Female sexual function and depression after kidney transplantation: comparison between deceased- and living-donor recipients

Disturbances in sexual function and depression are a common feature in women with chronic renal failure. Living-donor kidney transplantation seems to warrant better results than its cadaveric counterpart in many aspects but its impact on post-transplantation sexual function remains unknown. This study aimed to compare post-transplantation sexual function and depression in women receiving kidney grafts from living and deceased donors. From a single-center prospective database of 2016 renal transplantations between June 2011 and June 2013, we enrolled 50 sexually active women after kidney transplantation. Female sexual function was evaluated with the Female Sexual Function Index Questionnaire (FSFI) and depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scale. Thirty-four patients referred the questionnaires. The sexual domains of satisfaction and desire were significantly better in living-donor receptors; in all other domains evaluated by FSFI no statistically significant difference was encountered between groups, although living-donor receptors tended to report better function. Total BDI-II was well correlated with total FSFI score in our study cohort (Spearman's rho = -0.80, P < .001). Only 34.6% of women referred to have discussed sexual issues with their physicians before transplantation, whereas 73.1% stated it would have been important. In conclusion, living-donor transplantation exerted a positive effect on women's sexual function.

Living versus cadaveric-donor renal transplant recipients: a comparison on sexual function

Erectile dysfunction is experienced by 50% of men with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and uremia. The origin of this dysfunction is multifactorial. The aim of this study was to compare living donor versus cadaveric donor transplant recipients regarding male sexual function. Seventy-seven sexually active male kidney transplant recipients (44 from living donors; 33 from cadaveric donors) were randomly selected from our single-center prospective database of 2016 renal transplants. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected between June 2010 and June 2011. Male sexual function was evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire (IIEF-15). We assessed the prevalence of male sexual dysfunction according to established cutoff points for each of the IIEF-15 domains. Mann-Whitney and Pearson's chi- square statistical tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The median age at the time of completion of the questionnaires was 43 and 51 years (P = .003) with median times from transplantation was of 36 and 42 months for living donor and cadaveric donor recipients, respectively (P = .31). Median durations of ESRD before surgery were 17.5 and 57 months for living donor and cadaveric donor recipients, respectively (P < .001). Living donor and cadaveric donor recipients had median creatinine clearance values of 55 and 57 mL/min, respectively (P = .44). Median time after renal transplantation for first sexual intercourse was 1 and 2 months for living donor and cadaveric donor recipients, respectively (P = .35). Median body mass indices for living donor and cadaveric donor recipients were 24.8 and 24, respectively (P = .31). Regarding sexual function domains, there were significant differences only for intercourse satisfaction. In our cohort, living donor recipients tended to be younger, have shorter time of ESRD, and less incidence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus but with greater tobacco use. In conclusion, living donor transplantation exerted a favorable impact on sexual function.