Lymecycline vs. clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasonography evaluation

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic therapy remains the first-line treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on its comparative clinical efficacy and safety are limited.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of tetracycline (lymecycline 300 mg daily) vs. the combination therapy clindamycin and rifampicin (600 mg plus 600 mg daily) by evaluating and comparing the clinical response at the end of antibiotic treatment (10 weeks).

METHODS

The study retrospectively analysed 52 patients divided in two groups of 26 patients: Group A received lymecycline and Group B received clindamycin plus rifampicin for 10 weeks. Subjects had mild, moderate and severe HS. The clinical and ultrasonography extent of disease was measured by the Hurley Score, Sonographic Score of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), pain visual analogue scale (pain VAS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The primary outcome was the clinical response at the end of the antibiotic treatment period, according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure.

RESULTS

Both groups showed a significant improvement in IHS4, pain VAS and DLQI from baseline, but this was more marked in Group A. Reductions in nodule counts were similar between the two groups, whereas the number of abscesses and draining tunnels decreased more in Group B. Disease-free survival was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Lymecycline monotherapy and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination are both effective treatments for patients with moderate-severe HS. Nodular-type HS seems to respond better to lymecycline, whereas the abscess/tunnel type seems to respond better to clindamycin plus rifampicin.

Active implications for dermatologists in 'SARS-CoV-2 ERA': Personal experience and review of literature

Linked articles: COVID‐19 SPECIAL FORUM. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34: e346–e380.

Ingenol mebutate in actinic keratosis: a clinical, videodermoscopic and immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a cutaneous intraepithelial neoplasm that typically develops on sun-damaged skin. The incidence of AK is increasing worldwide, and it is accepted as the most frequent pre-malignant lesion in humans.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate that ingenol mebutate gel is effective in the treatment of actinic keratoses because of its clinical, dermoscopic, capillaroscopic, histopathological and immunohistochemical treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Sixty individuals with multiple non-hypertrophic AKs were enrolled into this non-randomized, open-label, prospective, trial. Acquisition of clinical, dermoscopic and capillaroscopic images at baseline (T0), immediately after treatment on 3^rd (trunk and/or extremities) or 4^th (scalp and/or face) day (T1), 14 days after the end of the treatment (T2) and at 60 days (T3). A subgroup of 20 patients received a cutaneous biopsy both at baseline and at T3 for histological and immunohistochemical evaluation.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement was observed in 100% of cases: total clearance in 41 patients (68.3%); partial clearance in 19 patients (32.7%). After treatment, dermoscopic improvement of all non-pigmented and pigmented AK lesions was observed. Most of the dermoscopic features disappeared with treatment. Total disappearance of specific vascular structures or significant reduction in the number and calibre of new blood vessels was capillaroscopically observed in all patients analysed (P ≤ 0.001). The immunohistochemical expression of p63 (P = 0.002), Ki-67 (P = 0.015) and VEGF (P = 0.016) significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical efficacy of ingenol mebutate on AKs is confirmed by its effect on angiogenesis, stem cell activity and cell proliferation in vivo.