The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for assessing hepatocellular carcinoma compared to histopathology; a retrospective single-center analysis of 119 patients1

BACKGROUND

HCC as the 6th most common tumor entity with the fourth highest mortality and an increasing prevalence especially due to today's lifestyle acquires a high attention in the clinical setting. Beside CECT and CEMRI, CEUS depicts a dynamic, low-risk and radiation free imaging method that finds its use mainly in screening and active surveillance programs.

PURPOSE

The aim of the retrospective study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of CEUS in correlation to pathologic findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004 and 2018 a total number of 119 patients were included in this retrospective single-center study. Every patient underwent CEUS in addition to a native B-mode and Color-Doppler scan. After given informed consent SonoVue® (Bracco, Milan, Italy), a second-generation blood-pool agent, was used as contrast medium. Every examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). A low mechanical index (MI) of <0,2 was chosen to obtain a good imaging quality.

RESULTS

All 119 included patients received CEUS followed by a liver biopsy for inter-modality comparison. In correlation to the pathology results, CEUS showed a diagnostic sensitivity of 96,6%, a specificity of 63,9%, a PPV of 86,7% and a NPV of 88,5% by detecting liver lesions suspicious for HCC. According to the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (k = 0,659) CEUS shows a strong inter-modality agreement in comparison to the histopathological finding.

CONCLUSION

With a high sensitivity and a strong cross-modality comparability to histopathology, the CEUS is highly effective in the detection of suspicious HCC lesions.

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for evaluating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) juxtaposed to MRI findings; a retrospective single-center analysis of 292 patients

BACKGROUND

HCC is the most frequent primary liver cancer entity. Major risk factors comprise chronic HBC and HCV infections, ALD or NAFLD. Apart from the anamnesis, the clinical examination and serologic analysis, an essential part of the diagnostic HCC work-up is due to imaging findings from sonography, CT or MRI scans. HCC lesions feature a distinct vascularization pattern: hyperenhancement during early arterial and hypoenhancement/wash-out during portal venous or delayed phases. CEUS facilitates dynamic assessment of microperfusion patterns of suspicious liver lesions.

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present retrospective single-center study was to determine the diagnostic value of CEUS for assessing HCC by comparison with findings from MRI scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2004-2018 292 patients with suspicious liver lesions underwent CEUS and MRI. All patients underwent native B-mode, Color Doppler and CEUS after given informed consent. The applied contrast agent was a second-generation blood pool agent (SonoVue®, Bracco, Milan, Italy). Every CEUS examination was performed and interpreted by a single experienced radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3).

RESULTS

CEUS was performed on all included patients without occurrence of any adverse effects. CEUS showed a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 91%, a PPV of 95% and a NPV of 94% for analyzing HCC in comparison with MRI as the diagnostic gold standard.

CONCLUSION

With a distinguished safety profile CEUS shows a high diagnostic accuracy in assessing HCC compared to corresponding results from MRI scans.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic evaluation of popliteal artery aneurysms, a single-center study

BACKGROUND

Popliteal artery aneurysms (PAA) are the most common peripheral artery aneurysms. Most common cause is arteriosclerosis. Acute thromboembolic limb ischemia and rupture of the PAA depict severe complications. Diagnostic tools for identifying PAAs are (Doppler) ultrasound, CT/MR angiography and DSA.

PURPOSE

The aim of the present retrospective single-center study is to assess the application and safety of CEUS for assessing untreated and treated PAAs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

13 patients were included in this study on whom CEUS was performed between 2007-2016. CEUS examinations were performed and interpreted by an experienced single radiologist (EFSUMB Level 3).

RESULTS

CEUS allowed for the detection of PAAs in all cases. CEUS allowed for detection of partial thrombosis of PAA in 7/8 of untreated patients, proper exclusion of PAA upon femoro-popliteal bypass in 3 patients, incomplete exclusion of PAA upon femoro-popliteal bypass in 1 patient and ruling out of in-stent stenosis in 1 patient.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is a useful and safe tool for in real-time evaluation of PAAs in the pre-/post-treatment status. In addition to conventional (Doppler) ultrasound and as an alternative tool to more elaborate imaging modalities, CEUS might be integrated in the future diagnostic work-up and follow-up of PAA patients.

Performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to MRI in the diagnostic of gallbladder diseases

BACKGROUND

Conventional ultrasound and MRI are very important techniques for the detection of gallbladder alterations. In the past years, studies showed that the additional use of contrast media to the conventional ultrasound allows the early depiction of pathological microvessels and their flow elucidating suspect findings stipulating the prompt therapy approach.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to evaluate the performance of CEUS in gallbladder diseases and compare it to MR imaging using histopathological findings as a gold standard.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective mono-center study analysed 18 patients with gallbladder alterations between 2009 and 2017. All patients underwent CEUS and MRI examinations and all results were confirmed in the pathology. CEUS images were performed and interpreted by a single experienced physician.

RESULTS

CEUS imaging results compared to MR imaging of the gallbladder demonstrated a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value of 67% and a negative predictive value of 100%.

CONCLUSION

CEUS enables the depiction and characterization of important vascularization's patterns facilitating the early differentiation between malignant and benign findings. In this study, CEUS displayed a better diagnostic accuracy than MRI proving to be a valuable additional tool to the established imaging modalities.

[Acute abdomen - gastrointestinal causes]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Diagnostic imaging plays a crucial role in the assessment and stratification of pathologic conditions causing acute abdomen. This report provides information on etiology, clinical manifestations and therapeutic options for six common diseases resulting in acute abdomen-appendicitis, cholecystitis, bowel obstruction, diverticulitis, acute pancreatitis, and viscus perforation.

PERFORMANCE

Besides initial ultrasound, CT scans often represent the imaging gold standard for the diagnostic evaluation of acute abdomen.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Depending on the underlying pathologic condition, sonography or CT is suitable for the stratification of the gastrointestinal disease causing acute abdomen.

Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood--comparison between waterbath and dry warming device

BACKGROUND

Thawing of cryopreserved mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) is routinely performed for autologous and allogeneic MPB transplantation. Usually thawing is achieved by submerging the cell bag in a waterbath (37 degrees C temperature). We compared the effectiveness of thawing cryopreserved MPB in a waterbath with an electric dry-warming device containing warmed gel pads (Sahara, Transmed).

METHODS

Two cryopreserved bags from each of 31 apheresis procedures were thawed in a waterbath and under dry conditions in parallel. Viability (dye exclusion), apoptosis/necrosis (annexin/propidiumiodide staining) and clonogenic potential (CFU-E plus BFU-E, CFU-GM) of the cells were tested after thawing.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis by Wilcoxon matched-pair test showed no significant difference between the thawing procedures in terms of the in vitro parameters tested.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that thawing of cryopreserved MPB using dry warming and water bath give similar viability, apoptosis/necrosis rate and clonogenic potential. Both procedures take about the same amount of time and are easy to perform. Nevertheless, the potentially decreased risk of bacterial contamination of either the cell product or the patient room, and guidelines of good clinical practice (GCP), favor the use of the dry warming procedure.