American Society of Clinical Oncology Road to Recovery Report: Learning From the COVID-19 Experience to Improve Clinical Research and Cancer Care

This report presents the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) evaluation of the adaptations in care delivery, research operations, and regulatory oversight made in response to the coronavirus pandemic and presents recommendations for moving forward as the pandemic recedes. ASCO organized its recommendations for clinical research around five goals to ensure lessons learned from the COVID-19 experience are used to craft a more equitable, accessible, and efficient clinical research system that protects patient safety, ensures scientific integrity, and maintains data quality. The specific goals are: (1) ensure that clinical research is accessible, affordable, and equitable; (2) design more pragmatic and efficient clinical trials; (3) minimize administrative and regulatory burdens on research sites; (4) recruit, retain, and support a well-trained clinical research workforce; and (5) promote appropriate oversight and review of clinical trial conduct and results. Similarly, ASCO also organized its recommendations regarding cancer care delivery around five goals: (1) promote and protect equitable access to high-quality cancer care; (2) support safe delivery of high-quality cancer care; (3) advance policies to ensure oncology providers have sufficient resources to provide high-quality patient care; (4) recognize and address threats to clinician, provider, and patient well-being; and (5) improve patient access to high-quality cancer care via telemedicine. ASCO will work at all levels to advance the recommendations made in this report.

Nursing intervention to enhance outpatient chemotherapy symptom management: Patient-reported outcomes of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a nurse practitioner (NP)-delivered symptom management intervention for patients initiating chemotherapy for nonmetastatic cancer. The aim was to reduce patient-reported symptom burden by facilitating patient-NP collaboration and the early management of symptoms.

METHODS

At the time of the first chemotherapy visit, adult participants with nonmetastatic breast, colorectal, or lung cancer (120 participants) completed self-report measures and were then randomly assigned to standard care plus the intervention or standard care alone. Intervention participants received proactive telephone calls from their oncology team NP during the week after each of the first 2 chemotherapy administration visits. Measures were repeated at the second and third chemotherapy visits. Group differences were analyzed with regard to patient-reported symptoms (Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form items), satisfaction with care (Family Caregiver Satisfaction-patient scale), and the likelihood of depression or anxiety symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-4).

RESULTS

At the time of the first visit, 50.8% of participants reported ≥1 physical symptom, most commonly lack of energy (35.8%) and drowsiness (30.8%). The number of symptoms (gamma coefficient [γ] = 0.16; P<.001), symptom distress (γ = 0.45; P<.001), and satisfaction with care (γ = 0.24; P = .004) increased whereas the likelihood of anxiety symptoms decreased (γ = -0.19; P = .02) and the likelihood of depression symptoms did not change (γ = 0.01; P = .91). Outcomes did not differ by randomized group. Randomized group interacted with emetogenic potential in predicting symptom distress (γ = 0.43; P = .03) and satisfaction with care (γ = -0.45; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention did not appear to reduce symptom burden compared with standard care. Early symptoms highlight the importance of continuing to examine strategies to improve symptom management during chemotherapy for nonmetastatic disease.