Extracellular histone release by renal cells after warm and cold ischemic kidney injury: Studies in an ex-vivo porcine kidney perfusion model

Extracellular histones are cytotoxic molecules involved in experimental acute kidney injury. In patients receiving a renal transplant from donors after circulatory death, who suffer from additional warm ischemia, worse graft outcome is associated with higher machine perfusate extracellular histone H3 concentrations. We now investigated temperature-dependent extracellular histone release in an ex vivo porcine renal perfusion model, and subsequently studied histone release in the absence and presence of non-anticoagulant heparin. Seven pairs of ischemically damaged porcine kidneys were machine perfused at 4°C (cold ischemia) or 28°C (warm ischemia). Perfusate histone H3 concentration was higher after warm as compared to cold ischemia (median (IQR) = 0.48 (0.20-0.83) μg/mL vs. 0.02 (0.00-0.06) μg/mL; p = .045, respectively). Employing immune-electron microscopy (EM), histone containing cytoplasmic protrusions of tubular and endothelial cells were found after warm ischemic injury. Furthermore, abundant histone localization was detected in debris surrounding severely damaged glomerular cells, in a "buck shot" pattern. In vitro, histones were cytotoxic to endothelial and kidney epithelial cells in a temperature-dependent manner. In a separate ex vivo experiment, addition of heparin did not change the total histone H3 levels observed in the perfusate but revealed a continuous increase in the level of a lower molecular weight histone H3 variant. Our findings show that ischemically damaged kidneys release more extracellular histones in warm ischemia, which by EM was due to histone release by renal cells. Blocking of histone-mediated damage during transplantation may be beneficial in prevention of renal injury.

The prevalence of antibodies against the HLA-DRB3 protein in kidney transplantation and the correlation with HLA expression

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB3 is a functional HLA class II gene, which has a limited allele diversity in the human population. Furthermore, the HLA-DRB3 gene is only present in a subset of individuals. Therefore, in organ transplantation, this HLA molecule is frequently mismatched between patient and graft donor and thus antibodies against this mismatched HLA molecule can develop. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence and reactivity of these antibodies and aimed to identify factors that underlie antibody formation against HLA-DRB3. We showed in our patient cohort that HLA-DRB3 antibodies are identified in about 7% of all patients that were screened with solid phase assays. In these assays, we observed multiple antibody reactivity patterns indicating that HLA-DRB3 harbours multiple epitopes. In those cases, where we succeeded at tracing back the induction of these antibodies to the molecular HLA typing of the immunogenic event, we noticed a different frequency of HLA-DRB1 allele groups in the donors as compared to a control group. To a certain extent this distribution (e.g. HLA-DRB1*11 individuals) could be linked to an altered expression level. However, it also appears that different HLA-DRB3 alleles (e.g. HLA-DRB3*01 group) vary in their immunogenicity without having an expression difference. In conclusion, our study provides information on the immunogenicity and reactivity patterns of antibodies against HLA-DRB3 in kidney transplantation, and it points towards the possibility of HLA expression as a factor underlying antibody formation.

The development of D antibodies after D-mismatched kidney transplantation in a setting of reduced immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

D antigens are not taken into account in the allocation of solid organs. Female transplant recipients with D antibodies as a consequence of D-mismatched kidney transplantation may develop hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in future pregnancies. We examined D antibody development in transplant recipients who received D-mismatched kidney transplantation in absence of D prophylaxis and in a setting of reduced immunosuppression.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From 1993 until 2015, a total of 1355 kidney patients received transplantations in our center of whom 156 received a D-mismatched graft. A retrospective analysis was conducted; frozen stored sera obtained from transplant recipients 3 months after transplantation were tested for irregular red blood cell (RBC) antibodies using a three-cell screening and an identification panel. In the case of D antibody positivity, additional testing was performed 1 month before transplantation.

RESULTS

In seven of 156 (4.5%) transplant recipients we found irregular RBC antibodies after transplantation, of which five (3.2%) were determined to be D antibodies. We observed only one (0.6%) recipient without D antibodies before transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Although the risk of D antibody development is considerably lower after D-mismatched kidney transplantation than D-mismatched pregnancy, anti-D prophylaxis may still be advisable for female transplant recipients of childbearing age.

Capsulotomy of Ischemically Damaged Donor Kidneys: A Pig Study

BACKGROUND

Ischemia-reperfusion injury of donor kidneys may worsen transplant outcome. Kidneys with severe injury, such as kidneys of donors after circulatory death, develop edema, which may lead to renal compartment syndrome with reduced tissue perfusion.

OBJECTIVE

We studied the effect of capsulotomy during hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of ischemically damaged porcine kidneys.

METHODS

Eight pairs of kidneys from slaughterhouse pigs were assigned to two groups (20 and 45 min of warm ischemia). After 21 h of HMP, capsulotomy was performed, and perfusion was continued for 2 h. During perfusion, machine flow (Q), renal resistance (RR), renovascular circulating volume (RCV), intraparenchymal pressure (IPP) and weight were recorded. Parenchymal injury was examined with methylene blue infusion.

RESULTS

Mean Q and RCV increased directly after capsulotomy [percentage increase (95% confidence interval): x0394;Q = 32% (17, 47), p = 0.001, and x0394;RCV = 19% (3, 35), p = 0.023]. Mean RR decreased [x0394;RR = -23% (-31, -15), p < 0.001]. Subanalysis comparing both warm ischemia groups showed no significantly different effect of capsulotomy between groups. There was no methylene blue leakage after capsulotomy in any kidney.

CONCLUSIONS

Renovascular perfusion can be improved with capsulotomy during HMP, without damaging the renal parenchyma. Follow-up studies need to determine which donor kidneys may benefit from capsulotomy.

Variability in protocols on donation after circulatory death in Europe

Introduction

Organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted strategy to reduce the shortage of organs for transplantation in many European countries. The use and number of DCD donors varies between countries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the available protocols for DCD in Europe.

Methods

We contacted national transplant societies and responsible transplant co-ordinators in the countries that perform DCD to obtain DCD protocols. We compared information on the protocols and additional data including: inclusion and exclusion criteria for donation, legislation, determination of death and preservation methods.

Results

In ten European countries DCD is performed, eight of which describe the methods in protocols. There are large differences in used DCD categories, legislation and the way death is determined. Protocols differ in the detail in which DCD procedures are described and the way methods are supported by additional consensus statements and ethical frameworks.

Conclusions

Although DCD is an established strategy to enlarge the donor pool and to contribute to the reduction of the waiting list for transplantation, its potential has not been fully utilized yet. To further promote DCD transplantation, it is important to share expertise and obtain consensus, so that this can be translated into more uniform and solid protocols supported by the competent authorities, transplant and intensive care professionals, which may eventually result in a further promotion of DCD transplantation in Europe.