POS0258 SAFETY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 VACCINE AMONG ADOLESCENTS WITH RHEUMATIC DISEASES TREATED WITH IMMUNOMODULATORY MEDICATIONS

Background

Adolescents with juvenile-onset autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) could be at risk for disease flare secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection or to withholding anti-inflammatory therapy. While vaccination can protect against COVID-19, safety and immunogenicity data regarding anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among adolescents with AIIRD are limited.

Objectives

This international, prospective, multicentre study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among adolescents and young adults with juvenile-onset AIIRD, 80% of whom are on chronic immunomodulatory therapy.

Methods

Vaccine side effects, disease activity, and short-term efficacy were evaluated after 3 months in 91 patients. Anti-spike S1/S2 IgG antibody levels were evaluated in 37 patients and 22 controls, 2–9 weeks after the second dose.

Results

Ninety-one patients and 40 healthy controls were included. Safety profile was good, with 96.7% (n=88) of patients reporting mild or no side-effects, and no change in disease activity. However, 3 patients had transient acute symptoms: 2 following the first vaccination (renal failure and pulmonary haemorrhage) and 1 following the second dose (mild lupus flare vs. viral infection). Seropositivity rate was 97.3% in the AIIRD group compared with 100% among controls. However, anti-S1/S2 antibody titres were significantly lower in the AIIRD group compared with controls (242±136.4 vs. 387.8±57.3 BAU/ml, respectively; p<0.0001). No cases of COVID-19 were documented during the 3-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Vaccination of juvenile-onset AIIRD patients demonstrated good short-term safety and efficacy, high seropositivity rate, but lower anti-S1/S2 antibody titres compared to healthy controls. These results should encourage vaccination of adolescents with juvenile-onset AIIRD, even while on immunomodulation.

References

[1]Fact sheet for healthcare providers administrating vaccine emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) for 12 years of age and older dilute before use for 12 years of age and old; Available from: www.cvdvaccine.com.

[2]Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Eng J Med 2020;383:2603–15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577

[3]Frenck RW, Klein NP, Kitchin N, Gurtman A, Absalon J, Lockhart S, et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine in adolescents. N Eng J Med 2021;385:239–50.

[4]First COVID-19 vaccine approved for children aged 12 to 15 in EU | European Medicines Agency [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 3]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/first-covid-19-vaccine-approved-children-aged-12-15-eu

[5]FDA authorizes Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use in children 5 through 11 Years of Age | FDA [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-authorizes-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccine-emergency-use-children-5-through-11-years-age

[6]Woodworth KR, Moulia D, Collins JP, Hadler SC, Jones JM, Reddy SC, et al. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ Interim Recommendation for Use of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine in Children Aged 5–11 Years — United States, November 2021. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report [Internet]. 2021 Nov 12 [cited 2021 Dec 1];70(45):1579–83. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7045e1.htm

[7]Liguoro I, Pilotto C, Bonanni M, Ferrari ME, Pusiol A, Nocerino A, et al. SARS-COV-2 infection in children and newborns: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr 2020;179:1029–46.

Acknowledgements

We thank the families and adolescents who participated in the study. We thank Mr. Yishai Friedlander, MPH, for performing the statistical analysis. We thank Faye Schreiber, MS, for editing the manuscript.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

OP0177 IMMUNOGENICITY INDUCED BY TWO AND THREE DOSES OF THE BNT162B2 mRNA VACCINE IN PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES AND IMMUNOCOMPETENT CONTROLS: A LONGITUDINAL MULTI-CENTER STUDY

Background

Data on the kinetics of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) are limited.

Objectives

To evaluate the kinetics of the immune response induced by two and three doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in adult patients with AIIRD and immunocompetent controls.

Methods

A prospective multicenter study investigated the antibody response to the BNT162b2 vaccine by serial measurement of serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG titers at the following time points: 2-6 weeks (AIIRD n=720, controls n=122) and six months (AIIRD n=628, controls=116) after the second vaccine dose, and 2-6 weeks after the third vaccine dose (AIIRD n=169, controls n=45). A seropositive response was defined as a detectable anti-S1/S2 IgG titer ≥ 15 BAU/ml. T-cell immune response was evaluated in a sample of patients (n=28) and controls (n=9) by intracellular staining of S-stimulated CD4+ T-cells for TNFα and IFNγ production.

Results

The two-dose vaccine regimen induced a higher humoral response in controls compared to patients, as reflected by the post-vaccination seropositivity rates of 100% vs 84.72%, p<0.0001, and 96.55% vs 74.26%, p<0.0001 at 2-to-6 weeks and at 6 months, respectively. The decline of S1/S2 IgG titers within six months was similar in controls and patients. Following the 3rd vaccine, the seropositivity rate increased to 80.47% and 100% in AIIRD and control groups, p=0.0028, with a significantly higher increase of S1/S2 IgG titers in controls compared with AIIRD patients, 284.09±76.58 vs 219.39±151.55 BAU/ml, p=0.0016. At all-time points, S1/S2 IgG titers were significantly lower in AIIRD patients compared with controls (Figure 1).

We further investigated the impact of therapies on the vaccine‘s immunogenicity (Figure 1). Glucocorticoids (GC) were associated with a significantly lower seropositivity rate and lower S1/S2 IgG titers compared to controls at all time points. Monotherapy with methotrexate (MTX) was associated with a comparable to controls humoral response at all time points. Anti-cytokine biologics (TNFi, IL6i, IL17i) were associated with an initial high seropositivity rate, similar to controls, followed by a steeper decline at 6 months, 79.82% vs 96.55%, p=0.0001, and restoration of seropositivity after the 3rd vaccine dose in all patients. JAKi were associated with a mildly decreased seropositivity rate after the 2nd vaccine dose and similar to controls response after the 3rd vaccine dose. Abatacept was associated with a reduced immunogenicity after the 2nd vaccine dose, but was restored to 100% seropositivity after the 3rd vaccine dose. Rituximab (RTX) significantly blunted the humoral response at all time points, with a seropositivity rate of 42% after the 2nd vaccine dose, 29% at 6 months, and with increase to 40% after the 3rd vaccine dose. A third of the RTX-treated patients who were seronegative after two vaccine doses, seroconverted after the 3rd dose. The multivariate model for predicting the seropositive response to vaccination found that higher S1/S2 IgG titers after the 2nd vaccine dose was associated with a higher seropositivity rate following the 3rd vaccine dose, OR 1.026 (1.008-1.045), p=0.0027, and that treatment with RTX was associated with a 14.3-fold risk for a negative humoral response, p≤0.0001. Cellular immune response, evaluated mainly in RTX treated patients, was preserved prior to and after the 3rd vaccine dose and was similar to controls.

Conclusion

Over a six-month period, the two dose BNTb262 vaccination was associated with a similar extent of waning of the humoral immune response in AIIRD patients and controls. The 3rd vaccine dose restored the response in all controls and in patients treated with MTX monotherapy, anti-cytokine biologics, abatacept, and JAKi. Treatment with GC and RTX was associated with an impaired humoral response at all time points.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the statistician Mr Yishai Friedlander and Mr Yoram Neufeld for their valuable assistance.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1244 THE EFFECT OF SECUKINUMAB ON THE HUMORAL RESPONSE FOLLOWING TWO AND THREE DOSES OF THE BNT162b2 mRNA VACCINE IN PATIENTS WITH SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background

Data on the effect of secukinumab on the humoral response to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine are limited.

Objectives

We aimed to assess prospectively the humoral response to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) treated with secukinumab in comparison to immunocompetent controls.

Methods

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with secukinumab for at least 3 months and immunocompetent controls were vaccinated with two-dose regimen of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Clinical and laboratory assessments were performed at 2-8 weeks [SpA: 37 on secukinumab, (median age 53% female), 122 controls (median age 53, 51% female)], and 6 months [SpA: 27 on secukinumab, 116 controls] after the second vaccine dose. A subgroup of patients (22 SpA on secukinumab, 45 controls) were evaluated after the third vaccine dose. The seropositive response was defined as a detectable S1/S2 IgG ≥15 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml.

Results

The two-dose vaccine regimen induced a similar immunogenic response in patients and controls reflected by the seropositivity rates of 100% in both groups. After six months, the rate of seropositivity remained as high as 96% in both secukinumab-treated patients and immunocompetent controls. The decline of S1/S2 IgG titer within six months was similar in controls and secukinumab-treated patients, -66.4 (95% CI {-70.9, -39.9}) and -55 BAU/ml (95% CI {-95.42, -36.87)). Following the third vaccine, the seropositivity rate increased to 100 % in both groups. At all-time points, S1/S2 IgG titers were similar in secukinumab treated patients and immunocompetent controls (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Kinetics of an immunogenic response (S1/S2 IgG titer) to two and three doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in SpA patients treated with secukinumab and immunocompetent controls.

Conclusion

SpA patients treated with secukinumab consistently demonstrated an adequate humoral response to the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination similar to immunocompetent controls, both short-term and within six months after two vaccine doses and after the third vaccine dose.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr Yishai Friedlander and Mr Yoram Neufeld for their assistance.

Disclosure of Interests

Ori Elkayam: None declared, Tali Eviatar: None declared, Hagit Peleg: None declared, Daphna Paran: None declared, David Levartovsky: None declared, Ilana Kaufman: None declared, Adi Broyde: None declared, Ofir Elalouf: None declared, Ari Polachek: None declared, Joy Feld: None declared, Amir Haddad: None declared, Tal Gazitt: None declared, Muna Elias: None declared, Nizar Hijaze: None declared, Maher Aassi Employee of: Novartis Pharma AG, Erhard Quebe-Fehling Employee of: Novartis Pharma AG, Ivette Alarcon Employee of: Novartis Pharma AG, Sara Pel: None declared, Devy Zisman: None declared, Victoria Furer: None declared

POS1206 SEROPREVALENCE OF SARS-CoV-2 ANTIBODIES IN AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATOLOGIC PATIENTS

Background:

Immune responses in AIIRD patients may be reduced and influenced by immunosuppressive treatments[1].The effect of immunosuppression on the mounting of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in AIIRD is not clear.

Objectives:

To assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in AIIRD patients and to define clinical factors affecting this prevalence.

Methods:

Consecutive consenting AIIRD patients from the Rheumatologic department in Tel Aviv Medical Center participated in the study.

Patients answered a questionnaire and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. A two stage antibody testing was done in order to increase specificity.

Results:

The study included 560 AIIRD patients (229 RA, 149 PsA, 84 SLE, 55 vasculitidies, 40 SpA, 3 other CTD), of them 26 patients were found to have SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies (4.6%) (Table 1). This was more than double than a previous prevalence in the same clinic population studied after the first wave of the pandemic in Israel, which was 2.07% (accepted for publication).

A lower rate of immunosuppression was found for positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG patients compared to negative serology patients (Table 1, p=0.009). There was also a trend for the subgroup of patients on biologic DMARDS (26.92% vs. 47% respectively, p=0.06).

Positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test was reported and confirmed in 36 patients, of them 14 (38.89%) had negative serology. Patients who did not have antibodies had numerically more than double rates of glucocorticoids and bDMARDs treatment. The time between positive PCR test to positive serology test was significantly shorter (mean±standart deviation 75.57±40.44 days) than the time between positive PCR to negative serology test (130.79±86.47 (p=0.04) (Table 1 and Figure 1) suggesting a fading of the antibody response with time.

Conclusion:

The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG was 4.6% in a population of AIIRD patients from a single tertiary medical center in Israel. SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence tended to be low among AIIRD patients on immunosuppressive treatment, including in patients with a confirmed history of positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR, similar to other studies [3].

As in individuals without AIIRD, the mounting of SARS-CoV-2 IgG seems to fade with time.

Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential effect of immunosuppression on the antibody response in AIIRDs.

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with negative and positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG, and in the subgroup with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test

Total population (n=560)Positive PCR population (n=36)Negative IgG(n=534)Positive IgG(n=26)PNegative IgG(n=14)Positive IgG(n=22)PFemale n (%)360 (67.42)22 (84.62)0.0810 (71.43)18 (81.82)0.68Age median (95% CI)57 (54.95-57.58)52.5 (46.55-58.6)0.2342 (35.46-53.11)52.5 (47.62-60.65)0.06No. of comorbiditiesmean±STD (95%CI)0.88±1.15 (0.78-0.98)0.92±1.2 (0.44-1.41)0.860.79±1.12 (0.14-1.43)0.96±1.3 (0.4-1.51)0.68AIIRD treatments n(%)Total immunosuppression401 (75.09)13 (50)0.00911 (78.57)12 (54.54)0.175GC113 (21.16)3 (11.54)0.325 (35.71)3 (13.64)0.32csDMARDS257 (48.13)13 (50)17 (50)13 (59.09)0.73bDMARDS251 (47)7 (26.92)0.069 (64.29)7 (31.82)0.09Anti CD-2036 (6.74)00.41 (7.14)00.39

SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2; IgG, immunoglobulin G; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; n, number; 95%CI, 95% confidence interval; GC, glucocorticoids; csDMARDS, conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs; bDMARDS, biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

References:

[1]V. Furer et al., “Incidence and prevalence of vaccine preventable infections in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD): a systemic literature review informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients wit,” RMD Open, vol. 5, no. 2, p. e001041, Sep. 2019.

[2]D. Simon et al., “Patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases receiving cytokine inhibitors have low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020.

Acknowledgements:

This study was performed in collaboration with the Israeli Ministry of Health.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared.

LB0003 IMMUNOGENICITY AND SAFETY OF THE BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 VACCINE IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES AND GENERAL POPULATION: A MULTICENTER STUDY

Background:

Vaccination represents a cornerstone in mastering the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of the novel BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD) are limited.

Objectives:

To investigate the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in patients with AIIRD compared to the general population.

Methods:

A prospective multicenter study investigated immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of the two-dose regimen BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in adult patients with AIIRD including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthropathy (axSpA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), connective tissues diseases (CTD), systemic vasculitides, and idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM), compared to control subjects without rheumatic diseases or immunosuppressive therapies. Serum IgG antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike S1/S2 proteins were measured 2 - 6 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG ≥15 binding antibody units (BAU)/ml. Post-vaccination efficacy defined as post-vaccination COVID-19 infection and safety were assessed. Pre- and post- vaccination disease activity indices were assessed as appropriate for each disease.

Results:

A total of 686 AIIRD patients and 121 controls participated into the study. AIIRD patients were significantly older than controls, mean age±SD 56.76±14.88 vs 50.76±14.68, respectively, p<0.0001. A total of 95.2% (n=653) AIIRD patients were treated with immunomodulatory medications.

The seropositivity rate was 86% (n=590) in patients with AIIRD compared to 100% in controls (p <0.0001) The level of the S1/S2 antibodies was significantly reduced in AIIRD patients compared to controls (mean± SD 132.9±91.7 vs 218.6±82.06, P<0.0001). In patients with PsA, AxSpA, SLE, and LVV, the seropositive rate was above 90%. In RA, the seropositive rate was 82.1% and the lowest seropositive rate (<40%) was observed in patients with AAV and IIM.

Anti-CD20 significantly impaired the vaccine’s immunogenicity, with the lowest seropositivity rate of 39%. The use of GC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and abatacept was associated with a significantly lower rate of seropositivity (Figure 1). MTX significantly reduced the seropositivity in patients treated with MTX monotherapy and in combinations with other treatments (92% and 84%, respectively), although at a lesser magnitude than anti-CD20, MMF, and abatacept. More than 97% of patients treated with anti-cytokine therapies including TNFi, interleukin-17 and interleukin-6 inhibitors had an appropriate immunogenic response when used as monotherapy. The combination of TNFi with MTX significantly reduced the rate of seropositivity to 93%, p=0.04. Age over 65 years, a diagnosis of RA, IIM, ANCA-associated vascilitis, and treatment with GC, MMF, anti-CD20, and abatacept were associated with a reduced likelihood of seropositivity.

Figure 1.

Seropositivity rate by immunosuppressive treatment.

There were no post-vaccination symptomatic cases of COVID-19 among AIIRD patients and one mild case in the control group. Major adverse events in AIIRD patients included death (n=2) several weeks after the second vaccine dose, non-disseminated herpes zoster (n=6), uveitis (n=2), and pericarditis (n=1). Post-vaccination disease activity remained stable in the majority of patients.

Conclusion:

Vaccination with the BNTb262 vaccine resulted in an adequate immunogenic response with an acceptable safety profile in the majority of patients with AIIRD. Treatment with GC, rituximab, MMF, and abatacept may impair BNT162b2-induced immunogenicity. Postponing administration of rituximab, when clinically feasible, seems to be reasonable to improve vaccine-induced immunogenicity. Holding treatment with abatacept and MMF may be considered on an individual basis.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

Efficacy of a novel intradermal Lawsonia intracellularis vaccine in pigs against experimental infection and under field conditions

Background

The efficacy of a novel inactivated intradermal Lawsonia intracellularis vaccine, Porcilis® Lawsonia ID, was evaluated in two experimental vaccination-challenge studies and under field conditions on a farm with a history of recurrent acute ileitis. In addition, the efficacy of the vaccine was compared to that of a commercially available live attenuated vaccine. The novel inactivated vaccine consists of a freeze-dried antigen fraction that is dissolved just prior to use in either the adjuvant or in Porcilis® PCV ID; an existing intradermal vaccine against porcine Circovirus type 2. In the two experimental vaccination-challenge studies, groups of 25 piglets were vaccinated once at 3 weeks of age or left unvaccinated as challenge control. Vaccines tested were Porcilis® Lawsonia ID as standalone (study 1) or in associated mixed use with Porcilis® PCV ID (study 2) and an orally administered commercially available live vaccine (study 1). The pigs were challenged with virulent L. intracellularis at 4 weeks (study 1) or 21 weeks (study 2) after vaccination. Post-challenge, the pigs were evaluated for clinical signs, average daily weight gain, shedding and macroscopic as well as microscopic immuno-histological ileum lesion scores. In the field study, the mortality and key performance parameters were evaluated over a period of 8 months.

Results

The results of the two experimental vaccination-challenge studies showed that Porcilis® Lawsonia ID as single vaccine or in associated mixed use with Porcilis® PCV ID, induced statistically significant protection against experimental L. intracellularis infection, 4 weeks or 21 weeks after vaccination. This was demonstrated by lower clinical scores, improved weight gain, reduction of L. intracellularis shedding and reduction of macroscopic as well as microscopic ileum lesion scores when compared to the controls. The protection induced was superior to that of the commercially available live vaccine. In the field study Porcilis® Lawsonia ID was highly efficacious in reducing L. intracellularis associated mortality and improving key production parameters.

Conclusion

The results support that this new intradermal vaccine is efficacious against L. intracellularis and may be used in associated mixed use with Porcilis® PCV ID.

Efficacy of a novel inactivated Lawsonia intracellularis vaccine in pigs against experimental infection and under field conditions

The efficacy of a novel inactivated Lawsonia intracellularis vaccine, Porcilis® Lawsonia, was compared to that of a commercially available live attenuated vaccine in three experimental vaccination-challenge studies in pigs. The efficacy of the new vaccine was further tested under field conditions on a farm with a history of acute ileitis. The novel inactivated vaccine consists of a freeze-dried antigen fraction that is dissolved just prior to use in either the adjuvant or in Porcilis® PCV M Hyo; an existing combination vaccine against porcine circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. The three experimental vaccination-challenge trials had a similar design and for each trial 75 piglets were used, randomly allotted to three groups of 25 piglets. The pigs were vaccinated at 4 or 5 weeks of age with either Porcilis® Lawsonia in adjuvant or in associated mixed use with Porcilis® PCV M Hyo (group 1), with the live vaccine (group 2), or left as unvaccinated controls (group 3). The pigs were challenged with virulent Lawsonia intracellularis 3, 4 or 17 weeks after vaccination. Post-challenge the pigs were evaluated for clinical signs, average daily weight gain, shedding and macroscopic as well as microscopic immuno-histological ileum lesion scores. In the field study, the mortality and key performance parameters were evaluated over a period of 8 months. The results of all three experimental vaccination-challenge trials showed that Porcilis® Lawsonia induced statistically significant protection against experimental Lawsonia intracellularis infection. This was demonstrated by lower clinical scores, improved weight gain, reduction of Lawsonia intracellularis shedding and reduction of macroscopic as well as microscopic ileum lesion scores when compared to the controls. The protection induced was superior to that of the commercially available live vaccine. In the field study, Porcilis® Lawsonia proved to be highly efficacious; reducing Lawsonia associated mortality to zero and improving key production parameters.