Gravimetric determination of the water concentration in whole blood, plasma and erythrocytes and correlations with hematological and clinicochemical parameters.
Clin Chim Acta 1993;
214:129-38. [PMID:
8472379 DOI:
10.1016/0009-8981(93)90105-d]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
We have assessed gravimetric methods for determination of intravascular water, established whole blood-, plasma- and erythrocyte water reference values in a healthy volunteer group (n = 97, 48 females) and correlated these variables with 30 simultaneous hematological, clinicochemical and body parameters. The water standard was 55.56 mol/kg = 100 mass %. For erythrocyte water determination three methods were evaluated: 2 indirect methods were easy to perform, the third, using a hematocrit centrifuge, was the most reliable. Imprecision (within-batch coefficient of variation (CV), %) was excellent: whole blood 0.2, plasma 0.1, erythrocytes 0.7-2.2 and recoveries (means, %) 99.7-100.1. Serum water was found to be slightly higher than plasma water. Volunteer group, mean reference values, mass %: whole blood water 79.7, plasma water 91.2, erythrocyte water, three methods 66.2, 64.6 and 64.2, respectively. Females had mean 1.6 mass % higher whole blood water and 0.9-1.0 mass % higher erythrocyte water than males with no difference in plasma water. In the volunteer group whole blood water correlated strongly with hematocrit (r = -0.96), hemoglobin (r = -0.94) and erythrocytes (r = -0.85) and centrifuge hematocrit (r = -0.91). Plasma water correlated strongly with plasma total protein (r = -0.74, all correlations P < 0.001). Hemoglobin and hematocrit can serve as surrogate parameters for whole blood water when water determination is not available; total protein reflects plasma water.
Collapse