Discrepancies in hidradenitis suppurativa lesion characterization by providers and patients

BACKGROUND

The hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) clinical response (HiSCR) has come under scrutiny as several HS clinical trials failed to meet primary endpoints with high placebo responses. This may be due to limitations of the tool and raters' ability to accurately characterize and count lesions, rather than lack of efficacy of the studied drug. Due to HS lesion complexity and potential differences in rater training, it was hypothesized that there would be discrepancies in how providers characterize and count lesions for HS clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how HS providers and patients name and count HS lesions and to identify discrepancies among providers to initiate the development of consensus-driven guidance for HS rater training.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to the members of HIdradenitis SuppuraTiva cORe outcomes set International Collaboration (HISTORIC). Respondents were asked to classify lesion images composed of multiple and different morphology types and answer questions regarding inclusion of associated dermatological conditions.

RESULTS

Forty-seven HISTORIC members responded (29 providers; 18 patients). There was variability in how respondents classified HS lesions. Of 12 questions containing images, four had ≥50% of respondents choosing the same answer. With an image of a lesion composed of different morphologies, 45% of providers counted it as a single lesion and 45% counted it as multiple distinct lesions. With an image of multiple interconnected draining tunnels, 7% of providers classified it as a single draining tunnel while 79% categorized it as multiple draining tunnels with the number estimated by visual inspection. There was also variability in deciding whether lesions occurring in associated conditions should be considered separately or included in HS lesion counts. Patient responses were also variable.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of the current study reaffirms the gap in how providers characterize and count HS lesions for clinical trials and the need to develop consensus-driven rater training related to HS outcome measures.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is unreliable in predicting melanoma mortality for both younger and older patients

BACKGROUND

Melanoma disease patterns vary with patient age.

AIM

To evaluate sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in managing melanoma at differing patient ages.

METHODS

Online prediction tools were applied to compare SLNB positivity (SLNB+) and survival risk at patient ages 20-80. Tübingen melanoma data were used to determine variations in the hazard ratio of SLNB+ for mortality at different patient ages.

RESULTS

Regardless of tumour thickness, predicted SLNB+ rates were markedly higher than mortality rates for 20-year-old patients. For 80-year-old patients, it is the opposite.

DISCUSSION

If 1000 20-year-olds with a 0.4 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, 100 would likely be positive. If all 100 were to be offered adjuvant drug therapy (ADT), fewer than three more melanoma deaths in those 1000 patients would be avoided. In total, 97 patients would have received medication they may never have needed. If 1000 80-year-olds with a 3 mm thickness non-ulcerated melanoma underwent SLNB, only 40 would likely be positive. In total, 274 patients would be predicted to die of melanoma, 245 being SLNB negative and 29 SLNB+. ADT linked to SLNB+ could deny treatment to 89% of these high-risk patients.

LIMITATIONS

The authors relied on published risk data.

CONCLUSION

SLNB has poor specificity at predicting mortality in young melanoma patients and poor sensitivity in older patients. SLNB is not indicated in managing cutaneous melanoma for patients under 40 or over 60 years of age. Many such patients could be managed with wide local excision alone in their clinician's office-based practice. For all cutaneous melanoma patients at all ages, linking ADT to BAUSSS biomarker, (an algorithm of Breslow thickness, age, ulceration, subtype, sex and Site) rather than SLNB+ is likely more appropriate. BAUSSS provides a more accurate melanoma-specific mortality risk assessment for patients without burdening them with added surgery, hospitalization, costs or morbidity risk.

Viewpoint on the evaluation of severity and treatment effects in mild hidradenitis suppurativa: the cumulative IHS4 (IHS4-C)

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent and debilitating inflammatory skin disease, characterized by painful inflamed nodules, abscesses and tunnels in the skin folds. Up to 66% of HS patients can be classified as having mild disease. However, currently, most clinical trials are focusing on patients with moderate to severe disease, resulting in more available treatment options for this smaller group of patients. This difference in treatment options and lack of clinical trials for patients with mild HS has been noticed and additional focus on milder HS cases is requested. However, an important hurdle to overcome studying treatment efficacy in mild HS is an adequate treatment outcome. Patients with mild HS sometimes have no lesions due to waxing and waning of the disease. Furthermore, the difference in aim of a clinical trial for patients with mild disease should be taken into consideration. Where treatment of moderate to severe patients focusses on lowering the number of draining tunnels, abscesses and inflammatory nodules, in patient with mild disease, we focus on prevention of new lesions and progression to moderate and severe disease. This clinical characteristic of mild HS and difference in aim of clinical trials are the key challenges for efficacy measurement in mild HS. To overcome these challenges, we propose to measure the continuous international hidradenitis suppurativa severity score (IHS4) monthly and use the cumulative IHS4 score (IHS4-C) over all these visits as a primary outcome in clinical trials in patients with mild HS, to increase the probability to detect the inflammatory lesions with a temporary nature. We argue that this novel application of the IHS4, has the potential to better facilitate assessment of treatments or interventions in patients with mild HS and should be tested in future studies.

Baseline Demographics, Comorbidities, Treatment Patterns and Burden of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults and Adolescents from the GLOBOSTAD Long-Term Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Insights into real-world treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) are relevant to clinical decision making. The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients who receive dupilumab for AD in a real-world setting.

METHODS

The GLOBOSTAD registry is an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective, observational study of patients with AD who receive dupilumab according to country-specific prescribing information. We report baseline characteristics, comorbidities and treatment patterns for patients enrolled from July 11, 2019 to March 31, 2022. Analyses are descriptive; no formal statistical comparisons were performed.

RESULTS

Nine hundred fifty-two adults and adolescents were enrolled in GLOBOSTAD. Patients had a high disease burden before starting dupilumab: (mean [standard deviation]) percent body surface area affected (44.8 [24.42]), Eczema Area and Severity Index total score (24.8 [12.95]), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis total score (60.5 [16.34]), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure total score (19.7 [6.37]) and Dermatology Life Quality Index total score (13.7 [7.02]). Overall, 741 (77.8%) patients reported ≥ 1 type 2 inflammatory comorbidities, most frequently allergic rhinitis (492 [51.7%]), asthma (323 [33.9%]), food allergy (294 [30.9%]) or another allergy (274 [28.8%]). In the previous 12 months, 310 (32.6%) patients had received systemic non-steroidal immunosuppressants and 169 (17.8%) systemic corticosteroids; 449 (47.2%) had received topical corticosteroids, most commonly potent topical corticosteroids; 141 (14.8%) had received topical calcineurin inhibitors and 32 (3.4%) ultraviolet therapy. Most (713 [74.9%]) patients started dupilumab because of prior treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Patients enrolled in GLOBOSTAD demonstrated considerable multidimensional burden of disease across AD signs, symptoms and quality of life despite previous use of systemic and non-systemic AD treatments.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03992417. Video Abstract.

Online prediction tools for melanoma survival: A comparison

BACKGROUND

Breslow thickness, patient age and ulceration are the three most valuable clinical and pathological predictors of melanoma survival. A readily available reliable online tool that accurately considers these and other predictors could be valuable for clinicians managing melanoma patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare online melanoma survival prediction tools that request user input on clinical and pathological features.

METHODS

Search engines were used to identify available predictive nomograms. For each, clinical and pathological predictors were compared.

RESULTS

Three tools were identified. The American Joint Committee on Cancer tool inappropriately rated thin tumours as higher risk than intermediate tumours. The University of Louisville tool was found to have six shortcomings: a requirement for sentinel node biopsy, unavailable input of thin melanoma or patients over 70 years of age and less reliable hazard ratio calculations for age, ulceration and tumour thickness. The LifeMath.net tool was found to appropriately consider tumour thickness, ulceration, age, sex, site and tumour subtype in predicting survival.

LIMITATIONS

The authors did not have access to the base data used to compile various prediction tools.

CONCLUSION

The LifeMath.net prediction tool is the most reliable for clinicians in counselling patients with newly diagnosed primary cutaneous melanoma regarding their survival prospects.

Factors associated with disease-specific life impact in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: results from the Global VOICE project

Patients with hidradenitis suppurativa experience significant life impact related to their disease. Younger age, Black race, high BMI, active smoking, flares, depression, anxiety, high comorbidity burden, disability, and difficult access to a dermatologist adversely influence life impact related to having hidradenitis suppurativa. Attention to these factors, particularly modifiable ones, may reduce overall impact of disease.

331 Prior treatment usage in patients with atopic dermatitis initiating dupilumab: an update from the GLOBOSTAD registry

The efficacy and safety of dupilumab have been reported previously based on data from controlled clinical trials. The GLOBOSTAD study extends the scope of these trials by providing real-world data. This analysis reports prior treatment usage in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) initiating treatment with dupilumab in a real-world setting. This 5-year, international, multicentre, non-interventional study (GLOBOSTAD; NCT03992417) included patients ≥12 years-old with moderate-to-severe AD (Investigator’s Global Assessment score ≥3) who initiated dupilumab treatment based on country-specific prescribing information. Data reported are for the population at baseline (N = 952, data cut-off: March 2022). At the study entry, the mean (standard deviation) Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) score was 19.7 (6.4). POEM range is 0–28 and scores greater than 17 are consistent with severe or very severe disease. The mean (standard deviation) pruritus on the 0–10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at study entry was 6.3 (2.1). Patient use of systemic treatments such as non-steroidal immunosuppressants (32.6%) and systemic corticosteroids (17.8%), as well as non-systemic treatments such as topical corticosteroids (47.2%) and calcineurin inhibitors (14.8%) in the 12 months preceding enrolment were reported. Ultraviolet phototherapy in the past 12 months was reported for 3.4% of patients. Patient-reported outcomes, including POEM and pruritus NRS, indicate a considerable burden of disease in patients with AD initiating dupilumab in the real world. A large proportion of patients from GLOBOSTAD reported the use of AD-specific systemic and non-systemic therapies prior to dupilumab initiation.

External validation of the IHS4-55 in a European antibiotic-treated HS cohort

BACKGROUND

Previously, a new dichotomous outcome was developed, calculated as 55% reduction in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa 4 score (IHS4-55). It was validated in datasets of adalimumab and placebo treated HS patients. External validation is an important aspect of clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to externally validate the novel dichotomous IHS4-55 in a non-biologic treated dataset of HS patients.

METHODS

Data from a previously published European-wide prospective clinical study of antibiotic treatment of HS patients was used to assess the association of IHS4-55 achievement with individual reduction in inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels. Moreover, the associations between IHS4-55 positivity and achievement of the minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), numerical rating scale (NRS) Pain, and NRS Pruritus were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data was obtained from 283 individual patients, of which 36.4% (103/283) were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin and 63.6% (180/283) with tetracyclines for 12 weeks. Achievers of the IHS4-55 demonstrated a significant reduction the counts of inflammatory nodules, abscesses, and draining tunnels (all p<0.001). Additionally, IHS4-55 achievers had an odds ratio (OR) for achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of DLQI, NRS Pain and NRS Pruritus of 2.16 (95% CI 1.28-3.65, p<0.01), 1.79 (95% CI 1.10-2.91, p<0.05), and 1.95 (95% CI 1.18-3.22, p<0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the external validity of the novel IHS4-55 by demonstrating a significant association between IHS4-55 achievement and a reduction in inflammatory lesion counts as well as achievement of MCIDs for DLQI, NRS Pain and NRS Pruritus in an antibiotic-treated cohort. These findings support the use of the IHS4-55 as a novel primary outcome measure in clinical trials.

Factors associated with treatment satisfaction in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: results from the Global VOICE project

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) report dissatisfaction with their treatment. However, factors related to treatment satisfaction have not been explored.

OBJECTIVES

To measure associations between treatment satisfaction and clinical and treatment-related characteristics among patients with HS.

METHODS

Treatment satisfaction was evaluated utilizing data from a cross-sectional global survey of patients with HS recruited from 27 institutions, mainly HS referral centres, in 14 different countries from October 2017 to July 2018. The primary outcome was patients' self-reported overall satisfaction with their current treatments for HS, rated on a five-point scale from 'very dissatisfied' to 'very satisfied'.

RESULTS

The final analysis cohort comprised 1418 patients with HS, most of whom were European (55%, 780 of 1418) or North American (38%, 542 of 1418), and female (85%, 1210 of 1418). Overall, 45% (640 of 1418) of participants were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their current medical treatment. In adjusted analysis, patients primarily treated by a dermatologist for HS had 1·99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·62-2·44, P < 0·001] times the odds of being satisfied with current treatment than participants not primarily treated by a dermatologist. Treatment with biologics was associated with higher satisfaction [odds ratio (OR) 2·36, 95% CI 1·74-3·19, P < 0·001] relative to treatment with nonbiologic systemic medications. Factors associated with lower treatment satisfaction included smoking (OR 0·78, 95% CI 0·62-0·99; active vs. never), depression (OR 0·69, 95% CI 0·54-0·87), increasing number of comorbidities (OR 0·88 per comorbidity, 95% CI 0·81-0·96) and increasing flare frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several factors that appear to positively influence satisfaction with treatment among patients with HS, including treatment by a dermatologist and treatment with a biologic medication. Factors that appear to lower treatment satisfaction include active smoking, depression, accumulation of comorbid conditions and increasing flare frequency. Awareness of these factors may support partnered decision making with the goal of improving treatment outcomes. What is already known about this topic? Nearly half of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa report dissatisfaction with their treatments. What does this study add? Satisfaction with treatment is increased by receiving care from a dermatologist and treatment with biologics. Satisfaction with treatment is decreased by tobacco smoking, accumulation of comorbid conditions including depression, and higher flare frequency. What are the clinical implications of this work? Awareness of the identified factors associated with poor treatment satisfaction may support partnered decision making and improve treatment outcomes.

Itch in Hidradenitis Suppurativa/Acne Inversa: A Systematic Review

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit leading to formation of painful, inflammatory nodules, abscesses and tunnels in apocrine gland-bearing areas of the skin. Pain and drainage are the most important symptoms associated with reduction of quality of life in HS. On the other hand, an overlooked symptom in quality of life studies is itch, despite the fact that several studies have reported its importance. Various theories have tried to explain the pathogenesis of itch in HS, such as the presence of mast cells in the cell infiltrates and elevated Ig E levels in the lesional skin. Smoking and advanced stage of disease have been found to be associated with increased intensity of itch. A PUBMED search was conducted to perform a systematic literature review using the term “hidradenitis suppurativa” [all fields], the keywords “pruritus”, “itching”, “itch” [all fields] and with “AND” as operator. Mast cells and mTor signaling were found to be raised in both lesional and perilesional skin. Itch as a presenting symptom has been found in 35–82.6% of patients across multiple studies. It often co-presents with pain and may be misinterpreted as burning, stinging, tickling, tweaking, prickling, etc. The presence of itch is associated with reduced quality of life, depression and impairment of social life. Brodalumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-17A receptor, produced significant improvements in itch, pain, QoL and depression in patients with moderate to severe HS. Statins have shown some reduction in itch intensity score. Further studies are required to gain a better understanding of the etiopathogenesis and optimal therapeutic modalities for itch in HS that will allow clinicians to better address issue and reduce its impact on quality of life.

Which hidradenitis suppurativa comorbidities should I take into account?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent skin inflammatory disease associated with a variety of comorbidities, like metabolic syndrome, reduced quality of life, sexual dysfunction, working disability, inflammatory bowel disease, axial spondyloarthritis, depression and anxiety. Like psoriasis, HS patients have been found to have higher risk of cardiovascular death and suicide risk. Evidence suggests that for such a chronic, multi-comorbid disease, the use of validated outcomes to assess severity and effect of treatment, along with the use of clinically important patient reported outcomes, is essential. Clinicians should be informed about these comorbidities so that appropriate screening is implemented. The potential of available treatments to negatively and positively affect these comorbidities should also be taken into account when designing treatment strategies. This article aims to provide an outline of important HS comorbidities with emphasis on possible implications for daily clinical practice.

Anti-COVID-19 measurements for hidradenitis suppurativa patients

The reported incidence of COVID‐19 among cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel and skin diseases under treatment with biologicals is low. Treatment may further modify disease severity as some biological modifiers, such as anakinra, are also proposed for the management of COVID‐19 patients potentially providing HS patients with an advantage.

The above preliminary evidence suggests that hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) does probably not provide an increased susceptibility for COVID‐19 and that any susceptibility is unlikely to be modified negatively by treatment with biologicals.

On the occasion of its 10th International Conference, experts of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation e.V. have prepared a consensus statement regarding anti‐COVID‐19 measurements for HS patients. Based on the available knowledge, patients with HS may be vaccinated against SARS‐CoV2 and patients affected by metabolic syndrome constitute a high‐risk group for COVID‐19 and should be vaccinated at the earliest convenient point in time. HS patients on treatment with adalimumab can be vaccinated with non‐living virus anti‐SARS‐CoV2 vaccines. A possible suboptimal effect of the vaccine may be suspected but might not be expected universally. The management of the biological treatment in HS patients is at the discretion of the dermatologist / responsible physician.

Quality of Life in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update

Knowledge on hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is rapidly increasing. HS has a profound impact on patients and their family life. Several factors, such as comorbidities, unemployment and HS severity, make this impact even more severe. The most widely used instrument to measure this impact is the dermatology-specific DLQI. We also identified six HS-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments. Of them, HIDRAdisk, HSIA, HiSQOL and HSQoL-24 are better validated but there is still lack of experience of its use. Several treatment methods showed positive effect on patients’ HRQoL. Surgery remains a method with a substantial positive effect on HRQoL. Several studies confirming a positive effect of adalimumab on the HRQoL of patients with HS were published during the last three years. Data on the influence of several other biologics on HRQoL of HS patients are controversial or based on studies with a small number of patients.

Target molecules for future hidradenitis suppurativa treatment

The registration of the tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor adalimumab in 2015 was a major step forward in the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS). However, it soon became evident that the effectiveness of adalimumab in daily practice was highly variable. A significant unmet medical need of HS patients remained, and the search for novel therapeutic targets was intensified. During the 10th European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) e.V. Conference, reknown international HS investigators virtually presented and discussed the published data on these potential target molecules for future HS treatment. This article addresses the most promising molecules currently under investigation from a pathophysiological and clinical point of view. With phase III trials ongoing, the anti- interleukin (IL)-17 biologics bimekizumab and secukinumab are in the most advanced stage of clinical development showing promising results. In addition, targeting IL-1α with bermekimab has shown encouraging results in two clinical trials. Directing treatment at neutrophil recruitment and activation by targeting IL-36 with spesolimab fits well in the pathogenic concept of HS and clinical phase II trial results are pending. In contrast to in situ evidence, Complement 5a (C5a) and C5a receptor blockade have only shown greater clinical benefit in patients with severe HS. Inhibition of Janus kinase (JAK) 1 signalling in HS showed clinical efficacy only in the highest dosage, highlighting that careful surveillance of the balance between safety and efficacy of JAK inhibition is warranted. Overall, clinical efficacies of all novel treatments reported so far are modest. To guide drug development, more and better-defined translational data on the pathogenesis of this severe and enigmatic inflammatory skin disease are required.

The efficacy and tolerability of tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: Results of a prospective European cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination therapy are both considered first-line therapy in current hidradenitis suppurativa guidelines. However, evidence for their efficacy is drawn from small studies, often without validated outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 12-week efficacy of oral tetracyclines and a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin.

METHODS

A prospective, international cohort study performed between October 2018 and August 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 63.6% of the included 283 patients received oral tetracyclines, and 36.4% were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System from baseline (both P < .001). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in 40.1% and 48.2% of patients, respectively (P = .26). Patient characteristics or disease severity were not associated with the attainment of HiSCR or the minimal clinically important differences for the Dermatology Life Quality Index and pain.

LIMITATIONS

Cohort study. Respectively, 23.9% and 19.4% of patients had to be excluded from the HiSCR analysis for the tetracycline and combination therapy group because of a low abscess and nodule count at baseline.

CONCLUSION

This study shows significant efficacy of both tetracycline treatment and clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy after 12 weeks in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the 2 treatments, regardless of disease severity.

Management of Ocular Manifestations of Atopic Dermatitis: A Consensus Meeting Using a Modified Delphi Process

There is a need for unified guidance on the management of ocular manifestations of atopic dermatitis and ocular manifestations associated with dupilumab in the Nordic region (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden). This initiative gathered Nordic dermatologists and ophthalmologists to identify consensus in this area using a modified Delphi process. The initiative was led by a Nordic expert panel who developed a questionnaire that was circulated to a wider group. The results informed an agenda consisting of 24 statements to be voted on using a 5-point Likert scale at a meeting in Copenhagen on 24 April 2019. A facilitator moderated discussion and revised statements according to expert feedback for a second vote when required to reach consensus. Consensus was reached for 23 statements regarding the diagnosis, treatment and referral of these patients, which we hope will improve patient management in the Nordic region.

Review of Comorbidities of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Implications for Daily Clinical Practice

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, recurrent skin inflammatory disease associated with a variety of comorbidities, like reduced quality of life, metabolic syndrome, sexual dysfunction, working disability, axial spondyloarthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, depression, and anxiety. Like psoriasis, HS patients have been found to have higher risk of cardiovascular death and suicide risk. Clinicians should be informed about these comorbidities so that appropriate screening is implemented. All this evidence suggests that for such a chronic, multi-comorbid disease, the use of validated outcomes to assess severity and effect of treatment, along with the use of clinically important patient reported outcomes, is essential. The potential of available treatments to negatively and positively affect these comorbidities should also be taken into account when designing treatment strategies. This review provides an outline of important HS comorbidities with emphasis on possible implications for daily clinical practice.

Evaluating patients' unmet needs in hidradenitis suppurativa: Results from the Global Survey Of Impact and Healthcare Needs (VOICE) Project

BACKGROUND

A needs assessment for patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) will support advancements in multidisciplinary care, treatment, research, advocacy, and philanthropy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate unmet needs from the perspective of HS patients.

METHODS

Prospective multinational survey of patients between October 2017 and July 2018.

RESULTS

Before receiving a formal HS diagnosis, 63.7% (n = 827) of patients visited a physician ≥5 times. Mean delay in diagnosis was 10.2 ± 8.9 years. Patients experienced flare daily, weekly, or monthly in 23.0%, 29.8%, and 31.1%, respectively. Most (61.4% [n = 798]) rated recent HS-related pain as moderate or higher, and 4.5% described recent pain to be the worst possible. Access to dermatology was rated as difficult by 37.0% (n = 481). Patients reported visiting the emergency department and hospital ≥5 times for symptoms in 18.3% and 12.5%, respectively. An extreme impact on life was reported by 43.3% (n = 563), and 14.5% were disabled due to disease. Patients reported a high frequency of comorbidities, most commonly mood disorders. Patients were dissatisfied with medical or procedural treatments in 45.9% and 34.6%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Data were self-reported. Patients with more severe disease may have been selected.

CONCLUSION

HS patients have identified several critical unmet needs that will require stakeholder collaboration to meaningfully address.

Quality of life measurement in hidradenitis suppurativa: position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology task forces on Quality of Life and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

This paper is organized jointly by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force (TF) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and the EADV TF on acne, rosacea and hidradenitis suppurativa (ARHS). The purpose of this paper was to present current knowledge about QoL assessment in HS, including data on HS-specific health-related (HR) QoL instruments and HRQoL changes in clinical trials, and to make practical recommendations concerning the assessment of QoL in people with HS. HS results in significant quimp that is higher than in most other chronic skin diseases. HS impact in published studies was assessed predominantly (84% of studies) by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). There is a lack of high-quality clinical trials in HS patients where HRQoL instruments have been used as outcome measures. One double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial on infliximab with low number of participants reported significantly better HRQoL improvement in the treatment group than in the placebo group. Well-designed clinical studies in HS patients to compare different treatment methods, including surgical methods and assessing long-term effects, are needed. Because of lack of sufficient validation, the Task Forces are not at present able to recommend existing HS-specific HRQoL instruments for use in clinical studies. The EADV TFs recommend the dermatology-specific DLQI questionnaire for use in HS patients. The EADV TFs encourage the further development, validation and use of other HS-specific, dermatology-specific and generic instruments but such use should be based on the principles presented in the previous publications of the EADV TF on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes.

Evaluation of medical and surgical treatments for hidradenitis suppurativa using real-life data from the Scandinavian registry (HISREG)

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) substantially affects health-related quality-of-life outcomes. Most treatment options are supported by low quality of evidence without validated outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of surgical and medical interventions using physician- and patient-reported outcomes registered in HISREG.

METHODS

Data were extracted for all adult patients registered in HISREG between January 2013 and April 2016. Primary endpoints included Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, pain as measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS), Sartorius score and Hurley classification. Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for DLQI and NRS pain were analysed. Secondary endpoints included comparisons among different treatment groups, safety and complications of various treatments.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-five patients were included in the study: 31, 188, and 36 patients had Hurley stages I, II and III disease, respectively. Treatment with CO₂ lasers was the most common treatment modality. One hundred and forty-nine patients (58.4%) were treated with surgical intervention, 87 (34.1%) received antibiotics and/or anti-inflammatory treatments, and 19 (7.5%) were treated with both surgery and medical intervention. No patients received biologic treatment. In patients with surgical treatments, Sartorius scores were significantly improved compared with baseline (P = 0.001), 83 patients (55%) achieved a DLQI MCID, and 75 patients (49.7%) achieved an NRS pain MCID. In patients with medical treatments, Sartorius scores were not significantly improved compared with baseline (P = 0.582); 25 patients (28%) achieved a DLQI MCID and 28 patients (31%) achieved an NRS pain MCID. In patients treated with surgical and medical combination, 9 (48%) achieved DLQI and NRS pain MCIDs and Sartorius scores were significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

CO₂ laser treatment is more effective than the non-biologic medical treatments in this analysis based on physician- and patient-derived outcomes. The study provides limited evidence for the combination of medical and surgical therapies in patients with HS.

Hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: a practical framework for treatment optimization - systematic review and recommendations from the HS ALLIANCE working group

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS)/acne inversa is a debilitating chronic disease that remains poorly understood and difficult to manage. Clinical practice is variable, and there is a need for international, evidence‐based and easily applicable consensus on HS management. We report here the findings of a systematic literature review, which were subsequently used as a basis for the development of international consensus recommendations for the management of patients with HS. A systematic literature review was performed for each of nine clinical questions in HS (defined by an expert steering committee), covering comorbidity assessment, therapy (medical, surgical and combinations) and response to treatment. Included articles underwent data extraction and were graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence‐based Medicine criteria. Evidence‐based recommendations were then drafted, refined and voted upon, using a modified Delphi process. Overall, 5310 articles were screened, 171 articles were analysed, and 65 were used to derive recommendations. These articles included six randomized controlled trials plus cohort studies and case series. The highest level of evidence concerned dosing recommendations for topical clindamycin in mild disease (with systemic tetracyclines for more frequent/widespread lesions) and biologic therapy (especially adalimumab) as second‐line agents (following conventional therapy failure). Good‐quality evidence was available for the hidradenitis suppurativa clinical response (HiSCR) as a dichotomous outcome measure in inflammatory areas under treatment. Lower‐level evidence supported recommendations for topical triclosan and oral zinc in mild‐to‐moderate HS, systemic clindamycin and rifampicin in moderate HS and intravenous ertapenem in selected patients with more severe disease. Intralesional or systemic steroids may also be considered. Local surgical excision is suggested for mild‐to‐moderate HS, with wide excision for more extensive disease. Despite a paucity of good‐quality data on management decisions in HS, this systematic review has enabled the development of robust and easily applicable clinical recommendations for international physicians based on graded evidence.

Impact of hidradenitis suppurativa on work loss, indirect costs and income

Background

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic cutaneous disease, can negatively affect work life.

Objectives

This retrospective cohort study evaluates the indirect burden among employed patients with HS in the U.S.A.

Methods

Newly diagnosed and general patients with HS, who were employees (age 18–64 years) from a large claims database (Q1 1999 to Q1 2015), were matched 1 : 5 to controls. Income growth and risk of leaving the workforce were assessed among the newly diagnosed HS and control cohorts in the 5‐year study period. Income, work loss days and indirect costs (absenteeism and disability) were assessed among the general HS and control cohorts in the 1‐year study period.

Results

Newly diagnosed (n = 1003, mean age 39·5 years, 66·3% female) and general patients with HS (n = 1204, mean age 39·9 years, 69·1% female) were matched to 5015 and 6020 controls, respectively. Newly diagnosed patients with HS had significantly slower income growth ($324 per year) and higher risk of leaving the workforce (adjusted hazard ratio 1·65, 95% confidence interval 1·45–1·88) compared with controls (all P < 0·05). General patients with HS had more total days of work loss (18·4 vs. 7·7), higher annual total indirect costs ($2925 vs. $1483) and lower annual income ($54 925 vs. $62 357) than controls (all P < 0·001).

Conclusions

Patients with newly diagnosed HS and general patients with HS experienced a greater indirect burden than matched controls.

What's already known about this topic?

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic inflammatory disease, can negatively affect work life.

What does this study add?

This retrospective claims analysis found that HS is associated with high indirect burden, in terms of slower income growth, higher risk of leaving the workforce and higher indirect costs.

These results indicate that patients with HS have unmet disease management needs.

Linked Editorial: Zouboulis. Br J Dermatol 2019; 181:7–8.

Plain language summary available online

Respond to this article

Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity

BACKGROUND

A validated tool for the dynamic severity assessment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa (HS) is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a novel dynamic scoring system to assess the severity of HS.

METHODS

A Delphi voting procedure was conducted among the members of the European Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (EHSF) to achieve consensus towards an initial HS Severity Score System (HS4). Strengths and weaknesses of HS4 were examined by a multicentre prospective study. Multivariate logistic regression, discriminant analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves, as well as examination for correlation (Spearman's rho) and agreement (Cohen's kappa) with existing scores, were engaged to recognize the variables for a new International HS4 (IHS4) that was established by a second Delphi round.

RESULTS

Consensus HS4 was based on number of skin lesions, number of skin areas involved and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and was evaluated by a sample of 236 patients from 11 centres. Subsequently, a multivariate regression model calculated adjusted odds ratios for several clinical signs. Nodules, abscesses and draining tunnels resulted as the scoring variables. Three candidate scores were presented to the second Delphi round. The resulting IHS4 score is arrived at by the number of nodules (multiplied by 1) plus the number of abscesses (multiplied by 2) plus the number of draining tunnels (multiplied by 4). A total score of 3 or less signifies mild, 4-10 signifies moderate and 11 or higher signifies severe disease. Cohen's kappa was fair (κ = 0·32) compared with Hurley classification, and moderate (κ = 0·49) compared with Expert Opinion. Correlation was good (ρ > 0·6) with Hurley classification, Expert Opinion, Physician's Global Assessment and Modified Sartorius score, and moderate for DLQI (ρ = 0·36).

CONCLUSIONS

The novel IHS4 is a validated tool to dynamically assess HS severity and can be used both in real-life and the clinical trials setting.

Quality of life measurement in acne. Position Paper of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

Acne causes profound negative psychological and social effects on the quality of life (QoL) of patients. The European Dermatology Forum S3-Guideline for the Treatment of Acne recommended adopting a QoL measure as an integral part of acne management. Because of constantly growing interest in health-related QoL assessment in acne and because of the high impact of acne on patients' lives, the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on QoL and Patient Oriented Outcomes and the Task Force on Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa have documented the QoL instruments that have been used in acne patients, with information on validation, purposes of their usage, description of common limitations and mistakes in their usage and overall recommendations.

Dermoscopy of early stage mycosis fungoides

BACKGROUND

Early stage mycosis fungoides (MF) is difficult to be clinically differentiated from chronic dermatitis (CD) in a high proportion of patients. Dermoscopy is a rapid, cheep, non-invasive and widely used method for the evaluation of skin tumours and, recently, of inflammatory skin diseases, as well.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the dermoscopic pattern of early stage MF and compare it with the dermoscopic features observed in CD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Dermoscopic images of lesions that were clinically equivocal between MF and CD were evaluated for the presence of predefined morphologic criteria. Diagnosis had been histopathologically and immunohistochemically confirmed in all cases. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for predefined dermoscopic criteria in relation to the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides.

RESULTS

A total of 67 dermoscopic images were selected for dermoscopic evaluation. Mycosis fungoides lesions exhibited a characteristic dermoscopic pattern consisting of fine short linear vessels (sensitivity 93.7%, specificity 97.1%) and orange-yellowish patchy areas (sensitivity 90.6%, specificity 99.7%). A characteristic vascular structure resembling spermatozoa was also found to be highly specific for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides. CD was typified by a different dermoscopic pattern, usually consisting of dotted vessels.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations provide a first indication that early stage MF exhibits a characteristic dermoscopic pattern which is different from CD. Prospective studies with long term follow-up are needed to determine the value of these dermoscopic criteria in the differentiation between the two entities in the daily routine.

Re-evaluation of the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients treated with anti-IL-12/23 biological agents for chronic plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To detect a detrimental or beneficial effect of anti-IL-12/23 biological agents (ustekinumab and briakinumab) for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, SciVerse Scopus and ongoing trial registries were searched from inception until December 2011. Search strategy, eligibility criteria, data and statistical analysis methods were defined prior to the literature search. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, monotherapy studies with safety data for MACEs of IL-12/23 antibodies in adults were eligible for inclusion. Studies of psoriatic arthritis were excluded. Information from each study was extracted independently by two reviewers, using a standardized data extraction form. The primary outcome measure was the number of MACEs during the placebo-controlled phase of treatment.

RESULTS

MACEs include myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or cardiovascular death. No statistical heterogeneity across the studies using the I(2) statistic (I(2) = 0) was found. We employed Peto one-step method to determine odds ratios and quantify a possible detrimental or beneficial association of IL-12/23 antibodies treatment with MACEs. We found a possible higher risk of MACEs in those patients treated with IL-12/23 antibodies compared with those at placebo (OR = 4.23, 95% CI: 1.07-16.75, P = 0.04). This study is unaffected by non-reporting of outcomes with no events.

CONCLUSION

Compared with placebo, there was a significant difference in the rate of MACEs observed in patients receiving anti-IL-12/23 biological agents.