Adjunctive Dexamethasone in HIV-Associated Cryptococcal Meningitis

BACKGROUND

Cryptococcal meningitis associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection causes more than 600,000 deaths each year worldwide. Treatment has changed little in 20 years, and there are no imminent new anticryptococcal agents. The use of adjuvant glucocorticoids reduces mortality among patients with other forms of meningitis in some populations, but their use is untested in patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited adult patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis in Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Laos, Uganda, and Malawi. All the patients received either dexamethasone or placebo for 6 weeks, along with combination antifungal therapy with amphotericin B and fluconazole.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped for safety reasons after the enrollment of 451 patients. Mortality was 47% in the dexamethasone group and 41% in the placebo group by 10 weeks (hazard ratio in the dexamethasone group, 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.47; P=0.45) and 57% and 49%, respectively, by 6 months (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.53; P=0.20). The percentage of patients with disability at 10 weeks was higher in the dexamethasone group than in the placebo group, with 13% versus 25% having a prespecified good outcome (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.69; P<0.001). Clinical adverse events were more common in the dexamethasone group than in the placebo group (667 vs. 494 events, P=0.01), with more patients in the dexamethasone group having grade 3 or 4 infection (48 vs. 25 patients, P=0.003), renal events (22 vs. 7, P=0.004), and cardiac events (8 vs. 0, P=0.004). Fungal clearance in cerebrospinal fluid was slower in the dexamethasone group. Results were consistent across Asian and African sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone did not reduce mortality among patients with HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis and was associated with more adverse events and disability than was placebo. (Funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development and others through the Joint Global Health Trials program; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN59144167.).

Efficacy and motor complications of original and generic levodopa in Parkinson's disease treatment

BACKGROUND

In general, a generic drug is considered interchangeable with the original formulated drug. In Parkinson's disease (PD), generic drug use remains debated. This study was aimed to investigate whether the generic drug was as effective as the original in improving the symptoms of PD and the prevalence of motor complications.

METHODS

This study was a multicenter cohort study of patients with PD enrolled from three northeast hospitals in Thailand between February 2013 and February 2014. The patients were categorized into original and generic levodopa groups. The clinical characteristics, efficacy, and motor complications were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were 400 eligible patients. Of these, 327 patients (81.75%) met the study criteria and were classified as the original levodopa group (200 patients, 61.16%) and the generic levodopa group (127 patients, 38.84%). The average age of all patients with PD was 65 years. The duration of PD and the modified Hoehn-Yahr stages were not different between the groups. The total doses of original and generic levodopa-equivalent doses were significantly different (199.97±127.08 versus 305.58±138.27 mg; P-value <0.001) and the actual doses were 198.10±117.92 versus 308.85±139.40 mg (P-value <0.001). Approximately 80% of patients with PD in both groups had good responses (P-value >0.999), but the development of motor complications was significantly greater in the original than in the generic group.

CONCLUSION

Generic levodopa was effective in improving the symptoms of PD. The prevalence of motor complications in the original compound group, at a lower dose of levodopa equivalent, was higher than in the generic group.

Prognostic factors among 130 patients with osteosarcoma

One hundred thirty patients with high grade osteosarcoma were enrolled in a randomized prospective multidisciplinary treatment that included intraarterial chemotherapy, local irradiation, limb salvage surgery, and prophylactic whole lung irradiation. The patients were evaluated to stage the prognostic factors. In a multivariate analysis, a minimal level of serum lactic acid dehydrogenase less than 300 IU/L showed a significant prognostic value. The history of trauma before diagnosis of disease, local irradiation of the affected site, histologic response to preoperative multidisciplinary therapy, and prophylactic whole lung irradiation were associated with significantly better prognosis in the log rank test. Patient age, site of the primary tumor, presentation of fracture, pathologic subtype, signs and symptoms, serum alkaline phosphatase level, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were not found to be prognostic factors. The 9-year survival rate of the whole group was 55%.

Osteosarcoma: a study of 130 cases

Multidisciplinary treatment of osteosarcoma in the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, using preoperative intraarterial and postoperative chemotherapy, with or without local irradiation, combined with surgery and prophylactic lung irradiation provided an excellent 5 years' survival of 55 per cent, the same rate as the 9 years' survival. The survival was stable after 4.4 years. The patients with local irradiation had more tumor destruction apparent on the surgical specimen. The administration of prophylactic whole lung irradiation provided an outcome without any undesirable complication. Sixteen per cent of the cases with PLI developed lung metastasis compared to 48 per cent without PLI. The most important prognostic factor was low level of serum lactic acid dehydrogenase. The unanswered question is what is the optimal treatment for osteosarcoma?