The pericranial flap for inner lining of full-thickness nasal defects: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Effective nasal reconstruction requires skin and soft tissue cover, cartilage or bone structure, and mucosal lining. Ideal lining is thin, pliable and vascularised, making reconstruction challenging. This paper presents the first case series with long-term outcomes of pericranial flaps used as inner lining for nasal reconstruction.

METHODS

Patients undergoing paramedial forehead flaps from 2007 to 2019 were identified using second-stage nasal reconstruction billing codes. Patients with pericranial flaps for lining, for whom there were data on resulting outcomes and complications, were identified.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients underwent second-stage nasal reconstruction. Eighteen patients had paramedian forehead and pericranial flaps for inner lining reconstruction. The flap lining had no immediate post-operative complications. Three patients suffered partial to major reconstructive failure post radiotherapy. Other complications included nasal stenosis and orocutaneous fistula.

CONCLUSION

Combined with paramedian forehead flaps, the pericranial flap is reliable as inner lining for nasal reconstruction. It is easily accessible and useful in resections with limited mucosal options.

Competency building for self-management and self-care: evidence informed development of an empowerment course for breast cancer survivors

18626

Purpose: To improve survivorship outcomes by empowering and preparing survivors to self- manage their health. We describe the evidence-informed development of a patient empowerment course “Managing Your Cancer Journey” offered in the Breast Cancer Survivorship Program at Princess Margaret Hospital in Toronto, Canada. Methods: Audio-taped and transcribed focus groups (3; n = 16 patients, August 2004), interviews (n = 8 lymphedema patients, spring 2004, n = 8 patients, spring 2005) were held for patient directed guidance in survivorship course and program development. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to develop a theoretical framework for empowerment. Three main competencies: knowing, navigating and negotiating emerged and were developed into 5 ×1.5 hour classes facilitated by two social workers in collaboration with health professionals and community organizations. Feedback from survivors in a community forum (n = 40) and during piloting with survivors (n = 10) and educators was solicited. Analysis of transcripts and observer/consultant debriefings were analyzed for emergent themes. Results: Respondents recommended program interventions that allowed people to gain mastery or a perceived sense of control over their lives with cancer. Survivors and expert consultants prioritized 3 major domains for the survivorship program: psychosocial support, information provision, and support for dealing with the physical effects of breast cancer. In response, outcome measures for empowerment will include: patient satisfaction, cancer knowledge, self-efficacy in disease management, empowerment, and depression. Conclusions: Ongoing iterative feedback from and piloting with the survivor target audience and embedding the course within the hospital’s strategic plan for patient centred care and competency building are keys to successful course implementation.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

LOWER URINARY TRACT RECONSTRUCTION FOR SPINA BIFIDA — DOES IT IMPROVE HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE?

PURPOSE

Reconstruction for incontinent myelomeningocele is assumed to improve health related quality of life (HRQOL) yet there are no published data to support this assumption.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of 36 consecutive incontinent meningomyelocele cases undergoing surgery (augmentation, with or without Mitrofanoff, bladder neck reconstruction and cecostomy). Controls were matched 2:1 for age, lesion level, parental marital status, ambulatory status and shunt status. HRQOL was assessed with a previously validated disease specific discriminative instrument that stratifies for ages 12 years or less and 13 years or greater. An additional 5-point Likert questionnaire was used for self-scoring of bladder and bowel continence.

RESULTS

Responses were 89% and 84% for cases and controls, respectively. The 2-sample t testing for subjects 12 years old or younger revealed no significant difference in mean HRQOL score between those who underwent reconstruction (12, mean 165 +/- 23) and those who did not (9, mean 162 +/- 27, p=0.73). Results in older subjects were similar for cases (20, mean 190 +/- 23) and controls (3, mean 192 +/- 26, p=0.80). This finding occurred despite the fact that 78% of reconstructed cases achieved urinary continence for 3 hours or more with equal or superior self-reported bladder and bowel continence compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to demonstrate superior HRQOL in patients over controls. Several possible interpretations exist, such as surgery may have no impact on HRQOL, patients might have scored much lower without surgery, or perhaps only caregiver quality of life improves. The impact of urinary tract reconstruction upon quality of life in the myelomeningocele population warrants further study.