Assessing associations between the AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

While interplay between BRCA1 and AURKA-RHAMM-TPX2-TUBG1 regulates mammary epithelial polarization, common genetic variation in HMMR (gene product RHAMM) may be associated with risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Following on these observations, we further assessed the link between the AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 functional module and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Forty-one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped in 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers and subsequently analyzed using a retrospective likelihood approach. The association of HMMR rs299290 with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers was confirmed: per-allele hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.15, p = 1.9 x 10(-4) (false discovery rate (FDR)-adjusted p = 0.043). Variation in CSTF1, located next to AURKA, was also found to be associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers: rs2426618 per-allele HR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.005 (FDR-adjusted p = 0.045). Assessment of pairwise interactions provided suggestions (FDR-adjusted pinteraction values > 0.05) for deviations from the multiplicative model for rs299290 and CSTF1 rs6064391, and rs299290 and TUBG1 rs11649877 in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Following these suggestions, the expression of HMMR and AURKA or TUBG1 in sporadic breast tumors was found to potentially interact, influencing patients' survival. Together, the results of this study support the hypothesis of a causative link between altered function of AURKA-HMMR-TPX2-TUBG1 and breast carcinogenesis in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Synchronous colonic adenocarcinoma and pelvic schwannoma

Pelvic schwannomas are rare; it is even more rare for a pelvic schwannoma to occur concurrently with a colon cancer. The authors report the case of a 62-year-old woman with a cecal mass that was surgically removed and the histopathologic diagnosis was adenocarcinoma of the colon. Meanwhile, aretroperitonealpelvic nodalmasswas detected as questionable metastasis of the primary tumor. A subsequent computed tomography-guided fine-needle biopsy was carried out to establish the tumor stage. Surprisingly, the fine-needle biopsy revealed a benign schwannoma. This unusual case posed a dilemma in postoperative staging of the colon cancer.

Systemic treatment of advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma: current status and future directions

Multiple systemic therapies have been used to treat patients with endometrial cancer. Although progestins have been the standard initial treatment for metastatic disease for the past 30 years, they are effective in only 20% of patients, and several large randomized trials have failed to demonstrate any benefit in the adjuvant setting. Alternative agents such as tamoxifen have shown modest activity. Few studies have investigated combinations of hormonally active drugs. Doxorubicin and cisplatin are the most active cytotoxic agents; a current randomized study is comparing the combination of these drugs with single-agent doxorubicin. Maximizing the effectiveness of established drugs, possibly with hematopoietic growth factors, and identifying alternative hormonal and cytotoxic agents with a sound scientific rationale will hopefully increase the effective treatment options for these patients.

Current status and future directions of clinical trials in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Standard therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia has been an alkylating agent plus a corticosteroid, a palliative approach. But now, because of sophisticated cytogenetic and biologic evaluation of CLL patients leading to more accurate staging, plus interest in two new chemotherapy agents, 2'-deoxycoformycin and fludarabine monophosphate, different approaches to the therapy of CLL are being studied. These include combination chemotherapy programs, incorporating the new drugs with standard therapy, combining them with each other, and investigating novel biological agents. While no treatment has clearly altered the outcome of patients with CLL, clinical trials of patients without prior therapy, using new standardized criteria for response, are needed.