Abstract PD6-07: Trends in the cost of care for breast cancer among women with commercial insurance

Background: Breast cancer care imposes a significant financial burden to U.S. healthcare systems and has become a key focus in the health care debate. Therapies for breast cancer are expensive, and the economic burden of these therapies may be rising due to the rapid introduction of pricey new drugs and techniques. There are limited data on the health care costs of individuals with breast cancer after initial diagnosis and how these costs have changed over time.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of commercially insured adult women with newly diagnosed non-metastatic breast cancer (identified via previously published claims-based algorithms) using 2007-2016 data from a large US health plan available in OptumLabs® Data Warehouse. We included patients with continuous health plan coverage for at least 2 years after initial diagnosis 2007-2014 and assessed how total health care spending and out-of-pocket costs (paid amounts) changed over this time. Costs were adjusted to 2016 US dollars using the general Consumer Price Index. Inpatient, outpatient, and outpatient pharmacy costs were evaluated. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine predictors of above average cost (cost > mean for that year of diagnosis).

Results: A total of 12,446 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were identified (mean age, 51.6 years). Forty percent had undergone mastectomy, 38% chemotherapy, and 63% radiation. After adjustment for inflation, total healthcare costs increased 29.7% from 2007 to 2014 (Table 1), with increases primarily observed during the first year after diagnosis. Out-of-pocket costs remained relatively stable, and accounted for 5.3% of the total spending. Approximately 80% of the total costs were related to care received in the outpatient setting. Factors independently associated with above average spending included treatment with mastectomy [OR 1.78 (95% CI 1.5-2.1)], reconstruction [OR 3.0 (95% CI 2.6-3.5)], radiation [OR 4.0 (95% CI 3.4-4.7)] and chemotherapy [OR 18.4 (95% CI 16.6-20.3].

Table 1.Average healthcare spending over time Mean cost during first year after diagnosisMean cost during second year after diagnosisYear of diagnosistotalout-of-pockettotalout-of-pocket2007$80,296.17$4,271.25$16,559.21$1,907.012008$84,126.70$4,445.78$16,785.43$2,205.982009$88,331.45$4,728.42$17,005.68$2,214.932010$91,502.58$5,067.78$17,243.91$2,126.192011$93,826.40$5,089.45$16,862.45$2,027.962012$96,690.06$5,449.91$17,814.09$2,179.262013$104,064.93$5,678.19$17,087.47$2,115.972014$104,169.74$5,620.51$16,714.12$1,590.67

Conclusions: Breast cancer care is increasingly expensive during the first year after diagnosis, and costs are greatest for the recipients of more aggressive treatments. Costs during the second year after diagnosis have remained relatively stable.

Citation Format: Ruddy KJ, Sangaralingham LR, Freedman RA, Jemal A, Mougalian SS, Keegan T, Loprinzi CL, Gross CP, Henk HJ, Shah N. Trends in the cost of care for breast cancer among women with commercial insurance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-07.

Abstract P5-14-06: Prioritization of patient reported outcomes by women with metastatic breast cancer

Introduction: An emphasis on patient-centered care has led to a growing interest in collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the setting of cancer care. Routine collection of actionable PROs has been shown to improve patient satisfaction with care and even prolong survival. However, completion rates of PROs outside of the research setting are low, which may be due to an incomplete understanding of the outcomes patients value most. Prior work has focused primarily on symptom burden, but patients are also affected by disease and treatment across multiple domains (e.g. physical, psychological, social, and financial). To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a qualitative study among women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to identify the optimal patient-centered approach to collecting PRO data.

Methods: We conducted 1-on-1 interviews with patients who had started a treatment regimen for MBC within the past 6 weeks at the Breast Center at Smilow Cancer Hospital of Yale New Haven Hospital to determine which PROs were most personally relevant. We assessed heterogeneity across patients in their prioritization. Patients were asked which of a list of six PRO domains they would like their provider to have information about and then ranked the domains by order of importance (from most to least important). The following domains were created from the NCCN Distress Thermometer: physical well-being, emotional well-being, treatment burden, functional status, financial concerns, and social well-being. For each ranked domain, patients were asked to rank items within the domain using a card sorting exercise where the number of items ranged from 5 to 15. Patients were then asked where and how often they preferred to report PROs.

Results: Ten women with MBC completed the card sorting exercise: mean age was 58 years (+/- 12), 7 were white, 2 African American and 1 Asian; 1 identified as Hispanic. After 10 interviews, it was apparent that no single set of domain rankings was common across patients. Patient prioritization of PRO domains was unique and varied. Selection and prioritization of PRO domains and items within each domain were unique and varied. Five women reported “physical well-being” as the most important domain; treatment burden and emotional well-being were also selected as most important or ranked as highly important. Participants preferred reporting MBC PROs while in the waiting room for all domains except emotional well-being (from home was the preference). However, participants were willing to complete PRO assessment in the waiting room for about ten minutes and at home for twenty minutes.

Conclusion: Substantial variation exists in how women with MBC rate the importance of specific PRO domains and items within each domain. Importantly, “physical symptoms” was not the top concern for half of the interviewed patients. This is an important finding, given that previous published studies of patient-reported outcomes have focused on one domain, such as symptoms and side effects or the financial burden of treatment. Our findings support the development of multi-dimensional tools for the collection of PROs. Although toxicity and physical symptoms are of utmost concern, clinicians should not neglect other dimensions of quality of life in women with MBC.

Citation Format: Mougalian SS, Aminawung JA, Presley C, Canavan ME, Holland ML, Hu X, Gross CP. Prioritization of patient reported outcomes by women with metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-06.

Abstract P6-17-28: Outcomes of real-world use of eribulin plus trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer

Background

Eribulin mesylate is approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) after two prior chemotherapy regimens including an anthracycline or a taxane in either the metastatic or adjuvant setting. Eribulin in combination with trastuzumab (E+T) has demonstrated tolerability and anti-tumor activity in phase I and II trials but is not FDA-approved for the treatment of HER2-positive mBC. Case series and retrospective research have noted the use of E+T in clinical practice. We sought to describe patient characteristics and long-term outcomes of treatment with E+T for HER2-positive mBC patients treated outside of clinical trials in the US.

Methods

US-based community oncologists from an open network of over 7,000 oncologists, hematologists, and urologists were invited to participate in identifying HER2-positive mBC patients treated with E+T between 01/01/11 and 12/31/13 outside of clinical trials. Data were collected from 03/18/2016 until 09/01/2016. Providers completed an electronic case report form (CRF) by abstracting data on disease characteristics, treatment patterns, disease response (per provider assessment), adverse events (Aes), and date of death. Duration of treatment and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the initiation of the E+T regimen. The target sample size was 60 patients and patients were selected according to resource available for chart data abstraction.

Results

Twenty-three providers submitted CRFs for 62 total patients. After data collection, 59 of 62 submitted records were validated for analysis. At mBC diagnosis, 69.4% of patients were ER/PR negative and 42.4% of patient had de novo stage IV disease. At initiation of E+T, the median age was 57 years and 81.4% were ECOG-OS 0/1. Mean length of follow-up from the initiation of any therapy was 33.6 months. Twenty-two (37.3%) patients initiated E+T as their first- or second-line of treatment; those remaining were in third-line or greater. At initiation of E+T, 72.8% of patients had prior treatment with trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy, 25.4% had prior trastuzumab in combination with pertuzumab and chemotherapy, and 16.9% had received TDM-1. Mean duration of E+T treatment was 5.2 months (SD=2.4). A response (complete [CR] or partial [PR]) was recorded by the providers for 64.4% of patients (not independently verified). The most common Aes reported were fatigue (67.8%), weakness (50.8%), decreased appetite (28.8%), decreased hemoglobin (27.1%), peripheral neuropathy (25.4%), and neutropenia (18.6%). At the end of the study period, 34 patients (57.6%) were deceased; the median OS from the initiation of E+T was 23.9 months (95% CI: 17.8-30.4).

Conclusions

In a small cohort of patients treated with E+T in the community setting, the observed response rate of 64.4% (CR+PR) was comparable to that of a prior phase II trial of E+T which reported an ORR with first-line E+T of 71.2% overall, 77.4% among T-naïve and 61.9% in T-pretreated patients. Further research is warranted to examine the tolerability and efficacy of E+T for metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients in different treatment settings.

Citation Format: Mougalian SS, Copher R, McAllister L, Radtchenko J, Wang EC, Broscious M, Yu H-T, Kish J. Outcomes of real-world use of eribulin plus trastuzumab for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-28.

Abstract PD6-02: Immunological differences between primary and metastatic breast cancer

Background: Little is known about how the immune microenvironment of breast cancer evolves during disease progression. Immunological differences between primary and metastatic lesions may explain discordant results of clinical trials that showed low tumor response rates with immune checkpoint therapy in metastatic breast cancer but high rates of pathologic complete response in early stage disease. The goal of this project was to examine TIL counts, PD-L1 protein expression and immune gene mRNA expression in primary tumors (P) and metastatic lesions (M).

Methods: FFPE blocks of primary breast cancers and core needle biopsies of matching distant metastases from 54 patients (n=104 samples). TIL count was assessed on H&E slides for 39 paired tissues and is reported as % of TIL in the stroma. PD-L1 protein expression was detected with immunohistochemistry (IHC, E1L3N antibody) in 36 pairs, samples with > 1% cells showing staining were considered PD-L1 positive which was determined separately for tumor and stroma. The expression of 770 immune-related genes was measured using the Nanostring PanCancer Immune Gene Panel in 31 P and 17 M, including 10 paired cases. Genes were organized into 14 immune cell type (total T, Th1, Treg, Total CD8, exhausted CD8, Cytotoxic T, B, NK, NK-CD56, Mast cell, CD45, Dendritic cell, macrophage, neutrophil) and 22 immune function metagenes. Differences in mean expression in P and M were assessed using Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney tests without adjustment for multiple comparisons due to overlap in metagene membership.

Results: Mean TIL counts (14% vs 20%, p=0.026) and stromal PD-L1 positivity by IHC (14% vs 54%, p=0.004) were significantly lower in M. PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells was similar (25% in M vs 42%, in P p=0.14). The total TIL gene expression score (2.48 vs 2.8 p=0.018) and all immune cell type metagenes, except neutrophils, had lower absolute expression levels in M. The relative abundance of neutrophils (0.035 vs -0.38, p=0.0001) and macrophages (0.62 vs 0.38 p=0.0013) increased in M. Among the 22 immune function metagenes, T, B and NK cell functions, cytotoxicity, chemokine and TNF superfamily expression, regulation and pathogen defense were significantly lower in M and none showed significantly increased expression in M. Pro-inflammatory/immune-activating cytokines of IL-6, CCL-5,-12,-19,-22 and CXCL-5,-9,-10,-11 were all significantly lower in M. The greatest drop was seen for CXCL-9 (2243 vs 422, p<0.0001) and CCL-19 (2537 vs 309, p<0.0001). No cytokine showed increased expression in M. Only 6 immune genes (C7, GPI, MAPK1, TAB1, TLR5, PVR) showed significantly higher (p<0.05) expression in M, the greatest increase was for Complement C7 (member of the terminal complement pathway membrane attack complex; 484 vs 3499, p=0.03) and GPI (glucose 6-phosphate isomerase that induces immunoglobulin secretion; 1967 vs 3011, p=0.01).

Conclusions: Breast cancer metastases exist in an attenuated immune microenvironment. Most immune cell subtypes, immune functions, and immune-associated gene expression are lower in M compared to P, consistent with immune escape. Metastatic lesions have higher relative abundance of macrophages and neutrophils, which suggest new therapeutic opportunities.

Citation Format: Szekely B, Bossuyt V, Li X, Baine M, Silber A, Sanft T, Hofstatter E, Mougalian S, Baghwagar S, Neumeister V, Pelekanou V, Hatzis C, Pusztai L. Immunological differences between primary and metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-02.

Abstract P5-15-16: Utilization and outcomes of eribulin in triple negative metastatic breast cancer: Real-world findings

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 10-20% of all breast cancers (BCs) and a significant proportion of all BC deaths. Eribulin is approved for the treatment of metastatic BC (MBC) after treatment with two prior regimens. A pooled analysis of two phase III studies of eribulin in women with TNBC patients found a 26% reduction in the risk of death vs. controls. Treatment patterns of eribulin and clinical outcomes associated with early vs. late use among TNBC patients treated in community oncology practices have not been evaluated.

Methods

Physicians from the Cardinal Health Oncology Research Network completed an electronic case report form (CRF) on up to 7 TNBC patients treated with eribulin between 01/01/11 and 12/31/13. Adult female patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic disease and not participating in any interventional clinical trial were included. Providers indicated the usage of chemotherapy, either alone or in combination, by line of therapy (LOT) up to the LOT of eribulin initiation. Reported data points include: clinical parameters (eg, site of metastases, ECOG performance status, and comorbidities), treatment events (eg, LOT start/end date and rationale for discontinuation), and outcomes (eg, clinical response and date of death). Dosing, adverse events, use of supportive care medications, and hospitalization were also captured during eribulin treatment. Use of eribulin in LOT 1/LOT 2 was considered early; LOT 3+ was considered late. All comparisons are univariate.

Results

An interim analysis was performed on 123 TNBC patients (planned sample size of 250) collected from 26 providers. Patient mean age at eribulin treatment initiation was 55.0 years. Mean follow-up duration was 27 mo (SD = 11.9) from initiation of first line metastatic treatment until date of last visit, death, or loss to follow-up. Overall, 74.0% were deceased, 85.4% had received at least 3 LOTs in the metastatic setting, and 45.4% were stage IV at diagnosis. Most women were prescribed eribulin in a later LOT (61.8%), 3 (2.4%) patients received eribulin in LOT1 and 44 in LOT2 (36.7%). Among patients with known treatment start and end dates (87.0%), mean duration of treatment (DOT) was 6.2 mo (SD = 3.3), median 5.8 mo among early recipients and 5.5 mo (SD = 5.7), median 4.1 mo, among later recipients (p = 0.39). Early users were more likely (p = 0.05) to have a complete/partial response (71.1% vs. 47.7%) and less likely to have progressive disease (7.1% vs. 12.3%). In comparing eribulin users to all other therapies, eribulin users had a significantly longer DOT in LOT2 (5.9 vs. 4.7 mo, p = 0.01) and LOT3 (5.8 vs. 3.6 mo, p = 0.03). In LOT3, eribulin users were significantly more likely to have complete/partial response (54.2% vs. 18.8%) and less likely to have to have progressive disease (4.2% vs. 37.5%) compared to all other observed LOT3 therapies.

Conclusions

This interim analysis indicates longer DOT for patients treated with eribulin for TNBC in LOT2 and LOT3 and a more favorable response rate compared to all other agents used in each LOT, respectively, among patients treated in community oncology practices. Full results will be available at the conference.

Citation Format: Kish JK, Mougalian SS, Copher R, McAllister L, Zhixiao W, Broscious M. Utilization and outcomes of eribulin in triple negative metastatic breast cancer: Real-world findings [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-16.

Abstract P5-11-03: Development of an interactive text messaging tool to improve adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy: Breast cancer endocrine therapy adherence (BETA) pilot study

Introduction: Approximately 75% of stage I-III breast cancers are hormone receptor (HR) positive for which the standard of care is 5-10 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, which has been shown to reduce recurrences and improve survival. Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients may not take the prescribed medication daily or may discontinue it early. Mobile health technology provides an opportunity to develop new innovative tools to identify women who are not taking medication as prescribed, to understand their barriers for adherence and to facilitate communication with providers to improve adherence.

Methods: The objective of the BETA study was to develop a new bi-directional text messaging application that simultaneously assesses patient adherence to endocrine therapy and provides direct communication to the provider team. Our primary endpoint was to assess feasibility of the application and the secondary endpoints included adherence, side effects and their severity, and quality of life (QOL). The intervention consisted of 3 types of text messages to which patients responded: 1) daily, evaluating adherence, 2) weekly, evaluating medication-related side effects and their severity, and 3) monthly, evaluating barriers to taking the medication. After 3 months of participation, patients completed surveys assessing the tolerability and financial burden of the intervention and adherence to medication. Patients were eligible if they had stage I-III, HR-positive breast cancer, owned a cell phone, and were initiating endocrine therapy. Target enrollment is 100 patients. For comparison, 100 consecutive patients meeting the above criteria were identified retrospectively as historical controls; adherence was assessed via chart review.

Results: Between November 2014 and May 2015, 62 patients (mean age 53.5 years) were enrolled and 25 had completed the study. Of those approached, 66% participated. Of those who completed the study, the application was found to be helpful by 63%; specifically, 76% felt the intervention was a reminder to take the medication, 96% felt it was easy to use, and 71% wanted to continue receiving text messages after the study ended. On average, patients spent 12 minutes with the application per week, 0% felt it took up too much time, and only 1 patient incurred text messaging fees. No patients withdrew from the study and only 1 patient did not adhere to treatment (as defined by ≥ 80% adherence). None of the enrolled patients discontinued endocrine therapy, compared to 9% of historical controls. Side effects were common: hot flashes/night sweats (61% of patients), joint aches/pains (56%), and vaginal symptoms (29%) were reported. Severe side effects (reported by 29% of patients) prompted a return phone call to the patient. The study is ongoing and final results will be available by December 2015.

Conclusion: We developed a new bi-directional text messaging intervention to assess adherence to endocrine therapy that provides real-time feedback to providers. Patients found the application helpful, easy to use, and not time consuming. Our tool is scalable for large population-based trials.

Citation Format: Epstein LN, Jhaveri AP, Han G, Abu-Khalaf MM, Hofstatter EW, Sanft TB, DiGiovanna MP, Silber AL, Adelson KB, Chung GG, Pusztai L, Gross CP, Mougalian SS. Development of an interactive text messaging tool to improve adherence with adjuvant endocrine therapy: Breast cancer endocrine therapy adherence (BETA) pilot study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-03.

Abstract P1-09-01: African American women have lower pathologic complete response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to white women for triple negative and HER 2 positive breast cancer

Introduction

Although racial disparities in breast cancer treatment have been well documented, data regarding differences in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy are few. In 2010 the National Cancer Database (NCDB) included a new variable, documenting pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore racial differences in the rates of pCR by molecular subtype.

Methods

The NCDB was queried to identify women diagnosed with invasive, stage 1-3 breast cancer in 2010 -2011 who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with likelihood of pCR.

Results

Out of 278,815 patients with known race and ethnicity, 27,300 (10%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of 17,970 where the outcome was known, 5,944 (33%) had a pCR. As seen in the table, there were no differences in response rate for ER/PR+ tumors, but compared to whites, non-hispanic black women had a lower rate of pCR for ER/PR- Her2+ and triple negative tumors. This difference persisted when adjusted for patient age, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, histology, grade, comorbidity index, facility type, geographic region, insurance status, and census-derived median income and education for the patient's zip code (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.93).

pCR rate by race and molecular subtype RacepCR number (%)p valueER/PR+, Her 2-Non-Hispanic White943/5129 (18.4%)reference Non-Hispanic Black204/1042 (19.6%)0.367 Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander59/291 (20.3%)0.420 Hispanic121/609 (19.9%)0.373ER/PR+, Her 2 +Non-Hispanic White852/2107 (40.4%)Reference Non-Hispanic Black143/380 (37.6%)0.304 Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander42/124 (33.9%)0.148 Hispanic92/224 (41.1%)0.854ER/PR-, Her 2 +Non-Hispanic White698/1295 (53.9%)Reference Non-Hispanic Black116/272 (42.6%)0.001 Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander66/112 (58.9%)0.306 Hispanic88/174 (50.6%)0.409ER/PR-, Her 2-Non-Hispanic White1318/3079 (42.8%)Reference Non-Hispanic Black416/1138 (36.6%)<0.001 Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander64/165 (38.8%)0.310 Hispanic159/381 (41.7%)0.689

Conclusions

Non-hispanic black women have a lower likelihood of pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to white women for triple negative and Her 2 positive breast cancer. It is unknown whether this is due to biologic differences in chemosensitivity or whether it represents treatment or socioeconomic differences that cannot be adjusted for in the current analysis.

Citation Format: Killelea BK, Chagpar AB, Horowitz NR, Pusztai L, Wang S, Mougalian S, Lannin DR. African American women have lower pathologic complete response rates to neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to white women for triple negative and HER 2 positive breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-01.

Abstract P3-14-02: Patterns of the use of primary systemic therapy in the United States

Background: Primary systemic therapy (PST) is an accepted alternative to adjuvant systemic therapy of breast cancer. It provides equivalent survival, increased breast conservation rates, and prognostic information.

Methods: This analysis assesses patterns of PST use based on information collected by the National Cancer Database (NCDB), a joint project of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society which captures data on over 70% of all diagnosed breast cancer patients in the U.S. Using the b-participant use file of the NCDB, we evaluated regional, patient, and tumor factors associated with PST use.

Results: The NCDB captured 621,319 patients treated with PST from 2006 to 2010. Of these, 7.4% received systemic therapy pre-operatively, and 3.6% in both the pre- and post-operative settings. Factors correlating with timing of therapy are shown in the table. PST use increased steadily from 7.0% to 7.8% (p<0.001) from 2006 to 2010. PST was significantly more frequently used in younger, African-American, Hispanic, low-income, uninsured patients with larger, node positive tumors, living in large metropolitan areas in the West and treated in academic centers. These factors remained significantly and independently associated with PST on multivariate analysis.

 UnivariateMultivariateFactorPre-opPost-opBothp-valuep-valueYear of Diagnosis   <0.001<0.00120067.0%90.0%3.0%  20077.1%89.5%3.4%  20087.2%89.2%3.6%  20097.6%88.6%3.8%  20107.8%87.7%4.5%  Region   <0.001<0.001Northeast5.7%90.9%3.4%  Atlantic6.7%90.4%2.9%  Southeast8.0%88.2%3.8%  Great Lakes6.5%90.1%3.4%  South7.7%88.4%3.9%  Midwest5.2%90.2%4.6%  West11.4%84.2%4.4%  Mountain8.8%88.7%2.5%  Pacific7.7%88.3%4.0%  Community type (pop):   <0.001<0.001Metro (>1M)7.9%88.3%3.8%  Metro (250K-1M)7.1%89.5%3.4%  Metro (<250K)6.3%90.5%3.2%  Urban, adjacent to a metro area (20K+)6.5%90.0%3.5%  Urban, not adjacent to metro (20K+)6.3%90.5%3.2%  Urban, adjacent to metro (2500-19,999)6.7%89.4%4.0%  Urban, not adjacent to metro (2500-19,999)6.0%90.6%3.4%  Rural/urban pop, adjacent to metro (<2500)6.0%90.3%3.8%  Rural/urban pop, not adjacent to metro (<2500)5.7%90.5%3.8%  Facility type:   <0.001<0.001Community program6.4%90.5%3.1%  Comprehensive community program7.1%89.5%3.5%  Academic/research8.4%87.4%4.2%  Other6.4%90.0%3.6%  Age:   <0.001<0.001<609.4%85.8%4.8%  ≥604.9%92.9%2.3%  Race:   <0.001<0.001Caucasian6.7%89.3%3.5%  African-American11.8%83.3%4.9%  Other8.4%87.5%4.1%  Ethnicity:   <0.001<0.001Non-Hispanic7.2%89.3%3.6%  Hispanic11.2%83.3%5.4%  Median household income:   <0.0010.023<$30K9.0%86.8%4.2%  $30K-$34,9997.7%88.6%3.7%  $35K-$45,9997.2%89.1%3.7%  $46K+6.9%89.6%3.4%  Insurance:   <0.001<0.001Uninsured15.3%78.1%6.6%  Private7.8%88.3%3.9%  Medicaid13.7%79.2%7.2%  Medicare4.8%93.0%2.2%  Military8.2%87.5%4.4%  Clinical T stage:   <0.001<0.001T12.4%96.4%1.2%  T213.6%79.5%6.9%  T3-T435.9%45.3%18.8%  Clinical N stage:   <0.001<0.001N04.8%92.9%2.3%  N1-326.0%60.3%13.7%  pop: population; multivariate OR and 95% CI not shown

Conclusion: PST appears to be underutilized, received by only 7.8% of all patients, 36% of T3-T4 tumors, and 26.0% of clinically node positive patients. However, its rate of use has increased over the past years. There is also significant regional variation in the use of PST, independent of patient and tumor factors.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-14-02.

Abstract P5-13-05: Richer and wiser: Factors correlated with chemoprevention use in the United States

Introduction: Tamoxifen and raloxifene have been shown to reduce the risk of breast cancer by up to 50%, yet the uptake of these agents remains poor. We sought to determine factors associated with chemoprevention uptake in a nationally representative sample.

Methods: The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) is a population-based survey conducted annually by the CDC and is designed to be representative of the non-institutionalized civilian population in the United States. We utilized data from the 2010 NHIS cancer supplement to determine factors associated with chemoprevention uptake in women ≥ 35 years of age. Statistical analyses were conducted using SUDAAN software.

Results: In 2010, 10,959 women ≥ 35 years of age were surveyed, representing 83,377,082 people in the population. Of these, 0.21% reported taking chemoprevention, using either tamoxifen or raloxifene. On bivariate analyses, factors correlating with chemoprevention uptake included age, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, income and geographic region (see Table). Interestingly, MRI use, family history of premenopausal breast cancer in first degree relatives, and personal risk perception were not associated with chemoprevention use. On multivariate analysis, education and income remained independent predictors of chemoprevention use.

Conclusion: Approximately 0.2% of women take chemoprevention. It is concerning that sociodemographic factors of education and income are independent predictors of the use of chemopreventive agents for breast cancer, while risk perception and family history do not seem to correlate with uptake rates. These findings are a call to action for improved education and counseling of those who are at greatest risk, and highlight potential disparities in access to appropriate chemoprevention across all sociodemographic groups.

Bivariate and Multivariate Analyses of Factors Correlated with Chemoprevention UptakeFactorBivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis Chemoprevention (%)No Chemoprevention (%)p-valueOR (95% CI)p-valueAge  0.0481 0.1087< 40 yr3.2211.93 1.00 40-49 yr5.8726.11 0.78 (0.05-12.44) 50-59 yr11.7024.88 1.44 (0.10-21.43) 60-69 yr23.8218.54 3.15 (0.32-31.41) 70-79 yr44.4110.77 8.62 (0.78-94.75) 80+ yr10.997.77 1.53 (0.10-23.66) Race/ethnicity  0.0006 0.8372Hispanic3.9011.06 00.81 (0.11-5.85) White96.1071.63 1.00 Black011.80 - Asian04.61 - Other00.89 - Education  0.0371 <0.0001< Grade 127.1214.15 1.00 High School25.8627.73 1.86 (0.35-9.75) Some college/Assoc21.4229.97 1.85 (0.36-9.45) Bachelors15.5917.49 1.44 (0.13-16.35) Masters11.708.37 3.23 (0.41-25.14) Prof/Doctorate18.302.28 25.22 (4.30-147.87) Insurance  0.0002 0.0686Not covered012.44 - Medicare72.6129.38 1.00 Medicaid3.224.50 2.38 (0.22-26.15) Military01.74 - Private24.1751.94 0.28 (0.06-1.26) Income  0.0005 0.0306<$35K32.3934.53 1.00 $35K-$74,99926.1131.53 0.97 (0.21-4.42) $75K-$99,999012.08 - $100K+41.6021.86 3.78 (0.94-15.22) Region  0.0441 0.1649Northeast27.9318.62 1.00 Midwest31.6022.88 0.92 (0.32-2.64) South34.4935.66 0.65 (0.21-2.04) West5.9822.84 0.16 (0.03-0.86) Oophorectomy40.1115.160.08132.17 (0.77-6.09)0.1404MRI use2.315.170.2597  Family History2.315.130.2601  Risk Perception  0.1451  High41.5212.50   Average25.8947.49   Low32.5940.01   

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-13-05.