[Stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy. Influence of endoloop or linear stapler on patient outcome]

BACKGROUND

Even though laparoscopic appendectomy is one of the most frequent procedures in abdominal surgery, the technique of appendiceal stump closure is still not standardized. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the effect of the use of endoloops or linear staplers for appendiceal stump closure concerning surgical site infections (SSI) and intra-abdominal abscesses (IAA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All laparoscopic appendectomies between January 1st 2007 and May 31st 2010 were split into an endoloop group (ELG) and a linear stapler group (LSG). The groups were compared with respect to the outcome parameters SSI and IAA.

RESULTS

A total of 430 appendectomies were performed in the study period of which 105 operations were conducted laparoscopically. In this study 47.6 % (n = 50) were alloted to the LSG and 52.4 % (n = 55) to ELG. In LSG 3.1 % (n = 1) developed an SSI versus 10.0 % (n = 4, p = 0.254) in ELG. No IAAs occurred in LSG compared to 2 (5.1 %, p = 0.499) in ELG.

CONCLUSION

The use of EL for appendiceal stump closure is safe and cost effective for low-grade appendicitis but high-grade appendicitis should be treated with LS.

[Continent ileoanal reservoir--a surgical challenge]

The optimization of surgical techniques has made it possible to now treat patients with deep-seated rectal cancer by performing deep anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis while avoiding a permanent stoma. To prevent a high bowel movement frequency and limited continence with an imperative need to empty the bowel, the coloanal pouch operation was developed to construct a rectal substitute. Nowadays, patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis of the colon undergo proctocolectomy as the definitive treatment for their underlying disease. Continuity is restored by creating an ileoanal reservoir. This contribution describes the surgical indications and pathophysiological changes for the colon J-pouch and ileoanal reservoir. In addition, explanations of the surgical techniques for both procedures are presented. The functional results are compared with those of other reconstruction options and discussed, taking our own results into consideration.

Improving laser-induced thermotherapy of liver metastases--effects of arterial microembolization and complete blood flow occlusion

INTRODUCTION

A prerequisite for an oncologically curative application of laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT) of liver metastases is complete tumor destruction. This increased effectiveness was achieved experimentally by combining LITT with interrupted hepatic perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an interventional selective arterial microembolization might be as effective as complete blood flow occlusion using an open Pringle's maneuver.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. LITT was performed without interrupted hepatic perfusion (control group) compared to LITT in combination with interrupted perfusion either by embolization of intraarterial degradable starch microspheres (DSM) (percutaneous access) or by complete hepatic inflow occlusion (Pringle's maneuver; open access). Online monitoring was performed using intraoperative ultrasound or MRI. Volumetric techniques were used to assess metastases and postinterventional lesions.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with 104 metastases (control group (25), DSM (37), and Pringle (42)) were treated. The preinterventional tumor volumes were significantly smaller than the postinterventional lesion volumes (control group: 9.8 vs. 25.3 cm3; DSM: 9.5 vs. 65.4 cm3; Pringle: 12.9 vs. 76.5 cm3). The morbidity rate was 21.4% without treatment-related mortalities. After 6 months follow-up, tumor recurrence was diagnosed in 6 patients (control group (4), LITT with DSM (1), and Pringle (1)).

CONCLUSIONS

Combining LITT with blood flow occlusion leads to a significant increase in lesion size. The application of DSM offers a safe and effective alternative to the open access with Pringle's maneuver. Compared to LITT-monotherapy, this modality achieves significantly larger thermal lesions with the need of fewer applications.