Endobronchial ultrasound bronchoscopy Franseen fine needle biopsy tool versus standard fine needle aspiration needle: Impact on diagnosis and tissue adequacy

BACKGROUND

The Franseen fine needle biopsy tool (Acquire®, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA) may provide better quality specimens than current endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TNBA) needles. We performed a comparative retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic yield of the Franseen fine needle biopsy (FNB) versus standard fine needle aspiration (FNA) for benign lymphadenopathy and tissue acquisition for next generation sequencing (NGS) in non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

All EBUS-TBNA procedures performed between January 1st, 2019 to January 1st^, 2020 where both the FNB needle and the FNA needle were used were analyzed. All demographic, procedural, and diagnostic data were recorded. The median tumor surface area, tumor cellularity and adequacy for NGS was evaluated for NSCLC specimens.

RESULTS

A total of 69 target lesions in 66 patients were biopsied with both the FNB and FNA needles. The mean (SD) size of target biopsied was 1.8 cm (0.8); The most common stations were 7 (54%) and 4R (26%). The mean (SD) needle passes were 6 (2.2) and 4 (1.8) with FNA and FNB needles, respectively (p < 0.0001). Benign lymphadenopathy was diagnosed with FNA needle in 46% and in 82% with FNB (p < 0.0001). NGS tissue adequacy was 47% with FNA needle versus 76% with FNB (p = 0.02). Median tumor surface area and tumor cellularity were greater with FNB needle than FNA needle (80 mm² versus 9 mm², p = 0.002, and 81% versus 45%, p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

The FNB needle demonstrated higher diagnostic yield in benign lymphadenopathy and higher quality for NGS than standard FNA needle.

Challenges in Pathology Specimen Processing in the New Era of Precision Medicine

CONTEXT.—

Precision therapies for patients with driver mutations can offer deep and durable responses that correlate with diagnosis, metastasis prognosis, and improvement in survival. Such targeted therapies will continue to increase, pushing us to change our traditional approaches. We needed to search for new tools to effectively integrate technological advancements into our practices because of their capability to improve the efficiency and accuracy of our diagnostic and treatment approaches. Perhaps nothing is as relevant as identifying and implementing new workflows for processing pathologic specimens and for improving communication of critical laboratory information to and from clinicians for appropriate care of patients in an efficient and timely manner.

OBJECTIVES.—

To define the gold standard in delivering the best care for patients, to identify gaps in the process, and to identify potential solutions that would improve our process, including gaps related to knowledge, skills, attitudes, and practices.

DESIGN.—

We assembled a team across disciplines to systematically perform a gap analysis study to clarify the discrepancy between the current reality in pathology specimen processing and the desired optimal situation to deliver the results intended for patient care.

RESULTS.—

A practical collaborative workflow for specimen management seeking the cooperation of the stakeholders in each medical discipline to provide guidelines in specimen collection, delivery, processing, and reporting of results with the ultimate goal of improving patients' outcomes is provided.

CONCLUSIONS.—

New tools are required to effectively integrate data-driven approaches in specimen processing to meet the new demands.

Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective External and Temporal Validation of the HAL and HOMER Models

BACKGROUND

Two models, the Help with the Assessment of Adenopathy in Lung cancer (HAL) and Help with Oncologic Mediastinal Evaluation for Radiation (HOMER), were recently developed to estimate the probability of nodal disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as determined by endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA). The objective of this study was to prospectively externally validate both models at multiple centers.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are the HAL and HOMER models valid across multiple centers?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This multicenter prospective observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with PET-CT clinical-radiographic stages T1-3, N0-3, M0 NSCLC undergoing EBUS-TBNA staging. HOMER was used to predict the probability of N0 vs N1 vs N2 or N3 (N2|3) disease, and HAL was used to predict the probability of N2|3 (vs N0 or N1) disease. Model discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-AUC), and calibration was assessed using the Brier score, calibration plots, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

Thirteen centers enrolled 1,799 patients. HAL and HOMER demonstrated good discrimination: HAL ROC-AUC = 0.873 (95%CI, 0.856-0.891) and HOMER ROC-AUC = 0.837 (95%CI, 0.814-0.859) for predicting N1 disease or higher (N1|2|3) and 0.876 (95%CI, 0.855-0.897) for predicting N2|3 disease. Brier scores were 0.117 and 0.349, respectively. Calibration plots demonstrated good calibration for both models. For HAL, the difference between forecast and observed probability of N2|3 disease was +0.012; for HOMER, the difference for N1|2|3 was -0.018 and for N2|3 was +0.002. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was significant for both models (P = .034 and .002), indicating a small but statistically significant calibration error.

INTERPRETATION

HAL and HOMER demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in multiple centers. Although calibration error was present, the magnitude of the error is small, such that the models are informative.

Navigational bronchoscopy specimens and PD-L1 expression: a retrospective study

Background

Additional data regarding the ability of navigational bronchoscopy (NB) to provide sufficient material for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is needed. We performed a retrospective study of NB cases at our institution to determine performance of NB in providing adequate samples for PD-L1.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of all consecutive NB procedures performed at our institution from January 1, 2018 to August 4, 2020 that involved biopsies of a lung nodule/mass with a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary outcome was adequacy of material for PD-L1 testing. All procedural, demographic, and diagnostic data were collected. The association of factors with PD-L1 adequacy was evaluated with rate ratios (RR) using modified Poisson regression models with robust standard errors.

Results

A total of 102 NB procedures with a diagnosis of NSCLC were performed over a 2-year period. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] nodule size was 25.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 18.0–32.0] mm and 57.8% (59/102) had a bronchus sign; 73% (68/93, 9 missing data) of samples were adequate for PD-L1 testing. Radial endobronchial ultrasound (REBUS) was utilized in 99% (101/102) of biopsies; a concentric or eccentric view was observed in 78.2% (79/101) and 16.8% (17/101), respectively. Transbronchial biopsy (TBBX) was performed in 92.2% (94/102). Only 4% (4/102) of cases required additional biopsies with either computed tomography (CT) guided transthoracic or surgical biopsies due to insufficient bronchoscopy tissue. No factors were predictive of PD-L1 adequacy in regression models.

Conclusions

NB demonstrated good performance in obtaining adequate samples for PD-L1 testing. Only 4% of patients required additional procedures for more tissue when clinically indicated. However, additional study is needed to validate these results against surgical resection specimens.

Risk factors for pleural effusion recurrence in patients with malignancy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of treatment in patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is symptom palliation. Currently, patients undergo repeat thoracenteses prior to receiving a definitive procedure as clinicians are not aware of the risk factors associated with fluid recurrence. The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with recurrent symptomatic MPE.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre cohort study of patients who underwent first thoracentesis was performed. The primary outcome was time to fluid recurrence requiring intervention in patients with evidence of metastatic disease. We used a cause-specific hazard model to identify risk factors associated with fluid recurrence. We also developed a predictive model, utilizing Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model, and externally validated the model.

RESULTS

A total of 988 patients with diagnosed metastatic disease were included. Cumulative incidence of recurrence was high with 30% of patients recurring by day 15. On multivariate analysis, size of the effusion on chest X-ray (up to the top of the cardiac silhouette (hazard ratio (HR): 1.84, 95% CI: 1.21-2.80, P = 0.004) and above the cardiac silhouette (HR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.43-3.46, P = 0.0004)), larger amount of pleural fluid drained (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.07, P < 0.0001) and higher pleural fluid LDH (HR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.004-1.011, P < 0.0001) were associated with increased hazard of recurrence. Negative cytology (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.43-0.64, P < 0.0001) was associated with decreased hazard of recurrence. The model had low prediction accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Pleural effusion size, amount of pleural fluid drained, LDH and pleural fluid cytology were found to be risk factors for recurrence.

Endobronchial hamartoma: a rare disease with more common presentation

Hamartomas are the most common benign tumours of the lung with an overall incidence of 0.025-0.32%. They are known to be amalgamation of various tissue types, originating from the embryonic mesoderm. Lung hamartomas typically involve lung parenchyma and only infrequently grows as endobronchial tumours. We present a case of an 80-year-old man who presented to the pulmonary clinic for consultation for breathlessness, recurrent pneumonias and an abnormal radiograph finding. CT scan of the chest showed scattered infiltrates and atelectasis in the left upper lobe. He underwent a diagnostic bronchoscopy that showed a lobulated endobronchial lesion obstructing the left upper lobe bronchus. Brush and forceps biopsies were obtained that were consistent with an endobronchial hamartoma. He was referred to the pulmonology department for endobronchial debulking of the lesion following which he improved clinically during postoperative follow-up.

Eponyms in cardiothoracic radiology--part II: vascular

Eponyms serve the purpose of honoring individuals who have made important observations and discoveries. As with other fields of medicine, eponyms are frequently encountered in radiology, particularly in chest radiology. However, inappropriate use of an eponym may lead to potentially dangerous miscommunication. Moreover, an eponym may honor the incorrect person or a person who falls into disrepute. Despite their limitations, eponyms are still widespread in the medical literature. Furthermore, in some circumstances, more than one individual may have contributed to the description or discovery of a particular anatomical structure or disease, whereas in others, an eponym may have been incorrectly applied initially and propagated for years in the medical literature. Nevertheless, radiologic eponyms are a means of honoring those who have made lasting contributions to the field of radiology, and familiarity with these eponyms is critical for proper reporting and accurate communication. In addition, the acquisition of some historical knowledge about those whose names are associated with various structures or pathologic conditions conveys a sense of humanity in the science of medicine. In this second part of a multipart series, the authors discuss a number of chest radiology eponyms as they relate to the pulmonary vasculature, including relevant clinical and imaging features, as well biographic information of the respective eponym׳s namesake.

Eponyms in cardiothoracic radiology: part III--interstitium

Eponyms serve the purpose of honoring individuals who have made important observations and discoveries. As with other fields of medicine, eponyms are frequently encountered in radiology, particularly in chest radiology. However, inappropriate use of an eponym may lead to potentially dangerous miscommunication. Moreover, an eponym may honor the incorrect person or a person who falls into disrepute. Despite their limitations, eponyms are still widespread in the medical literature. Furthermore, in some circumstances, more than one individual may have contributed to the description or discovery of a particular anatomical structure or disease, whereas in others, an eponym may have been incorrectly applied initially and propagated for years in the medical literature. Nevertheless, radiologic eponyms are a means of honoring those who have made lasting contributions to the field of radiology, and familiarity with these eponyms is critical for proper reporting and accurate communication. In addition, the acquisition of some historical knowledge about those whose names are associated with various structures or pathologic conditions conveys a sense of humanity in the science of medicine. In this third installment of this series, the authors discuss a number of chest radiology eponyms as they relate to the pulmonary interstitium, including relevant clinical and imaging features, as well biographical information of the respective eponym's namesake.

Eponyms in cardiothoracic radiology: Part I. Neoplasms

Eponyms serve the purpose of honoring individuals who have made important observations and discoveries. As with other fields of medicine, eponyms are frequently encountered in radiology, particularly in chest radiology. However, inappropriate use of an eponym may lead to potentially dangerous miscommunication. Moreover, an eponym may honor the incorrect person or a person who falls into disrepute. Despite their limitations, eponyms are still widespread in medical literature. Furthermore, in some circumstances, more than one individual may have contributed to the description or discovery of a particular anatomical structure or disease, whereas in others, an eponym may have been incorrectly applied initially and propagated for years in medical literature. Nevertheless, radiologic eponyms are a means of honoring those who have made lasting contributions to the field of radiology, and familiarity with these eponyms is critical for proper reporting and accurate communication. In addition, the acquisition of some historical knowledge about those whose names are associated with various structures or pathologic conditions conveys a sense of humanity in the field of medicine. In this article, the first of a multipart series, the authors discuss a number of chest radiology eponyms as they relate to neoplasms, including relevant clinical and imaging features, as well biographic information of the respective eponym׳s namesake.