Goodbye Hartmann trial: a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study on the current use of a surgical procedure developed a century ago

BACKGROUND

Literature suggests colonic resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) instead of Hartmann's procedure (HP) for the treatment of left-sided colonic emergencies. We aim to evaluate the surgical options globally used to treat patients with acute left-sided colonic emergencies and the factors that leading to the choice of treatment, comparing HP and RPA.

METHODS

This is a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. A total 1215 patients with left-sided colonic emergencies who required surgery were included from 204 centers during the period of March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020. with a 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

564 patients (43.1%) were females. The mean age was 65.9 ± 15.6 years. HP was performed in 697 (57.3%) patients and RPA in 384 (31.6%) cases. Complicated acute diverticulitis was the most common cause of left-sided colonic emergencies (40.2%), followed by colorectal malignancy (36.6%). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were higher in the HP group (P < 0.001). 30-day mortality was higher in HP patients (13.7%), especially in case of bowel perforation and diffused peritonitis. 1-year follow-up showed no differences on ostomy reversal rate between HP and RPA. (P = 0.127). A backward likelihood logistic regression model showed that RPA was preferred in younger patients, having low ASA score (≤ 3), in case of large bowel obstruction, absence of colonic ischemia, longer time from admission to surgery, operating early at the day working hours, by a surgeon who performed more than 50 colorectal resections.

CONCLUSIONS

After 100 years since the first Hartmann's procedure, HP remains the most common treatment for left-sided colorectal emergencies. Treatment's choice depends on patient characteristics, the time of surgery and the experience of the surgeon. RPA should be considered as the gold standard for surgery, with HP being an exception.

The COVID - AGICT study: COVID-19 and advanced gastro-intestinal cancer surgical treatment. A multicentric Italian study on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic impact on gastro-intestinal cancers surgical treatment during the 2020. Analysis of perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

This Italian multicentric retrospective study aimed to investigate the possible changes in outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHOD

Our primary endpoint was to determine whether the pandemic scenario increased the rate of patients with colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers resected at an advanced stage in 2020 compared to 2019. Considering different cancer staging systems, we divided tumors into early stages and advanced stages, using pathological outcomes. Furthermore, to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical outcomes, perioperative data of both 2020 and 2019 were also examined.

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 8250 patients, 4370 (53%) and 3880 (47%) were surgically treated during 2019 and 2020 respectively, in 62 Italian surgical Units. In 2020, the rate of patients treated with an advanced pathological stage was not different compared to 2019 (P = 0.25). Nevertheless, the analysis of quarters revealed that in the second half of 2020 the rate of advanced cancer resected, tented to be higher compared with the same months of 2019 (P = 0.05). During the pandemic year 'Charlson Comorbidity Index score of cancer patients (5.38 ± 2.08 vs 5.28 ± 2.22, P = 0.036), neoadjuvant treatments (23.9% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), rate of urgent diagnosis (24.2% vs 20.3%, P < 0.001), colorectal cancer urgent resection (9.4% vs. 7.37, P < 0.001), and the rate of positive nodes on the total nodes resected per surgery increased significantly (7 vs 9% - 2.02 ± 4.21 vs 2.39 ± 5.23, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic did not influence the pathological stage of colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers at the time of surgery, our study revealed that the pandemic scenario negatively impacted on several perioperative and post-operative outcomes.

Ruptured aneurysm of replaced left hepatic artery

Hepatic artery aneurysm is an uncommon and potentially fatal form of vascular disease. We report the case of a 53-year-old man with an isolated, nontraumatic rupture of an aneurysm of a replaced left hepatic artery originating from the left gastric artery. This case is unusual because the ruptured aneurysm involved an hepatic artery with a rare vascular pattern.

Abdominal wall desmoid tumors: A proposal for US-guided resection

BACKGROUND

Desmoid tumors (DTs) is a benign tumor with high tendency to infiltrative evolution and recurrence. Nowadays, in abdominal localization, the standard approach is surgery with R0 condition. The need to repair post-surgical wide wall defect requires conservative technique to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia and to obtain better quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

We perform an abdominal wall desmoid resection using ultrasound guide. This technique ensures to spare a wide wall area and to obtain a multilayer reconstruction minimizing postoperative risk. This approach allows good oncological results and better managing abdominal wall post-resection defect.

RESULTS

We use US guided surgery to get radical approach and wall tissue spare that allows us a multilayer reconstruction minimizing post-operative complications. No recurrences were observed in one year follow up period.

CONCLUSION

Our experience represents first step to consider ultrasound mediated technique usefull to optimize wall resection surgery and to minimize following complications.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Our experience ten years later

AIM

To analyze GISTs behaviour observing their clinical evolution and outline the best approach to this neoplasia.

MATERIAL OF STUDY

In a period between December 1999 and October 2009 came to our observation, at the Institute of General Surgery, 37 patients with GIST. We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the anatomo-pathological aspects, the clinical situation and the tumour characteristics of the 37 patients with GIST.

RESULTS

The 37 patients included 21 women (57%) and 16 men (43%), the mean age was 67 years. GISTs originated from the stomach (27), jejunum (5), ileum (3), anus (1) and transverse mesocolon (1), the symptom most frequently found was acute anaemia and in 5 cases the diagnosis was occasional; 36 patients underwent surgical treatment. Based on tumor size, mitotic count, presence of areas of necrosis and/or haemorrhage, GISTs were classified according to the categories of potential high-grade malignancy (13 pts), intermediate grade (8 pts), low grade (16 pts).

DISCUSSION

According to international literature, surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with primary resectable GIST without evidence of metastasis and should also be utilized when surgery has minimal risk of morbidity for the patient. The goal of surgery is complete surgical resection with negative margins (R0). The follow-up for some patients is still ongoing; only 10 patients underwent to adjuvant therapy with Imatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

In the last decade, GISTs have become an emblematic example of the possibility of pharmacologically interfering with the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis.