Bipolar ablation of refractory ventricular arrhythmias using a novel dedicated adapter. A multicenter study

Background

Bipolar ablation (BA) recently emerged as an alternative for treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular contractions (PVC) refractory to a classic unipolar ablation (UA). Data on the use of available BA systems is lacking.

Purpose

To determine feasibility, safety and efficacy of a novel BA adapter in consecutive patients with refractory VT/PVC undergoing repeat ablations.

Methods

The study group consisted of consecutive patients with VT/PVC after failure of at least one standard UA who underwent redo procedures performed with a support of BA at six European centers. A second ablation catheter was connected in the position of a return electrode using a novel BA adapter.

Results

Between March 2021 and March 2022 a total number of 19 patients after failed ablation attempts underwent redo procedure using a novel BA adapter (17 males, age 61±11, number of prior ablation attempts 2,5±1,6; range 1–7). The main indication for redo ablation was recurrence of frequent PVC (n=10), VT (n=8) or electrical storm (n=1). Fifteen patients underwent combined UA+BA procedure during redo ablation, whereas 4 remaining patients underwent BA only. Two patients required epicardial access. Mean procedural time was 157±77 minutes. The mean BA time was 367±245s (power 32±9W) and mean UA time was 349±290s (power 43±6W). Apart from 1 anticipated AV block there were no major complications. Minor complications included char formation at 8mm tip electrode and steam pop without sequalae in one VT patient. BA+UA led to acute elimination of clinical PVC/VT in 18 patients. In the remaining 1 patient no effect on clinical VT during UA+BA was observed. The follow up lasted 4±3 months. Six (75%) VT patients remained arrhythmia-free and significant PVC burden reduction was achieved in nine (90%) PVC patients during follow-up. One patient treated for electrical storm experienced a single VT episode after 11 months. One patient after initially failed UA+BA underwent successful bipolar reablation after 2 months.

Conclusions

Bipolar ablation of refractory ventricular arrhythmias using a novel dedicated adapter is feasible, seems safe and effective. These encouraging preliminary results need to be confirmed in properly designed prospective trials.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Multipolar pulsed-field ablation for the treatment of left atrial reentry tachycardia

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

A multipolar pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter was recently introduced for pulmonary vein isolation and combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. It may also be used to treat left atrial (LA) reentry tachycardia.

Purpose

To describe our initial experience using a multipolar PFA catheter for the treatment of LA reentry tachycardia.

Methods

We included all patients with LA reentry tachycardia treated with a multipolar PFA catheter at our institution. Using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (3D-EAM), we identified the tachycardia mechanism and applied linear lesions either at the left atrial roof, mitral isthmus or on the anterior wall, as appropriate. Positioning of the PFA catheter was verified by integration into 3D-EAM. Applications were performed using 2.0kV with the catheter in basket or flower configuration, depending on ablation site. Bidirectional block across linear lesions was verified using standard criteria. Additional focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was used to achieve bidirectional block if necessary.

Results

We treated 17 LA reentry tachycardia with a multipolar PFA catheter in 13 patients (median age 69 (59-73) years; 5 females). The tachycardia mechanism was identified as roof-dependent in five, peri-mitral in eight and anterior scar-related in four cases. PFA lesion sets consisted of 12 posterior wall isolations (i.e. roof lines), four mitral isthmus lines (MIL) and eight anterior lines. For ablation of the mitral side of the anterior line, we always used the PFA catheter in basket configuration, while we targeted the posterior wall and the superior side of the anterior line exclusively with the catheter in flower configuration. To ablate the MIL we used both flower and basket configurations. Three roof-dependent, six peri-mitral, and four anterior scar-related tachycardias were successfully terminated by PFA (76%). Additional RFA was necessary for two MIL, two anterior lines and no roof line (17%). Finally, we achieved bidirectional block across all lines. PFA triggered, vagal-mediated and reversible AV block was observed in one case. Otherwise, there were no acute procedural complications.

Conclusion

Linear lesion sets are feasible and safe using a multipolar PFA catheter. Posterior wall isolation by PFA for the treatment of roof-dependent LA reentry tachycardia is highly efficient while anterior lines and MIL remain challenging and may need complementary RFA or a PFA catheter designed for focal or linear ablations.

Pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation: recurrence rate after first pulmonary vein isolation and first insights into durability at redo procedures

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is newly available for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. Independent data on the recurrence-rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) after PVI and on PVI durability during redo procedures are scarce.

Purpose

We report data on the recurrence rate of AF after first PVI using PFA and first insights into findings of PVI durability during redo procedures.

Methods

Consecutive AF patients undergoing a first PFA PVI at our center between May 2021 and August 2021 were included. PVI was verified by 3D-electroanatomical mapping (3D-EAM), and additional PFA lesions were applied when necessary until all PV were isolated. Seven-day Holter ECGs were performed at 3 and 6 months after ablation. After a blanking period of 3 months, episodes of AF/AT lasting more than 30 seconds were considered as AF-recurrence.

Results

41 Patients, median age 69 (interquartile range 62-73) years, 24% female, 56% persistent AF, underwent first PVI by PFA. All PVs were successfully isolated using a multipolar PFA catheter. Median total procedure time including 3D-EAM was 104 (85-121) min. Total fluoroscopy time and dose were 26 (19-30) min and 671 (323-1248) Gym2. Acute complications occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient (cardiac tamponade requiring drainage). Early recurrence of AF during the blanking period occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient. Median follow-up time was 107 (91-152) days. Recurrence of AF after the blanking period was detected in 5 (12%) patients, 1 (6%) in paroxysmal AF and 4 (17%) in persistent AF patients, respectively. Redo procedures in 3 (7.3%) patients with AF recurrence confirmed durable isolation of 12/12 (100%) pulmonary veins and showed no evidence of PFA lesion regression.

Conclusion

AF recurrence rates after PVI by means of PFA are low. Durable isolation of 12/12 pulmonary veins (100%) and no evidence of PFA lesion regression was observed during redo procedures in patients with AF recurrence.

Comparison of the accuracy of contact force measurement in four commercially available force-sensing ablation catheters

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Contact force-sensing catheters are widely used for ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. They allow precise quantification of catheter-to-tissue contact, which is an important determinant of lesion size and durability. Moreover, contact force information reduces the risk for cardiac perforation and is used for estimation of lesion size. However, the accuracy of contact force sensors across different manufacturers has not been validated independently.

Objective

To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of different force sensing catheters used in cardiac electrophysiology procedures.

Methods

A force measurement setup containing a heated saline water bath and a catheter fixation mechanism was constructed. The setup allows to accurately measure forces applied to a platform with the catheter. We studied four different catheter models, equipped with the following, unique force-measurement technologies (figure 1): 1) multiple-fiber optical sensor; 2) single-fiber optical sensor; 3) inductive sensor; and 4) magnetic field sensors. For each model, we assessed three catheters. Repeated measurements within the force range of 0g to 60g and at electrode-tissue contact angles of 0°, 45°, and 90° were performed and validated against the force measurement unit of our measurement setup.

Results

For each catheter, at least 500 measurements at different contact forces (equally distributed across the measurement range of 0 to 60 grams) were performed. Correlation of measured-force to real-force was ρSpearman=0.99 for MFOS, ρSpearman=0.98 for SFOS, ρSpearman=0.99 for IS, and ρSpearman=0.98 for MFS. MFS and SFOS showed a higher variance for high forces and increased intra-catheter variability compared to MFOS and IS. IS overestimated higher contact force at 0° and 30°. MFS and SFOS underestimated contact force for higher forces at 30° and 45° (figure 2). Within a clinical range of 5g to 40g, the catheters reached the following root-mean-square-error, independent of contact angle: MFOS 0.88g ±0.68g, SFOS 2.15g ±1.74g, IS 0.88g ±0.72g, and MFS 1.13g ±1.01g.

Conclusion

Measured contact by force-sensing catheters correlates well with true exerted electrode-tissue force. Despite an excellent overall correlation, some technologies may be prone to significant errors at higher forces (>10g under-/overestimation of true contact force) with potential clinical consequences related to increased risk of perforation.

Validation of a multipolar pulsed field ablation catheter for endpoint assessment in pulmonary vein isolation procedures

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): FP7/2007-2013, №602299, EU-CERT-ICD

Objective

To validate the performance of a multipolar PFA catheter compared to a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter for endpoint assessment of PVI.

Background

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using single-shot devices combines the benefits of high procedural efficacy and safety. A newly available multipolar PFA catheter allows real-time recording of pulmonary vein (PV) signals during PVI.

Methods

Patients undergoing first PVI using PFA with the standard ablation protocol (8 applications per PV) were studied. Entrance- and exit-block (10V/2ms) were assessed using the PFA catheter. Subsequently, a high-density bipolar voltage 3D electro-anatomical map (3D-EAM) was constructed using a standard pentaspline 3D-mapping catheter. Additional PFA applications were delivered only after confirmation of residual PV-connection by 3D-EAM.

Results

In 56 patients, 213 PVs were targeted for ablation. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of PVs: in 199/213 (93%) PVs with the standard ablation protocol alone and in the remaining 14 PVs after additional PFA applications. Accuracy of PV assessment with the PFA catheter after the standard ablation protocol was 91% (194/213 veins). In 5/213 (2.3%) PVs, the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated PV-isolation. In 14/213 (6.6%) the PFA catheter incorrectly indicated residual PV-conduction due to high-output pace-capture. When the output was reduced to 5V/1ms, pace-capture was reduced to 0.9% (2/213).

Conclusion

A novel multipolar PFA catheter allows reliable endpoint assessment for PVI. Due to its design, far-field sensing and high-output pace-capture can occur, which may require adjustment of standard pacing outputs for verification of exit-block.

Electrophysiological differences of deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Dexmedetomidine and propofol are commonly used drugs for deep sedation during cardiovascular interventions. Patients undergoing these interventions often have impaired sinus node function or atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease. Anesthetics used for deep sedation may further compromise sinus node function and AV nodal conduction, and thereby interfere with the intervention.

Purpose

To compare the electrophysiological effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the function of the sinus node and AV conduction.

Methods

We randomized patients undergoing first atrial fibrilation ablation 1:1 to deep sedation by dexmedetomidine (DEX group) versus propofol (PRO group), according to a standardized protocol. At the end of the ablation procedure with the patients still deeply sedated and hemodynamically stable, we conducted a standard electrophysiological study and assessed sinus node function, properties of AV conduction and atrial refractoriness.

Results

Of 160 patients (65±11 years old; 32% female) included into the study, 80 patients were randomized to the DEX and PRO group each. Procedure duration (128±59 minutes) and sedation depth, as assessed by the "Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation" score (median 3; interquartile range 2, 3), was not different among groups. DEX group patients received a mean of 231±111 mcg of dexmedetomidine and PRO group patients a mean of 657±356 mg of propofol. The table shows the results of the electrophysiological study. DEX group patients had lower sinus rate and longer unadjusted sinus node recovery time (SNRT) at pacing cycle lengths of 600, 500 and 400 ms. However, both corrected (SNRT-RR) and normalized (SNRT/RR) SNRT did not differ among groups. Compared to PRO group patients, AV nodal conduction was slower in DEX group patients as evidenced by longer PR and AH intervals, and a higher Wenckebach cycle length and AV node effective refractory period (ERP) was observed. Conduction properties in the His-Purkinje system were not different among groups, as QRS width and HV interval were similar. An arrhythmia, mainly atrial fibrillation, was induced in 33 patients (21%) during the electrophysiological study, without differences among groups.

Conclusions

Sinus rate and AV conduction are slower during deep sedation with dexmedetomidine compared to propofol. These differences in electrophysiological effects need to be taken into account when using these anesthetics during cardiovascular interventions.

Durability of CLOSE-guided pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation - First results from a prospective remapping study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

The CLOSE protocol for pulmonary vein isolation (CLOSE-PVI) combines ablation index and inter-lesion distance (≤6 mm) targets. CLOSE-PVI has been shown to result in high clinical success rates. Data on durability of PVI after CLOSE-PVI mainly derive from repeat procedures in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with recurrent AF.

Purpose

We sought to assess the incidence of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections during a staged redo procedure performed independently of AF recurrence 6 months after CLOSE-PVI in patients with persistent AF.

Methods

In this prospective, single-center study, patients with symptomatic persistent AF (EHRA score >1) undergoing AF ablation were included. Close-PVI was performed during the index procedure. A blanking period of 3 months was applied. Seven-day Holter ECGs were performed at 3 and 6 months post ablation. All patients underwent a staged redo procedure including high-density voltage mapping of the left atrium at 6 months after the index procedure.

Results

Overall, 20 patients were included (median age: 68 years [IQR 63-71]; 20% women; median duration of persistent AF: 8 months [IQR 5-15]; median LAVI 45 ml/m2 [IQR 43-53]). All PVs were successfully isolated with CLOSE-PVI during the index procedure. Four patients (20%) had AF recurrence. The redo procedure was performed after a median of 6.1 months (IQR 5.6-7.3). Of 80 PVs, 71 (89%) were still isolated. No patient had a common ostium. Reconnections were observed in 3 left superior (15%), in one left inferior (5%), in one right superior (5%) and in 4 right inferior (20%) PVs. Fourteen patients (74%) had completely isolated PVs. Two of four patients with AF recurrence (50%) and 12 of 16 patients without AF recurrence (75%) had completely isolated PVs (p=0.33).

Conclusions

CLOSE-PVI achieves durable PVI after 6 months in the majority of patients with persistent AF. In half of persistent AF patients with recurrence after CLOSE-PVI, all PVs are still isolated. These patients may need adjunctive ablation.

Impact of clinical risk factor profile vs. atrial fibrillation phenotype on outcome after pulmonary vein isolation

Aims

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly performed. Both clinical risk factors as well as the AF phenotype have been shown to influence ablation outcomes. The inter-relationship of the two however is incompletely understood.

Methods

In a retrospective analysis of a prospective registry of patients undergoing a first pulmonary vein isolation, the association of 8 predefined clinical risk factors (age >70 years, female gender, hypertension, BMI >30 kg/m2, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease (CKD; eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2) and diabetes mellitus) and the AF phenotype (paroxysmal vs. persistent AF) were assessed as well as their impact on AF recurrence during follow-up.

Results

Overall, 715 patients were enrolled (median age 63 years, 27% females, 69% paroxysmal AF). The prevalence of obesity, hypertension, heart failure and CKD was significantly higher in persistent AF, while female gender was more prevalent in paroxysmal AF. After 2 years of follow-up, overall freedom from recurrence was 46%, and was higher in paroxysmal AF compared to persistent AF (54.1% vs. 29.1%, p<0.001). Of the clinical risk factors, obesity (p=0.02), CKD (p=0.01) and heart failure (p=0.01) were significantly associated with lower arrhythmia-free survival, and there was a trend for hypertension and coronary artery disease (both p<0.2). A risk score composed of those 5 factors was associated with recurrences in patients with paroxysmal AF (p=0.04, Figure 1), but not in those with persistent AF (p=0.85, Figure 2).

Conclusion

Clinical risk factors predict outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. This is likely due to a strong association of those risk factors with the occurrence of persistent AF.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1Figure 2

P1492Comparison of the long-term performance of the quadripolar IS-4 and the bipolar IS-1 left ventricular lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

The implantation of left ventricular (LV) leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the management of lead-related complications can be challenging. The introduction of the quadripolar IS-4 LV lead may have facilitated the implantation procedure and may have reduced lead-related complications. Data of long-term follow-up (FU) comparing the IS-4 lead with the IS-1 LV lead are rare and conflicting.

PURPOSE

Comparison of lead-related complications and all-cause mortality between CRT patients who received an IS-4 or an IS-1 LV lead in the long-term FU.

METHODS

Adults with an indication for a CRT-Defibrillator or CRT-Pacemaker, a successful endovascular IS-4 or IS-1 LV lead implantation, and a minimal FU of three years were included in this retrospective study. The combined primary endpoint was freedom from lead-related complications defined as (i) occurrence of persisting high pacing threshold (>2.75V/0.4ms), (ii) unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation, (iii) LV lead dislodgement/disruption, (iv) the necessity of re-interventions affecting the LV lead, and (v) LV lead deactivation/explantation. Secondary endpoints were all singular complications and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Eligible for the study were 133 patients (IS-4 n = 66; IS-1 n = 67) with a mean FU of 4.03 ± 1.93 years. Baseline characteristics of both patient groups did not differ significantly. Freedom from lead-related complications was higher in patients with an IS-4 lead as compared to an IS-1 lead (Figure 1; 87.9% vs. 65.7%; p = 0.002). The secondary outcomes showed a higher rate of LV lead dislodgement/disruption (4.5% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.015) in the IS-1 patient group and more patients suffered from unresolved phrenic nerve stimulation with an IS-1 lead (3.0% vs. 13.4%; p = 0.029). LV lead deactivation/explantation during FU and LV lead-related re-interventions were fewer in case of an IS-4 lead (4.5% vs 22.4%; p = 0.003; 6.1% vs. 17.9%; p = 0.036, respectively). The rate of persisting high pacing thresholds and all-cause mortality did not differ (4.5% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.492; 22.7% vs 25.4%; p = 0.721, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The quadripolar IS-4 LV lead showed in this retrospective study a better long-term performance than the bipolar IS-1 lead.

Abstract Figure 1

P2855Unexpectedly high rate of lead failure of the Microport (formerly Sorin/Livanova) Beflex and Vega pacemaker electrodes: A single centre experience

Introduction

Pacing leads remain the weak link of current pacemaker systems. Various differences in design and material exist among companies. Lead performance is mainly assessed via post-marketing studies of the manufacturing companies. Reliable independent reports are rare. We aimed to study the early and long-term performance of the Microport (formerly Sorin/Livanova) Beflex and Vega leads at our centre, for which a lead survival >99% at 3 years has been reported by the company.

Method

In this single centre, retrospective study we analysed the performance of all right ventricular Microport pacemaker leads implanted at our centre between January 2014 and January 2018. Only first pacemaker implants were considered. Lead failure was defined as any lead issue requiring reintervention during follow-up (dislocation, perforation, electrical abnormalities such as lead noise or excessively high thresholds).

Results

A total of 271 Microport right ventricular pacing leads were implanted (233 Beflex and 38 Vega leads). Mean patient age was 76±13.1 years (66% men). Dual chamber pacemakers were implanted in 162 patients (60%) and single chamber in 109 (40%). Mean threshold at implant was 0.6V/0.5ms (range 0.3–1.2V), mean R wave 13.2 mV (range 1.5–30mV) and mean impedance 816 Ohm (range 469–1639 Ohm). Patients without available follow-up information were excluded (N=18, 6.6%). The remaining 253 patients (93.4%) were analysed. Median follow-up was 1.26 years, IQR [25%=0.91 and 75%=2.24]. We observed a total of 25 lead failures (10%). Lead dislocation occurred in 2 cases (0.8%), lead perforation in 5 cases (2%), electrical abnormalities in 6 cases (2.4%) and excessively high threshold in 12 cases (4.8%; mean voltage 4V, range 2–7.5V; mean pulse width 0.75ms, range 0.35–1ms). Yearly incidence of lead failure per 100 leads was 6.1% (95%-CI [4.09–8.98] with a failure rate of 12.74% at 3 year in Kaplan-Meier analysis (Figure).

Figure 1

Conclusion

We found an unexpectedly high rate of lead failure of the Microport Beflex and Vega pacing leads at our centre. The two main reasons for premature lead failure were excessively high thresholds as well as electrical abnormalities during follow-up. Comparison of lead performance with other centres and against other leads are needed to further assess the magnitude of the problem.