Toxicity and Patient Reported Quality of Life after PSMA-PET and mpMRT-Based Focal Dose Escalated Definitive Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer Patients: 2-Year Follow-Up of the HypoFocal Phase II Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The prospective, 2-armed non-randomized HypoFocal phase II trial investigates the safety and feasibility of focal dose escalated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients based on PSMA-PET and multiparametric MRI. This approach improves tumor coverage and thus putatively treatment effectiveness but leads to larger boost volumes. Here we present toxicity and patient reported quality of life (QoL) results after 2 years follow-up (FU) MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa and cN0/cM0 stage were included. Patients in arm A received 60 Gy in 20 fractions to the prostate with an integrated boost of up to 75 Gy. Patients in arm B received one session HDR-BT with 15 Gy to the prostate and a boost of up to 19 Gy, followed by EBRT of 44 Gy in 20 fractions. Boost volumes were defined by PSMA-PET and mpMRI based on validated approaches. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (CTCAE v5.0) and QoL with IPSS and EORTC questionnaires (QLQ30 and PR25) were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were treated in both arms in two centers (Freiburg and Berlin). Table 1 shows patients characteristics. In arm, A grade 2 GU and GI toxicity rates after 2 years were 8% and 4%. There were no grade 3 GU toxicities. Two patients experienced grade 3 GI toxicities due to multifactorial causes. In Arm B grade 2 GU and GI toxicity rates after 2 years were 17% and 0%. No grade 3 toxicities were observed in arm B. Toxicities were not statistically significantly different between baseline and 2y FU (p>0.055). QoL analysis was performed with patients with available questionnaires at baseline and 2y FU (12-15 in Arm A and 13-15 in Arm B). Only bowel function (p = 0.0005, median 4 vs 25 points) in Arm A and sexual- (p = 0.016, median 25 vs 50 points) and bowel function (p = 0.004, median 0 vs 8 points) and dyspnea (p = 0.031, median 0 vs 0 points) in Arm B decreased significantly after 2 year FU. Other QoL items were not significantly different. Bowel symptoms were significantly worse in Arm A compared to Arm B (p = 0.003). Median PSA values after 2 years were 0.23 ng/ml in Arm A and 0.33 ng/ml in Arm B.

CONCLUSION

Despite large boost volumes, the 2 years FU of the HypoFocal-Phase II trials shows no significantly increased GU and GU toxicities compared to baseline symptoms. Patients reported about a good QoL but increased bowel symptoms after 2 years, particularly if treated with EBRT only. Implementation of PSMA-PET into focal dose escalated radiotherapy approaches appears safe and feasible. However, radioproctitis demands careful management. The current PSA values suggest a highly effective therapy, but longer FU is needed to evaluate oncological outcomes. The HypoFocal-SBRT phase III trial will evaluate the PSMA-PET and mpMRI-based focal dose escalated SBRT.

Feasibility, pitfalls and results of a structured concept-development phase for a randomized controlled phase III trial on radiotherapy in primary prostate cancer patients

Objective

Failure rate in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is > 50%, includes safety-problems, underpowered statistics, lack of efficacy, lack of funding or insufficient patient recruitment and is even more pronounced in oncology trials. We present results of a structured concept-development phase (CDP) for a phase III RCT on personalized radiotherapy (RT) in primary prostate cancer (PCa) patients implementing prostate specific membrane antigen targeting positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET).

Materials and methods

The 1 yr process of the CDP contained five main working packages: (i) literature search and scoping review, (ii) involvement of individual patients, patients’ representatives and patients’ self-help groups addressing the patients’ willingness to participate in the preparation process and the conduct of RCTs as well as the patient informed consent (PIC), (iii) involvement of national and international experts and expert panels (iv) a phase II pilot study investigating the safety of implementation of PSMA-PET for focal dose escalation RT and (v) in-silico RT planning studies assessing feasibility of envisaged dose regimens and effects of urethral sparing in focal dose escalation.

Results

(i) Systematic literature searches confirmed the high clinical relevance for more evidence on advanced RT approaches, in particular stereotactic body RT, in high-risk PCa patients. (ii) Involvement of patients, patient representatives and randomly selected males relevantly changed the PIC and initiated a patient empowerment project for training of bladder preparation. (iii) Discussion with national and international experts led to adaptions of inclusion and exclusion criteria. (iv) Fifty patients were treated in the pilot trial and in- and exclusion criteria as well as enrollment calculations were adapted accordingly. Parallel conduction of the pilot trial revealed pitfalls on practicability and broadened the horizon for translational projects. (v) In-silico planning studies confirmed feasibility of envisaged dose prescription. Despite large prostate- and boost-volumes of up to 66% of the prostate, adherence to stringent anorectal dose constraints was feasible. Urethral sparing increased the therapeutic ratio.

Conclusion

The dynamic framework of interdisciplinary working programs in CDPs enhances robustness of RCT protocols and may be associated with decreased failure rates. Structured recommendations are warranted to further define the process of such CDPs in radiation oncology trials.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09434-2.