A new window on subcutaneous ICD system performance: Z-lead impedance change over time in devices with and without extracellular matrix envelope use

Background

Device impedance for subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICDs) may rise over time reflecting changes in tissue electrical conduction due to fibrosis from the natural foreign body response, increasing the risk of defibrillation failure. A biologic envelope optimized for S-ICDs may mitigate fibrosis and encourages angiogenesis around the device possibly decreasing impedance rise over time. The S-ICD system performs routine low-voltage Z-lead (LVZ) impedance testing (impedance between shocking coil and can) that may provide insight into the impedance changes on device functionality and efficacy over time.

Purpose

Explore early and late impedance changes over time in S-ICDs implanted with and without envelopes using periodic LVZ measurements.

Methods

30 patients received S-ICDs (15 with envelope) between 1/2017 and 3/2021, after excluding those with device complications, uncontrolled comorbidities, or recent cardiac surgery. Impedance data was recorded at initial implantation. LVZ impedance data was extracted from the wireless remote monitoring system, trended over 0–4 years post implant, and analyzed blinded to patient information.

Results

24 patients (12 envelope) had evaluable implant and chronic data sets. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Impedance in general was higher in the envelope group at initial implantation (LVZ mean 89 Ω vs 74 Ω) and throughout the first year. Comparing envelope to no envelope, the initial average shock impedance was 87.3±30.50 vs 66.7±10.40, followed by an average low-V impedance drop of 29 Ω vs 17 Ω during the first month, with a recovery to 109 Ω vs 91 Ω at 30 months post implant. After 30 months, impedance trends demonstrated a modest linear increase up to 48 months in the no envelope group in comparison with a modest decrease in the envelope group (sample sizes too small to determine significance) (Figure 1).

Conclusion

The results demonstrate periodic LVZ testing in the S-ICD monitoring system can reliably trend changes in system impedance over time. Impedance measurements within the first 6–7 months (and most markedly within the first 3 months) appear to be transiently lower than the values seen after this timepoint suggesting that early impedance measurements may not predict steady-state impedance. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of envelope use and the S-ICD impedance changes beyond 30 months.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Multicenter study of principles-based waveforms for external defibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of a shock waveform for external defibrillation depends on the waveform characteristics. Recently, design principles based on cardiac electrophysiology have been developed to determine optimal waveform characteristics. The objective of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of principles-based monophasic and biphasic waveforms for external defibrillation.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter study of 118 patients undergoing electrophysiologic testing or receiving an implantable defibrillator was conducted. Ventricular fibrillation was induced, and defibrillation was attempted in each patient with a biphasic and a monophasic waveform. Patients were randomly placed into 2 groups: group 1 received shocks of escalating energy, and group 2 received only high-energy shocks.

RESULTS

The biphasic waveform achieved a first-shock success rate of 100% in group 1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 95.1% to 100%) and group 2 (95% CI 94.6% to 100%), with average delivered energies of 201+/-17 J and 295+/-28 J, respectively. The monophasic waveform demonstrated a 96.7% (95% CI 89.1% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 215+/-12 J for group 1 and a 98.2% (95% CI 91.7% to 100%) first-shock success rate and average delivered energy of 352+/-13 J for group 2.

CONCLUSION

Using principles of electrophysiology, it is possible to design both biphasic and monophasic waveforms for external defibrillation that achieve a high first-shock efficacy.

Maintenance of sinus rhythm with oral d,l-sotalol therapy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. d,l-Sotalol Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group

Currently d,l-sotalol is widely used to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter, although a randomized dose-response study has not previously been conducted to guide therapy for this indication. This study summarizes findings of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the efficacy, safety, and dose-response relation of 3 fixed doses of d,l-sotalol (80, 120, and 160 mg twice daily) for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in 253 patients with atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. All patients were in sinus rhythm at randomization. Treatment (69 patients on placebo, 59 on 80 mg, 63 on 120 mg, and 62 on 160 mg given twice daily) was continued for 12 months or until documented recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitoring was used to detect symptomatic recurrences. Demographic characteristics were not different in the 4 groups. Structural heart disease was present in 57% of patients. Patients with a history of heart failure were excluded. The time from randomization to symptomatic arrhythmia recurrence was significantly longer in the 2 higher d,l-sotalol dose groups than in the placebo group. The median times to recurrence were 27, 106, 229, and 175 days for the placebo, 80, 120, and 160 mg groups, respectively. There were no deaths or cases of torsade de pointes, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or ventricular fibrillation reported. Thus, d,l-sotalol appeared to be both safe and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Further, the 120-mg twice daily dose appeared to provide the most favorable benefit and/or risk.

Separation of ventricular tachycardia from sinus rhythm using a practical, real-time template matching computer system

Template matching morphology analysis of the intraventricular electrogram (IVEG) has been proposed for inclusion in implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) to reduce the number of false ventricular tachyarrhythmia detections caused by rate overlap between ventricular tachycardia (VT) and sinus tachycardia and/or supraventricular tachycardia. Template matching techniques have been developed that reduce the computational complexity while preserving the perceived important aspects of electrogram amplitude and baseline independence found in such computationally unsolved methods as correlation waveform analysis (CWA). These methods have been shown to work as well as CWA for separation of VT, however, they have not been proven in real-time on a system that incorporates many of the constraints of present day ICDs. The present study was undertaken with two purposes: (1) to determine if real-time IVEG template matching analysis on an ICD sensing emulator was accurate in separating VT from sinus rhythm (SR) electrograms; and (2) to compare amplitude normalized area of difference (NAD) with signature analysis (SIG), a new, computationally less expensive technique that normalizes for amplitude variation within the expected physiological level of variability. In this study, IVEGs, obtained from 16 patients who underwent electrophysiological study (EPS) for evaluation of sustained ventricular arrhythmia, were digitized to 250 Hz with 6-bit quantization after filtering (16-44 Hz) and differentiation. After an SR template was selected and periodically updated, it was compared to subsequent IVEGs using NAD and SIG. In general, SIG calculates the fraction of samples occurring outside template window boundaries. Eleven-beat running medians from beat-by-beat NAD and SIG results were determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mexiletine: pharmacology and therapeutic use

Mexiletine is a Class IB antiarrhythmic which has basic and clinical electrophysiologic properties similar to lidocaine. Like other Class I antiarrhythmic agents, mexiletine blocks the rapid inward sodium current responsible for phase 0 of the action potential. It has been noted in the clinical electrophysiology laboratory to have minimal effect on sinus node function and AV nodal and His-Purkinje system conduction. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that oral absorption is rapid with bioavailability of 80-90%. Mexiletine is predominantly metabolized by the liver with elimination half-life of 9 to 12 hours. The antiarrhythmic effects of the primary drug's metabolites remain to be defined. Hemodynamic studies have shown mexiletine to have a lesser negative inotropic effect than procainamide or disopyramide. Although mexiletine as a single agent successfully suppresses 60 to 80% of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias, it has lower efficacy in suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias. Multiple studies have shown that as monotherapy mexiletine is effective in preventing the induction of ventricular tachycardia in approximately 20% of patients. When used in combination with a Class IA antiarrhythmic drug for suppression of induced ventricular arrhythmias, multiple investigators have reported greater efficacy. Neurological side effects (tremor, dizziness, memory loss) occur in approximately 10% of patients while gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, anorexia, gastric irritation) occur in up to 40% of patients. Proarrhythmia or other serious toxicity from the drug is uncommon.

External cardiac programmed stimulation for noninvasive termination of sustained supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia

To examine the feasibility of using a noninvasive temporary pacemaker for termination of well-tolerated supraventricular (SVT) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), a standard external demand pacemaker was modified to allow stimulation with single or multiple extrastimuli and overdrive pacing. To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerance of external cardiac programmed stimulation, a standard arrhythmia termination protocol was used in 223 tachycardias in 22 patients. The technique of external cardiac programmed stimulation was used in 209 episodes of SVT in 13 patients. It terminated 95% of the episodes with success in 19 of 20 episodes of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and 179 of 189 episodes of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia. Of 198 episodes of SVT terminated by the technique 168 (85%) were terminated by a single extrastimulus and 28 (14%) by double extrastimuli. Only 2 episodes of SVT required overdrive pacing for termination. External cardiac programmed stimulation did not result in atrial fibrillation or arrhythmia acceleration. Of 14 episodes of sustained monomorphic VT 5 were terminated by external cardiac programmed stimulation. One tachycardia was terminated by a single extrastimulus, 1 by double extrastimuli and 3 by overdrive pacing. Arrhythmia acceleration occurred once and was terminated by endocardial pacing. On 27 separate occasions patient evaluation of maximal discomfort included 4 ratings of mild, 10 of moderate, 11 of severe and 2 of intolerable discomfort. External cardiac programmed stimulation is effective and safe in patients with well-tolerated sustained supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias.

The efficacy of full-lung tomography in the detection of early metastatic disease from melanoma

In a prospective study, 62 patients with proved melanoma and negative chest radiographs underwent full-lung tomography. Of 109 examinations performed, 12 patients had positive findings on tomography; nine were false-positive and three were true-positive. Of the true-positive examinations, two patients already had widespread metastatic disease and one had an advanced local lesion. Clinical staging and therapy were changed in only one patient as a result of information provided by full-lung tomography. It appears from these results that full-lung tomography is of limited use in detection of metastases from melanoma in the presence of a negative chest radiograph.