A service evaluation of joint working across sectors to promote self-administration of subcutaneous systemic anti-cancer therapy in breast cancer patients

Introduction

Trastuzumab(T) is a humanized monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer and is available as a subcutaneous(sc) formulation thereby allowing short and convenient administration. A lack of trained nurses to administer T at home and/or train patients at home to self-administer, together with challenges in maintaining cold-chain delivery have impeded uptake of home administration.1,2 In order to support patients’ ability to self-administer T at home, we have implemented an educational programme that includes nurse-led training, education material, support apps and follow-up telephone clinics. Home delivery of pre-filled syringes was enabled in collaboration with commercial providers for aseptics and logistic.

Aim

The aim of this service evaluation was to evaluate the utility of this programme from the patients’ perspective and to assess patient satisfaction and impact on quality of life (QOL).

Methods

A previously validated Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ)3 was modified to assess patient satisfaction, perceptions and impact of the programme. Patients who had agreed to enrol on the ‘self-administration’ scheme, were asked to complete the questionnaire at baseline, at the third training session and at the second self-administered dose. Approval from a Research Ethics Committee is not required for this service evaluation.

Results

All 14 patients offered the questionnaire responded to all questions. The median age was 58 years old (age range 43-76), 11 patients were Caucasian, 2 were Asian and one was African/Caribbean. The average distance from their home address to hospital was 10.1 miles (range 4-19). Following completion of the one-to-one nurse training there was an improvement in patient confidence to self-administer sc. T. No differences in ‘feeling in control of their treatment’ or ‘satisfaction of attending hospital appointments’ were noted. Of the 11 patients who reached the self-administration stage, 10 reported that they felt ‘very confident’ and 8 reported that it was ‘very easy’ to give themselves the injection. All patients rated themselves ‘very satisfied’ with self-administration and reported that the nurse training programme helped them to be more confident. 10 patients reported that the App and written information was useful as well as the pre- and post- administration telephone clinics. All patients reported that the self-administration programme had a positive impact on their QOL by reducing the number of hospital visits. In the first 4 months of self-administration each patient reduced their hospital attendance by an average of 8 appointments (median=8) equating to 10 hours of time that would have been spent at hospital.

Discussion/Conclusion

The subcutaneous T self-administration programme was well received by patients. The nurse training sessions and supportive materials enabled patients to feel more confident about self-administration with no reported incidents or adverse events. This led to fewer hospital visits and improved QOL. This programme was critically dependent on the services of a commercial compounder and homecare provider, emphasizing the importance of joint working between the NHS and commercial sector. Evaluation of this programme will continue and will include other agents, including Phesgo® (sc trastuzumab and pertuzumab) which have more patients and will improve the reliability of the results.

References

1. Tjalma, W., Huizing, M., Papadimitriou, K. The smooth and bumpy road of trastuzumab administration: from intravenous (IV) in a hospital to subcutaneous (SC) at home. Facts Views Vis Obgyn, 2017;9(1):51-55.

2. Grady, PA, Gough, LL. Self-management: a comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health 2014; 104(8):e25-31. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041

3. Keininger D, Coteur G. Assessment of self-injection experience in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: psychometric validation of the Self-Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:2. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-2

Evaluation of prognostic risk models for postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and international external validation cohort study

BACKGROUND

Stratifying risk of postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery allows clinicians to modify risk through targeted interventions and enhanced monitoring. In this study, we aimed to identify and validate prognostic models against a new consensus definition of postoperative pulmonary complications.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and international external validation cohort study. The systematic review was done in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched MEDLINE and Embase on March 1, 2020, for articles published in English that reported on risk prediction models for postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. External validation of existing models was done within a prospective international cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing major abdominal surgery. Data were collected between Jan 1, 2019, and April 30, 2019, in the UK, Ireland, and Australia. Discriminative ability and prognostic accuracy summary statistics were compared between models for the 30-day postoperative pulmonary complication rate as defined by the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine Core Outcome Measures in Perioperative and Anaesthetic Care (StEP-COMPAC). Model performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC).

FINDINGS

In total, we identified 2903 records from our literature search; of which, 2514 (86·6%) unique records were screened, 121 (4·8%) of 2514 full texts were assessed for eligibility, and 29 unique prognostic models were identified. Nine (31·0%) of 29 models had score development reported only, 19 (65·5%) had undergone internal validation, and only four (13·8%) had been externally validated. Data to validate six eligible models were collected in the international external validation cohort study. Data from 11 591 patients were available, with an overall postoperative pulmonary complication rate of 7·8% (n=903). None of the six models showed good discrimination (defined as AUROCC ≥0·70) for identifying postoperative pulmonary complications, with the Assess Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia score showing the best discrimination (AUROCC 0·700 [95% CI 0·683-0·717]).

INTERPRETATION

In the pre-COVID-19 pandemic data, variability in the risk of pulmonary complications (StEP-COMPAC definition) following major abdominal surgery was poorly described by existing prognostication tools. To improve surgical safety during the COVID-19 pandemic recovery and beyond, novel risk stratification tools are required.

FUNDING

British Journal of Surgery Society.