Outcomes of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients treated with second-line chemotherapy (SL): A retrospective analysis of 166 patients

e19093

Background: Patients with SCLC progressed after first-line chemotherapy (FL) have a poor prognosis and the evidence of a benefit of SL is still limited.This retrospective analysis evaluates the clinical outcomes of patients who received a SL treatment after failure of a FL for SCLC Methods: Retrospectively we reviewed 166 consecutive patients who failed a FL and received a second or third-line treatment, between 1993 and 2008 in 17 institutions. We divided patients for analysis in four subgroups, according to the type of SL administered: 1) Platinum-based (P) rechallenge 2) Non-platinum-based polichemotherapy 3) Non-topotecan monochemotherapy 4) topotecan monochemotherapy. Our endpoints were Overall survival (OS), Progression free survival (PFS) and Response Rate. Survival curves were designed with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was used for investigating factors which influence survival Results: Median age was 63 (range 25–86). Median OS from the SL was 6.2 months and PFS 2.9. 163 patients received a platinum based chemotherapy as FL, among them 67% obtained a response (CR=14%, PR=53.7%) and 19% had a progressive disease. 74% of patients had a PS 0–1 when started on SL. Moreover, 50 patients underwent also a third-line chemotherapy. Of the 23 CR at FL, 7 patients achieved a response in SL(30%), of the 85 PR only 19 (22%) and of the PD+SD only 6 (16%) (test for trend p=.03). No statistical differences among regimens groups were found; however, patients rechallenged with P went better then others when a long PFS in FL was demonstrated (p=.02) Conclusions: The clinical benefit of SL therapy for SCLC is poor and strictly dependent on response and on duration of response with FL treatment. Our retrospective analysis confirms that median OS for patients receiving SL is about 6 months and median PFS 2.9 months. A rechallenge with platinum should be the best options in patients with a long PFS in FL. Single agent topotecan, the most investigated agent in the literature, did not show evidence of superiority against other chemotherapy regimens

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The efficacy of second line chemotherapy (CHT) in platinum-sensitive advanced/metastatic small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients: Results of an ongoing Italian multicenter survey

18090

Background: Despite CHT and radiotherapy for SCLC, most patients (pts) die within 2 years. Response rates for second-line CHT are low, with a median survival of 5 months in platinum-refractory pts. Re-challenge with platinum salts or salvage regimens is a standard option for pts with platinum-sensitive disease with a median overall survival (OS) of 6.5–8 months (Chua et al., Cancer Treat Rev. 2004). The purpose of this study was to explore the benefits of different second line regimens in this platiunum sensitive population. Methods: Clinical records of 73 platinum sensitive SCLC pts (first line relapse free survival > 6 months) were reviewed from 13 medical oncology departments in Italy from January 1993 to December 2006. Pt. characteristics: 59 males, 14 females, median age 64 years (range 27–93), median ECOG performance status (PS): 1, limited/extended disease: 33/40 pts. Pts received salvage chemotherapy which consisted of monotherapy in 37% and platinum-containing doublets in 55%. Doublets without platinum salts were administered in the remaining 8%. Results: Of 67 evaluable pt, second line CHT produced partial responses (PR) in 58 (79%) and stable disease (SD) in 9 pts (12%) by RECIST criteria. Overall tumor growth control (PR+SD) was 91%. Despite these encouraging results, the median TTP was 3 months and OS for all evaluable pts was 6.5 months. Survival at 1 year was 11%. Multivariate analysis revealed that the most important prognostic factor for response was age ( p<0.04) and there was no statistically significant difference between platinum-based regimens and monotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed no impact on survival by prior response to first line treatment, female sex or smoking status. Conclusions: Within the limits of a retrospective study, despite the high rate of responses obtainable in this setting, TTP and OS do not appear significantly improved by salvage regimens. Second line CHT has marginal activity and should be considered only in younger pts with a good PS. On the basis of these results, re-treatment with platinum salts could be avoided in these pts.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Preclinical and clinical evaluation of four gemcitabine plus carboplatin schedules as front-line treatment for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To explore the activity and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) we tested four administration sequences on H460 NSCLC cells, and at the same time performed a randomized phase II trial using analogous schedules.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

GEM was given first in two in vitro sequences, and CBDCA first in the other two; interaction was quantified calculating a combination index. Eighty-eight chemotherapy-naïve, stage IV NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive either: GEM (1000 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 and CBDCA (AUC 5 mg.min/ml) on day 1, 4 h before GEM (arm A); same as arm A except CBDCA given 4 h after GEM (arm B); GEM on days 1 and 8 and CBDCA on day 2 (arm C); GEM on days 2 and 9 and CBDCA on day 1 (arm D). Courses were repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

In the preclinical study, CBDCA given before GEM produced a synergistic cytotoxic effect. Two complete and 29 partial responses occurred in 86 of 88 treated patients (intention-to-treat analysis 35%; 95% confidence interval 25.5% to 46.8%). One- and 2-year survivals were 44% and 11%, respectively. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 11%; grade 3/4 neutropenia in 17%; and non-hematological toxicity was insignificant. Median survival was 11 months (range 7-18+), but better in patients receiving CBDCA first (arms A and D) (13 versus 9 months) than in patients receiving GEM first (arms B and C). The response was greater (50% versus 31%) in arm A than in the other arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBDCA/GEM combination is safe and active against stage IV NSCLC. Our preclinical and clinical findings suggest that administration of CBDCA before GEM gives the better outcome.

[New strategies in the treatment of esophageal cancer]

Esophageal cancer is uncommon, but its incidence is rapidly increasing in the Western countries because of the high incidence of the cardia esophageal adenocarcinoma. Notwithstanding the encouraging results achieved with surgical procedures, esophageal carcinoma has a poor prognosis with 5-year survival in 10% of cases without differences between both squamous and adenocarcinoma histologies. Almost 50% of esophageal cancer patients have unresectable disease at presentation; in the past years combined modality treatments, using chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with or without surgery, have been evaluated to reduce the risk of local and/or distant recurrences. Ongoing regimens with new agents (Taxanes, Vinorelbine, Irinotecan), in association or not with platinum compounds, show good antitumor efficacy and tolerability, even in the metastatic disease. Preoperative strategies with radiation only did not give any advantage compared to surgery alone, instead, controversial results were obtained, with a minimal advantage, using chemotherapy. Combined chemotherapy and radiation, in suitable candidates for resection has shown an improvement of complete pathological responses, in both the histologies, but with superior toxicities when compared to chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone. Postoperative adjuvant therapies as radiation, chemotherapy or both, have not led to a marked improvement in overall survival and should be performed only in clinical trials. The use of chemoradiotherapy showed a clear advantage versus radiotherapy alone and in many cases equivalent to regimens plus surgery even if control studies haven't been performed. Clinical trials with novel biologic agents, in combination to chemotherapy or alone, against cell growth arrest, neoagiongenesis and tumor metastasis invasion process are currently under evaluation. In the coming years new markers as antigen Ki-67 determination, p53 mutation or high levels activity of thymidylate synthase and novel staging techniques as PET could be precious to identify the better treatment for each patient.