Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: a review of outcomes and prognostic scores evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic brain radiosurgery provides good local control in patients with limited brain metastases. A newly developed frameless system allows pain-free treatment. We reviewed the effectiveness of this frameless stereotactic brain radiosurgery and identified prognostic factors that may aid better patient selection.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with brain metastases treated with linear accelerator-based frameless stereotactic brain radiosurgery between January 2010 and July 2015 in a university affiliated hospital in Hong Kong were reviewed. Outcomes including local and distant brain control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were analysed. Prognostic factors were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses. Association of outcomes with four common prognostic scores was performed.

RESULTS

In this study, 64 patients with 94 lesions were treated with a median dose of 18 Gy (range, 12-22 Gy) in a single fraction. The median follow-up was 11.5 months. One-year actuarial local and distant brain control rates were 72% and 71%, respectively. The median overall survival was 13.0 months. On multivariable analysis, Karnofsky performance status score (>50 vs ≤50) and number of lesions (1-2 vs ≥3) were found to associate significantly with distinct brain progression-free survival (P=0.022, hazard ratio=0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.05-0.80 and P=0.003, hazard ratio=0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.68, respectively). Overall survival was associated significantly with Basic Score for Brain Metastases (P=0.031), Score Index for Radiosurgery in Brain Metastases (P=0.007), and Graded Prognostic Assessment (P=0.003). Improvement in overall survival was observed in all groups of different prognostic scores.

CONCLUSION

Frameless stereotactic brain radiosurgery is effective in patients with oligo-metastases of brain and should be increasingly considered in patients with favourable prognostic scoring.

Abstract PD01-08: Differences in estrogen receptor signaling in non-malignant primary ER-positive breast epithelial cells and breast cancer

Background: The estrogen receptor (ER) is expressed in ∼70% of sporadic breast cancer and activates genes driving cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. We have previously performed genome-wide analysis of ER binding sites in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, and identified distinct mechanisms of ER signaling. We have also previously used EpCAM and CD49f as markers to enrich for viable ER-positive (ER+) cells obtained from non malignant breast tissue. Here, we seek to elucidate differences in ER signaling between non-malignant and ER+ breast cancer cells.

Methods: Primary breast epithelial cells were obtained from patients undergoing reduction mammoplasties and surgical excision of ER+ breast cancer. After dissociation of breast reductions into a single-cell suspension, ER+ mature luminal (ML; EpCAM+CD49f−) and luminal progenitor (LP; EpCAM+CD49f+) subpopulations were obtained by flow cytometry. Following estrogen stimulation, RNA was extracted for gene microarray analysis. ER chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) was performed. These results were compared to MCF-7 breast cancer cells.

Results: Reduction mammoplasty and ER+ breast cancer tissues were analyzed, and compared to MCF-7 cells. Gene expression profiles were different between non-malignant tissue and ER+ breast cancer cells following estrogen stimulation, with a 2–3 fold higher number of ER regulated genes in ER+ breast cancer compared to ER+ non malignant cells, and few overlapping estrogen regulated genes. Genes that promotes cell cycling and cell proliferation were downregulated in non-malignant tissue, but were upregulated in breast cancer cells (P < 10–5). CYP1A1, a major estradiol metabolizing enzyme, was upregulated in normal cells but downregulated in ER+ breast cancer cells. Motif analysis of ER ChIP-seq data in normal and ER+ breast cancer tissues demonstrated an enrichment of ER motifs in the overlapping sites and an enrichment of FOXA1 motifs in ER+ breast cancer cells and TCF12 motifs in non-malignant ER+ epithelial cells.

Conclusions: There are contrasting differences in ER signaling between normal mammary and breast cancer cells, with estrogen having anti-proliferative effects in normal luminal cells compared to pro-proliferative effects in breast cancer. ER ChIP-Seq has identified TCF12 as a major co-factor in non-malignant breast tissue whilst FOXA1 is a major co-factor in ER+ breast cancer. Our data provides evidence for key alterations in ER-signaling during tumorigenesis, and identifies potential mechanisms to target cancer specific ER signaling.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD01-08.