1
|
Dio CD, Azenkoud I, Trezza A, Lentini E, D’Augè TG, Cuccu I, Bartolomeo GD, Firulli I, Canicchio A, Sgamba L, Muzii L. Early-stage cervical cancer treatment - what's new? Prz Menopauzalny 2023; 22:87-92. [PMID: 37674927 PMCID: PMC10477763 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2023.127774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
The gold standard of treatment for patients with early-stage cervical cancer is radical hysterectomy, in agreement with the entire scientific community. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the minimally invasive approach. Several studies have suggested that the minimally invasive approach could improve surgical and perioperative outcomes. Because of these findings, ESCO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines state that a "minimally invasive approach is favoured" in comparison with open surgery, as a grade B recommendation. Because of the lack of a grade A recommendation, this randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial evaluated open vs. minimally invasive approach in the early stage. It demonstrated an increase in mortality among patients treated with minimally invasive surgery, revolutionizing current thinking on the primary surgical approach to early cervical cancer. The aim of this study is to analyse which is the best treatment for early cervical cancer and which approach is the most effective at the moment. Further studies are needed to state with certainty the appropriateness of the treatments offered to patients with early cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Di Dio
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilham Azenkoud
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Trezza
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele Lentini
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D’Augè
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Di Bartolomeo
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Firulli
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Canicchio
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovica Sgamba
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cuccu I, D’Oria O, Sgamba L, De Angelis E, Golia D’Augè T, Turetta C, Di Dio C, Scudo M, Bogani G, Di Donato V, Palaia I, Perniola G, Tomao F, Muzii L, Giannini A. Role of Genomic and Molecular Biology in the Modulation of the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Narrative Review and Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11040571. [PMID: 36833105 PMCID: PMC9957190 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies in Western countries. Traditionally, loco-reginal dissemination and histological characteristics are the main prognostic factors. Nowadays, molecular and genomic profiling showed exciting results in terms of prognostication. According to the data provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas and other studies, molecular and genomic profiling might be useful in identifying patients al low, intermediate, and high risk of recurrence. However, data regarding the therapeutic value are scant. Several prospective studies are ongoing to identify the most appropriate adjuvant strategy in EC patients, especially for those with positive nodes and low volume disease. The molecular classification has offered the possibility to improve the risk stratification and management of EC. The aim of this review is to focus on the evolution of molecular classification in EC and its impact on the research approach and on clinical management. Molecular and genomic profiling might be useful to tailor the most appropriate adjuvant strategies in apparent early-stage EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Cuccu
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ottavia D’Oria
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Translational Medicine and Oncology, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Ludovica Sgamba
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuele De Angelis
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D’Augè
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Turetta
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Camilla Di Dio
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Scudo
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Innocenza Palaia
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgia Perniola
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bogani G, Di Donato V, Scambia G, Raspagliesi F, Chiantera V, Sozzi G, Golia D’Augè T, Muzii L, Benedetti Panici P, D’Oria O, Vizza E, Giannini A. Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:ijerph191811641. [PMID: 36141917 PMCID: PMC9517651 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Radical hysterectomy and plus pelvic node dissection are the primary methods of treatment for patients with early stage cervical cancer. During the last decade, growing evidence has supported the adoption of a minimally invasive approach. Retrospective data suggested that minimally invasive surgery improves perioperative outcomes, without neglecting long-term oncologic outcomes. In 2018, the guidelines from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology stated that a "minimally invasive approach is favored" in comparison with open surgery. However, the phase III, randomized Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial questioned the safety of the minimally invasive approach. The LACC trial highlighted that the execution of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy correlates with an increased risk of recurrence and death. After its publication, other retrospective studies investigated this issue, with differing results. Recent evidence suggested that robotic-assisted surgery is not associated with an increased risk of worse oncologic outcomes. The phase III randomized Robotic-assisted Approach to Cervical Cancer (RACC) and the Robotic Versus Open Hysterectomy Surgery in Cervix Cancer (ROCC) trials will clarify the pros and cons of performing a robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy (with tumor containment before colpotomy) in early stage cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-3803933116
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00182 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Chiantera
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Giulio Sozzi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Tullio Golia D’Augè
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Ottavia D’Oria
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Enrico Vizza
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Giannini
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|