Oral gepotidacin versus nitrofurantoin in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3): two randomised, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, non-inferiority trials

BACKGROUND

Gepotidacin is a novel, bactericidal, first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that inhibits bacterial DNA replication by a distinct mechanism of action and a unique binding site, providing well balanced inhibition of two type II topoisomerase enzymes. Oral gepotidacin is under investigation to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral gepotidacin with that of nitrofurantoin in adolescent and adult female individuals with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

METHODS

EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3 were phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority (10% margin) trials, in which patients were enrolled at 219 centres worldwide. Patients assigned female at birth, non-pregnant, aged 12 years or older, weighing 40 kg or more, with two or more symptoms of dysuria, frequency, urgency, or lower abdominal pain, and with evidence of urinary nitrite, pyuria, or both were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by interactive response technology to receive oral gepotidacin (1500 mg twice daily for 5 days) or oral nitrofurantoin (100 mg twice daily for 5 days), with randomisation stratified by age category and history of recurrent uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Patients, investigators, and the sponsor study team were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint, therapeutic response (success or failure) at test-of-cure (ie, day 10-13), was evaluated in randomly assigned patients with nitrofurantoin-susceptible qualifying uropathogens (≥105 colony-forming units [CFU] per mL) and who received at least one dose of study treatment. Conforming to regulatory guidance, therapeutic success was defined as combined clinical success (ie, complete symptom resolution) and microbiological success (ie, reduction of qualifying uropathogens to <103 CFU/mL) without other systemic antimicrobial use. Safety analyses included patients who were randomly assigned and who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04020341 (EAGLE-2) and NCT04187144 (EAGLE-3), and are completed.

FINDINGS

Studies were undertaken from Oct 17, 2019, to Nov 30, 2022 (EAGLE-2), and from April 23, 2020, to Dec 1, 2022 (EAGLE-3). 1680 patients in EAGLE-2 and 1731 patients in EAGLE-3 were screened for eligibility, of whom 1531 and 1605 were randomly assigned, respectively (767 in the gepotidacin group and 764 in the nitrofurantoin group in EAGLE-2, and 805 in the gepotidacin group and 800 in the nitrofurantoin group in EAGLE-3). After an interim analysis, which was prospectively agreed as a protocol amendment, both studies were stopped for efficacy. Thus, the primary analysis population included only patients who, at the time of the interim analysis data cutoff, had the opportunity to reach the test-of-cure visit or were known to not have attained therapeutic success before the test-of-cure visit. In EAGLE-2, 162 (50·6%) of 320 patients assigned gepotidacin and 135 (47·0%) of 287 patients assigned nitrofurantoin had therapeutic success (adjusted difference 4·3%, 95% CI -3·6 to 12·1). In EAGLE-3, 162 (58·5%) of 277 patients assigned gepotidacin and 115 (43·6%) of 264 patients assigned nitrofurantoin had therapeutic success (adjusted difference 14·6%, 95% CI 6·4 to 22·8). Gepotidacin was non-inferior to nitrofurantoin in both studies and superior to nitrofurantoin in EAGLE-3. The most common adverse event with gepotidacin was diarrhoea (observed in 111 [14%] of 766 patients in EAGLE-2 and in 147 [18%] of 804 patients in EAGLE-3), whereas the most common adverse event with nitrofurantoin was nausea (in 29 [4%] of 760 patients in EAGLE-2 and in 35 [4%] of 798 patients in EAGLE-3). Cases were mostly mild or moderate. No life-threatening or fatal events occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Gepotidacin is an efficacious oral antibiotic with acceptable safety and tolerability profiles. As a first-in-class investigational oral antibiotic with activity against common uropathogens, including clinically important drug-resistant phenotypes, gepotidacin has the potential to offer substantial benefit to patients.

FUNDING

GSK and the US Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority.

Impact of the 2019 Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection on Treatment Response Rates: A Reanalysis of a Clinical Trial of Nitrofurantoin vs Fosfomycin

Background

Current US Food and Administration (FDA) guidance recommends that the primary efficacy endpoint for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) clinical trials be a composite of clinical and microbiological responses. We applied these criteria to a previous clinical trial to determine the impact on treatment outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a patient-level reanalysis of a randomized clinical trial of nitrofurantoin versus fosfomycin for treatment of uUTI in nonpregnant adult women. Women were included in the reanalysis if they had 2 or more signs/symptoms of uUTI and a single bacterial species isolated from baseline urine culture at ≥105 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL. The applied primary efficacy endpoint-therapeutic response-required both clinical resolution of signs/symptoms and reduction of the infecting bacterial pathogen to <103 CFU/mL at day 14 post-treatment completion.

Results

Two hundred eleven of 513 (41%) patients were eligible for inclusion in the reanalysis. Among these patients, 74% (76/103) and 69% (75/108) in the nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin groups, respectively, achieved clinical resolution by day 14. Similarly, 70% (72/103) and 67% (72/108) in each group achieved microbiological success at day 14. As such, 59% (61/103) and 57% (62/108) of women in each group met the primary efficacy endpoint-therapeutic success-at day 14. In comparison, 75% and 66% of patients in each group achieved clinical resolution at day 14 in the initial clinical trial.

Conclusions

Applying current FDA guidance resulted in lower composite efficacy rates than clinical resolution alone as observed in the initial clinical trial. This may limit the ability to compare antibiotic treatment effects between historical and future clinical trials.

Efficacy and Safety of Gepotidacin as Treatment of Uncomplicated Urogenital Gonorrhea (EAGLE-1): Design of a Randomized, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 3 Study

INTRODUCTION

Gonorrhea, caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), is the second most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI). Rates of antimicrobial resistance to standard care are increasing worldwide, with many antibiotic classes now ineffective against NG. Gepotidacin is a first-in-class, bactericidal, triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that inhibits bacterial DNA replication by inhibition of two enzymes, where a single target-specific mutation does not significantly impact susceptibility. Gepotidacin confers activity against NG, including most strains resistant to marketed antibiotics. Here, we describe the design of a phase 3 clinical trial (EAGLE-1; NCT04010539) evaluating gepotidacin for the treatment of uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomized, multicenter, sponsor-blinded, noninferiority study across six countries is comparing the efficacy of gepotidacin with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin in 400 patients with uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea (microbiological intent-to-treat population) and assessing the safety of gepotidacin in approximately 600 patients (intent-to-treat population). Eligible participants 12 years of age or older with clinical suspicion of urogenital gonococcal infection and a NG-positive urogenital sample and/or purulent discharge are randomized 1:1 to receive oral gepotidacin (2 × 3000 mg 10-12 h apart) or ceftriaxone (500 mg, intramuscular) plus azithromycin (1 g, oral). The primary endpoint is culture-confirmed bacterial eradication of NG from the urogenital site at the test-of-cure (days 4-8) visit.

PLANNED OUTCOMES

This trial was designed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (2015) and European Medicines Agency (2011) guidance, particularly the primary endpoint and microbiological evaluability requirements. This study will help characterize the risk-benefit profile of gepotidacin for treating uncomplicated urogenital gonorrhea. Gepotidacin is an important potential treatment for gonorrhea to help address the urgent unmet need of multidrug resistance and the increasingly limited number of oral treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04010539.

Fitness of real-world data for clinical trial data collection: Results and lessons from a HARMONY Outcomes ancillary study

BACKGROUND

Despite the extensive use of real-world data for retrospective, observational clinical research, our understanding of how real-world data might increase the efficiency of data collection in patient-level randomized clinical trials is largely unknown. The structure of real-world data is inherently heterogeneous, with each source electronic health record and claims database different from the next. Their fitness-for-use as data sources for multisite trials in the United States has not been established.

METHODS

For a subset of participants in the HARMONY Outcomes Trial, we obtained electronic health record data from recruiting sites or Medicare claims data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. For baseline characteristics and follow-up events, we assessed the level of agreement between these real-world data and data documented in the trial database.

RESULTS

Real-world data-derived demographic information tended to agree with trial-reported demographic information, although real-world data were less accurate in identifying medical history. The ability of real-world data to identify baseline medication usage differed by real-world data source, with claims data demonstrating substantially better performance than electronic health record data. The limited number of lab results in the collected electronic health record data matched closely with values in the trial database. There were not enough follow-up events in the ancillary study population to draw meaningful conclusions about the performance of real-world data for identification of events. Based on the conduct of this ancillary study, the challenges and opportunities of using real-world data within clinical trials are discussed.

CONCLUSION

Based on a subset of participants from the HARMONY Outcomes Trial, our results suggest that electronic health record or claims data, as currently available, are unlikely to be a complete substitute for trial data collection of medical history or baseline lab results, but that Medicare claims were able to identify most medications. The limited size of the study population prevents us from drawing strong conclusions based on these results, and other studies are clearly needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Design of Two Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Studies Comparing Gepotidacin with Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Female Participants

BACKGROUND

Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) are among the most common community-acquired infections for women worldwide. Treatment options are increasingly limited by antibiotic resistance; novel oral antibiotics are urgently needed. Gepotidacin is a novel, bactericidal, first-in-class triazaacenaphthylene antibiotic that inhibits bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) replication by a distinct mechanism of action, which confers activity against most strains of target pathogens, such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus, including those resistant to current antibiotics. Here, we describe the designs of two near-identical phase III clinical trials (EAGLE-2 and EAGLE-3) evaluating gepotidacin for the treatment of uUTI.

METHODS

These are phase III, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, comparator-controlled, noninferiority studies, comparing the efficacy and safety of gepotidacin to nitrofurantoin in the treatment of uUTI. Eligible participants are women aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 2 uUTI symptoms, randomized (1:1) to receive oral gepotidacin (1500 mg) plus placebo or nitrofurantoin (100 mg) plus placebo, twice daily for 5 days. The primary therapeutic endpoint is composite clinical and microbiological efficacy, with noninferiority comparisons made in individuals with a qualifying (≥ 10⁵ colony-forming units/mL urine) nitrofurantoin-susceptible uropathogen.

RESULTS

These trials were designed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration (2019) and European Medicines Agency (2018) guidance, particularly the composite endpoint and microbiological evaluability requirements. Across the trials ~ 5000 participants are planned to be enrolled from > 200 centers globally.

CONCLUSIONS

Gepotidacin represents an important potential treatment option being evaluated to address the need for novel oral antibiotics to treat uUTI. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ) where the full protocols can be accessed under trial IDs: NCT04020341 (EAGLE-2) and NCT04187144 (EAGLE-3).

The use of electronic health records for recruitment in clinical trials: a mixed methods analysis of the Harmony Outcomes Electronic Health Record Ancillary Study

Background

The electronic health record (EHR) contains a wealth of clinical data that may be used to streamline the identification of potential clinical trial participants. However, there is little empirical information on site-level facilitators of and barriers to optimal use of EHR systems with respect to trial recruitment.

Methods

We conducted qualitative focus groups and quantitative surveys as part of the EHR Ancillary Study, which is being conducted alongside the multicenter, global, Harmony Outcomes Trial comparing albiglutide to standard care for the prevention of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Subject matter experts used findings from focus groups to draft a 20-question survey examining the use of the EHR for participant identification, common site recruitment strategies, and variation in perceived barriers to optimal use of the EHR. The final survey was fielded with 446 site investigators actively enrolling participants in the main trial.

Results

Nearly two-thirds of respondents were study coordinators (63.2%), 23.1% were principal investigators, and 13.7% held other research roles. Approximately half of the respondents reported using the EHR to find potential trial participants. Of these, 79.4% reported using EHR searches in conjunction with other recruitment methods, including reviewing of upcoming clinic schedules (75.3%) and contacting past trial participants (71.2%). Important barriers to optimal use of the EHR included the lack of availability of certain research-focused EHR modules and limitations on the ability to contact patients cared for by other providers. Of survey respondents who did not use the EHR to find potential participants, one-quarter reported that the EHR was not accessible in their country; this finding varied from 2.6% of respondents in North America to 50% of respondents in the Asia Pacific.

Conclusions

While EHR screening was commonly used for recruitment in a cardiovascular outcomes trial, important technical, governance, and regulatory barriers persist. Multifaceted, scalable, and customizable strategies are needed to support the optimal use of the EHR for trial participant identification.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02465515. Registered on 8 June 2015

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05397-0.

Randomized 52-week Phase 2 Trial of Albiglutide Versus Placebo in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

GLP-1 receptor agonists are an established therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes; however, their role in type 1 diabetes remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVE

Determine efficacy and safety of once-weekly albiglutide 30 mg (up-titration to 50 mg at week 6) versus placebo together with insulin in patients with new-onset type 1 diabetes and residual insulin production.

DESIGN

52-week, randomized, phase 2 study (NCT02284009).

METHODS

A prespecified Bayesian approach, incorporating placebo data from a prior study, allowed for 3:1 (albiglutide:placebo) randomization. The primary endpoint was 52-week change from baseline in mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) stimulated 2-h plasma C-peptide area under the curve (AUC). Secondary endpoints included metabolic measures and pharmacokinetics of albiglutide.

RESULTS

12/17 (70.6%, placebo) and 40/50 (80.0%, albiglutide) patients completed the study. Within our study, mean (standard deviation) change from baseline to week 52 in MMTT-stimulated 2-h plasma C-peptide AUC was -0.16 nmol/L (0.366) with placebo and -0.13 nmol/L (0.244) with albiglutide. For the primary Bayesian analysis (including prior study data) the posterior treatment difference (95% credible interval) was estimated at 0.12 nmol/L (0-0.24); the probability of a difference ≥0.2 nmol/L between treatments was low (0.097). A transient significant difference in maximum C-peptide was seen at week 28. Otherwise, no significant secondary endpoint differences were noted. On-therapy adverse events were reported in 82.0% (albiglutide) and 76.5% (placebo) of patients.

CONCLUSION

In newly diagnosed patients with type 1 diabetes, albiglutide 30 to 50 mg weekly for 1 year had no appreciable effect on preserving residual β-cell function versus placebo.

Albiglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (Harmony Outcomes): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists differ in chemical structure, duration of action, and in their effects on clinical outcomes. The cardiovascular effects of once-weekly albiglutide in type 2 diabetes are unknown. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of albiglutide in preventing cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

METHODS

We did a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 610 sites across 28 countries. We randomly assigned patients aged 40 years and older with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (at a 1:1 ratio) to groups that either received a subcutaneous injection of albiglutide (30-50 mg, based on glycaemic response and tolerability) or of a matched volume of placebo once a week, in addition to their standard care. Investigators used an interactive voice or web response system to obtain treatment assignment, and patients and all study investigators were masked to their treatment allocation. We hypothesised that albiglutide would be non-inferior to placebo for the primary outcome of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. If non-inferiority was confirmed by an upper limit of the 95% CI for a hazard ratio of less than 1·30, closed testing for superiority was prespecified. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02465515.

FINDINGS

Patients were screened between July 1, 2015, and Nov 24, 2016. 10 793 patients were screened and 9463 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to groups: 4731 patients were assigned to receive albiglutide and 4732 patients to receive placebo. On Nov 8, 2017, it was determined that 611 primary endpoints and a median follow-up of at least 1·5 years had accrued, and participants returned for a final visit and discontinuation from study treatment; the last patient visit was on March 12, 2018. These 9463 patients, the intention-to-treat population, were evaluated for a median duration of 1·6 years and were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary composite outcome occurred in 338 (7%) of 4731 patients at an incidence rate of 4·6 events per 100 person-years in the albiglutide group and in 428 (9%) of 4732 patients at an incidence rate of 5·9 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·78, 95% CI 0·68-0·90), which indicated that albiglutide was superior to placebo (p<0·0001 for non-inferiority; p=0·0006 for superiority). The incidence of acute pancreatitis (ten patients in the albiglutide group and seven patients in the placebo group), pancreatic cancer (six patients in the albiglutide group and five patients in the placebo group), medullary thyroid carcinoma (zero patients in both groups), and other serious adverse events did not differ between the two groups. There were three (<1%) deaths in the placebo group that were assessed by investigators, who were masked to study drug assignment, to be treatment-related and two (<1%) deaths in the albiglutide group.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, albiglutide was superior to placebo with respect to major adverse cardiovascular events. Evidence-based glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists should therefore be considered as part of a comprehensive strategy to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline.

Sex and BMI Alter the Benefits and Risks of Sulfonylureas and Thiazolidinediones in Type 2 Diabetes: A Framework for Evaluating Stratification Using Routine Clinical and Individual Trial Data

OBJECTIVE

The choice of therapy for type 2 diabetes after metformin is guided by overall estimates of glycemic response and side effects seen in large cohorts. A stratified approach to therapy would aim to improve on this by identifying subgroups of patients whose glycemic response or risk of side effects differs markedly. We assessed whether simple clinical characteristics could identify patients with differing glycemic response and side effects with sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We studied 22,379 patients starting sulfonylurea or thiazolidinedione therapy in the U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) to identify features associated with increased 1-year HbA_1c fall with one therapy class and reduced fall with the second. We then assessed whether prespecified patient subgroups defined by the differential clinical factors showed differing 5-year glycemic response and side effects with sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones using individual randomized trial data from ADOPT (A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial) (first-line therapy, n = 2,725) and RECORD (Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiovascular Outcomes and Regulation of Glycemia in Diabetes) (second-line therapy, n = 2,222). Further replication was conducted using routine clinical data from GoDARTS (Genetics of Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland) (n = 1,977).

RESULTS

In CPRD, male sex and lower BMI were associated with greater glycemic response with sulfonylureas and a lesser response with thiazolidinediones (both P < 0.001). In ADOPT and RECORD, nonobese males had a greater overall HbA_1c reduction with sulfonylureas than with thiazolidinediones (P < 0.001); in contrast, obese females had a greater HbA_1c reduction with thiazolidinediones than with sulfonylureas (P < 0.001). Weight gain and edema risk with thiazolidinediones were greatest in obese females; however, hypoglycemia risk with sulfonylureas was similar across all subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient subgroups defined by sex and BMI have different patterns of benefits and risks on thiazolidinedione and sulfonylurea therapy. Subgroup-specific estimates can inform discussion about the choice of therapy after metformin for an individual patient. Our approach using routine and shared trial data provides a framework for future stratification research in type 2 diabetes.

New medicinal products for chronic heart failure: advances in clinical trial design and efficacy assessment

Despite the availability of a number of different classes of therapeutic agents with proven efficacy in heart failure, the clinical course of heart failure patients is characterized by a reduction in life expectancy, a progressive decline in health-related quality of life and functional status, as well as a high risk of hospitalization. New approaches are needed to address the unmet medical needs of this patient population. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is undertaking a revision of its Guideline on Clinical Investigation of Medicinal Products for the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure. The draft version of the Guideline was released for public consultation in January 2016. The Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in partnership with the Heart Failure Association of the ESC, convened a dedicated two-day workshop to discuss three main topic areas of major interest in the field and addressed in this draft EMA guideline: (i) assessment of efficacy (i.e. endpoint selection and statistical analysis); (ii) clinical trial design (i.e. issues pertaining to patient population, optimal medical therapy, run-in period); and (iii) research approaches for testing novel therapeutic principles (i.e. cell therapy). This paper summarizes the key outputs from the workshop, reviews areas of expert consensus, and identifies gaps that require further research or discussion. Collaboration between regulators, industry, clinical trialists, cardiologists, health technology assessment bodies, payers, and patient organizations is critical to address the ongoing challenge of heart failure and to ensure the development and market access of new therapeutics in a scientifically robust, practical and safe way.

Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research

Electronic health records (EHRs) provide opportunities to enhance patient care, embed performance measures in clinical practice, and facilitate clinical research. Concerns have been raised about the increasing recruitment challenges in trials, burdensome and obtrusive data collection, and uncertain generalizability of the results. Leveraging electronic health records to counterbalance these trends is an area of intense interest. The initial applications of electronic health records, as the primary data source is envisioned for observational studies, embedded pragmatic or post-marketing registry-based randomized studies, or comparative effectiveness studies. Advancing this approach to randomized clinical trials, electronic health records may potentially be used to assess study feasibility, to facilitate patient recruitment, and streamline data collection at baseline and follow-up. Ensuring data security and privacy, overcoming the challenges associated with linking diverse systems and maintaining infrastructure for repeat use of high quality data, are some of the challenges associated with using electronic health records in clinical research. Collaboration between academia, industry, regulatory bodies, policy makers, patients, and electronic health record vendors is critical for the greater use of electronic health records in clinical research. This manuscript identifies the key steps required to advance the role of electronic health records in cardiovascular clinical research.

Improving clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases: a position paper from the Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology

AIMS

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of mortality and morbidity in the world, but the pharmaceutical industry's willingness to invest in this field has declined because of the many challenges involved with bringing new cardiovascular drugs to market, including late-stage failures, escalating regulatory requirements, bureaucracy of the clinical trial business enterprise, and limited patient access after approval. This contrasts with the remaining burden of cardiovascular disease in Europe and in the world. Thus, clinical cardiovascular research needs to adapt to address the impact of these challenges in order to ensure development of new cardiovascular medicines.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The present paper is the outcome of a two-day workshop held by the Cardiovascular Round Table of the European Society of Cardiology. We propose strategies to improve development of effective new cardiovascular therapies. These can include (i) the use of biomarkers to describe patients who will benefit from new therapies more precisely, achieving better human target validation; (ii) targeted, mechanism-based approaches to drug development for defined populations; (iii) the use of information technology to simplify data collection and follow-up in clinical trials; (iv) streamlining adverse event collection and reducing monitoring; (v) extended patent protection or limited rapid approval of new agents to motivate investment in early phase development; and (vi) collecting data needed for health technology assessment continuously throughout the drug development process (before and after approval) to minimize delays in patient access. Collaboration across industry, academia, regulators, and payers will be necessary to enact change and to unlock the existing potential for cardiovascular clinical drug development.

CONCLUSIONS

A coordinated effort involving academia, regulators, industry, and payors will help to foster better and more effective conduct of clinical cardiovascular trials, supporting earlier availability of innovative therapies and better management of cardiovascular diseases.

Effect of darapladib treatment on endarterectomy carotid plaque lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 activity: a randomized, controlled trial

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of darapladib, a selective oral investigational lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ inhibitor, on both plasma and plaque lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ activity.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective carotid endarterectomy were randomized to darapladib 40 mg (n = 34), 80 mg (n = 34), or placebo (n = 34) for 14 days, followed by carotid endarterectomy 24 hours after the last dose of study medication.

Results

Darapladib 40 mg and 80 mg reduced plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ activity by 52% and 81%, respectively, versus placebo (both P<0.001). Significant reductions in plaque lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ activity were also observed compared with placebo (P<0.0001), which equated to a 52% and 80% decrease compared with placebo. No significant differences were observed between groups in plaque lysophosphatidylcholine content or other biomarkers, although a dose-dependent decrease in plaque matrix metalloproteinase-9 mRNA expression was observed with darapladib 80 mg (P = 0.053 vs placebo). In a post-hoc analysis, plaque caspase-3 (P<0.001) and caspase-8 (P<0.05) activity were found to be significantly lower in the darapladib 80-mg group versus placebo. No major safety concerns were identified in the study.

Conclusions

Short-term treatment (14±4 days) with darapladib produced a robust, dose-dependent reduction in plasma lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ activity. More importantly, darapladib demonstrated placebo-corrected reductions in carotid plaque lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A₂ activity of similar magnitude. Darapladib was generally well tolerated and no safety concerns were identified. Additional studies of longer duration are needed to explore whether these pharmacodynamic effects are associated with improved clinical outcomes, as might be hypothesized.

Trial Registration Information

Name of Registry 1: ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry Number 1: NCT01916720

Trial URL in Registry Database 1: www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01916720

Name of Registry 2: GSK Clinical Study Register

Registry Number 2∶480848/010

Trial URL in Registry Database 2: www.gsk-clinicalstudyregister.com/result_detail.jsp?protocolId=480848%2F010&studyId=74F5DB65-4661-4FA8-91D4-EBF78D769F24&compound=darapladib&type=Compound&letterrange=A-F

The pharmacological treatment of primary aldosteronism

Aldosterone is increasingly considered to have a fundamental role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease. Primary aldosteronism is a much more common cause of secondary hypertension than once suspected, accounting for approximately 10% of cases. Screening for primary aldosteronism should be considered even in the presence of normokalaemia. The non-classical effects of aldosterone, some of which are transcription-independent, may be of similar or greater importance than its traditional effects on the kidney. Treatment of primary aldosteronism should be specific and aim to ameliorate all hormone-related effects of aldosterone, not just the most obvious manifestation of hypertension. Mineralocorticoid antagonism, shown to lead to significant additional survival advantage in heart failure, offers the best prospect for achieving therapeutic goals. For the increasing proportion of patients with primary aldosteronism suitable for long-term medical treatment, mineralocorticoid receptor blockade (better tolerated with eplerenone) should be considered the most appropriate choice of treatment, pending the development of better alternatives.

Suprasellar germ cell tumours: specific problems and the evolution of optimal management with a combined chemoradiotherapy regimen

OBJECTIVE

Suprasellar germ cell tumours are rare, and there are few series of patients outlining the problems in diagnosis and management, and providing clear guidelines for optimal therapy. We have therefore reviewed our own series of 11 such patients who were managed in a joint endocrinology/clinical oncology setting.

PATIENTS AND DESIGN

A retrospective case review assessment of all patients seen within a given time. Clinical, biochemical and radiological findings were reviewed, the types of therapy administered noted, and the responses to treatment analysed.

RESULTS

In the years 1977-2001, 11 patients with suprasellar (SS) germ cell tumours (GCT) were seen (germinomatous : nongerminomatous = 8 : 3). SSGCT had an approximately equal sex incidence (M : F, 6 : 5), in contrast to pineal tumours, the commonest site of origin of intracranial GCT and which occur predominantly in men. The median age at presentation was 20 years (range 6-49 years) with a median duration of symptoms before diagnosis of 17 months (range 1-35 months). Polyuria was the commonest presenting symptom (10 patients). Diabetes insipidus occurred in all patients, as did partial or complete anterior pituitary failure. Visual failure was present in 55% of cases. Anorexia, weight loss and disturbed thirst sensation were also common. Positron emission tomography scanning was occasionally useful in the evaluation of suprasellar tumours/pituitary stalk lesions deemed too risky to biopsy. A "central nervous system-friendly" chemoradiotherapy regimen comprising vincristine, etoposide and carboplatin and differential daily dose irradiation, usually administered using a partial transmission block technique, produced a 5-year survival of 100% with low morbidity. Treatment did not correct previously abnormal endocrine function although it did improve vision in three of six patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We therefore emphasize the use of techniques other than biopsy in the diagnosis of these patients, note the problems in the management of their fluid control, and highlight the favourable response to a combined chemotherapy-radiotherapy protocol.

In vitro basal and GnRH-stimulated secretion of gonadotrophins reflects long-lasting modulatory effects, and peripheral levels are not predicted by pituitary responsiveness to GnRH

OBJECTIVE

Production of the appropriate pattern of gonadotrophin levels is crucial to proper functioning of the female reproductive system. We aimed to establish whether the pituitary has invariant secretory characteristics when isolated from in vivo controls. We aimed to obtain information during both the rising and declining phases of the gonadotrophin surge.

DESIGN

This study investigated factors that are directed at the pituitary by isolating it from the acute influences of the in vivo environment and studying gonadotrophin secretion in vitro.

METHODS

Pituitaries of adult female rats were collected at selected times during the day of pro-oestrus and incubated in vitro, and at the same time blood was collected. Peripheral levels of LH and FSH were measured over the whole day of pro-oestrus, basal in vitro secretions of LH and FSH from pituitaries were measured, GnRH-stimulated LH and FSH secretion were assessed, and the responsiveness of LH and FSH secretion to GnRH were calculated.

RESULTS

Peripheral levels of LH peaked at 1800 h (P<0.02) followed by a subsequent decline. In contrast, although FSH had a peak at 1800 h (P<0.01), serum levels were also high at the end pro-oestrus. The profile of basal LH and FSH secretion from the pituitary in vitro, in the absence of added secretagogue, resembled that of the peripheral blood levels of each gonadotrophin. Pituitaries collected at 1800 h secreted most LH (P<0. 02). FSH secretion was low early on the day of pro-oestrus and then increased to and was maintained at high levels in the last quarter of the day (P<0.01). When the pituitaries were stimulated with GnRH the patterns of LH release and FSH release approximated those observed for basal release. Responsiveness of the pituitaries to GnRH was calculated by determining the ratio of GnRH-stimulated release to basal release. However, low levels of gonadotrophin were secreted even from pituitaries which were highly responsive as determined from consideration of percentage increase in secretion induced by GnRH.

CONCLUSIONS

The secretory activity was dependent on the time of day the pituitaries were collected. Since the secretion occurred after the tissue had been removed from the direct influence of the in vivo environment, the variations in secretion must reflect long-lasting components of the mechanism that regulate gonadotrophin concentrations. There were changes in both LH and FSH responsiveness to GnRH stimulation over the day of pro-oestrus. Delineation of the time courses and changing predominance of multiple processes is needed to assist understanding the mechanisms underlying the female reproductive cycle.

An uncoupling protein 2 gene variant is associated with a raised body mass index but not Type II diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Linkage between markers close to the uncoupling protein 2 and 3 genes (11q13) and resting metabolic rate and a pre-diabetic phenotype have been found. The syntenic region in mouse has been found to be linked to quantitative traits associated with obesity and diabetes. UCP2 and UCP3 could therefore have an important role in body weight regulation and susceptibility to diabetes. We investigated a recently identified variant of the UCP2 gene in exon 8 as a marker for glucose and weight homeostasis.

METHODS

Length variation of the UCP2 exon 8 variant was studied by the polymerase chain reaction and agarose gel electrophoresis. Sequence variants of the UCP3 gene were sought by semi-automated DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

In 453 South Indian subjects, we found an association in women between the UCP2 exon variant and body mass index (p = 0.018). These findings were replicated in a separate group of South Indian subjects (n = 143, p < 0.001) irrespective of sex. Although no association was found between the UCP2 exon 8 variant and overt obesity in British subjects, the UCP2 genotype of obese women (n = 83) correlated with fasting serum leptin concentration (p = 0.006) in the presence of extreme obesity. These observations could not be explained by tight linkage disequilibrium with a coding region variant in the region of the UCP3 gene of biological significance. Lastly, no association was found between UCP2 and Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes using either a family based design (85 families) or case control study (normal glucose tolerance n = 335, impaired glucose tolerance n = 42, Type II diabetes n = 76).

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

We have described a UCP2 gene exon 8 variant that may affect susceptibility to weight gain by influencing regulation of leptin.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and oxytocin secretion from the hypothalamus in vitro during pro-oestrus: the effects of time of day and melatonin

An accurately timed surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), during the second half of the day of pro-oestrus in rats, is a crucial part of the endocrine signal that leads to expulsion of an ovum from an ovarian follicle. LH release is partly controlled by a number of peptides, including gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and oxytocin, which travel from the hypothalamus to the pituitary. The profile of secretion of these peptides is poorly understood. Therefore, the amounts of GnRH and oxytocin that were secreted from hypothalamic explants were determined at several time points during the day of pro-oestrus. Basal secretion of oxytocin from hypothalami taken later in pro-oestrus was greater than from hypothalami taken earlier in the day (p < 0.02). On the other hand, basal secretion of GnRH decreased during the day of pro-oestrus (p < 0.03). The different trends of GnRH and oxytocin secretion reveal that their secretion is regulated by distinct mechanisms. GnRH secretion was higher at midpro-oestrus than late in the day (o < 0.05) consistent with a peak of GnRH having been observed by others in portal blood in the second half of the day of pro-oestrus. Responsiveness of oxytocin to stimulation by K+ of the hypothalami declined from the early light hours to the evening dark hours (p < 0.02). Thus, oxytocin modulation might be achieved partly by modification of intracellular processes. Melatonin, secreted during hours of darkness, is frequently involved in modulating time-dependent events in mammals, but its contribution to peptide regulation during the ovulatory cycle is unclear. Melatonin was observed to inhibit basal oxytocin secretion from hypothalami collected during light hours (p < 0.05). The investigation has, therefore, revealed the potential for melatonin to modulate peptide secretion from the hypothalamus during the day of pro-oestrus. We also observed that secretion from the hypothalamus of the two LH-regulating peptides, GnRH and oxytocin, are differently regulated during the day of pro-oestrus.

Carcinoid tumours

The use of long-acting and potent somatostatin analogues is a major advance in the management of carcinoid tumours. In addition to providing effective symptom relief in malignant carcinoid syndrome, octreotide can also be used for diagnostic purposes. Despite its expense, octreotide is the current agent of choice for the treatment of this condition while analogues with different receptor specificities and pharmacokinetics hold promise for the future. Gastric carcinoids have aroused interest because of their experimental association with chronic hypergastrinaemia, a condition now commonplace because of the widespread use of H2-blockers and proton-pump inhibitors. This subject is reviewed. The slow evolution of many tumours demands prolonged follow-up and the active use of a variety of palliative interventions. These include measures such as hepatic and cardiac surgery, which might be deemed inappropriate for patients with other types of metastatic malignancy. Interferons may have a role when first-line treatments have failed. Chemotherapy is, generally, of limited value.