Single-center Outcomes After Liver Transplantation With SARS-CoV-2-Positive Donors: An Argument for Increased Utilization

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in SARS-CoV-2-test positive potential organ donors. The benefits of life-saving liver transplantation (LT) must be balanced against the potential risk of donor-derived viral transmission. Although emerging evidence suggests that the use of COVID-19-positive donor organs may be safe, granular series thoroughly evaluating safety are still needed. Results of 29 consecutive LTs from COVID-19-positive donors at a single center are presented here.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of LT recipients between April 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Differences between recipients of COVID-19-positive (n = 29 total; 25 index, 4 redo) and COVID-19-negative (n = 472 total; 454 index, 18 redo) deceased donor liver grafts were compared.

Results

COVID-19-positive donors were significantly younger (P = 0.04) and had lower kidney donor profile indices (P = 0.04) than COVID-19-negative donors. Recipients of COVID-19-positive donor grafts were older (P = 0.04) but otherwise similar to recipients of negative donors. Donor SARS-CoV-2 infection status was not associated with a overall survival of recipients (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-5.04; P = 0.89). There were 3 deaths among recipients of liver grafts from COVID-19-positive donors. No death seemed virally mediated because there was no qualitative association with peri-LT antispike antibody titers, post-LT prophylaxis, or SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Conclusions

The utilization of liver grafts from COVID-19-positive donors was not associated with a decreased overall survival of recipients. There was no suggestion of viral transmission from donor to recipient. The results from this large single-center study suggest that COVID-19-positive donors may be used safely to expand the deceased donor pool.

Polyarteritis Nodosa Associated With Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a rare necrotizing vasculitis that affects medium-sized arteries. The association of hepatitis B virus (HBV)and HIV with PAN is well documented. Although there are documented cases of PAN in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the connection between PAN and HCV is not well established. We report a case of PAN in a patient with HCV infection who failed treatment with interferon.

High sustained virologic response rates, regardless of race or socioeconomic class, in patients treated with chronic hepatitis C in community practice using a specialized pharmacy team

Approved direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens against hepatitis C virus (HCV) can cure nearly all patients; however, socioeconomic disparities may impact access and outcome. This study assesses socioeconomic factors, differences in insurance coverage and the drug prior authorization process in HCV-infected patients managed in community practices partnered with a dedicated pharmacy team with expertise in liver disease. This Institutional Review Board-approved, ongoing study captures data on a cohort of 2480 patients from community practices. Patients had chronic hepatitis C and were treated with DAA regimens selected by their physician. The HCV Health Outcomes Centers Network provides comprehensive patient management including a dedicated pharmacy support team with expertise in the prior authorization process. In this cohort, 60.1% were male, 49% were Hispanic Whites (HW), 37% were Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), and 14% were Black/African American (BAA). Eighty-seven percent of patients were treatment-naïve, 74% were infected with genotype 1 virus and 63% had advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis (F3/F4 = 68.2% HW, 65.6% BAA, 55.4% NHW). Forty percent of patients were on disability with the highest percentage in the BAA group and less than one-third were employed full time, regardless of race/ethnicity. Medicare covered 42% of BAA patients versus 32% of HW and NHW. The vast majority of HW (80%) and BAA (75%) had a median income below the median income of Texas residents. Additionally, 75% of HW and 71% of BAA had median income below the poverty level in Texas. Despite the above socioeconomic factors, 92% of all prior authorizations were approved upon first submission and patients received DAAs an average of 17 days from prescription. DAA therapy resulted in cure in 95.3% of patients (sustained virologic response = 94.8% HW, 94.0% BAA, 96.5% NHW). Despite having more advanced diseases and more negative socioeconomic factors, >94% of HW and BAA patients were cured. Continued patient education and communication with the healthcare team can lead to high adherence and > 94% HCV cure rates regardless of race/ethnicity or underlying socioeconomic factors in the community setting.

Women’s health issues in solid organ transplantation: Breast and gynecologic cancers in the post-transplant population

The success of solid organ transplant has steadily improved which has led to a unique set of post-transplant issues. The rates of de novo cancer in the solid organ transplant recipient population are higher than those in the general population. There is growing evidence that breast and gynecologic cancers may have a higher mortality rate in post-transplant patients. Cervical and vulvovaginal cancers specifically have a significantly higher mortality in this population. Despite this increased mortality risk, there is currently no consistent standard in screening and identifying these cancers in post-transplant patients. Breast, ovarian and endometrial cancers do not appear to have significantly increased incidence. However, the data on these cancers remains limited. Further studies are needed to determine if more aggressive screening strategies would be of benefit for these cancers. Here we review the cancer incidence, mortality risk and current screening methods associated with breast and gynecologic cancers in the post-solid organ transplant population.

Behavioural characteristics associated with dementia assessment referrals in adults with Down syndrome

BACKGROUND

Behavioural changes associated with dementia in Down syndrome are well documented, yet little is known about the effect of such behaviours on carers and referral. By comparing the behavioural and cognitive profiles of individuals referred for a dementia assessment with those of individuals not referred, some insight can be gained into behavioural characteristics that initiate referral for specialist support or interventions.

METHOD

Forty-six adults with Down syndrome were divided into two groups dependent upon method of entry into the study; post-referral to a specialist service for older adults with intellectual disabilities and Down syndrome for a dementia assessment (n = 17) or after receiving information sent out to day centres and residential homes (n = 29). These groups were compared on established measures of dementia alongside two informant measures of behaviour.

RESULTS

Those referred for a dementia assessment evidenced scores indicative of cognitive decline on both informant and direct Neuropsychological Assessments and showed more behavioural excesses, but not deficits, and lower socialisation and coping skills than those in the comparison group. Carers of those referred for a dementia assessment reported a greater impact of behavioural excesses on staff than on the individual showing the behaviour in contrast to the comparison group.

CONCLUSION

The behavioural differences between those referred and the comparison group suggest that two factors are involved in the instigation of a referral for a dementia assessment: the nature of the behavioural presentation (excesses rather than deficits) and the effect of that behavioural change upon the care staff.