1
|
Abstract P4-16-01: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of testosterone (T) for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgias (AIA) in postmenopausal women: Alliance A221102. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-16-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Aromatase inhibitors are a mainstay hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treatment. AIA occur in up to 50% of patients (pts), adversely affecting quality of life and treatment compliance. A small phase II clinical trial of oral testosterone unedeconate appeared to improve AIA over placebo (P), with no significant androgenic side effects. The current study was performed to confirm these findings.
Methods: This randomized P-controlled trial enrolled postmenopausal women on adjuvant anastrozole or letrozole and experiencing moderate-to-severe AIA (≥5 on 0-10 scale). Pts were initially randomized to receive a subcutaneous pellet containing T 120 mg + anastrozole 8 mg (T+AIpellet) or P at the end of the first week on study (after obtaining baseline hot flash data) and at 3 months (mo). Due to slow accrual, the protocol was amended to change the route of delivery to topical T or P applied to the skin once daily for 6 mo. Baseline and monthly questionnaires were administered, including: Modified Brief Pain Inventory for aromatase arthralgia (BPI-AIA), prolife of mood states (POMS), the menopause specific quality of life questionnaire (MENQOL), a hot flash diary, the hot flash related daily interference scale (HFRDIS) and a symptom experience questionnaire. The primary endpoint was intra-patient change in joint pain at 3 mo, compared using a two-sample t-test.
Results: 227 pts were accrued between 9/1/2013-11/29/2017. 55 pts were randomized prior to the protocol amendment and received T+AIpellet or P. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms, with the exceptions of median weight, BMI, hemoglobin (all higher in T arm), and breast tenderness, dissatisfaction with personal life/depression, and skin changes (all higher in P arm). Compared to baseline, there were no significant differences between T and P in average pain or joint stiffness at 3 (p=0.483) or 6 mo (p=0.573). Average pain was significantly lower each month compared to baseline, irrespective of treatment arm. There were no significant differences in any other items evaluated by BPI-AIA, POMS, MENQOL, hot flash diary or HFRDIS. Similarly, there were no substantial differences in toxicity. A subset analysis of the 55 pts randomized to receive T+AIpellet or P identified significant reductions in average pain scores with T+AIpellet during the first month (p=0.038), but not thereafter. T+AIpellet pts had significantly more reduction in reported % of baseline hot flash frequency (p=0.034) and score (p=0.031), nausea (p=0.019), fatigue (p=0.042), mood swings (p=0.026), hand/feet swelling (p=0.009), stress urinary incontinence (p=0.039) and changes in appearance, texture or tone of their skin (p=0.0083), than pts on P.
Conclusions: Overall, T did not improve AIA or menopausal symptoms compared to P. While there was significant improvement in AIA over the study period, T did not facilitate this process. However, T+AIpellet was associated with improvement in short-term AIA and several menopausal symptoms compared to P, suggesting that subcutaneous T combined with anastrozole may be superior to transdermal T alone.
Support: UG1CA189823, U10CA180820, U10CA189809; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01573442
Citation Format: Leon-Ferre RA, Le-Rademacher J, Terstriep S, Glaser R, Novotni P, Giuliano A, Copur MS, Jones C, Page S, Mitchell W, Birrell SN, Loprinzi CL. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of testosterone (T) for aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgias (AIA) in postmenopausal women: Alliance A221102 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-16-01.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
10601 Background: Brachial plexopathy is a well-recognized complication of breast cancer, most attributed to late effects of radiation. However, direct involvement of brachial plexus by recurrent breast cancer occurs. Misdiagnoses may lead to inappropriate attribution of the plexopathy to radiation, and therefore inappropriate therapy. Methods: We report fourteen cases of brachial plexopathy secondary to breast cancer diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic-Rochester from 2003 to 2005. Results: Thirteen of fourteen primary tumors and 12/14 recurrences were ER/PR positive. Only 1/14 patient had Her 2 neu overexpression. The median time from the original breast cancer diagnosis to first brachial plexus symptom was 14 years. The median time from the development of symptoms to diagnosis was 8 months with the range being 1 month to 8 years. MRI revealed a distinct mass in 3/13 patients, plexus thickening in 5/13, and was normal in 5/13. Only 5/13 original MRI interpretations suggested tumor. In four patients that the 1.5 T MRI was either interpreted as normal or unlikely cancer the 3 Tesla MRI revealed abnormal uptake suggestive of malignancy. PET scan suggested malignancy in 3/6 patients. Two of these cases had other metastatic disease. In the other three cases that PET scans were done the uptake was mild, suggesting inflammation rather than malignancy. Reinterpretations of the PET scan and MRI in combination by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist was highly suggestive of malignancy in all cases. Definitive diagnosis was eventually obtained by biopsy of the brachial plexus (7/14) or another site of metastasis in (4/14). Conclusions: The often slowly progressive nature of hormonally driven breast cancer can mimic radiation induced brachial plexopathy. In the cases reviewed, PET was not reliable in differentiating inflammation from tumor. MRI findings are nonspecific and higher resolution 3T MRI may be needed to detect an abnormality. Interpretation of MRI and PET together is useful. Patients with a history of breast cancer, and brachial plexus symptoms should be carefully evaluated with consideration for recurrent disease as a cause. Biopsy of the brachial plexus can be done safely and has an important role in diagnosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
|