Transplant benefit-based offering of deceased donor livers in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The National Liver Offering Scheme (NLOS) was introduced in the UK in 2018 to offer livers from deceased donors to patients on the national waiting list based, for most patients, on calculated transplant benefit. Before NLOS, livers were offered to transplant centres by geographic donor zones and, within centres, by estimated recipient need for a transplant.

METHODS

UK Transplant Registry data on patient registrations and transplants were analysed to build survival on the list (M1) and survival post-transplantation (M2) statistical models. A separate cohort of registrations - not seen by the models before - was analysed to simulate what liver allocation would have been under M1, M2 and a Transplant Benefit Score (TBS) model (combining both M1 and M2), and to compare these allocations to what had been recorded in the Registry. Number of deaths on the waiting list and patient life years were used to compare the different simulation scenarios and to select the optimal allocation model. Registry data were monitored, pre- and post-NLOS, to understand the performance of the scheme.

RESULTS

The TBS was identified as the optimal model to offer livers from donors after brain death (DBD) to adult and large paediatric elective recipients and, in the first two years of NLOS, 68% of DBD livers were offered using the TBS to this type of recipient. Monitoring data indicate that mortality on the waiting list post-NLOS significantly decreased compared with pre-NLOS (p<0.0001), and that patient survival post-listing is significantly greater post-than pre-NLOS (p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first two years of NLOS offering, waiting list mortality fell while post-transplant survival was not negatively impacted, delivering on the scheme's objectives.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

The National Liver Offering Scheme (NLOS) was introduced in the UK in 2018 to increase transparency of the deceased donor liver offering process, maximise the overall survival of the waiting list population, and improve equity of access to liver transplantation. To our knowledge, it is the first scheme that offers organs based on statistical prediction of transplant benefit; the Transplant Benefit Score (TBS). The results are important to the transplant community - from healthcare practitioners to patients - and demonstrate that, in the first two years of NLOS offering, waiting-list mortality fell while post-transplant survival was not negatively impacted, thus delivering on the scheme's objectives. The scheme continues to be monitored to ensure that the TBS remains up-to-date and that signals that suggest the possible disadvantage of some patients are investigated.

The positive impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on organ utilisation in liver transplantation

Background

As the world recovers from the aftermath of devastating waves of an outbreak, the ongoing Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has presented a unique perspective to the transplantation community of ''organ utilisation'' in liver transplantation, a poorly defined term and ongoing hurdle in this field. To this end, we report the key metrics of transplantation activity from a high-volume liver transplantation centre in the United Kingdom over the past two years.

Methods

Between March 2019 and February 2021, details of donor liver offers received by our centre from National Health Service Blood & Transplant, and of transplantation were reviewed. Differences in the activity before and after the outbreak of the pandemic, including short term post-transplant survival, have been reported.

Results

The pandemic year at our centre witnessed a higher utilisation of Donation after Cardiac Death livers (80.4% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.016) with preserved United Kingdom donor liver indices and median donor age (2.12 vs. 2.02, p = 0.638; 55 vs. 57 years, p = 0.541) when compared to the pre-pandemic year. The 1- year patient survival rates for recipients in both the periods were comparable. The pandemic year, that was associated with increased utilisation of Donation after Cardiac Death livers, had an ischaemic cholangiopathy rate of 6%.

Conclusions

The pressures imposed by the pandemic led to increased utilisation of specific donor livers to meet patient needs and minimise the risk of death on the waiting list, with apparently preserved early post-transplant survival. Optimum organ utilisation is a balancing act between risk and benefit for the potential recipient, and technologies like machine perfusion may allow surgeons to increase utilisation without compromising patient outcomes.

Satellite liver transplant centres significantly improve transplant assessment outcomes for patients with chronic liver disease but not hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Liver transplantation (LT) remains integral to the management of end-stage chronic liver disease (CLD). However, referral thresholds and assessment pathways remain poorly defined. Distance from LT centre has been demonstrated to impact negatively on patient outcomes resulting in the development of satellite LT centres (SLTCs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of SLTCs on LT assessment in patients with CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken including all patients with CLD or HCC assessed for LT at King's College Hospital (KCH) between October 2014 and October 2019. Referral location, social, demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to assess the impact of SLTCs on patients being accepted as LT candidates and contraindications being identified.

Results

1102 and 240 LT assessments were included for patients with CLD and HCC, respectively. MVA demonstrated significant associations with; patients living greater than 60 min from KCH/SLTCs and LT candidacy acceptance in CLD, and less deprived patients and LT candidacy acceptance in HCC. However, neither variable was associated with identification of LT contraindications. MVA demonstrated that referrals from SLTCs were more likely to result in acceptance of LT candidacy and less likely to result in a contraindication being identified in CLD. However, such associations were not demonstrated in HCC.

Conclusion

SLTCs improve LT assessment outcomes in CLD but not HCC reflecting the standardised HCC referral pathway. Developing a formal regional LT assessment pathway across the UK would improve equity of access to transplantation.

Enhanced recovery for liver transplantation: recommendations from the 2022 International Liver Transplantation Society consensus conference

There is much controversy regarding enhanced recovery for recipients of liver transplants from deceased and living donors. The objectives of this Review were to summarise current knowledge on individual enhanced recovery elements on short-term outcomes, identify key components for comprehensive pathways, and create internationally accepted guidelines on enhanced recovery for liver-transplant recipients. The ERAS4OLT.org collaborative partnered by the International Liver Transplantation Society performed systematic literature reviews on the effect of 32 relevant enhanced perioperative recovery elements on short-term outcomes, and global specialists prepared expert statements on deceased and living donor liver transplantation. The Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach was used for rating of quality of evidence and grading of recommendations. A virtual international consensus conference was held in January, 2022, in which results were presented, voted on by the audience, and discussed by an independent international jury of eight members, applying the Danish model of consensus. 273 liver transplantation specialists from 30 countries prepared expert statements on elements of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation based on the systematic literature reviews. The consensus conference yielded 80 final recommendations, covering aspects of enhanced recovery for preoperative assessment and optimisation, intraoperative surgical and anaesthetic conduct, and postoperative management for the recipients of liver transplants from both deceased and living donors, and for the living donor. The recommendations represent a comprehensive overview of the relevant elements and areas of enhanced recovery for liver transplantation. These internationally established guidelines could direct the development of enhanced recovery programmes worldwide, allowing adjustments according to local resources and practices.

The optimal immunosuppression management to prevent early rejection after liver transplantation: A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations

BACKGROUND

The optimal immunosuppression protocol to prevent early acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT) avoiding prolonged hospitalization and early hospital readmission is undefined.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the most suitable immunosuppression regimen for inclusion in ERAS programs in order to minimize early ACR after LT and to provide expert panel recommendations DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central.

METHODS

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. Studies from January 2000 onward focusing on early ACR were included. Rates of early renal dysfunction and infection were evaluated. CRD42021245586 RESULTS: Thirty-seven studies met inclusion criteria; 23 randomized controlled trials, 14 retrospective or prospective observational comparative or noncomparative studies. Several sources of biases which potentially confound conclusions were identified: heterogeneity in immunosuppression protocols, higher serum tacrolimus levels than currently used in clinical practice, differences in the definition of ACR.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus is the standard immunosuppression after LT and can be used in combination with other drugs such as corticosteroids and MMF, and in association with anti-IL2 receptor antibody (IL2Ra) induction. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Low dose or delayed introduction of tacrolimus in association with corticosteroids and MMF and/or anti-IL2Ra induction can be used to reduce acute kidney injury. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Use of tacrolimus in association with corticosteroids and MMF and/or anti-IL2Ra induction does not lead to increased infection rates. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Weak).

Liver transplantation for HCC: validation of prognostic power of the RETREAT score for recurrence in a UK cohort

BACKGROUND

The Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score as a prognostic index for recurrence has been reported previously and has not been validated outside the USA. Our study has validated the score in a single center UK cohort of patients being transplanted for HCC.

METHODS

LT for HCC between 2008 and 2018 at our center were analyzed. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared by the RETREAT score and validated using Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) by comparing it to Milan criteria.

RESULTS

346 adult HCC patients were transplanted of whom 313 were included. 28 (8.9%) had a recurrence. Summation of largest diameter and total number of viable tumors (HR = 1.19, p < 0.001), micro-/macro-vascular invasion (HR = 3.74, p = 0.002) and AFP>20 ng/ml (HR = 3.03, p = 0.005) were associated with recurrence on multivariate analysis. RFS decreased with increasing RETREAT score (log-rank p = 0.016). RETREAT performed better than Milan with significant NRI at 1- and 2-years post-transplant (0.43 (p = 0.004) and 0.38 (p = 0.03) respectively).

CONCLUSION

LT outcomes using the revised UK criteria are equivalent to Milan criteria. Further, RETREAT score was validated as a prognostic index for the first time in a UK cohort and may assist risk stratification, selection for adjuvant therapies and guide surveillance.

Validation of a Capillary Dry Blood Sample MITRA-Based Assay for the Quantitative Determination of Systemic Tacrolimus Concentrations in Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus is a narrow therapeutic index medication, which requires therapeutic drug monitoring to optimize dosing based on systemic exposure. MITRA microsampling offers a convenient, minimally invasive approach for the collection of capillary blood samples from a finger prick versus conventional venous blood sampling for quantitation of tacrolimus blood concentrations. However, the suitability of MITRA microsampling for the determination of tacrolimus concentrations requires assessment in clinical settings.

METHODS

Paired venous (2 mL) and capillary (10 μL) blood samples were collected pre-tacrolimus dose and 1 and 3 hours postdose during routine outpatient visits from stable adult liver or kidney transplant patients receiving prolonged-release tacrolimus. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and the concentrations obtained by the 2 sampling methods were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman agreement analyses.

RESULTS

Samples were available for 82 transplant recipients (kidney, n = 41; liver, n = 41). A high correlation was observed between tacrolimus concentrations in capillary and venous blood samples (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.97; Lin concordance coefficient, 0.87; slope of the fitted line, >1.0). Tacrolimus concentrations in capillary samples were 22.5% higher on average than in the corresponding venous blood samples (95% limits of agreement, 0.5%-44.6%). Similar results were observed in both transplant subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

MITRA finger prick sampling provides a convenient alternative to venipuncture for therapeutic drug monitoring in transplant recipients maintained on prolonged-release tacrolimus. When using the finger prick MITRA method, the positive bias in tacrolimus concentrations observed with this technique, when compared with venipuncture, needs to be taken into consideration.

Assessing the Time-Dependent Impact of Performance Status on Outcomes After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Identifying how the prognostic impact of performance status (PS) differs according to indication, era, and time period ("epoch") after liver transplantation (LT) could have implications for selection and treatment of patients on the waitlist. We used national data from the United Kingdom and Ireland to assess impact of PS on mortality separately for HCC and non-HCC recipients.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We assessed pre-LT PS using the 5-point modified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale and used Cox regression methods to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) that compared posttransplantation mortality in different epochs of follow-up (0-90 days and 90 days to 1 year) and in different eras of transplantation (1995-2005 and 2006-2016). 2107 HCC and 10,693 non-HCC patients were included. One-year survival decreased with worsening PS in non-HCC recipients where 1-year survival was 91.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.3-94.4) in those able to carry out normal activity (PS1) compared to 78.7% (95% CI, 76.7-80.5) in those completely reliant on care (PS5). For HCC patients, these estimates were 89.9% (95% CI, 85.4-93.2) and 83.1% (95% CI, 61.0-93.3), respectively. Reduction in survival in non-HCC patients with poorer PS was in the first 90 days after transplant, with no major effect observed between 90 days and 1 year. Adjustment for donor and recipient characteristics did not change the findings. Comparing era, post-LT mortality improved for HCC (adjusted HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.74) and non-HCC recipients (0.48; 95% CI, 0.42-0.55), but this did not differ according to PS score (P = 0.39 and 0.61, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Impact on mortality of the recipient's pretransplant PS is principally limited to the first 3 months after LT. Over time, mortality has improved for both HCC and non-HCC recipients and across the full range of PS.

Risk-adjusted survival in liver transplant patients assessed and managed by a non-transplanting centre: South West Liver Unit experience

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant services remain a scarce resource not reflective of geography or burden of liver disease within the UK. To address geographical concerns in the South West (SW), a devolved network model of care for liver transplantation was established in 2004 between the SW Liver Unit (SWLU) at Derriford Hospital, Plymouth and King's College Hospital, London. The SWLU has evolved to deliver both pre-transplant and post-transplant care for patients across the SW Peninsula. We determined whether risk-adjusted survival in patients assessed and managed at the SWLU compared with existing UK transplant centres.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of records at National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) for patients ≥18 years listed or undergoing first liver only deceased donor transplantation from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2017. Data collected and used were in accordance with standard NHSBT outcome measures.

RESULTS

We identified 8492 patients registered for first liver only transplant and 6140 patients who subsequently underwent transplantation. Of these, 215 patients listed and 172 patients transplanted were registered at the SWLU. The 1-year, 5-year and 10-year risk-adjusted post-listing survival for patients registered at the SWLU were 86%, 75% and 67%, respectively, with 1-year and 5-year risk-adjusted post-transplant survival 94.9% and 84.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk-adjusted post-listing 1-year, 5-year and 10-year survival outcomes and risk-adjusted 1-year and 5-year post-transplant survival outcomes at the SWLU are good and comparable with the seven UK transplant centres. These outcomes provide assurance that care delivered by our regional programme is equivalent to well-established liver transplant programmes.

Rifaximin reduces the incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, variceal bleeding and all-cause admissions in patients on the liver transplant waiting list

BACKGROUND

Rifaximin reduces the risk of overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and is associated with significant reductions in hospitalisations and 30-day readmissions.

AIM

To examine the outcomes of patients listed for liver transplantation with a diagnosis of HE on rifaximin compared to those naïve to the drug.

METHODS

Patient records of those listed for liver transplantation over a 2-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they had at least two episodes of overt HE resulting in hospitalisation or were encephalopathic at the time of assessment.

RESULTS

Of the 622 patients listed for transplantation, 101 had HE. Sixty-six patients were treated with rifaximin and 35 were naïve at listing. The use of concurrent lactulose was not significantly different between groups. Median MELD score was similar (15 [14-16)] rifaximin-treated and 16 [14-18] rifaximin-naïve). Patients on the waiting list treated with rifaximin had reduced all-cause admissions, episodes of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and variceal bleeding. Mean length of stay was 9 days (95% CI 6-12) in the rifaximin-treated group vs 14 (95% CI 7-21) in the rifaximin-naïve group. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that rifaximin was independently associated with an increase in average days to readmission (adjusted effect estimate 71, 95% CI 3-140 days) and reduced likelihood of requirement for prioritisation on the waiting list (odds ratio 0.29; 95% CI 0.89-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Rifaximin prescribed for HE in patients listed for liver transplantation improved outcomes with significant reduction in admissions related to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, ascites and variceal bleeding.

Developing a donation after cardiac death risk index for adult and pediatric liver transplantation

AIM

To identify objective predictive factors for donor after cardiac death (DCD) graft loss and using those factors, develop a donor recipient stratification risk predictive model that could be used to calculate a DCD risk index (DCD-RI) to help in prospective decision making on organ use.

METHODS

The model included objective data from a single institute DCD database (2005-2013, n = 261). Univariate survival analysis was followed by adjusted Cox-regressional hazard model. Covariates selected via univariate regression were added to the model via forward selection, significance level P = 0.3. The warm ischemic threshold was clinically set at 30 min. Points were given to each predictor in proportion to their hazard ratio. Using this model, the DCD-RI was calculated. The cohort was stratified to predict graft loss risk and respective graft survival calculated.

RESULTS

DCD graft survival predictors were primary indication for transplant (P = 0.066), retransplantation (P = 0.176), MELD > 25 (P = 0.05), cold ischemia > 10 h (P = 0.292) and donor hepatectomy time > 60 min (P = 0.028). According to the calculated DCD-RI score three risk classes could be defined of low (DCD-RI < 1), standard (DCD-RI 2-4) and high risk (DCD-RI > 5) with a 5 years graft survival of 86%, 78% and 34%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The DCD-RI score independently predicted graft loss (P < 0.001) and the DCD-RI class predicted graft survival (P < 0.001).

Outcomes of pregnancy following liver transplantation: The King's College Hospital experience

Reports of pregnancy in liver transplantation (LT) patients have largely favorable outcomes. Concerns remain with regards to maternal and graft risk, optimal immunosuppression (IS), and fetal outcomes. We review all post-LT pregnancies at our center with regard to the outcomes and safety for the patient, graft, and fetus. A total of 117 conceptions occurred in 79 patients. Median age at conception was 29 years. Maternal complications included graft loss (2%), acute cellular rejection (ACR; 15%), pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (15%), gestational diabetes (7%), and bacterial sepsis (5%). ACR was significantly more common in those women who conceived within 12 months of LT (P = 0.001). The live birth rate was 73%. Prematurity occurred in 26 (31%) neonates, and 24 (29%) neonates were of low or very low birth weight. IS choice (cyclosporine versus tacrolimus) had no significant effect on pregnancy outcomes and complications. No congenital abnormalities occurred, and only 1 child born at 24 weeks had delayed developmental milestones. In conclusion, pregnancy following LT has a favorable outcome in the majority, but severe maternal risks remain. Patients should be counseled with regard to the above information so informed decisions can be made, and pregnancy must be considered high risk with regular monitoring by transplant clinicians and specialist obstetricians.

Maintaining clinical governance when giving telephone advice

OBJECTIVE

Delivering excellent healthcare depends on accurate communication between professionals who may be in different locations. Frequently, the first point of contact with the liver unit at King's College Hospital (KCH) is through a telephone call to a specialist registrar or liver fellow, for whom no case notes are available in which to record information. The aim of this study was to improve the clinical governance of telephone referrals and to generate contemporaneous records that could be easily retrieved and audited.

DESIGN

An electronic database for telephone referrals and advice was designed and made securely available to registrars in our unit.

SETTING

Service development in a tertiary liver centre that receives referrals from across the UK and Europe.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic and clinical data were recorded prospectively and analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Data from 350 calls were entered during 5 months. The information included the nature and origin of the call (200 from 75 different institutions), disease burden and severity of disease among the patients discussed with KCH, and outcome of the call. The majority of cases were discussed with consultants or arrangements were made for formal review at KCH.

CONCLUSIONS

A telephone referrals and advice database provides clinical governance, serves as a quality indicator and forms a contemporaneous record at the referral centre. Activity data and knowledge of disease burden help to tailor services to the needs of referrers and commissioners. We recommend implementation of similar models in other centres that give extramural verbal advice.

Distinct microRNA profiles are associated with the severity of hepatitis C virus recurrence and acute cellular rejection after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with accelerated fibrosis rates after liver transplantation (LT) and is the leading cause of graft failure. Furthermore, distinguishing recurrent HCV from acute cellular rejection (ACR) can be problematic, and this can lead to inappropriate treatments and adverse outcomes. We hypothesized that intragraft microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles could distinguish the severity of recurrent HCV and differentiate recurrent HCV from ACR. We established meticulously matched post-LT patient cohorts in order to derive robust global miRNA expression profiles and minimize the impact of variables known to influence HCV recurrence. These cohorts consisted of patients with slow HCV fibrosis progression (Ishak stage < F2), fast HCV fibrosis progression (Ishak stage ≥ F2), ACR, and nonviral etiologies. We found increased intragraft expression of miRNA-146a, miRNA-19a, miRNA-20a, and miRNA-let7e in slow progressors versus fast progressors, and we validated these findings with quantitative PCR. This miRNA network regulates the expression of cardinal genes implicated in promoting antifibrogenic, antiangiogenic, and anti-inflammatory pathways. miRNA-19a and miRNA-20a were also specifically detected in the serum of slow progressors. Furthermore, intragraft miRNA expression distinguished fast HCV progression from ACR. Here, changes in the expression of key miRNAs regulating fibrogenic and angiogenic pathways were associated with fast HCV progression. We demonstrate specific miRNA expression signatures that discriminate the rates of fibrosis progression in patients with recurrent HCV, and we distinguish recurrent HCV from ACR after LT. A pathway analysis indicates that specific miRNAs may play a regulatory role in these processes. Selected miRNAs may serve as intragraft and serum biomarkers for recurrent HCV after LT and help to distinguish between ACR and recurrent HCV.

The impact of inflammatory bowel disease post-liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

An association between primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is well recognized. However, the disease course of IBD following liver transplantation (LT) for PSC remains ill-defined.

AIMS AND METHODS

We aimed to assess the impact of IBD in patients that had undergone LT for PSC to help identify risk factors for flare and to assess the impact of IBD on graft survival.

RESULTS

110 patients underwent LT for PSC (Oct 1990-Aug 2009) at King's College Hospital. 74 (67%) patients had concurrent IBD and 36 had PSC alone prior to transplant. 39 patients developed IBD (flare of IBD and de-novo) post transplant. Cumulative risk for IBD at 1-, 2-, 5- and 10-years was 16%, 24%, 38% and 72% respectively. Flare of IBD occurred in 33 patients with a mean time to flare of 30 ± 28 months. De-novo IBD occurred in 6 patients (all UC). Mean time to diagnosis was 29 ± 25 months. Multivariate cox-regression analysis identified active IBD at time of LT as a significant predictor of graft failure post LT (HR 10, CI 3-39, P = 0.001) and smoking at time of transplantation and subsequent cessation predictive of recurrent IBD post transplantation (HR 17, 2-180, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, smoking at time of LT was predictive of flare of IBD and active IBD at time of transplantation had a significant effect on graft survival. Medical therapy needs to be maximised in the pre-LT period. Patients with poorly controlled IBD refractory to medical therapy should be considered for colectomy at time of transplantation.

Systematic review: the role of liver transplantation in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Liver transplantation offers a potential cure for this otherwise devastating disease. The selection of the most appropriate candidates is paramount in an era of graft shortage.

AIM

To review systematically the role of liver transplantation in the management of HCC in current clinical practice.

METHODS

An electronic literature search using PUBMED (1980-2010) was performed. Search terms included HCC, hepatoma, liver cancer, and liver transplantation.

RESULTS

Liver transplantation is a highly successful treatment for HCC, in patients within Milan criteria (MC), defined as a solitary tumour ≤50 mm in diameter or ≤3 tumours ≤30 mm in diameter in the absence of extra-hepatic or vascular spread. Other eligibility criteria for liver transplantation are also used in clinical practice, such as the University of California, San Francisco criteria, with outcomes comparable to MC. Loco-regional therapies have a role in the bridging treatment of HCC by minimising wait-list drop-out secondary to tumour progression. Beyond MC, encouraging results have been demonstrated for patients with down-staged tumours. Post-liver transplantation, there is no evidence to support a specific immunosuppressive regimen. In the context of an insufficient cadaveric donor pool to meet demand, the role of adult living donation may be increasingly important.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation offers a curative therapy for selected patients with HCC. The optimisation of eligibility criteria is paramount to ensure that maximum benefit is accrued. Although wait-list therapies have been incorporated into clinical practice, additional high quality data are required to support this strategy.

Liver transplantation in patients over 60 and 65 years: an evaluation of long-term outcomes and survival

With increased demand for liver transplantation (LT), outcomes of older recipients have been subjected to greater scrutiny, as previous studies have demonstrated poorer survival outcomes. Outcomes of 77 patients aged>65 yr (group 1) who underwent transplantation between 1988 and 2003 at King's College Hospital, London, were compared with all recipients aged between 60 and 64 yr (group 2, n=137) and 202 time-matched control patients with chronic liver disease aged between 18-59 yr (group 3). Patient survival at 30-days for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 99%, 94%, and 94%, respectively (P=not significant [NS]). At 1-yr, survival in the 3 groups was 82%, 86%, and 83%, respectively (P=NS), and at 5-yr patient survival was comparable (73%, 80%, and 78%, respectively) (P=NS). Episodes of acute cellular rejection (ACR) were fewer in the older cohorts (43% vs. 45% vs. 61%, P=0.0016), although there was no significant difference identified in the numbers of patients in each group who experienced ACR (P=0.16). A similar but nonsignificant trend was identified for rates of chronic rejection among the groups. In conclusion, these data suggest that survival of patients over 60 and 65 yr undergoing LT is satisfactory, at least in the first 5-yr posttransplantation. In addition, patients over 65 yr experience less rejection, with good graft survival. Thus, LT should not be denied to patients>65 yr on the basis of age alone, once a comprehensive screen for comorbidity has been undertaken.

B cells and professional APCs recruit regulatory T cells via CCL4

Using gene expression profiling, we show here that activation of B cells and professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) induces the expression of common chemokines. Among these, CCL4 was the most potent chemoattractant of a CD4+CD25+ T cell population, which is a characteristic phenotype of regulatory T cells. Depletion of either regulatory T cells or CCL4 resulted in a deregulated humoral response, which culminated in the production of autoantibodies. This suggested that the recruitment of regulatory T cells to B cells and APCs by CCL4 plays a central role in the normal initiation of T cell and humoral responses, and failure to do this leads to autoimmune activation.

Nef triggers a transcriptional program in T cells imitating single-signal T cell activation and inducing HIV virulence mediators

Gene expression profiling was used to explore the role of Nef in HIV. Nef induces a transcriptional program in T cells that is 97% identical to that of anti-CD3 T cell activation. This program is inhibited in the presence of cyclosporin. A requirement for TCR zeta and ZAP-70 is demonstrated for formation of the complete profile. Among eight factors particular to the anti-CD3 activation profile are IL16 and YY1, negative regulators of HIV transcription. In contrast, Nef exclusively upregulates factors positively regulating HIV, including Tat-SF1, U1 SNRNP, and IRF-2. New genes associated with Nef include CDK9, the induction of which enhances Tat function. Thus, Nef acts as a master switch early in the viral life cycle, forcing an environment conducive to dynamic viral production.

The Patient Requests Form: a way of measuring what patients want from their general practitioner

A consumer-oriented approach to the delivery of health care and an understanding of the processes that influence clinical management decisions require the measurement of what patients seek when they consult their doctor. The present study completed the development of an instrument (the Patient Requests Form) that can quantify the intentions of patients attending their general practitioner. The Patient Requests Form was completed by 410 patients attending two general practices: one in an inner city area, the other in a small town. Principal components analysis revealed that the responses from each sample yielded identical components that described three distinct types of request: (i) for explanation and reassurance, (ii) for emotional support, and (iii) for investigation and treatment. Scales constructed to measure each type of request have high internal consistency while being sufficiently brief to be acceptable to general practice patients. The Patient Requests Form is a novel, convenient method to quantify the intentions of patients when they consult a general practitioner. It permits research into neglected aspects of consultation behaviour, including the factors that influence patients' intentions to seek different kinds of help and GPs' perceptions of these intentions.