Cost of Treatment of Neuroischemic Ulcers of the Lower Extremity in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease in the United States

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the cost of treating neuroischemic ulcers of the lower extremity in patients with peripheral artery disease by using medical and hospital claims records submitted for reimbursement to payers (private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid).

METHODS

Adjudicated claims and remittance data on claims that include submitted charges, line items paid by insurers directly to providers and patient payments of copays, deductibles and co-insurance were used. Eligible patients from a commercial database containing more than 60% of US patients with health insurance were analyzed. Patient selection, performed using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes, yielded a study population of 42,837 unique anonymized patients.

RESULTS

Using the metric of "submitted charges" to overcome differences in levels of reimbursement across insurance payers and Medicare/Medicaid, we identified 34,348 patients with ulcers with an average treatment cost of $94,100 per patient ($41,800 annualized) The costliest ulcer subtype was nonpressure ulcer of the heel/midfoot among 13,184 patients with $121,400 per patient ($53,900 annualized), 29% higher than across all ulcer types. The subset of 22,281 ulcer patients who also had a surgical procedure incurred costs of $121,000 per patient ($53,800 annualized). The costliest surgical codes were complications of vascular prosthetic devices, implants, grafts among 6444 patients with $146,900 per patient ($65,300 annualized). The combination of most expensive ulcer and most expensive surgery yielded a cohort of 2355 patients with the highest average cost of $177,400 per patient ($78,800 annualized).

CONCLUSIONS

The resource burden for management of neuroischemic ulcers of the lower extremity in patients with peripheral artery disease is substantial. Mitigating this burden may help reduce significant resource utilization.

Effect of Lanreotide Depot/Autogel on Urinary 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid and Plasma Chromogranin A Biomarkers in Nonfunctional Metastatic Enteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) is an established biomarker in neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome; however, its role in nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors is not defined. We present post hoc data on urinary 5-HIAA and plasma chromogranin A (CgA) from the CLARINET study.

METHODS

Patients with well- or moderately differentiated, nonfunctioning, locally advanced or metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors were randomized to deep subcutaneous lanreotide depot/autogel 120 mg or placebo once every 28 days for 96 weeks. Tumor response, evaluated centrally (RECIST 1.0), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by treatment and biochemical response, defined as (a) baseline >upper limit of normal (ULN, 41.6 μmol per day 5-HIAA; 98.1 μg/L CgA) and (b) ≥50% decrease from baseline and to ≤ULN value on study.

RESULTS

Forty-eight percent (82 of 171; lanreotide, n = 45; placebo, n = 37) and 66% (129 of 195; lanreotide, n = 65; placebo, n = 64) of randomized patients had 5-HIAA and CgA > ULN at baseline. Among patients with >ULN baseline values who did not progress after 96 weeks of treatment, significantly greater reductions in 5-HIAA and CgA were observed in lanreotide-treated versus placebo-treated patients throughout the study (all p < .05). PFS was significantly prolonged among 5-HIAA responders versus nonresponders (median not reached vs. 16.2 months, p < .0001; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.48) and CgA responders versus nonresponders (median not reached vs. 16.2 months, p = .0070; HR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.12-0.76), regardless of treatment arm. PFS was also significantly prolonged among lanreotide-treated 5-HIAA responders versus nonresponders (p = .0071) but was not significantly different among placebo-treated 5-HIAA responders versus nonresponders. There were no significant differences in PFS between lanreotide-treated CgA responders versus nonresponders or between placebo-treated CgA responders versus nonresponders.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-HIAA findings are noteworthy because they occurred in patients with nonfunctioning enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Monitoring 5-HIAA and CgA may be useful when treating patients with nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Current guidelines focus only on the monitoring of 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) in the diagnosis and management of functional neuroendocrine tumors with carcinoid syndrome. The current post hoc analysis of patients with nonfunctional enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the CLARINET study demonstrated that measuring and following both 5-HIAA and chromogranin A as biomarkers of disease progression may be useful in the management of patients with nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors.

BIOCHEMICAL RESPONSES IN SYMPTOMATIC AND ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS WITH NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS: POOLED ANALYSIS OF 2 PHASE 3 TRIALS

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are associated with elevated 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) and chromogranin A (CgA) levels. This study aimed to analyze relationships between urinary 5-HIAA and plasma CgA levels and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Centrally assessed biomarker levels and correlations with progression-free survival (PFS) and carcinoid syndrome (CS) symptom control were evaluated in a pooled analysis of CLARINET (96-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled) and ELECT (16-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 32-week initial open label and ≥2 year long-term extension open label) studies of adults with NETs, with (ELECT) or without (CLARINET) CS at 97 institutions. Patients were treated with subcutaneous lanreotide depot 120 mg monthly.

RESULTS

Of 319 pooled patients, 86% and 95% had baseline 5-HIAA and CgA data, respectively, with 47% and 74% having levels greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN). PFS was longer among patients who experienced a decrease in biomarker levels at week 12, with statistical significance reached in the CgA cohort (not reached vs. 14.4 months; P<.0001). A large proportion (87%) of patients without symptoms of CS in the CLARINET study had detectable levels of 5-HIAA (48% >ULN). In ELECT, patients with CS who received lanreotide and experienced a biochemical response (≥50% decrease from baseline) achieved greater symptom control.

CONCLUSION

This pooled analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that 5-HIAA and CgA are secreted as biochemical biomarkers in many patients with NETs, regardless of clinical syndromes. Significant biochemical response was associated with improved clinical outcomes, as measured by improved PFS or improved CS symptom control.

ABBREVIATIONS

5-HIAA = 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; CgA = chromogranin A; CI = confidence interval; CLARINET = Controlled Study of Lanreotide Antiproliferative Response in Neuroendocrine Tumors; CS = carcinoid syndrome; ELECT = Evaluation of Lanreotide Depot/Autogel Efficacy and Safety as a Carcinoid Syndrome Treatment; HR = hazard ratio; ITT = intention-to-treat; NET = neuroendocrine tumor; PanNET = pancreatic NET; PFS = progression-free survival; PPI = proton pump inhibitor; SSA = somatostatin analogue; ULN = upper limit of normal.

Patient-Reported Symptom Control of Diarrhea and Flushing in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors Treated with Lanreotide Depot/Autogel: Results from a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind and 32-Week Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND

In the double-blind (DB) ELECT study, lanreotide depot/autogel significantly reduced versus placebo the need for short-acting octreotide for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome (CS) control in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients. Here we present patient-reported symptom data during DB and initial open-label (IOL) treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults with NETs and CS history, with/without prior somatostatin analog use, were randomized to 16 weeks' DB lanreotide 120 mg subcutaneous or placebo every 4 weeks, followed by 32 weeks' IOL lanreotide. Patients recorded diarrhea and/or flushing frequency and severity daily by Interactive Voice (Web) Response System for 1 month prior to randomization and throughout the study.

RESULTS

Of 115 patients randomized (n = 59 lanreotide, n = 56 placebo), 56 lanreotide and 45 placebo patients enrolled in the IOL phase. During DB treatment, least square (LS) mean percentages of days with moderate/severe diarrhea and/or flushing were significantly lower for lanreotide (23.4%) versus placebo (35.8%; LS mean difference [95% confidence interval]: -12.4 [-20.73 to -4.07]; p = .004). For DB lanreotide patients, average daily composite (frequency × severity) diarrhea scores improved significantly between DB and IOL treatment (mean difference: -0.71 [-1.20 to -0.22]; p = .005), and remained stable for diarrhea and/or flushing. For DB placebo patients, composite scores for diarrhea, flushing, and diarrhea and/or flushing improved significantly between DB and IOL treatment (mean differences: -1.07 [-1.65 to -0.49]; -1.06 [-1.93 to -0.19]; and -2.13 [-3.35 to -0.91]; all p ≤ .018).

CONCLUSION

Improved diarrhea and flushing control in CS patients during 16-week lanreotide treatment was sustained during maintenance of lanreotide treatment for the 32-week IOL phase (48 weeks total).

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study prospectively collected daily patient-reported data on diarrhea and flushing from the ELECT trial to evaluate the direct impact of lanreotide depot on patients' relief of carcinoid syndrome symptoms. Treatment with lanreotide depot was associated with significant reductions in the percentages of days patients reported symptoms of diarrhea and flushing, as well as reductions in the frequency and severity of daily symptoms compared with placebo during 16 weeks of double-blind treatment. These improvements were sustained for 32 additional weeks of open-label lanreotide treatment (i.e., through week 48 of treatment), resulting in clinically meaningful, long-term symptom reduction.

Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (mGEP-NETs)

331

Background: mGEP-NETs are rare and heterogeneous tumors. Limited data has been published on real world clinical management of these tumors. This study was conducted to understand the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with mGEP-NETs treated in the community oncology setting. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using US Oncology’s (USON) iKnowMed electronic health record (EHR) database with supplemental chart review. The first diagnostic record of mGEP-NET in the EHR system was defined as the date of diagnosis of mGEP-NET. Inclusion criteria: ≥ 18 years of age at diagnosis; diagnosis of mGEP-NET between 1/1/2008 to 12/31/2012. Patients in clinical trials or with poorly differentiated tumors were excluded. Results: 229 patients were included with a median age of 64.0 years. Primary tumor site included small bowel (47.6%), pancreas (31.4%), and other (21.0%). Tumor grade was available for 134/229 (58.5%) patients, and the majority was reported as well-differentiated (52.8%). Chromogranin A (CgA) and urinary 5-HIAA were reported for 34.9%, and 32.8% of patients respectively. 37 (16.2%) of patients were under observation only. For those receiving systemic treatment, median time to first systemic treatment after diagnosis was 2.7 weeks, with 75% of patients starting therapy by 9.4 weeks. 120 (52.4%) patients received only somatostatin analogs (SSAs) during the study period, and 72 (31.4%) patients received chemotherapy, and/or targeted therapy. In the 1st line setting (n = 192), 148 (77%) patients received SSAs, 23 (12%) chemotherapy, and 21 (10.9%) targeted therapy. The most common AEs for SSAs were diarrhea (18.2%), abdominal pain (16.9%), and fatigue (13.5%). The median OS from diagnosis was 84.2 months [95%CI 70.9, 108.0 months] for the overall cohort. OS was longer in small bowel NETs than in pancreatic or other NETs (median OS 108.0 vs 69.9 vs 84.2 months, p = 0.017). Conclusions: Most of the patients with mGEP-NETs received systemic treatment soon after diagnosis and referral to USON. The OS and AEs were consistent with other studies. Low reporting of CgA, 5-HIAA, and tumor grade reflected variability of clinical practice in the community setting.

Tumor response in the CLARINET study of lanreotide depot vs. placebo in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs)

434

Background: In the CLARINET study, significant improvement in progression-free survival (primary endpoint) was reported in patients (pts) treated with lanreotide depot (LAN), a long-acting somatostatin analog, for moderately- or well-differentiated, nonfunctioning, locally advanced or metastatic GEP-NETs. A favorable safety profile was also observed. This retrospective analysis presents tumor response from CLARINET. Methods: Pts were randomized to LAN 120 mg (n=101) or PBO (n=103) once every 28 days for 96 weeks. Tumor response was evaluated centrally using RECIST version 1.0. Pts’ tumors were measured by sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of target lesions (TLs). Change was calculated for each pt’s SLD from baseline to last available post-baseline assessment. Tumor response was classified as complete response (CR): disappearance of all TLs and non-target lesions (NTLs) and no new lesions; partial response (PR): ≥30% decrease in SDL and no progressive disease (PD); stable disease (SD): not meeting criteria for CR/PR or PD; PD: ≥20% increase in SLD from baseline or nadir, unequivocal progression of NTLs or appearance of new lesions. The remaining pts were not evaluable (NE) for response. Results: 101 pts treated with LAN and 103 pts treated with PBO were assessed for tumor response. Among pts receiving LAN, 64% (65/101) demonstrated SD compared to 43% (44/103) of pts receiving PBO (Table). An additional 2 pts in the LAN group achieved a PR. Similar trends were observed in pts with pancreas and midgut origin tumors. Conclusions: A clinical benefit (defined as CR+PR+SD) of 66% (67/101) was observed with single agent LAN vs 43% (44/103) with PBO in the CLARINET population, further supporting the clinical efficacy of LAN. Clinical trial information: NCT00353496. [Table: see text]

Real-world use of sunitinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: efficacy, safety and biomarker analyses in 1689 consecutive patients

Objective

This prospective, post-marketing study collected sunitinib safety and efficacy data in Japanese patients with unresectable/metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Retrospective analysis investigated adverse events as potential sunitinib efficacy biomarkers.

Methods

Patients administered sunitinib, after its release, were registered until reaching a pre-specified number of cases. Primary starting dose was 50 mg/day orally on a 4-weeks-on and 2-weeks-off schedule. Physicians completed investigation forms at 6-week intervals for 24 weeks. Associations between baseline characteristics and adverse events were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model and compared by χ² test. The log-rank test compared survival in subpopulations based on selected factors.

Results

Of note, 1689 patients receiving sunitinib were registered between June 2008 and November 2009. Most of them were males (75%), aged <65 years (56%), and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1 (90%), metastatic disease (88%) and previous systemic therapy (66%). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 70%, with reduced platelet count the most common (34%). Characteristics significantly associated with Grade ≥3 adverse events were female sex, age ≥55 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, history of several medical conditions and prior treatment. Objective response rate was 22%. Median progression-free survival was 22.7 weeks. Median overall survival was not reached; however, 24-week overall survival rate was 84%. Improved overall survival was associated with higher relative dose intensity during the first 6 weeks and specific adverse events: hypertension, hand–foot syndrome, hypothyroidism, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia.

Conclusions

Sunitinib demonstrated acceptable safety and useful efficacy in Japanese patients with unresectable/metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Potential biomarkers associated with greater efficacy were relative dose intensity and specific adverse events.

National Working Group Meeting on ALK diagnostics in lung cancer

The global landscape of molecular testing is rapidly changing, with the recent publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines and the ALK Atlas. The IASLC/CAP guidelines recommend that tumors from patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) be tested for ALK rearrangements in addition to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The spur for this recommendation is the availability of novel therapies that target these rearrangements. This article is based on coverage of a Pfizer-sponsored National Working Group Meeting on ALK Diagnostics in Lung Cancer, held around the 15th World Lung Cancer Conference, in Sydney on October 31, 2013. It is based on the presentations given by the authors at the meeting and the discussion that ensued. The content for this article was discussed and agreed on by the authors.

Sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an ethnic Asian subpopulation analysis for safety and efficacy

AIMS

We evaluated and compared the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in Asian and non-Asian patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma enrolled in a previously reported global expanded access program.

METHODS

Previously treated and treatment-naïve patients received open-label sunitinib at a starting dose of 50 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off treatment, in repeated 6-week cycles. Safety was assessed regularly, tumor measurements were performed per local practice, and survival data collected where possible.

RESULTS

Data were available for 212 Asian patients from Asian sites (Asian-A), 113 Asian patients from non-Asian sites (Asian-O) and 4046 non-Asian patients. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, asthenia and fatigue. The incidence of many adverse events was greater in Asian-A than in Asian-O or non-Asian patients. Sunitinib efficacy was comparable between Asian and non-Asian patients, with an objective response rate of 18% versus 14%; median progression-free survival of 8.7 versus 10.9 months; and overall survival of 18.9 versus 18.4 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sunitinib demonstrated tolerable safety and similar efficacy in Asian and non-Asian patients. Geographic differences in the reported frequency of specific adverse events were noted across Asian patients.

Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial

PURPOSE

Open-label, phase III trial evaluating whether sunitinib was superior or equivalent to sorafenib in hepatocellular cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were stratified and randomly assigned to receive sunitinib 37.5 mg once per day or sorafenib 400 mg twice per day. Primary end point was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Early trial termination occurred for futility and safety reasons. A total of 1,074 patients were randomly assigned to the study (sunitinib arm, n = 530; sorafenib arm, n = 544). For sunitinib and sorafenib, respectively, median OS was 7.9 versus 10.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.30; one-sided P = .9990; two-sided P = .0014); median progression-free survival (PFS; 3.6 v 3.0 months; HR, 1.13; one-sided P = .8785; two-sided P = .2286) and time to progression (TTP; 4.1 v 3.8 months; HR, 1.13; one-sided P = .8312; two-sided P = .3082) were comparable. Median OS was similar among Asian (7.7 v 8.8 months; HR, 1.21; one-sided P = .9829) and hepatitis B-infected patients (7.6 v 8.0 months; HR, 1.10; one-sided P = .8286), but was shorter with sunitinib in hepatitis C-infected patients (9.2 v 17.6 months; HR, 1.52; one-sided P = .9835). Sunitinib was associated with more frequent and severe adverse events (AEs) than sorafenib. Common grade 3/4 AEs were thrombocytopenia (29.7%) and neutropenia (25.7%) for sunitinib; hand-foot syndrome (21.2%) for sorafenib. Discontinuations owing to AEs were similar (sunitinib, 13.3%; sorafenib, 12.7%).

CONCLUSION

OS with sunitinib was not superior or equivalent but was significantly inferior to sorafenib. OS was comparable in Asian and hepatitis B-infected patients. OS was superior in hepatitis C-infected patients who received sorafenib. Sunitinib-treated patients reported more frequent and severe toxicity.

Lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and costs of a large-scale therapeutic statin formulary conversion program

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the lipid-lowering efficacy, safety, and costs of a large-scale statin formulary conversion program.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 980 patients consented to participate; 942 patients completed the study.

INTERVENTION

Patients were converted from their current statin therapy to either cerivastatin 0.4 or 0.8 mg/day, or simvastatin 80 mg/day, using a conversion algorithm.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Efficacy and safety were evaluated at baseline and after 6 weeks of therapy; costs were also measured. Overall attainment of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) increased from 64.8% to 74.5% of patients (p<0.001); mean LDL decreased from 115+/-30 mg/dl to 106+/-25 mg/dl (p<0.001). Adverse events occurred in 3% of patients, and included myositis (0.6%) and increased hepatic transaminases (0.1%). Overall costs were reduced by $115/patient treatment-year.

CONCLUSION

Statin therapeutic interchange can improve lipid control at reduced costs. The possibility of uncommon but potentially serious adverse effects suggests that these programs require appropriate monitoring.

Rapid reduction in C-reactive protein with cerivastatin among 785 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Long-term therapy with hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) has been shown to reduce levels of C-reactive protein (CRP). However, the generalizability, speed of onset, and dose-response characteristics of this effect are uncertain.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured CRP, LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), and HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) levels among 785 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia at baseline and after 8 weeks of therapy with either 0.4 or 0.8 mg of cerivastatin. Overall, cerivastatin resulted in a 13.3% reduction in median CRP levels (P:<0.001) and a 24.5% reduction in mean CRP levels (P:<0.001). Although LDL-C promptly decreased in a dose-dependent manner (mean LDL-C reduction, 37.3% for 0.4 mg and 42.2% for 0.8 mg of cerivastatin), no clear dose-response effect of cerivastatin on CRP was observed, nor was there any substantive correlation between the magnitude of change in CRP and the magnitude of change in LDL-C (r=-0.08) or the magnitude of change in HDL-C (r=-0.04). Thus, <2% of the variance in the percent change in CRP over 8 weeks could be attributed to the percent change in either of these lipid parameters. Further, there was no evidence of correlation between baseline CRP levels and baseline lipid levels or between end-of-study CRP levels and end-of-study lipid levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 785 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, CRP levels were significantly reduced within 8 weeks of initiating cerivastatin therapy in a lipid-independent manner.