, with analgesics, antidepressants, and sedatives used most commonly. No adverse interactions between sumatriptan and neurological drugs were found, possibly reflecting relative inability of the former to cross the blood-brain barrier. No difference in cardiovascular adverse events was associated with oral contraceptive use, which was more common than expected. No other drug class influenced adverse event probability, although sample sizes for these comparisons was sometimes <400 patients. This study confirms the prevalence of polypharmacy in migraine, identifies the drugs used, and concludes that, on a population basis, the tolerability of s.c. sumatriptan, when used according to labeled instructions, is unaffected by these concomitant drugs.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adolescent
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use
- Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
- Anticonvulsants/administration & dosage
- Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use
- Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects
- Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use
- Cardiovascular Agents/therapeutic use
- Cohort Studies
- Comorbidity
- Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects
- Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Depression/drug therapy
- Depression/epidemiology
- Drug Evaluation
- Drug Interactions
- Drug Therapy, Combination
- Epilepsy/drug therapy
- Epilepsy/epidemiology
- Female
- Humans
- Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage
- Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use
- Injections, Subcutaneous
- Male
- Methysergide/administration & dosage
- Methysergide/therapeutic use
- Middle Aged
- Migraine Disorders/drug therapy
- Migraine Disorders/epidemiology
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care
- Prospective Studies
- Serotonin Receptor Agonists/adverse effects
- Serotonin Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use
- Smoking/epidemiology
- Sumatriptan/adverse effects
- Sumatriptan/therapeutic use
- Valproic Acid/administration & dosage
- Valproic Acid/therapeutic use
- Vasoconstrictor Agents/adverse effects
- Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic use
Collapse
|
20
|
Prospective large-scale study of the tolerability of subcutaneous sumatriptan injection for acute treatment of migraine. Cephalalgia 1999; 19:223-31; discussion 200. [PMID: 10376167 DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1999.019004223.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
To investigate prospectively serious adverse events associated with sumatriptan injection, we studied 12,339 typical migraineurs for up to 12 months each. This study imitated the ordinary clinical use of sumatriptan injection except that: (a) a short, written informed consent was required, (b) there was a centralized, automated dispensing service that audited each patient's product use, (c) patients were sometimes reviewed by telephone, and (d) drug supply and medical consultation were without charge. All adverse events were recorded regardless of etiology. There were 25 fatalities during the study, none being attributable to sumatriptan injection. Of six strokes in the study, two occurred soon after treatment of a migraine attack with sumatriptan injection; whether these were migraine-related or drug-related is discussed. None of the three myocardial infarctions was due to sumatriptan injection use. We conclude that sumatriptan injection is well tolerated when used in accordance with labeling.
Collapse
|
21
|
Comparison of rizatriptan and sumatriptan. Headache 1999; 39:59-60. [PMID: 18567177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
|
22
|
Sumatriptan injection reduces productivity loss during a migraine attack: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE 1998; 158:1013-8. [PMID: 9588435 DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.9.1013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of sumatriptan succinate injection compared with placebo on productivity loss during a migraine attack in the workplace. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. SETTING Fifteen clinical centers in the United States. PATIENTS One hundred thirty-five patients 18 years and older diagnosed as having migraine according to International Headache Society criteria. INTERVENTIONS Patients self-administered sumatriptan injection (6 mg) or matching placebo to treat a moderate or severe migraine occurring within the first 4 hours of a minimum 8-hour work shift. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mean productivity loss 2 hours after dosing and across the work shift; percentages of patients returning to normal work performance within 2 hours after dosing and across the work shift; percentages of patients experiencing headache relief (reduction of moderate or severe predose pain to mild or no pain) 1 and 2 hours after dosing. RESULTS Mean productivity loss was significantly (P< or =.002) lower in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group both during the 2-hour postdose period (sumatriptan, 39 minutes; placebo, 54 minutes) and across the work shift (sumatriptan, 86 minutes; placebo, 168 minutes). Significantly (P<.001) greater percentages of patients in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group returned to normal work performance by 2 hours after dosing (sumatriptan, 52%; placebo, 9%) and across the work shift (sumatriptan, 66%; placebo, 18%). Significantly (P< or =.001) greater percentages of patients in the sumatriptan group compared with the placebo group experienced headache relief 1 hour after dosing (sumatriptan, 69%; placebo, 18%) and 2 hours after dosing (sumatriptan, 79%; placebo, 32%). CONCLUSION Sumatriptan reduced migraine-associated productivity loss during a minimum 8-hour work shift by approximately 50% compared with placebo and alleviated headache in more than three fourths of patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
2-21-13 The safety and tolerability of sumatriptan suppositories: Review of clinical trial experience. J Neurol Sci 1997. [DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(97)85359-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|