1
|
Rischin D, Mehanna H, Young RJ, Bressel M, Dunn J, Corry J, Soni P, Fulton-Lieuw T, Iqbal G, Kenny L, Porceddu S, Wratten C, Robinson M, Solomon BJ. Prognostic stratification of HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer based on CD103 + immune cell abundance in patients treated on TROG 12.01 and De-ESCALaTE randomized trials. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:804-813. [PMID: 35525376 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.04.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High CD103+ intratumoral immune cell (ITIC) abundance is associated with better prognosis in unselected patients with human papilloma virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-associated OPSCC) treated with cisplatin and radiotherapy (CIS/RT). Substituting cetuximab (CETUX) for CIS with RT in HPV-associated OPSCC resulted in inferior efficacy. Our aim was to determine whether quantification of CD103 ITIC could be used to identify a population of HPV-associated OPSCC with superior prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We pooled data from the TROG 12.01 and De-ESCALaTE randomized trials that compared CETUX/70GyRT with CIS/70GyRT in low-risk HPV-associated OPSCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer 7 stage III (excluding T1-2N1) or stage IV (excluding N2b-c if smoking history >10 pack-years and/or distant metastases), including all patients with available tumor samples. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS) in patients receiving CETUX/RT comparing CD103+ ITIC high (≥30%) versus low (<30%). High and low CD103 were compared using Cox regression adjusting for age, stage and trial. RESULTS Tumor samples were available in 159/182 patients on TROG 12.01 and 145/334 on De-ESCALaTE. CD103+ ITIC abundance was high in 27% of patients. The median follow-up was 3.2 years. The 3-year FFS in patients treated with CETUX/RT was 93% [95% confidence interval (CI) 79% to 98%] in high CD103 and 74% (95% CI 63% to 81%) in low CD103 [adjusted hazard ratio = 0.22 (95% CI 0.12-0.41), P < 0.001]. The 3-year overall survival in patients treated with CETUX/RT was 100% in high CD103 and 86% (95% CI 76% to 92%) in low CD103, P < 0.001. In patients treated with CIS/RT, there was no significant difference in FFS. CONCLUSIONS CD103+ ITIC expression separates CETUX/RT-treated low-risk HPV-associated OPSCC into excellent and poor prognosis subgroups. The high CD103 population is a rational target for de-intensification trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rischin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - H Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - R J Young
- Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Bressel
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Corry
- Genesiscare St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Soni
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - T Fulton-Lieuw
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - G Iqbal
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - L Kenny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - S Porceddu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - C Wratten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - M Robinson
- Cellular Pathology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals, Newcastle, UK
| | - B J Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lorenc A, Wells M, Fulton-Lieuw T, Nankivell P, Mehanna H, Jepson M. Clinicians' Views of Patient-initiated Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: a Qualitative Study to Inform the PETNECK2 Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:230-240. [PMID: 34862101 PMCID: PMC8950325 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Current follow-up for head and neck cancer (HNC) is ineffective, expensive and fails to address patients' needs. The PETNECK2 trial will compare a new model of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) with routine scheduled follow-up. This article reports UK clinicians' views about HNC follow-up and PIFU, to inform the trial design. MATERIALS AND METHODS Online focus groups with surgeons (ear, nose and throat/maxillofacial), oncologists, clinical nurse specialists and allied health professionals. Clinicians were recruited from professional bodies, mailing lists and personal contacts. Focus groups explored views on current follow-up and acceptability of the proposed PIFU intervention and randomised controlled trial design (presented by the study co-chief investigator), preferences, margins of equipoise, potential organisational barriers and thoughts about the content and format of PIFU. Data were interpreted using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Eight focus groups with 34 clinicians were conducted. Clinicians highlighted already known limitations with HNC follow-up - lack of flexibility to address the wide-ranging needs of HNC patients, expense and lack of evidence - and agreed that follow-up needs to change. They were enthusiastic about the PETNECK2 trial to develop and evaluate PIFU but had concerns that PIFU may not suit disengaged patients and may aggravate patient anxiety/fear of recurrence and delay detection of recurrence. Anticipated issues with implementation included ensuring a reliable route back to clinic and workload burden on nurses and allied health professionals. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians supported the evaluation of PIFU but voiced concerns about barriers to help-seeking. An emphasis on patient engagement, psychosocial issues, symptom reporting and reliable, quick routes back to clinic will be important. Certain patient groups may be less suited to PIFU, which will be evaluated in the trial. Early, meaningful, ongoing engagement with clinical teams and managers around the trial rationale and recruitment process will be important to discourage selective recruitment and address risk-averse behaviour and potential workload burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Lorenc
- QuinteT Research Group, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - M Wells
- Nursing Directorate, Imperial College Healthcare, NHS Trust / Department of Surgery and Oncology, Imperial College, London, London, UK
| | - T Fulton-Lieuw
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Nankivell
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - H Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Jepson
- QuinteT Research Group, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vreugdenhil M, Fong C, Iqbal G, Roques T, Evans M, Palaniappan N, Yang H, O'Toole L, Sanghera P, Nutting C, Foran B, Sen M, Al Booz H, Fulton-Lieuw T, Dalby M, Dunn J, Hartley A, Mehanna H. Improvement in Dysphagia Outcomes Following Clinical Target Volume Reduction in the De-ESCALaTE Study. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:795-803. [PMID: 34340917 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The De-ESCALaTE study showed an overall survival advantage for the administration of synchronous cisplatin chemotherapy with radiotherapy in low-risk oropharyngeal cancer when compared with synchronous cetuximab. During the trial, a radiotherapy quality assurance protocol amendment permitted centres to swap from the original radiotherapy contouring protocol (incorporating the whole oropharynx into the high-dose clinical target volume (CTV); anatomical protocol) to a protocol that incorporated the gross tumour volume with a 10 mm margin into the CTV (volumetric protocol). The purpose of this study was to examine both toxicity and tumour control related to this protocol amendment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Overall survival and recurrence at 2 years were used to compare tumour control in the two contouring cohorts. For toxicity, the cohorts were compared by both the number of severe (grades 3-5) and all grades acute and late toxicities. In addition, quality of life and swallowing were compared using EORTC-C30 and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, respectively. RESULTS Of 327 patients included in this study, 185 were contoured according to the anatomical protocol and 142 by the volumetric protocol. The two cohorts were well balanced, with the exception of significantly more patients in the anatomical cohort undergoing prophylactic feeding tube insertion (P < 0.001). With a minimum of 2 years of follow-up there was no significant difference in overall survival or recurrence between the two contouring protocols. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the rate of reported severe or all grades acute or late toxicity and no sustained significant difference in quality of life. However, there was a significant difference in favour of volumetric contouring in several domains of the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory questionnaire at 1 year, which persisted to 2 years in the dysphagia functional (P = 0.002), dysphagia physical (P = 0.009) and dysphagia overall function (P = 0.008) domains. CONCLUSION In the context of the unplanned post-hoc analysis of a randomised trial, measurable improvement in long-term dysphagia has been shown following a reduction in the CTV. Further reductions in the CTV should be subject to similar scrutiny within the confines of a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Vreugdenhil
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Fong
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - G Iqbal
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - T Roques
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, Norwich, UK
| | - M Evans
- Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - H Yang
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - L O'Toole
- Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK
| | - P Sanghera
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - B Foran
- Weston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - M Sen
- St James' Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK
| | - H Al Booz
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - T Fulton-Lieuw
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Dalby
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Dunn
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - A Hartley
- Hall-Edwards Radiotherapy Research Group, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
| | - H Mehanna
- Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education (InHANSE), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fong C, Mistry P, Roques T, Evans M, Yang H, O'Toole L, Sanghera P, Nutting C, Foran B, Sen M, Al Booz H, Fulton-Lieuw T, Dalby M, Dunn J, Hartley A, Mehanna H. OC-0573: Improvement in late dysphagia following clinical target volume reduction in the De-ESCALaTE study. Radiother Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)00595-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Jones D, Mehanna H, Mistry P, Dalby M, Fulton-Lieuw T, Kong A, Dunn J, Gray A. Cisplatin reduces costs and provides more quality adjusted life years (QALYs) than cetuximab in chemoradiotherapy for patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+OPC). Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz252.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
6
|
Mehanna H, Robinson M, Hartley A, Kong A, Foran B, Fulton-Lieuw T, Dalby M, Mistry P, Sen M, O’Toole L, Dunn J. OC-011 New insights from the De-ESCALate HPV trial. Radiother Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(19)30177-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
7
|
Mehanna H, Kong A, Hartley A, Mistry P, Dalby M, Fulton-Lieuw T, Robinson M, Gray A, Foran B, Sen M, O'Toole L, Dyker K, Al Booz H, Moleron R, Brennan S, Aynsley E, Chan A, Srinivasan D, Buter J, Dunn J. Cetuximab versus cisplatin in patients with HPV-positive, low risk oropharyngeal cancer, receiving radical radiotherapy. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy424.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|