Complementary and alternative medicine and musculoskeletal pain in the first year of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment in early breast cancer patients

Background

Patients with breast cancer (BC) show strong interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), particularly for adverse effects of adjuvant endocrine treatment — e.g., with letrozole. Letrozole often induces myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, with potential noncompliance and treatment termination. This analysis investigated whether CAM before aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with pain development and the intensity of AI-induced musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) during the first year of treatment.

Patients and methods

The multicenter phase IV PreFace study evaluated letrozole therapy in postmenopausal, hormone receptor–positive patients with early BC. Patients were asked about CAM use before, 6 months after, and 12 months after treatment started. They recorded pain every month for 1 year in a diary including questions about pain and numeric pain rating scales. Data were analyzed for patients who provided pain information for all time points.

Results

Of 1396 patients included, 901 (64.5%) had used CAM before AI treatment. Throughout the observation period, patients with CAM before AI treatment had higher pain values, for both myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, than non-users. Pain increased significantly in both groups over time, with the largest increase during the first 6 months. No significant difference of pain increase was noted regarding CAM use.

Conclusions

CAM use does not prevent or improve the development of AIMSS. Pain intensity was generally greater in the CAM group. Therefore, because of the risk of non-compliance and treatment discontinuation due to the development of higher pain levels, special attention must be paid to patient education and aftercare in these patients.

•

Pain levels of myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia increase under letrozole intake.

•

Within one year pain levels increase in both, CAM users as well as non-CAM users.

•

In CAM users pain levels were higher at all time points than in non-CAM users.

•

The greatest increase of pain levels was noted in the first six treatment months.

•

CAM does not prevent or improve the development of myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia.

Abstract P1-13-01: Final results of the ASG1-3 study, a randomized phase III study comparing a standard dose chemotherapy with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel with a dose dense regimen with epirubicin and paclitaxel

Background

Dose dense chemotherapy (DDT) has shown improvements of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival for primary breast cancer patients with a high risk of relapse. There are much less data about the effect of DDT in patients with intermediate risk of recurrence (1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes). Aim of this prospectively randomized trial was to investigate the superiority of a DDT schedule over a standard chemotherapy (ST) in primary breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes.

Methods

The ASG1-3 study is a prospectively randomized, open label phase III study of the Adjuvant Study Group of the NOGGO association. Patients were eligible for the trial, if they had a primary invasive breast cancer (pT1-3) with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes and no evidence of distant metastases. Patients were randomized to an adjuvant therapy with either 4 cycles epirubicin (90mg/m2 body surface area, BSA) and cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2 BSA) q3w, followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175mg/m2 BSA) referred to as ST or to a therapy with 4 cycles of epicubicin (120 mg/m2 BSA) q2w and primary G-CSF support followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175mg/m2 BSA) q2w and primary G-CSF support referred to as DDT. Trastuzumab was not given in this study. The study was designed to show an increase of 70% DFS (ST) to 80% DFS (DDT) 5 years after randomization. Comparisons were conducted using Kaplan Meier estimates, log rank tests and Cox regression analyses. In an exploratory way, subgroup analyses were performed for HER2, hormone receptor status and grading using Cox regression models with interaction terms.

Results

A total of 936 patients were eligible for survival analysis, of which 465 were randomized to ST and 471 to DDT from 2001 to 2004. Patient characteristics were mainly well balanced, with patients being 52.5/52.1 years old, 71.9/78.1% being hormone receptor positive, 24.4/24.6% being HER2 positive and 38.6/38.8% having a tumor grade of 3 in the ST arm and DDT arm respectively. 53 events occurred after ST and 46 after DDT. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.87 (95%CI: 0.57-1.35; p=0.54). 5 year DFS rates were 85% (ST) vs. 87% (DDT). Hematological toxicities were the most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 57.2 vs. 28.0%, grade 3/4 anemia in 15.3% vs. 17.1% and grade 3 /4 pain symptoms were seen in 13.2 vs. 12.4% of the patients in the ST arm vs. DDT arm respectively. Other grade 3/4 toxicities were less frequent than 10%. Subgroup analysis showed a significant interaction (p<0.001) between HER2 status and randomization arm with regard to DFS. In HER2 negative patients the HR was 1.53 (95%CI: 0.91-2.59), whereas in HER2 positive patients the HR was 0.22 (95%CI: 0.09-0.55). Patients with HER2 positive disease and DDT had a similar prognosis like HER2 negative patients.

Conclusion

In the overall population a statistically significant improvement of DFS could not be shown for the DDT arm. In patients with HER2 positive breast cancer DDT chemotherapy improved the disease-free survival to a prognosis which was similar to patients with HER2 negative disease.

Citation Format: Fasching PA, Eggemann H, Krocker J, Häberle L, Volz B, Kleine-Tebbe A, Blohmer J-U, Kittel K, Hufnagel M, Janni W, Emons G, Simon E, Köhler U, Thomssen C, Kohls A, Beckmann MW, Hielscher C, Krabisch P, Zeiser T, Brodkorb T, Baier F, Nabieva N, Kellner S, Untch M, Stadie S, Budner M, Breitbach G-P, Keller M, Stickeler E, Kühn T, Tolkmitt M, Belau AK, Schmidt M, Ulm K, Kümmel S. Final results of the ASG1-3 study, a randomized phase III study comparing a standard dose chemotherapy with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel with a dose dense regimen with epirubicin and paclitaxel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-01.

The International Endometriosis Evaluation Program (IEEP Study) - A Systematic Study for Physicians, Researchers and Patients

INTRODUCTION

Endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease characterized by a range of different presentations. It is usually diagnosed when patients present with pain and/or infertility, but it has also been diagnosed in asymptomatic patients. Because of the different diagnostic approaches and diverse therapies, time to diagnosis can vary considerably and the definitive diagnosis may be delayed, with some cases not being diagnosed for several years. Endometriosis patients have many unmet needs. A systematic registration and follow-up of endometriosis patients could be useful to obtain an insight into the course of the disease. The validation of biomarkers could contribute to the development of diagnostic and predictive tests which could help select patients for surgical assessment earlier and offer better predictions about patients who might benefit from medical, surgical or other interventions. The aim is also to obtain a better understanding of the etiology, pathogenesis and progression of the disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To do this, an online multicenter documentation system was introduced to facilitate the establishment of a prospective multicenter case-control study, the IEEP (International Endometriosis Evaluation Program) study. We report here on the first 696 patients with endometriosis included in the program between June 2013 and June 2015.

RESULTS

A documentation system was created, and the structure and course of the study were mapped out with regard to data collection and the collection of biomaterials.

CONCLUSION

The documentation system permits the history and clinical data of patients with endometriosis to be recorded. The IEEP combines this information with biomaterials and uses it for scientific studies. The recorded data can also be used to evaluate clinical quality control measures such as the certification parameters used by the EEL (European Endometriosis League) to assess certified endometriosis centers.