P11.65.B GBM AGILE: A global, phase 2/3 adaptive platform trial to evaluate multiple treatment regimens in newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma

Background

GBM AGILE (Glioblastoma Adaptive, Global, Innovative Learning Environment) is a biomarker based, multi-arm, international, seamless Phase 2/3 Response Adaptive Randomization platform trial designed to rapidly identify experimental therapies that improve overall survival and confirm efficacious experimental therapies and associated biomarker signatures to support new drug approvals and registration. It is a collaboration between academic investigators, patient organizations and industry, under the sponsorship of the non-profit organization, Global Coalition for Adaptive Research, to support new drug applications for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM.

Material and Methods

The primary objective of GBM AGILE is to identify therapies that effectively improve overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM. Bayesian response adaptive randomization is used within subtypes of the disease to assign participants to investigational arms based on their performance. Operating under a master protocol, GBM AGILE allows multiple drugs from different pharmaceutical companies to be evaluated simultaneously and/or over time against a common control arm. Based on performance, a drug may graduate and move to a Stage 2 (Phase 3) within the trial, and the totality of the data can be used for a new drug application and registration process. New experimental therapies are added as information about promising new drugs is identified while other therapies are removed as they complete their evaluation. The master protocol/ trial infrastructure includes efficiencies through an adaptive trial design, shared control arm and operational processes such as risk-based monitoring and enhanced remote activities. With its adaptable structure, GBM AGILE has continued trial activation, inclusion of new investigational therapies, and enrollment globally through the challenges of a global pandemic.GBM AGILE provides an efficient mechanism to screen and develop robust information regarding the efficacy of proposed novel therapeutics and associated biomarkers for GBM and to quickly move therapies and biomarkers into clinic. GBM AGILE received initial approval from the United States FDA in April 2019, and in Europe through the Voluntary Harmonization Procedure (VHP) in April, 2021. As of 2022, AGILE has screened over 1000 patients studying multiple investigational treatments. Enrollment rates are 3 to 4 times greater than traditional GBM trials, with active sites averaging 0.75 to 1 patients/site/month.

Currently, there are 41 sites activated in the US, 4 in Canada and 2 in Switzerland and an estimated 24 sites yet to open in Germany, France, Switzerland, Italy and Austria. In addition to the continued expansion in Europe, effort is undergoing to extend the trial to China and Australia as well. Clinical trial information: NCT03970447

OS01.7.A Detection of methylation-based prognostic signatures in liquid biopsy specimens from patients with meningiomas

Background

Detection of distinct epigenetic biomarkers in circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of liquid biopsy (LB) specimens (e.g. blood) fosters opportunity for prognostication of central nervous system (CNS) tumors and has not been thoroughly explored in patients with meningiomas.

Material and Methods

We profiled the cfDNA methylome (EPIC array) in serum specimens from patients with meningiomas (MNG; n= 63) and harnessed internal and external meningioma tissue methylome data with reported follow up (n=48). To predict recurrence risk (RR), we consolidated a tissue cohort with at least 5 years of follow up and divided them into confirmed recurrence (CR; either reported progressive disease in post-surgical imaging, or additional resections following initial surgery) and confirmed no-recurrence (CNR: no confirmed disease progression w/in at least 5-years of follow-up). Then through application of an iterative process consisting of multiple tissue- and serum-based supervised analyses, we identified risk-specific methylation markers with serum specific features which, when inputted into a random forest algorithm allowed for segregation of both tumor tissue and liquid biopsy specimens according to recurrence risk. We estimated immune cell composition using MethylCIBERSORT, where a reference methylome atlas of chosen immune cell types was utilized to deconvolute the MNG samples.

Results

The resulting recurrence risk classifier demonstrated an appreciable predictive power in classifying samples as high or low recurrence risk across the tumor tissue cohort (ACC: 87.5%, CUI+: 85.2%). When compared to another classifier, our model demonstrated statistically significant agreement across primary meningioma samples (κ=0.269, p=0.002), and more accurately predicted samples to recur across an expanded time window (time to recurrence >5yrs). Across resulting liquid biopsy classifications, recurrence risk subgroups were analogous with reported risk factors, including WHO grade, extent of resection, and tumor location. Recurrence risk subgroups (high and low) also demonstrated differential estimated immune cell contributions, with low-risk samples exhibiting a “hot” profile, or enrichment of B-Cells, CD56- and CD4 T-Cells, and natural killer cells. Notably, the estimated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, previously purported to be relevant to tumor prognosis, was appreciably higher for those meningioma samples with the highest recurrence risk.

Conclusion

DNA methylation markers identified in the serum are suitable for the development of machine learning-based models which present high predictive power to prognosticate patients with meningioma and estimate a differential immune profile across recurrence risk groups. After validation in an external cohort, this noninvasive approach may improve the presurgical therapeutic management of patients with meningiomas.

P01.02 Serum-derived DNA methylation markers distinguish functional and invasiveness subtypes in patients harboring pituitary tumors

BACKGROUND

Molecular profiling of circulating biomarkers released by tumors has a relevant clinical value in central nervous system (CNS) tumors, but its feasibility has not been investigated in pituitary tumors (PT) despite being the second common intraaxial tumors of the CNS (~15%). Although usually benign and slow-growing, they can be nonfunctioning and invade surrounding structures resulting in significant comorbidities. DNA methylation aberrations distinguish PT according to their functional status but their role in invasiveness is still unclear. Pre-surgical detection of clinically relevant molecular markers associated with tumor behavior can address current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We hypothesized that PT release cell-free DNA (cfDNA) into the bloodstream allowing for the profiling of epigenetic markers associated with relevant clinicopathological features.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Genome-wide methylome profile of paired serum cfDNA (EPIC array) and tissue from 13 patients with pituitary macroadenomas (9 males; median age: 62; 9 NFPT, 6 invasive) and 3 controls serum (patients with epilepsy).

RESULTS

Unsupervised analysis of the serum methylome from patients harboring PT was distinct from controls and other diseases (hypopituitarism, glioma and colorectal cancer) and supervised analysis (Wilcoxon Rank-sum Test) identified significant differentially methylated probes (DMP) that segregated PT from control serum specimens. Nonfunctioning and invasive-specific DMPs identified in the serum also defined functional, and less prominently invasive status, in the tissue of an independent cohort of PT.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to show the feasibility to profile the methylome in the serum of patients with PT using cfDNA. In addition, we identified unique methylation signatures that distinguished PT according to functional and invasiveness subtypes. These results underpin the potential role of methylation profile and liquid biopsy as a noninvasive approach to assess clinically relevant molecular features in the serum of patients harboring PT.

OS1.5 Detection of glioma and prognostic subtypes by non-invasive circulating cell-free DNA methylation markers

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling has shown that epigenetic abnormalities are biologically important in glioma and can be used to classify these tumors into distinct prognostic groups. Thus far, DNA profiling has required surgically resected glioma tissue; however, gliomas release tumoral material into biofluids providing an opportunity for a minimally invasive testing. While prior studies have shown that molecular markers can be detected in liquid biopsy (LB), there has been low sensitivity for tumor-specific markers. We hypothesize that the low sensitivity is due to the targeted assay methods. METHODS: Genome-wide CpG methylation levels in DNA of tumor tissue and cell-free DNA serum of glioma patients. RESULTS: We defined glioma-specific and IDH-specific epigenetic LB (eLB) signatures (Glioma-eLB and IDH-eLB, respectively) from serum cell-free DNA from patients diagnosed with glioma (N=15 IDH mutant and N=7 IDH wildtype) and with epilepsy (N=3). The epigenetic profiles of the matched tissue demonstrate that these eLB signatures reflected the signature of the tumor. Through cross-validation we show that Glioma-eLB can accurately predict a patient’s glioma from those with other neoplasias (N=6 Colon; N=14 Pituitary; N=3 Breast; N=4 Lung), non-neoplastic immunological conditions (N=22 sepsis; N=9 pancreatic islet transplantation), and from healthy individuals (sensitivity: 98%; specificity: 99%). Finally, IDH-eLB includes promoter methylated markers associated with genes known to be involved in glioma tumorigenesis (PVT1 and CXCR6). CONCLUSIONS: The application of the non-invasive eLB signature discovered in this study has the potential to complement the standard of care for patients harboring glioma.

This project is supported by the Henry Ford Health System, Department of Neurosurgery and the Hermelin Brain Tumor Center Foundation (A30935), United States National Institutes of Health (R01CA222146), and United States Department of Defense (CA170278)

P11.54 Identification of PDGFRA and MYC(N) as somatic driver genes in Glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Somatic oncogene amplification happens frequently in glioblastoma (GBM). The second most frequently amplified gene encoding receptor tyrosine kinases in GBMs is platelet derived growth factor alpha (PDGFRA) (15%). In contrast, MYC and MYCN amplification occurs in 1.6% and 2.9%, respectively. Our goal was to characterize the role of PDGFRɑ and Myc in GBM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Neurosphere cultures were implanted in cohorts of 10–15 nude mice. 5 PDX lines, presenting median survival of 29–59 days were classified as short survivors, and 5 lines with median survival between 104–134 days classified as long survivors. Total RNA was extracted from PDX terminal tumors (3 biological replicates) and sequenced in a paired-end read format. Mouse reads were filtered out using Xenome. MYC and PDGFRA expression patterns were analyzed in tissue microarrays representing duplicated samples from 40 glioma neurosphere-derived PDX lines by IHC (1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma, 8 recurrent GBM with 2 newly diagnosed/recurrent pairs). Normalized staining intensity (MI) and area (A) were quantified using Fiji/ImageJ.

RESULTS

PDGFRA, MYC, MYCN gene amplifications were represented in a molecularly diverse panel of GBM patient-derived cancer stem-like cells (CSC) and orthotopic mouse xenografts (PDX). Transforming to a normal distribution (log10), 4/13 of cell lines had a PDGFRA mRNA expression (RPKM) higher than 1.5. Similarly, one PDX line had a staining index of greater than 10, 11 (27.5%) had an index between 5–10. The range of intra-tumoral variance, represented by standard deviation, was 0.09–24.25 highlighting the heterogeneity of PDGFRɑ expression. PDGFRɑ phosphorylation (Y754) did not differ between 8 cell lines cultured in NMGF, but deviated in alternate medias without growth factors, supplemented with FBS. In comparison, MYC(N) mRNA expression is only elevated in the context of a known amplification. Furthermore, a a MYC activity signature consisting of 18 target genes was only evident in the 5 amplified CSC lines. Taking advantage of genomic heterogeneity, we have isolated subclones lacking PDGFRA amplification from a PDGFRA amplified GBM CSC. The absence of PDGFRA amplification reduced the self-renewal potential to 37% of the PDGFRA amplified cell population (p=0.001) in clone 1 and 57% in clone 2 (p=0.013). Pertaining to determinants of in vivo survival, MYC was altered in 80% of short survivors (2/5 MYC, 2/5 MYCN amplification) and in 0% of long survivors. Myc signature was highly correlated with in vivo survival (Pearsons’ corr. = -0.77) and MYC gene expression was correlated with in vivo TMZ resistance (corr. = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that PDGFRɑ expression and activity can occur in the absence of gene amplification, while Myc activity is dependent on gene amplification. Both oncogenes drive oncogenic pathways that should be explored as therapeutic targets.

Phase 1 dose escalation trial of the safety and pharmacokinetics of cabozantinib concurrent with temozolomide and radiotherapy or temozolomide after radiotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with high-grade gliomas

BACKGROUND

Cabozantinib inhibits mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and has demonstrated activity in patients with recurrent glioblastoma, warranting evaluation of the addition of cabozantinib to radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma.

METHODS

Cabozantinib doses of 40 mg and 60 mg were explored. Patients on the concurrent treatment arm received cabozantinib daily with standard TMZ and after RT continued cabozantinib daily with adjuvant TMZ. In the maintenance arm, patients who completed RT and ≥1 adjuvant cycle of TMZ continued adjuvant TMZ with added cabozantinib (3 schedules: days 1-28, days 1-14, or days 8-21).

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients (25 with recurrent glioblastoma and 1 patient with anaplastic astrocytoma) aged 30 to 72 years were enrolled (10 to the concurrent arm and 16 to the maintenance arm). The median number of post-RT TMZ cycles was 4.5 (range, 0-14 cycles) in the concurrent arm and 5.5 (range, 1-12 cycles) in the maintenance arm. Cabozantinib at a dose of 60 mg daily was the maximum administered dose and a dose of 40 mg daily was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose for both treatment arms (schedule of days 1-28). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (31% of patients), leukopenia (27% of patients, including 5 patients with neutropenia), and deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism (23% of patients) (adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]).

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib at a dose of 40 mg daily with RT plus TMZ and post-RT TMZ for patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma was generally well tolerated, and demonstrated no pharmacokinetic interactions with concurrent TMZ. Given the strong theoretical rationale for combining anti-VEGF and anti-MET activity with standard therapy, cabozantinib at a dose of 40 mg daily warrants evaluation in combination with standard therapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Outcome of Adult Brain Tumor Consortium (ABTC) prospective dose-finding trials of I-125 balloon brachytherapy in high-grade gliomas: challenges in clinical trial design and technology development when MRI treatment effect and recurrence appear similar

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to define the maximal safe radiation dose to guide further study of the GliaSite balloon brachytherapy (GSBT) system in untreated newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NEW-GBM) and recurrent high-grade glioma (REC-HGG). GBST is a balloon placed in the resection cavity and later filled through a subcutaneous port with liquid I-125 Iotrex, providing radiation doses that diminish uniformly with distance from the balloon surface.

METHODS

The Adult Brain Tumor Consortium initiated prospective dose-finding studies to determine maximum tolerated dose in NEW-GBM treated before standard RT or after surgery for REC-HGG. Patients were inevaluable if there was progression before the 90-day posttreatment toxicity evaluation point.

RESULTS

Ten NEW-GBM patients had the balloon placed, and 2/10 reached the 90 day timepoint. Five REC-HGG enrolled and two were assessable at the 90-day evaluation endpoint. Imaging progression occurred before 90-day evaluation in 7/12 treated patients. The trials were closed as too few patients were assessable to allow dose escalation, although no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Median survival from treatment was 15.3 months (95 % CI 7.1-23.6) for NEW-GBM and 12.8 months (95 % CI 4.2-20.9) for REC-HGG.

CONCLUSION

These trials failed to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for further testing as early imaging changes, presumed to be progression, were common and interfered with the assessment of treatment-related toxicity. The survival outcomes in these and other related studies, although based on small populations, suggest that GSBT may be worthy of further study using clinical and survival endpoints, rather than standard imaging results. The implications for local therapy development are discussed.

A safety run-in and randomized phase 2 study of cilengitide combined with chemoradiation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NABTT 0306)

BACKGROUND

Cilengitide is a selective integrin inhibitor that is well tolerated and has demonstrated biologic activity in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. The primary objectives of this randomized phase 2 trial were to determine the safety and efficacy of cilengitide when combined with radiation and temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and to select a dose for comparative clinical testing.

METHODS

In total, 112 patients were accrued. Eighteen patients received standard radiation and temozolomide with cilengitide in a safety run-in phase followed by a randomized phase 2 trial with 94 patients assigned to either a 500 mg dose group or 2000 mg dose group. The trial was designed to estimate overall survival benefit compared with a New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) Consortium internal historic control and data from the published European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial EORTC 26981.

RESULTS

Cilengitide at all doses studied was well tolerated with radiation and temozolomide. The median survival was 19.7 months for all patients, 17.4 months for the patients in the 500 mg dose group, 20.8 months for patients in the 2000 mg dose group, 30 months for patients who had methylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status, and 17.4 months for patients who had unmethylated MGMT status. For patients aged ≤70 years, the median survival and survival at 24 months was superior to what was observed in the EORTC trial (20.7 months vs 14.6 months and 41% vs 27%, respectively; P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

Cilengitide was well tolerated when combined with standard chemoradiation and may improve survival for patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme regardless of MGMT methylation status. The authors concluded that, from an efficacy and safety standpoint, future trials of this agent in this population should use the 2000 mg dose.

Correlation of perfusion parameters with genes related to angiogenesis regulation in glioblastoma: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Integration of imaging and genomic data is critical for a better understanding of gliomas, particularly considering the increasing focus on the use of imaging biomarkers for patient survival and treatment response. The purpose of this study was to correlate CBV and PS measured by using PCT with the genes regulating angiogenesis in GBM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen patients with WHO grade IV gliomas underwent pretreatment PCT and measurement of CBV and PS values from enhancing tumor. Tumor specimens were analyzed by TCGA by using Human Gene Expression Microarrays and were interrogated for correlation between CBV and PS estimates across the genome. We used the GO biologic process pathways for angiogenesis regulation to select genes of interest.

RESULTS

We observed expression levels for 92 angiogenesis-associated genes (332 probes), 19 of which had significant correlation with PS and 9 of which had significant correlation with CBV (P < .05). Proangiogenic genes such as TNFRSF1A (PS = 0.53, P = .024), HIF1A (PS = 0.62, P = .0065), KDR (CBV = 0.60, P = .0084; PS = 0.59, P = .0097), TIE1 (CBV = 0.54, P = .022; PS = 0.49, P = .039), and TIE2/TEK (CBV = 0.58, P = .012) showed a significant positive correlation; whereas antiangiogenic genes such as VASH2 (PS = -0.72, P = .00011) showed a significant inverse correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are provocative, with some of the proangiogenic genes showing a positive correlation and some of the antiangiogenic genes showing an inverse correlation with tumor perfusion parameters, suggesting a molecular basis for these imaging biomarkers; however, this should be confirmed in a larger patient population.