Elevated Troponin I as a Marker for Unfavorable Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke

OBJECTIVE

To assess if elevated cardiac troponin I (cTnI) serves as a sign of unfavorable functional outcomes in ischemic stroke.

METHODS

In this single-center prospective cohort study, 100 consecutive patients admitted with acute ischemic stroke (normal troponin I group n = 52, raised troponin I group n = 48) were included. Hospital mortality was documented in both groups; the remaining patients were followed up to 90 days. Then two groups were compared in terms of unfavorable short-term outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale > 3) and mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to determine the predictive value of elevated cTnI. The Kaplan-Meier curve was drawn and compared to determine the difference in survival between the two groups. To find out the most probable cut-off level for an unfavorable outcome, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted.

RESULT

 A higher frequency of coronary artery disease (p=0.030), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (p=0.008) score, and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (p=0.002) was observed in raised troponin I group. Even after the exclusion of confounding elevated troponin I was found to be an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, OR 8.25 {95% confidence interval, CI: 2.65-25.75}; p<0.001). The patients with raised troponin I had a significantly lower rate of survival after 90 days (p=0.022). The elevated troponin I was observed to have a significantly high accuracy (p<0.001; area under curve, AUC: 0.768 {moderate accuracy}, 95% CI: 0 .676 to 0.861) in predicting unfavorable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Elevated cTnI is independently associated with unfavorable short-term outcomes. It is also associated with a lower rate of survival.

Efficacy and Safety of Analog Insulin in Comparison With Human Insulin for Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients With Acute Stroke: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Center Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of analog insulins in comparison with human insulins for hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients with acute stroke.

METHODS

In this single-center, open-label, randomized trial, 102 patients (age 59.4 ± 11.7 years, 54 women) admitted with acute stroke (52 ischemic, 50 hemorrhagic) and hyperglycemia were assigned to analog insulin (n = 52) or human insulin (n = 50) group during February to June 2021. Insulin was initiated and titrated according to the predefined standard protocol. The capillary blood glucose (BG) level was monitored by standardized glucometers. The primary outcomes were mean daily BG and the number of hypoglycemic events.

RESULTS

Between the 2 treatment groups, there was no significant difference in the mean daily BG (P >.05 for all days) or in the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes (P =.727). Four participants experienced severe hypoglycemia; all were receiving human insulin (P =.054). In the analog insulin group, there was a tendency toward lower daily total requirement for insulin (P =.053). The difference in bolus insulin dose was significantly lower in the analog insulin group (P =.029), but the difference in basal insulin dose was similar (P =.167). Between the 2 groups, there were no significant differences in the hospital mortality rate, modified Rankin Scale score on outcome, or length of hospital stay (P =.729,.658, and.918, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Hospitalized patients acute stroke and hyperglycemia exhibited similar mean BG but a trend of lower incidence of severe hypoglycemia when treated with analog insulins in comparison with human insulin.

Mucormycosis in Different Clinical Settings: A Case Series

Mucormycosis is a fungal infection that can be very destructive and often fatal. People most prone to this infection include those who are immunocompromised. Early diagnosis and treatment, along with addressing the risk factors, play a pivotal role in the management. Here, the authors are reporting three cases of immunocompromised patients. Among them, two had uncontrolled diabetes, and the third had a history of renal transplant and COVID-19 infection. All three cases are distinct anatomically; one is pulmonary, one is rhino-orbital-cerebral, and the last one is rhino-maxillary.