Comparative analysis of endovenous laser ablation versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of venous leg ulcers

BACKGROUND

Endovenous thermal and non-thermal therapeutic approaches have become standard of care for the treatment of venous insufficiency. However, comparative studies on its use in the population of venous leg ulcer patients are scarce.

METHODS

The present study aimed at a comparison of the efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) for the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VUs). We retrospectively analyzed patient records of 68 patients with active VUs (C6 of the CEAP-classification), who underwent EVLA (n=33) or UGFS (n=35) between January 2001 and January 2021.

RESULTS

In 68 patients, 97 venous segments (GSV: 43, SSV: 17:, NSV: 37) were treated. Ulcer surface area at initial presentation did not differ significantly between both treatment groups (EVLA: 7.7±10.7 vs. UGFS: 8.5±16.3 cm² ; p=0.73). No significant difference regarding patient characteristics was found, with the exception of age, as patients receiving UGFS treatment were significantly older (EVLA: 61±17 vs. UGFS: 70±14 years; p=0.018). The rate of ulcer resolution was not significantly different between EVLA and UGFS groups (97.0% vs. 85.7%; p=0.20). Also, the mean time to complete ulcer healing after endovenous intervention was comparable (EVLA: 59±37 vs. UGFS: 63±41 days; p=0.68). However, the relapse rate was significantly higher for UGFS than for EVLA treated patients (31.4% vs. 3.0%; p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Rates of ulcer resolution and ulcer healing time after endovenous intervention were comparable between both treatment modalities. However, a significantly higher relapse rate was observed in UGFS treated patients.

Differentiating Arteriolosclerotic Ulcers of Martorell from Other Types of Leg Ulcers Based on Vascular Histomorphology

Clinical differential diagnosis of arteriolosclerotic ulcers of Martorell is challenging due to the lack of clearly affirmative instrument-based diagnostic criteria. The aim of this study was to develop vascular histomorphological diagnostic criteria differentiating Martorell ulcers from other types of leg ulcers. The histomorphology of patients diagnosed with arteriolosclerotic ulcers of Martorell (n = 67) was compared with that of patients with venous leg ulcers, necrotizing leukocytoclastic vasculitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and non-ulcerative controls (n = 15 each). In a multivariable logistic regression model, the rates of arteriolar calcification (odds ratio (OR) 42.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.43–443.96, p < 0.001) and subendothelial hyalinosis (OR 29.28, 95% CI 4.88–278.21, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in arteriolosclerotic ulcers of Martorell. Arteriolar cellularity was significantly lower in Martorell ulcers than in controls (OR 0.003, 95 CI < 0.001–0.97, p = 0.05). However, the wall-to-lumen ratio was similar in all ulcers (OR 0.975, 95% CI 0.598–2.04, p = 0.929). Based on the Youden index, a wall cellularity of < 0.24 cells/100 μm² was determined as the optimum cut-off point (sensitivity 0.955, specificity 0.944). Thus, arteriolar calcification, subendothelial hyalinosis, and arteriolar cellularity revealed high discriminatory power for arteriolosclerotic ulcers of Martorell.

Thrombose und COVID-19

Die Prävalenz der venösen thromboembolischen (VTE) Ereignisse ist bei Coronavirus diesease 2019 (COVID-19) -Patienten hoch, insbesondere bei schwer Erkrankten. Patienten mit schwerer COVID-19 und VTE haben eine signifikant höhere Mortalität im Vergleich zu Patienten ohne VTE. Die Manifestation einer schweren Infektion mit Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV‑2) entspricht einem systemischen proinflammatorischen und prokoagulatorischen Phänotyp, der mit vaskulären Thrombosen nicht nur in den Venen, sondern auch in den Arterien, Kapillaren sowie mit einer Inflammation der Gefäße assoziiert ist. Ein erhöhter D‑Dimer-Spiegel kann als Indikator für VTE bei Patienten mit COVID-19 verwendet werden. Die meisten medizinischen Gesellschaften empfehlen eine VTE-Prophylaxe vorzugsweise mit niedermolekularen Heparinen (LMWH) bei allen stationären Patienten. Weitere Daten von randomisierten kontrollierten Studien (RCTs) über die optimale Antikoagulation und antithrombotische Therapie werden in der nahen Zukunft erwartet.

Therapeutic effect of compression stockings versus no compression on isolated superficial vein thrombosis of the legs: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Leg compression is considered basic treatment for superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), although scientific proof for its efficacy is lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of compression stockings on isolated SVT of the legs.

METHODS

This was a single-center randomized controlled trial. Eighty patients with isolated SVT of the legs were instructed to wear compression stockings (23-32 mmHg) (CG) or no compression (NCG) for 3 weeks. All patients received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at prophylactic dosage. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were allowed. The primary outcome variable was the reduction of pain as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Lowenberg test. Secondary outcomes were the consumption of analgesics, thrombus length, skin erythema, D-dimer, and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients completed the study. Clinical symptoms and QoL significantly improved from baseline to day 21 in both groups (p < .001 for VAS, Lowenberg test, thrombus length, and erythema; p < .006 for QoL), and consumption of analgesics and D-dimer significantly decreased (p < .001). There was no significant difference between the groups for all tested variables. At day 7, patients in the CG revealed a significantly faster thrombus regression (p = .02).

CONCLUSION

Adding compression stockings for 3 weeks to LMWH and NSAIDs does not bring significant additional benefit in the treatment of isolated SVT. When worn for 1 week, compression stockings stimulate significantly faster thrombus regression.

Oral vs. bath PUVA using 8-methoxypsoralen for chronic palmoplantar eczema

BACKGROUND

Both oral and bath PUVA with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) have been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic palmoplantar eczema. However, most studies were retrospective and did not include longer follow-up periods.

AIM

To compare the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and duration of remission after oral vs. bath PUVA using 8-MOP in patients with chronic palmoplantar eczema.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients were randomly allocated to treatment with oral or bath PUVA. Treatment was given thrice weekly for a maximum of 20 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the improvement in eczema score at the end of treatment. After clearing patients were followed up until relapse or up to 40 months.

RESULTS

Overall, both PUVA modalities appeared comparably effective. However, after stratifying according to eczema type, significant differences in therapeutic outcome in general as well as in response to the two regimes were found. Dyshidrotic eczema responded better to both treatments (P=0.048) and remained longer in remission than hyperkeratotic eczema. Hyperkeratotic eczema cleared significantly better with oral than with bath PUVA (P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Oral PUVA is preferable for patients with hyperkeratotic eczema and bath PUVA for patients with dyshidrotic eczema.

UVA1 phototherapy for disseminated granuloma annulare

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Disseminated granuloma annulare is a benign granulomatous skin disease of unknown etiology. Recently, UVA1 (340-400 nm) phototherapy has been found effective in a small series of four patients. The purpose of this two-center study was to determine the rate and duration of clinical response to UVA1 phototherapy in a larger cohort of 20 patients with disseminated granuloma annulare.

METHODS

Twenty patients with long-standing, stable disease (median 42 months, 95% CI 23-105) underwent UVA1 phototherapy. Sixteen patients were treated with a high-dose regimen (median single dose 110 J/cm2, 95% CI 103-121) and four patients with a medium-dose regimen (median single dose 50 J/cm2, CI 50-50). The clinical response was graded on a 5-point scale [0 = none, 1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = substantial, 4 = (near) complete]. After cessation of therapy, patients with a clinical score of 3 or 4 were followed up to evaluate the duration of clinical improvement.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, five patients each had substantial improvement or (near) complete clearance. Another five patients had a moderate response, three patients were considered as poor responders and two patients as treatment failures. Out of the 10 patients with good or excellent response nine were available for follow up. Of these, two patients were still clear after 3 and 6 months, and seven patients relapsed after a median of 3 months (95% CI 1.68-6.46).

CONCLUSIONS

UVA1 phototherapy provided good or excellent results in half of our 20 patients with disseminated granuloma annulare. In the majority of patients with a satisfactory response, however, discontinuation of treatment was followed by early recurrence of disease.

Observer-blind, randomized, intrapatient comparison of a novel 1% coal tar preparation (Exorex) and calcipotriol cream in the treatment of plaque type psoriasis

BACKGROUND

In a recent pilot study a novel, patented fatty acid-based 1% coal tar preparation (Exorex) has been found to be similar in efficacy to calcipotriol in the treatment of psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to investigate the therapeutic efficacy, safety and cosmetic acceptability of the new 1% coal tar preparation in comparison with calcipotriol cream in a larger patient cohort.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients with chronic plaque type psoriasis were included in this randomized, observer-blind, intrapatient comparison trial. In each patient two comparable target plaques were treated twice daily with 1% coal tar preparation or calcipotriol cream. At the onset of therapy and at weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, the response to treatment was determined by the psoriasis severity index (PSI) that assesses the degree of erythema, infiltration and scaling of the psoriatic lesions on a five-point scale. In addition, all treatment-related side-effects were recorded and cosmetic acceptability of both treatments was rated every second week by the patients. After complete or near complete clearing the patients were followed up until relapse or for a maximum period of 18 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients completed the study. At termination of the trial the mean +/- SD baseline PSI score of 9.2 +/- 1.5 was reduced to 3.0 +/- 2.9 by 1% coal tar preparation and to 2.8 +/- 2.7 by calcipotriol. The mean PSI reduction between baseline and final assessment did not differ significantly between 1% coal tar preparation and calcipotriol (P = 0.77). The mean intraindividual difference in reduction of PSI score between 1% coal tar preparation and calcipotriol was 0.1 score points (95% confidence interval - 0.84 to + 0.63). No difference between either preparation was observed with regard to time until relapse. Itching was caused by 1% coal tar preparation in four patients and by calcipotriol in one patient. Unpleasant odour or staining of the 1% coal tar preparation was reported by six patients, whereas one patient complained about the smell of the calcipotriol cream.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel 1% coal tar preparation was found to be comparably as effective as calcipotriol in treating psoriasis. Tolerability and cosmetic acceptability was better for calcipotriol. Taking into consideration that the coal tar preparation is considerably less expensive than calcipotriol this new product appears as a very useful topical medication for chronic plaque type psoriasis.

A comparison of psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) monotherapy, tacalcitol plus PUVA and tazarotene plus PUVA in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have shown that the additional administration of topical or systemic antipsoriatic agents might serve as an effective means to increase the efficacy of photochemotherapy [psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV) A (PUVA)] for psoriasis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the therapeutic response to tacalcitol plus PUVA, tazarotene plus PUVA and PUVA monotherapy in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis. In addition, we also assessed the duration of remission induced by each regimen and the tolerability of the two combination treatments.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis were included in this observer-blinded, intrapatient comparison trial. PUVA treatment was given four times weekly. Additionally, tacalcitol ointment and 0.1% tazarotene gel were applied separately on two target areas once daily in the evening. At the onset of therapy and every 2 weeks thereafter the response to treatment was determined by the Psoriasis Severity Index score, which assesses the degree of erythema, infiltration and scaling of the psoriatic lesions. After complete or near complete clearing patients were followed-up until relapse.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients completed the study. The treatment requirements to induce complete or near complete clearing were significantly lower for both combination treatments than for PUVA monotherapy (P < 0.01). The median cumulative UVA dose and number of exposures were 30.6 J cm-2 (95% confidence interval, CI 22.5-71.2) and 14 (95% CI 11-16) for tacalcitol plus PUVA, 32.3 J cm-2 (95% CI 22.5-73.8) and 14 (95% CI 11-19) for tazarotene plus PUVA, and 37.0 J cm-2 (95% CI 29.5-83.9) and 16 (95% CI 14-22) for PUVA monotherapy. No difference between the three regimens was observed with regard to duration of remission. Adverse reactions occurred more often with 0.1% tazarotene than with tacalcitol but were in general mild and completely reversible upon using a lower concentration of 0.05% tazarotene.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacalcitol ointment and tazarotene gel are both comparably effective in improving the therapeutic result of PUVA therapy in patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Besides accelerating the treatment response, both agents, by virtue of their UVA dose-sparing effect, might also help to reduce possible long-term hazards of PUVA treatment.

High-dose versus medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy for patients with severe generalized atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of UVA1 (340-400 nm) phototherapy for patients with severe atopic dermatitis. However, the optimum treatment dose has yet to be determined. Although in seminal investigations high UVA1 doses were used, comparable results were reported in recent studies with a medium-dose regimen.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of high-dose with medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy for patients with severe generalized atopic dermatitis.

METHODS

Ten adult patients with a median baseline SCORAD score of 67 were enrolled in an investigator-blinded, bilateral comparison study. Treatment was given 5 times weekly over a period of 3 weeks on an outpatient basis. Irradiation was performed by exposing one half of the patient's body to high-dose UVA1 (< or =130 J/cm(2)), and the contralateral body side received only half that dose. The clinical response was assessed after 5, 10, and 15 treatments. After completion of the study, patients were followed up for 6 months to evaluate the duration of clinical improvement.

RESULTS

All but one patient responded favorably to treatment. High-dose UVA1 led to a decrease of the median SCORAD score by 33.4% after 1 week, 38.4% after 2 weeks, and 34.7% after 3 weeks. The respective values for the medium-dose regimen were 29.7%, 36.4%, and 28.2%. The difference in efficacy between the two dosages remained below the level of significance at all time points. Relapses occurred after a median of 4 weeks. Time of onset and severity of relapse were the same for both doses.

CONCLUSION

Our data support previous uncontrolled observations that medium-dose UVA1 is comparably as effective as high-dose treatment for patients with severe generalized atopic dermatitis. Irrespective of the dose regimen, follow-up examinations revealed early relapse in the majority of patients.