A 10-Year Experience with Mastectomy and Tissue Expander Placement to Facilitate Subsequent Radiation and Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

An integrated approach to skin sparing mastectomy with tissue expander placement followed by radiotherapy and delayed reconstruction was initiated in our institution in 2002. The purpose of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of this strategy.

METHODS

Between September 2002 and August 2013, a total of 384 reconstructions had a tissue expander placed at the time of mastectomy and subsequently underwent radiotherapy. Rates and causes of tissue expander explantation before, during, and after radiotherapy, as well as tumor specific outcomes and reconstruction approaches, were collected.

RESULTS

Median follow-up after diagnosis was 5.6 (range 1.3-13.4) years. In the study cohort, 364 patients (94.8%) had stage II-III breast cancer, and 7 patients (1.8%) had locally recurrent disease. The 5-year rates of actuarial locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 99.2, 86.1, and 92.4%, respectively. The intended delayed-immediate reconstruction was subsequently completed in 325 of 384 mastectomies (84.6% of the study cohort). Of the remaining 59 tissue expanders, 1 was explanted before radiotherapy, 1 during radiotherapy, and 7 patients (1.8%) were lost to follow-up. Fifty patients (13.0%) required tissue expander explantation after radiation and before their planned final reconstruction, primarily due to cellulitis. Nonetheless, the cumulative rate of completed reconstructions was 89.6%. The median time from placement of the tissue expander until reconstruction was 12 (interquartile range 9-15) months.

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue expander placement at skin-sparing mastectomy in patients who require radiotherapy appears to be a viable strategy for combining reconstruction and radiotherapy.

Capturing the Experience: Reflections of Women With Breast Cancer Engaged in an Expressive Writing Intervention

BACKGROUND

Expressive writing has been shown to improve quality of life, fatigue, and posttraumatic stress among breast cancer patients across cultures. Understanding how and why the method may be beneficial to patients can increase awareness of the psychosocial impact of breast cancer and enhance interventional work within this population. Qualitative research on experiential aspects of interventions may inform the theoretical understanding and generate hypotheses for future studies.

AIM

The aim of the study was to explore and describe the experience and feasibility of expressive writing among women with breast cancer following mastectomy and immediate or delayed reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

Seven participants enrolled to undertake 4 episodes of expressive writing at home, with semistructured interviews conducted afterward and analyzed using experiential thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged through analysis: writing as process, writing as therapeutic, and writing as a means to help others.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings illuminate experiential variations in expressive writing and how storytelling encourages a release of cognitive and emotional strains, surrendering these to reside in the text. The method was said to process feelings and capture experiences tied to a new and overwhelming illness situation, as impressions became expressions through writing. Expressive writing, therefore, is a valuable tool for healthcare providers to introduce into the plan of care for patients with breast cancer and potentially other cancer patient groups.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study augments existing evidence to support the appropriateness of expressive writing as an intervention after a breast cancer diagnosis. Further studies should evaluate its feasibility at different time points in survivorship.

Neurothekeoma

OBJECTIVES:

The purpose of this study was to investigate and share the experiences at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in diagnosing, treating, and following patients with neurothekeoma. We report 13 cases.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series. The clinical, surgical, and pathology records of the 7 patients with neurothekeoma treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, the pathology records of 6 patients reviewed by the Department of Pathology for diagnosis only were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS:

Nine patients were women. Their mean age was 30 years (median, 24 years). Six of the lesions were on the head or neck, 4 were on extremities, and 2 were on the trunk, and the location of 1 was not recorded. Two lesions had been previously diagnosed, histologically, as leiomyosarcomas, 1 as a malignant nodular hidradenoma, and 1 as a clear cell hidradenoma. All the lesions had the characteristic nested pattern of growth, with various degrees of myxoid background. Mitotic figures and marked cellular pleomorphism were not common. Six cases were treated with wide local excision. A lesion of the nasal ala was excised by using Möhs micrographic surgery. Most cases were limited to the dermis, but 2 lesions infiltrated subcutaneous tissue and skeletal muscle. All patients were without evidence of disease at 8 months median follow-up range (0 to 35 months).

CONCLUSION:

Neurothekeoma is a benign neoplasm occurring usually in women and commonly in the head and neck. Because it may be locally invasive, treatment with wide local excision using frozen section control of margins is recommended. Care must be taken in the pathologic diagnosis of cutaneous neoplasms, and neurothekeoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis for spindle cell lesions.

SIGNIFICANCE

Neurothekeoma is commonly misdiagnosed, pathologically and clinically, and it can be treated successfully with surgical excision. EBM rating: C.

Robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest in delayed-immediate breast reconstruction

For two-stage, implant-based, delayed-immediate reconstruction of the radiated breast, robotic-assisted latissimus dorsi harvest (RALDH) is a good option for patients who wish to avoid a traditional latissimus dorsi donor-site incision. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of RALDH and the traditional open technique (TOT) for patients undergoing delayed-immediate breast reconstruction following radiation therapy. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all consecutive patients undergoing latissimus dorsi harvest for radiated breast reconstruction between 2009 and 2013 was performed. Indications, surgical technique, complications, and outcomes were assessed. One hundred forty-six pedicled latissimus dorsi muscle flaps were performed for breast reconstruction and 17 were performed robotically during the study period (average follow-up 14.6 ± 7.3 mo). Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction following radiation was performed in 64 patients using TOT and 12 using RALDH. Surgical complication rates were 37.5% in TOT versus 16.7% in RALDH (p = 0.31) including seroma (8.9% versus 8.3%), infection (14.1 versus 8.3%), delayed wound healing (7.8% versus 0), and capsular contracture (4.7% vs. 0). Robotic-assisted harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle is associated with a low complication rate and reliable results for delayed reconstruction of the irradiated breast while eliminating the need for a donor-site incision.