Diagnostic evaluation and cardiopulmonary exercise test findings in young athletes with persistent symptoms following COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

Persistent or late-onset cardiopulmonary symptoms following COVID-19 may occur in athletes despite a benign initial course. We examined the yield of cardiac evaluation, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), in athletes with cardiopulmonary symptoms after COVID-19, compared CPETs in these athletes and those without COVID-19 and evaluated longitudinal changes in CPET with improvement in symptoms.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study evaluated young (18-35 years old) athletes referred for cardiopulmonary symptoms that were present>28 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. CPET findings in post-COVID athletes were compared with a matched reference group of healthy athletes without COVID-19. Post-COVID athletes underwent repeat CPET between 3 and 6 months after initial evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one consecutive post-COVID athletes with cardiopulmonary symptoms (21.9±3.9 years old, 43% female) were evaluated 3.0±2.1 months after diagnosis. No athlete had active inflammatory heart disease. CPET reproduced presenting symptoms in 86%. Compared with reference athletes (n=42), there was similar peak VO2 but a higher prevalence of abnormal spirometry (42%) and low breathing reserve (42%). Thirteen athletes (62%) completed longitudinal follow-up (4.8±1.9 months). The majority (69%) had reduction in cardiopulmonary symptoms, accompanied by improvement in peak VO2 and oxygen pulse, and reduction in resting and peak heart rate (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite a high burden of cardiopulmonary symptoms after COVID-19, no athlete had active inflammatory heart disease. CPET was clinically useful to reproduce symptoms with either normal testing or identification of abnormal spirometry as a potential therapeutic target. Improvement in post-COVID symptoms was accompanied by improvements in CPET parameters.

Sex-Based Differences in Peak Exercise Blood Pressure Indexed to Oxygen Consumption Among Competitive Athletes

PURPOSE

Although exercise testing guidelines define cutoffs for an exaggerated exercise systolic blood pressure (SBP) response, SBPs above these cutoffs are not uncommon in athletes given their high exercise capacity. Alternately, guidelines also specify a normal SBP response that accounts for metabolic equivalents (METs; mean [SD] of 10 [2] mm Hg per MET or 3.5 mL/kg/min oxygen consumption [V˙o₂]). SBP and V˙o₂ increase less during exercise in females than males. It is not clear if sex-based differences in exercise V˙o₂ are related to differences in SBP or if current recommendations for normal increase in SBP per MET produce reasonable estimates using measured METs (ie, V˙o₂) in athletes. We therefore examined sex-based differences in exercise SBP indexed to V˙o₂ in athletes with the goal of defining normative values for exercise SBP that account for fitness and sex.

METHODS

Using prospectively collected data from a single sports cardiology program, normotensive athlete patients were identified who had no relevant cardiopulmonary disease and had undergone cardiopulmonary exercise testing with cycle ergometry or treadmill. The relationship between ΔSBP (peak - rest) and ΔV˙o₂ (peak - rest) was examined in the total cohort and compared between sexes.

FINDINGS

A total of 413 athletes (mean [SD] age, 35.5 [14] years; 38% female; mean [SD] peak V˙o₂, 46.0 [10.2] mL/kg/min, 127% [27%] predicted) met the inclusion criteria. The ΔSBP correlated with unadjusted ΔV˙o₂ (cycle: R² = 0.18, treadmill: R² = 0.12; P < 0.0001). Female athletes had lower mean (SD) peak SBP (cycle: 161 [15] vs 186 [24] mm Hg; treadmill: 165 [17] vs 180 [20] mm Hg; P < 0.05) than male athletes. Despite lower peak SBP, mean (SD) ΔSBP relative to unadjusted ΔV˙o₂ was higher in female than male athletes (cycle: 25.6 [7.2] vs 21.1 [7.3] mm Hg/L/min; treadmill: 21.6 [7.2] vs 17.0 [6.2] mm Hg/L/min; P < 0.05). When V˙o₂ was adjusted for body size and converted to METs, female and male athletes had similar mean (SD) ΔSBP /ΔMET (cycle: 6.0 [2.1] vs 5.8 [2.0] mm Hg/mL/kg/min; treadmill: 4.7 [1.8] vs 4.8 [1.7] mm Hg/mL/kg/min).

IMPLICATIONS

In this cohort of athletes without known cardiopulmonary disease, observed sex-based differences in peak exercise SBP were in part related to the differences in ΔV˙o₂ between male and female athletes. Despite lower peak SBP, ΔSBP/unadjusted ΔV˙o₂ was paradoxically higher in female athletes. Future work should define whether this finding reflects sex-based differences in the peripheral vascular response to exercise. In this athletic cohort, ΔSBP/ΔMET was similar between sexes and much lower than the ratio that has been proposed by guidelines to define a normal SBP response. Our observed ΔSBP/ΔMET, based on measured rather than estimated METs, provides a clinically useful estimate for normal peak SBP range in athletes.

Utility of the oxygen pulse in the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease in physically fit patients

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) guidelines recommend analysis of the oxygen (O₂ ) pulse for a late exercise plateau in evaluation for obstructive coronary artery disease (OCAD). However, whether this O₂ pulse trajectory is within the range of normal has been debated, and the diagnostic performance of the O₂ pulse for OCAD in physically fit individuals, in whom V ˙ O 2 may be more likely to plateau, has not been evaluated. Using prospectively collected data from a sports cardiology program, patients were identified who were free of other cardiac disease and underwent clinically-indicated CPET within 90 days of invasive or computed tomography coronary angiography. The diagnostic performance of quantitative O₂ pulse metrics (late exercise slope, proportional change in slope during late exercise) and qualitative assessment for O₂ pulse plateau to predict OCAD was assessed. Among 104 patients (age:56 ± 12 years, 30% female, peak V ˙ O 2 119 ± 34% predicted), the diagnostic performance for OCAD (n = 24,23%) was poor for both quantitative and qualitative metrics reflecting an O₂ pulse plateau (late exercise slope: AUC = 0.55, sensitivity = 68%, specificity = 41%; proportional change in slope: AUC = 0.55, sensitivity = 91%, specificity = 18%; visual plateau/decline: AUC = 0.51, sensitivity = 33%, specificity = 67%). When O₂ pulse parameters were added to the electrocardiogram, the change in AUC was minimal (-0.01 to +0.02, p ≥ 0.05). Those patients without OCAD with a plateau or decline in O₂ pulse were fitter than those with linear augmentation (peak V ˙ O 2 133 ± 31% vs. 114 ± 36% predicted, p < 0.05) and had a longer exercise ramp time (9.5 ± 3.2 vs. 8.0 ± 2.5 min, p < 0.05). Overall, a plateau in O₂ pulse was not a useful predictor of OCAD in a physically fit population, indicating that the O₂ pulse should be integrated with other CPET parameters and may reflect a physiologic limitation of stroke volume and/or O₂ extraction during intense exercise.