Keratin 17 is a prognostic and predictive biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To determine the role of keratin 17 (K17) as a predictive biomarker for response to chemotherapy by defining thresholds of K17 expression based on immunohistochemical tests that could be used to optimize therapeutic intervention for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

We profiled K17 expression, a hallmark of the basal molecular subtype of PDAC, by immunohistochemistry in 2 cohorts of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded PDACs (n = 305). We determined a K17 threshold of expression to optimize prognostic stratification according to the lowest Akaike information criterion and explored the potential relationship between K17 and chemoresistance by multivariate predictive analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with advanced-stage, low K17 PDACs treated using 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapeutic regimens had 3-fold longer survival than corresponding cases treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. By contrast, PDACs with high K17 did not respond to either regimen. The predictive value of K17 was independent of tumor mutation status and other clinicopathologic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of K17 in 10% or greater of PDAC cells identified patients with shortest survival. Among patients with low K17 PDACs, 5-FU-based treatment was more likely than gemcitabine-based therapies to extend survival.

Pancreatic cancer: new approaches to drug therapy

Outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain poor due to a variety of biological, clinical, and societal factors. However, in recent years, PDAC has seen 1) increased precision of initial evaluation, 2) increased emphasis on supportive care, 3) deeper understanding of the translation biology of PDAC, especially as pertains to genomic alterations, and 4) foundational combination chemotherapy clinical trials across all disease stages. These advances have led to a wide range of new approaches to drug therapy for PDAC. Currently available drugs are showing added benefit, both by resequencing them with each other and also with respect to other therapeutic modalities. Molecular strategies are being developed to predict response to known therapeutic agents and to identify others. Additionally, a wide range of new drugs for PDAC are under development, including drugs which inhibit critical molecular pathways, drugs which attempt to capitalize on homologous repair deficiencies, immunotherapeutic approaches, antimetabolic agents, and drugs which attack the extracellular matrix which supports PDAC growth. These new approaches offer the promise of improved survival for future PDAC patients.

Abstract 983: Design and methodology of LAPIS, an ongoing, phase III trial of neoadjuvant pamrevlumab (pam) with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)

Background: LAPC is associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 15-18 mos in contemporary clinical trials. CT is typically the initial treatment, and subsequent surgical resection with curative intent is rare. Pam is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the effects of connective tissue growth factor. Phase I and II trials (NCT01181245 and NCT02210559) of CT+pam provided the rationale for a Phase III study of pts with LAPC. CT plus pam/placebo (PBO) is being evaluated in the Phase III LAPIS trial (NCT03941093).

Objective: LAPIS is evaluating the efficacy and safety of CT+pam/PBO as first-line/neoadjuvant therapy in unresectable LAPC.

Methods: LAPIS is a global, Phase III, PBO-controlled trial with six cycles of CT+pam/PBO therapy given in a first-line/neoadjuvant setting, surgical eligibility using protocol-specific response criteria, surgery, and follow-up periods, including long-term follow-up for OS. Major eligibility criteria include adults (≥18 yrs of age); ECOG PS of 0-1; histologic/cytologic confirmation of pancreatic cancer; LAPC diagnosis considered unresectable by standard criteria (NCCN v2.2018 and reviewed by central radiology); measurable disease by RECIST v1.1; and treatment-naïve status. Pts were randomized 1:1 to pam+investigator’s choice CT (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2+nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2; or either FOLFIRINOX [5-fluoruracil 400 mg/m2+folinic acid/leucovorin 400 mg/m2; 5-fluoruracil 2,400 mg/m2; irinotecan 180 mg/m2; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2; or mFOLFIRINOX [folinic acid/leucovorin 400 mg/m2; 5-fluoruracil 2,400 mg/m2; irinotecan 180 mg/m2; oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2]), or CT+PBO, then stratified by unreconstructable disease (yes/no) and geographic region. Pts received six cycles (24 wks) of first-line therapy prior to surgical eligibility decision. Surgical eligibility was defined per protocol for pts with ≥1 of the following: decline in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 ≥50%; FDG-PET value decrease by ≥30%; radiographic downstage to resectable/borderline resectable criteria per NCCN. Surgical recommendation (resect or not) is provided by the central surgical board. Final decisions on surgery remain with site surgeons. Primary endpoint is OS. Key secondary endpoints include event-free survival [EFS, defined as time to “treatment failure” based on earliest occurrence of 1) failure to achieve local disease-free status at end of treatment and/or after surgery; 2) local or distant recurrence; or 3) death], progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR; complete or partial response) by RECIST v 1.1. Safety (including treatment-emergent adverse events) is evaluated throughout the study, Days 28 and 60 after last CT dose, and Day 90 post-surgery. LAPIS enrollment is complete (N=284). Study completion is estimated for early 2024.

Citation Format: Vincent J. Picozzi, Syed Raza, Jack Li, Ewa Carrier. Design and methodology of LAPIS, an ongoing, phase III trial of neoadjuvant pamrevlumab (pam) with chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 983.

Tumor treating fields (TTFields) concomitant with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: The phase 3 PANOVA-3 study

TPS770

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy is a loco-regional antimitotic treatment approved for glioblastoma and malignant mesothelioma. TTFields (150 kHz), with/without chemotherapy, induced antiproliferative and anticlonogenic activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. The phase (ph) 2 PANOVA study (NCT01971281) demonstrated that TTFields therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP; TTFields/GnP) is well-tolerated, with promising efficacy in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). Despite advances in the treatment of LAPC, prognosis is poor and available therapies negatively impact quality of life (QoL); there is an unmet need for effective and tolerable treatments. Methods: PANOVA-3 (NCT03377491) is a prospective, randomized, ph 3 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TTFields/GnP in patients (pts) with LAPC, with a planned enrollment of 556 pts. Pts with unresectable LAPC (per NCCN guidelines), ECOG PS of 0–2, and no prior treatment are eligible. Pts will be stratified by performance status and geographical region, and assigned 1:1 to TTFields/GnP or GnP alone. Standard doses of GnP will be administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. TTFields (150 kHz) generated by the NovoTTF-200T System, will be delivered ≥ 18 h/day until local disease progression per RECIST v1.1. Pt usage is tracked by the device. Follow-up will be performed Q4W; CT scans of the chest and abdomen will be taken Q8W. After local disease progression, pts will be followed every month until death. The primary endpoint is overall survival. QoL, pain-free survival, and puncture-free survival will be compared between TTFields/GnP and GnP alone. Other secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate, 1-year survival rate, rate of resectability, and safety. Device Support Specialists (DSS) will provide technical and lifestyle integration training for pts and caregivers throughout TTFields therapy. The device manufacturer will also provide guidance on preventing and managing skin adverse events in line with published guidance, by means of DSS, field personnel, and various information resources. Usage information from the NovoTTF-200T System is provided to pts and physicians to facilitate discussions to optimize outcomes by maximizing time on therapy. Together, these novel support approaches help pts to confidently operate the NovoTTF-200T System with the knowledge that a multi-faceted support structure is available, ensuring TTFields therapy is seamlessly integrated into everyday life, increasing likelihood of high usage and ultimately optimizing pt outcomes. The trial is currently recruiting at 148 sites, globally. The DMC last reviewed the trial in September 2022, and suggested that the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01971281 .

Effect of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) on body weight in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC)

698

Background: Malnutrition/cachexia is common in PC and is associated with multiple adverse patient (pt) outcomes. Current NCCN guidelines recommend PERT in PC pts with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). However, little evidence exists regarding the impact of PERT on clinical outcomes in PC, especially APC. Data on impact of PERT use on change in body weight is presented here. Methods: Pts in this retrospective cohort study were identified from the Virginia Mason PC database. Eligibility requirements included: 1) no upfront resection 2) no prior PC therapy 3) pancreatic stool elastase 1< 200 µg/g stool or documented clinical evidence of EPI at diagnosis 4) treatment at least to initial restaging event (8 weeks) 5) available data regarding PERT use/dosage. Weight/BMI was assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks on therapy. Two pt groups were compared; a) pts prescribed PERT for EPI at recommended package insert dose (≥ 500KU-2500/kg/meal for ≥ 3 meals/day) for ≥ 50% treatment period and b) pts who received no PERT. Pts on PERT at lower than recommended dose and /or < 50% interval between 1st treatment and reassessment were excluded from analysis. Statistical significance was determined using the T-test for continuous variables, chi-squared for categorical variables. Results: 505 total pts were study eligible; 197 (39%) pts received PERT, 308 (61%) pts did not. Pt characteristics are shown. Despite a more adverse patient population with respect to weight loss, pts receiving PERT after 8 weeks experienced less change in weight (-0.36 kg vs -1.54 kg, P = 0.025) and change in BMI ( -0.64% vs -1.96., p= 0.026). Pts with cachexia experienced a similar outcome (-0.36% vs. -2.02 %, p= 0.026). No other pt characteristics achieved statistical significance. Conclusions: Despite a more adverse population with respect to weight loss at baseline, PERT usage prescribed per package insert guidance reduced wt loss/ change in BMI loss in APC over the 1st 8 weeks of therapy. This was also true in APC pts with cachexia. Further analysis of the impact of PERT therapy in APC with respect to treatment tolerability, and toxicity, quality of life and overall survival is warranted. [Table: see text]

Abstract A021: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy concomitant with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the phase 3 PANOVA-3 study

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy is a loco-regional antimitotic treatment approved for glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma. TTFields (150 kHz), with/without chemotherapy, induced antiproliferative and anticlonogenic activity in pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. The phase (ph) 2 PANOVA study (NCT01971281) demonstrated that TTFields therapy with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is well-tolerated, with promising efficacy in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). Despite advances in the treatment of LAPC, prognosis is poor and available therapies negatively impact quality of life (QoL). As such, there is an unmet need for effective and tolerable treatments. Trial design: PANOVA-3 (NCT03377491) is a prospective, randomized, ph 3 trial investigating the efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy with GnP in patients (pts) with LAPC, with a planned enrollment of 556 pts. Pts with unresectable LAPC (per NCCN guidelines), ECOG PS of 0–2, and no prior treatment are eligible. Pts will be stratified by performance status and geographical region, and assigned 1:1 to TTFields therapy + GnP or GnP alone. Standard doses of GnP will be administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. TTFields (150 kHz) generated by the NovoTTF-200T System, will be delivered ≥ 18 h/day until local disease progression per RECIST v1.1. Pt usage is tracked by the device. Follow-up will be performed every 4 wks; CT scans of the chest and abdomen will be taken every 8 wks. After local disease progression, pts will be followed every month until death. The primary endpoint is overall survival. QoL, pain-free survival, and puncture-free survival will be compared between TTFields therapy + GnP and GnP alone. Other secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate, 1-year survival rate, rate of resectability, and safety. Device Support Specialists (DSS) will provide technical and lifestyle integration training for pts and caregivers throughout TTFields therapy. The device manufacturer will also provide guidance on preventing and managing skin adverse events in line with published guidance, by means of DSS, field personnel, and various information resources. Furthermore, usage information from the NovoTTF-200T System is provided to both pts and physicians to facilitate discussions to optimize outcomes by maximizing time on therapy. Together, these novel support approaches help pts to confidently operate the NovoTTF-200T System with the knowledge that a multi-faceted support structure is available, ensuring TTFields therapy is seamlessly integrated into everyday life, increasing likelihood of high usage and ultimately optimizing pt outcomes. The trial is currently recruiting at 120 sites, globally. The DMC last reviewed the trial in August 2021, and suggested that the trial continue as planned.

Citation Format: Vincent J. Picozzi, Teresa Macarulla, Philip Agop Philip, Carlos Roberto Becerra, Tomislav Dragovich. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy concomitant with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the phase 3 PANOVA-3 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2022 Sep 13-16; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(22 Suppl):Abstract nr A021.

Abstract CT234: PANOVA-3: A phase 3 study of tumor treating fields with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a novel, locoregional antimitotic treatment modality approved for glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Continuous, non-invasive low intensity, intermediate frequency (150-200 kHz) alternating electric fields are delivered to the tumor via skin-placed arrays. In vitro, TTFields (150 kHz), with or without chemotherapy, induced antiproliferative and anticlonogenic activity on pancreatic cancer cell lines. The phase 2 PANOVA study (NCT01971281) demonstrated that the combination of TTFields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GnP) is well-tolerated, with promising efficacy in both metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). These data indicate that TTFields with GnP warrant phase 3 evaluation. Methods: PANOVA-3 (NCT03377491) is a prospective, randomized, phase 3 trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TTFields concomitant with GnP in patients with LAPC. The planned enrollment is 556 patients. Eligibility criteria include unresectable LAPC (per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified by performance status and geographical region, and randomly assigned 1:1 to TTFields plus GnP or GnP alone. Based on a recent protocol amendment, a smaller and lighter-weight (reduced from 6 to 2.7 lbs) TTFields device will be used. Standard doses of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) will be administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered ≥ 18 h/day until local disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V1.1. Follow-up will be performed every 4 weeks and a computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen every 8 weeks. After local disease progression, patients will be followed every month until death. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate, 1-year survival rate, pain- and puncture-free survival rate, rate of resectability, quality of life, and toxicity. The sample size was estimated per log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus GnP with published clinical trial data on patients treated with GnP alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.75 in OS. Type I error is set to 0.05 (2-sided) and power to 80%. The trial is currently recruiting at 104 sites in Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, and USA.

Citation Format: Vincent J. Picozzi, Judith Finlay, Teresa Macarulla, Philip A. Philip, Carlos R. Becerra, Tomislav Dragovich. PANOVA-3: A phase 3 study of tumor treating fields with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT234.

Precision Promise (PrP): An adaptive, multi-arm registration trial in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

TPS4188

Background: The success rate of drug development in PDAC is disappointingly low.PrP is a transformative, adaptive platform clinical trial designed to continuously evaluate many novel therapeutic options while increasing the probability that patients (pts) are randomized to effective experimental therapies. It cultivates enhanced cooperation among groups representing pts advocacy, pharmaceutical companies, academia, and the FDA. This patient-centric study aims to become the largest Phase 3 registrational study in PDAC and represents a fundamental shift in drug development for PDAC in the United States (US). Methods: PrP (NCT04229004) is a platform clinical trial sponsored by the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), developed based on the FDA 2020 guidance document regarding "complex innovative designs" in registration trials https://www.fda.gov/media/130897/download . It utilizes adaptive randomization and other Bayesian statistical innovations provided by Berry Consultants LLC, including the “time machine” which uses all previously randomized controls for each arm, suitably adjusted for line of therapy and the time period of the arm. Focused on 1st and 2nd line treatment of mPDAC, PrP uses an adaptive platform design with randomization to one of 2 control arms (gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GA) or mFOLFIRINOX, 30% of pts) or experimental therapy (70% of pts). Candidate experimental arms are reviewed by an Arm Selection Committee based on validity of the treatment target and strength of the pre-clinical and clinical data. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Pts undergo pre- and on-treatment biopsies with state-of-the-art genomic, transcriptomic, and immune analysis, along with a serial collection of blood-based research samples. Pts are managed using novel supportive care techniques; PrP contains 3 sub-protocols evaluating quality of life, sarcopenia, and actigraphy. PrP launched in 2020 and has enrolled > 130 pts; 30 US sites have been selected with 17 currently active. Current experimental arms include: (i) GA + Pamrevlumab, an anti-CTGF Ab, (ii) Racemetyrosine monotherapy, a cancer metabolism-based therapy (for follow-up of patients) and (iii) an immuno-oncology arm in activation. Other arms are in the planning stages. Compared to traditional designs, PrP offers several advantages: multiple investigational treatments evaluated in parallel over time; ̃175 pts per experimental arm required to initiate a regulatory registration; and continuous learning from every patient, resulting in significant savings of time and resources. PrP has created an entirely new learning environment for accelerating drug development in PDAC. Clinical trial information: NCT04229004.

PANOVA-3: A phase 3 study of tumor-treating fields with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for frontline treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

TPS4187

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a novel, locoregional antimitotic treatment modality approved for glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Continuous, non-invasive low intensity, intermediate frequency (150–200 kHz) alternating electric fields are delivered to the tumor via skin-placed arrays. In vitro, TTFields (150 kHz), with or without chemotherapy, induced antiproliferative and anticlonogenic activity on pancreatic cancer cell lines (Giladi M, et al. Pancreatology 2014;14:54–63). The phase 2 PANOVA study (NCT01971281) demonstrated that the combination of TTFields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GnP) is well-tolerated, with promising efficacy in metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) (Rivera F, et al. Pancreatology 2019;19:64–72). These data indicate that TTFields with GnP warrant phase 3 evaluation. Methods: PANOVA-3 (NCT03377491) is a prospective, randomized, phase 3 trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TTFields concomitant with GnP in patients with LAPC. Planned enrollment is 556 patients. Eligibility criteria include unresectable LAPC (per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2, and no prior treatment. Patients will be stratified by performance status and geographical region, and randomly assigned 1:1 to TTFields plus GnP or GnP alone. Based on a recent protocol amendment, a smaller and lighter-weight (reduced from 6 to 2.7 lbs) TTFields device will be used. Standard doses of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) will be administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered ≥ 18 h/day until local disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V1.1. Follow-up will be performed every 4 weeks and a computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen every 8 weeks. After local disease progression, patients will be followed every month until death. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate, 1-year survival rate, pain- and puncture-free survival rate, rate of resectability, quality of life, and toxicity. The sample size was estimated per log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus GnP with published clinical trial data on patients treated with GnP alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.75 in OS. Type I error is set to 0.05 (2-sided) and power to 80%. The trial is currently recruiting at 106 sites in Austria, Belgium, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, and USA. The DMC last reviewed the trial in August 2021, and suggested that the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

PANOVA-3: A phase 3 study of tumor treating fields (TTFields) with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

TPS629

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, loco-regional antimitotic therapy approved for the treatment of glioblastoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma. TTFields (150–200 kHz) are delivered via arrays placed on the skin surrounding the tumor site. In vitro, TTFields (150 kHz), with or without chemotherapy, had antiproliferative and anticlonogenic effects on pancreatic cancer cells. The Phase 2 PANOVA study (NCT01971281) demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (GnP) in both metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). Methods: The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding TTFields to GnP in a larger group of patients with LAPC. This prospective, randomized trial is currently enrolling 556 patients with unresectable LAPC (per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive TTFields plus GnP or to GnP alone, stratified by performance status and geographical region. A recent protocol amendment included the use of a smaller, more light-weight (reduced from 6 to 2.7 lbs.) TTFields device. Standard doses of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) will be administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered ≥ 18 h/day until local disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria V1.1. Follow-up visits will be conducted every 4 weeks; a computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen will be performed every 8 weeks. After local disease progression, patients will be followed for survival on a monthly basis. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), local PFS, objective response rate, 1 year survival rate, pain- and puncture-free survival rate, rate of resectability, quality of life, and toxicity. The sample size calculation used a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus GnP with control patients on gemcitabine alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio of 0.75 in OS. Type I error is set to 0.05 (2-sided) and power to 80%. Study locations in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, and the US are currently recruiting. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

Oral SM-88 plus MPS, an effective yet less toxic treatment option in second-line advanced pancreatic cancer? Final phase II/III study results

585

Background: Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has a poor prognosis in refractory patients (pts). SM-88 Regimen, which comprises oral SM-88 (racemetyrosine, TYME Inc) plus 10mg methoxsalen, 50mg phenytoin, and 0.5mg sirolimus (MPS), has previously shown clinical activity in mPDAC. Methods: We report on the final results (primary objective, ORR) of our multicenter, prospective open-label phase II/III RCT (TYME-88-Panc Part 1, NCT03512756) of SM-88 Regimen in pts with mPDAC who had received at least one prior line of therapy. Subjects received either 230 mg BID or 460 mg BID PO SM-88; oral MPS QD was given at the same dose in both arms. Results: The last subject was enrolled on Mar 12, 2019. As of Sep 1, 2021, 49 subjects were randomized to either 460 (n = 26) or 920mg (n = 23) SM-88 plus MPS daily (ITT population); 37 were deemed evaluable after completing at least one 28-day cycle of treatment (min 23 days on treatment). The study population was heterogeneous: a majority (32/37 = 86.5%) had failed at least 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Twenty pts (54.1%) had received FOLFIRINOX in the first line and 16 pts (43.2%), a gemcitabine-based regimen. For evaluable pts, the overall disease control rate (DCR) was 27.0%: 10/37 subjects reached RECIST v1.1-verified stable disease (SD); 3 of the 10 had RECIST-confirmed SD. For the 49 ITT pts, mOS was 3.4 months (mo). For the 37 evaluable pts, mOS was 3.9 mo, and mPFS was 1.9 mo. mOS, mPFS, and DCR did not differ significantly by SM-88 dose. mOS and mPFS trended toward improvement in subjects with fewer prior lines of treatment: for pts in the second line (n = 5), mOS was 8.1 mo (95% CI: 3.0 – no UL), and mPFS was 3.8 mo (95% CI: 0.9 – no UL). Although not confirmatory, exploratory analyses showed that circulating tumor cells decreased on SM-88 Regimen. SM-88 Regimen was well tolerated: only one pt of the 48 ever dosed (2.1%) experienced related SAEs on treatment (Grade 3 abdominal pain, Grade 4 hypotension), which were eventually resolved. Enrollment criteria specified ECOG < = 2 at study entry; these scores were maintained or improved for most pts (24/37 = 64.9%) while on treatment. Overall health and quality of life (QOL) scores via EORTC QLQ-C30 were maintained, trending toward superiority for pts on 920 mg vs. 460 mg (p = ns). Conclusions: This final analysis confirmed that SM-88 Regimen was well tolerated, with pts attaining an overall DCR of 27%. Of note, for the small subset of pts treated in the second line, the mOS and mPFS were on par with results achieved in other published randomized PhIII second-line trials for mPDAC. Moreover, SM-88 Regimen exhibited far fewer Grade 3 and 4 AEs than other commonly used cytotoxic regimens in the second line. The 27% DCR, 8.1 mo mOS, and 3.8 mo mPFS in the second line, with minimal toxicity and preserved QOL, resulted in the active investigation of SM-88 Regimen in a large, ongoing second-line trial in mPDAC (NCT04229004). Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.

Abstract PO-050: Precision Promise (PrP): An adaptive, multi-arm registration trial in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

Background: Drug development in PDAC has been disappointing with an extremely low trial success rate despite considerable effort. PrP is a transformative, adaptive clinical trial platform that attempts to correct this by continuously and rapidly evaluating novel therapeutic options while maximizing the probability of patient (pt) randomization to an experimental treatment and nurturing enhanced cooperation among groups representing pt advocacy, pharmaceuticals, translational/clinical academia, and the FDA. This patient-centric study represents a fundamental shift in drug development for PDAC in the United States and aims to become the largest Phase 2/3 registrational study ever launched in this disease. Methods: PrP (NCT04229004) is a clinical trial platform sponsored by the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) and funded solely through non-government sources. The protocol was finalized based on the FDA 2020 guidance document regarding "complex innovative designs" in registration trials https://www.fda.gov/media/130897/download. It utilizes adaptive randomization along with several trial design and Bayesian statistical innovations provided by Berry Consultants LLC. All pts undergo pre-and on-treatment biopsies with state-of-the-art genomic, transcriptomic, and immune analysis, along with collection of blood samples for research purposes throughout the study. Pts are managed using novel standardized supportive care techniques, and PrP contains 3 sub-protocols involving quality of life, sarcopenia and actigraphy. PrP was launched in 2020, and currently includes 20 US sites. Focused on both 1st and 2nd line treatment of metastatic PDAC, PrP uses an adaptive platform design with 30% of pts randomized between one of the 2 standard of care control arms (gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel and mFOLFIRINOX) and 70% to experimental arms, currently either SM-88, a cancer metabolism-based agent (Tyme Inc); or Pamrevlumab, an antibody inhibiting the activity of the connective tissue growth factor (Fibrogen Inc.) The study is ongoing with &gt;100 pts enrolled to date. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee regularly reviews the data and continues to recommend that the trial proceeds as planned. New study arms will be added after review by an Arm Selection Committee that assesses the validity of the treatment target and the adequacy of the preexisting pre-clinical and clinical data. An additional experimental arm is anticipated in 2021. Conclusion: Compared to traditional trial designs, PrP offers several advantages: multiple investigational treatments can be evaluated in parallel over time; only ~ 175 pts per experimental arm required to initiate a regulatory registration; and increased learning from every patient during the trial, altogether resulting in both time saving and a 30-50% cost saving. In effect, PrP has created an entirely new “learning community” and can substantially accelerate drug development for PDAC.

Citation Format: Vincent J. Picozzi, Anne-Marie Duliege, Anirban Maitra, Manuel Hidalgo, Andrew Eugene Hendifar, Gregory L. Beatty, Sudheer Doss Doss, Regina Deck, Lynn M. Matrisian, Julie Fleshman, Diane M. Simeone. Precision Promise (PrP): An adaptive, multi-arm registration trial in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Special Conference on Pancreatic Cancer; 2021 Sep 29-30. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(22 Suppl):Abstract nr PO-050.

Alternating gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GA) and 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for de novo metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC): Safety and effect

4125

Background: Both gemcitabine and 5FU-based chemotherapy have demonstrated efficacy in MPC. Alternating regimens may 1) reduce toxicity 2) slow resistant cancer biology emergence and 3) provide a broader platform for addition of other therapeutic agents. Alternating GA and FOLFIRI in MPC has been previously reported as part of the SEENA -1 trial,our own institution, and elsewhere (Picozzi et.al. GI Cancer Symposium 2017, Picozzi et.al, ASCO 2018 Assenat et,al, ASCO 2018). An extension of our institutional observations are reported here. Methods: Pt eligibility required the following: 1) biopsy proven de novo MPC, 2) no prior evidence MPC on CT, 3) ECOG performance status ≤ 2, and 4) bi-dimensionally measurable disease. Treatment (Rx) entailed gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 1, (8), 15 alternating every 8 wks (2 cycles) with FOLFIRI using standard dosing. Patients were radiographically re-staged every 8 wks. Rx was continued up to 48 wks; Rx thereafter decided by pt/MD. Results: 108 pts met eligibility requirements from 10/2015 and 12/2020. Pt characteristics included median age 68 ( range 35-81), ECOG PS 0/≥1 54%/46%, # diseases sites 1/≥1 62%/38%, liver /non-liver 76%/24%, biliary obstruction yes/no 40%/60%, C 19.9 NL/ < 59XNL/ > 59X NL 12%/32%/56%; median Ca 19.9 4598 With median f/u of 19.7 mo, 17 pts remain on Rx < 48 wks, 35/91 (38%) completed 48 wks Rx, 56/91 (62%) pts progressed prior to 48 wks. Median # mos on Rx was 8.9. ≥ grade 3 heme toxicity included anemia 7%, neutropenia 9%, thrombocytopenia 5%. Neutrophil growth factors were not used in this pt cohort. ≥ 3 non-hem toxicity included neuropathy1%, nausea/vomiting 2%, mucositis 2%, diarrhea 1%. Disease control at 16 wks was 81% (35% PR/46% SD/16% PD, 95% CI 72-87%). Median OS was 13.7 mo (95% CI 10.9-18.7 mo). 6 /12/18/24 mo OS were 87%/55%/41%/ 20% respectively. Prognostic significance was seen with Rx > vs < 48 wks (21.1 vs 8.0 mo, p <.0001), and ECOG PS 0 vs. ≥1 ( 17.8 vs. 10.9 mo, p = 0.03) Age, # metastatic sites, liver involvement, biliary obstruction and magnitude of CA 19.9 elevation all failed to achieve prognostic significance at the p <.05 level. Conclusions: 1) Alternating GA/ FOLFIRI in MPC has a more favorable toxicity profile than standard regimens 2) Med OS appears superior to GA and competitive with FOLFIRINOX ; longer term (18/24 mo ) OS seemed particularly encouraging 3) ≥ 48 wks Rx and ECOG PS 0 were prognostically significant 4) Further investigation using this regimen including a) randomized comparisons, b) incorporation of molecular data and c) addition of additional agents seems indicated Updated survival data will be presented at the meeting

Phase II/III study of SM-88 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

437

Background: SM-88 (racemetyrosine, Tyme Inc) is a dysfunctional tyrosine derivative used with MPS (methoxsalen 10mg, phenytoin 50mg and sirolimus 0.5mg). SM-88 was well tolerated with improvement in survival among select heavily pretreated PDAC patients who achieved stable disease (HR 0.08, p = 0.02) (Noel et al. Annal Oncol 2019). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) were prognostic in identifying a PDAC subgroup that may be more likely to benefit from SM-88. Preliminary radiomic analysis of the largest metastases at baseline correlated with baseline CTCs (Ocean et al, Annal Oncol 2019). Here we describe the subsequent randomized portion of the trial in third-line patients only, of SM-88 vs physician/patient choice chemotherapy, to evaluate the potential role of SM-88 in metastatic PDAC through analysis of CTCs and passively acquired biometrics data from a wearable device. Methods:Prospective open-label RCT (Tyme 88 Panc Part 2, NCT03512756) after 2 prior lines for metastatic PDAC. A cell adhesion matrix (CAM) was used to enrich solitary CTCs and cells in clusters floating in the medium after 24 hour culture. Isolated CTCs were collected each cycle on day 1, isolated, and enumerated by flow cytometry using the epithelial cell surface marker Epi+ and cellular uptake of green fluorescent labeled CAM (GCAM+). Results:As of Sept 15, 67 subjects were consented. Randomized and evaluable subjects (n=38) included: mean age 65y (45-86); BMI 24.6 (18.8-38.7); female 39.5%; White 76.3%. Of treated subjects 65.8% (25/38) had 166 AEs, with 25.7% (26/101) being at least possibly SM-88-related, with 1 Grade 3. Four CTC subpopulations defined by GCAM, Epi+ and cluster status, were enumerated and correlated to each other (r=0.03-0.71). At least one CTC subpopulation was detected at baseline (mean 33.8 cells/2mL) in all subjects (n=27). The longest metastatic lesion diameter at baseline correlated with baseline CTCs (r=0.55 for Epi+ cluster; r=0.52 for GCAM+ cluster). CTCs were successfully separated and enumerated at each cycle for correlation with survival, response and other parameters. The median baseline daily step count during the first two weeks on treatment was 3993.8 (IQR: 2745.6 - 5078) for those alive vs. 689.3 (IQR: 630.0-2083.6) among deaths in evaluable subjects (p = NS). Passively acquired mean heart rate during week 3 on trial was 89.3 (SD 10.5) among those who died vs. 78.0 (SD 9.2) among those living; medians are 87.0 for deaths vs. 79.2 for alive (p= NS). Conclusions: In a preliminary exploratory analysis, passively acquired biometrics from a wearable device can be collected for correlation with other clinical outcomes. CTC collection and enumeration is also feasible for correlation with traditional trial outcomes. Given that the longest lesion diameter is correlated with CTCs at baseline, additional radiologic feature analysis (eg radiomics) may be important predictor of CTCs. SM-88 was well tolerated with no treatment-related Grade 4 or 5 events. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.

A phase III trial of tumor-treating fields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for front-line treatment of locally-advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC): PANOVA-3

TPS448

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma. TTFields at specific frequency (150-200 kHz) are delivered via transducer arrays placed on the skin in proximity to the tumor site. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. The phase 2 PANOVA study, the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients, demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in both metastatic and LAPC. The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) is designed to test the efficacy and safety of adding TTFields to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in LAPC. Methods: Patients (N = 556) with unresectable, LAPC (per NCCN guidelines) will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Patients should have an ECOG score of 0-2 and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified based on their performance status and geographical region, and will be randomized 1:1 to TTFields plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone. Chemotherapy will be administered at standard dose of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered at least 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria V1.1. Follow up will be performed q8w, including a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Following local disease progression, patients will be followed monthly for survival. Overall survival will be the primary endpoint and progression-free survival, objective response rate, rate of resectability, quality of life and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus chemotherapy with control patients on chemotherapy alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio 0.75 in overall survival. Type I error is set to 0.05 (two-sided) and power to 80%. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

Impact of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) on clinical outcomes in nonresected pancreatic cancer (PC): Initial results

400

Background: Current NCCN guidelines recommend PERT use in PC patients (pts) with symptoms of EPI. However, little evidence exists regarding clinical outcomes following PERT use in PC pts, especially those with nonresected disease. We present initial results from PERT use in this pt group regarding disease control and symptom improvement. Methods: Pts with initially nonresected PC were obtained for this study from the Virginia Mason PC Database. Eligibility criteria included:1) pathologically diagnosed nonresected adeno PC from January 2014-December 2019 ; 2) no prior PC anticancer therapy (PCRx) of any kind; 3) ≥2 PGSGA (Patient Generated Global Subjective Assessment ) forms completed with initial PGSGA reporting before 30 days following first PCRx. Pts were stratified by PERT vs non-PERT prescription as validated by the EHR. Clinicians tended to prescribe PERT based on either abnormal fecal elastase and/or clinical symptoms (e.g. diarrhea) as in the PGSGA; no formal criteria for PERT usage existed. Pts were considered to have received PERT if prescribed for the majority of time during the assessment period (i.e. > 30 days) and were analyzed based on an "intent to treat" basis without compliance validation. Results: 344 pts were identified via this method ; 207 (60%)/137 (40%) did/did not receive PERT. > 95% received Creon as PERT. Median time from 1st day PCRx to 1st reassessment was 60 days. 79% pts completed PGSGA prior to and 97% within 2 weeks of 1st day PCRx. Pt characteristics were balanced between PERT/ non PERT groups including race (90% white), age (median 68 yrs), sex (M/F 53%/47%), non-metastatic/metastatic disease 24%/76% . BMI distribution (< 18.5 3%, 18.5-25 40%, 25-30 34%, and >30 23%),and albumin distribution (<3 g/dL 6%, 3-3.4 g/dL 12% and ≥3.5 g/dL 82%). However, mean baseline PGSGA score was higher in the PERT vs non PERT group (9.9 overall, 10.9 (95% CI 10.1-11.7) vs 8.2 (95% CI 7.3 - 9.1), p< 0.01). At 1st reassessment, disease control (PR+SD) (83% overall) was greater in the PERT (87%) vs. non PERT (79%) group (p=0.04).Change from baseline PGSGA was favorable overall (Δ-5.0, 95% CI-5.7--4.3), and in all pt subsets, but with greater improvement in the PERT (Δ-6.0) vs. non PERT (Δ -3.4) group (p< 0.001) and in disease controlled (Δ-5.3) vs. non-disease controlled (Δ- 3.2) pts (p=0.033). Disease controlled vs. non-disease controlled PERT pts did not differ in their PGSGA response (Δ-6.2/-4.8, p=0.98) Conclusions: 1) PERT vs non-PERT pts were similar with respect to basic clinical or nutritional parameters (e.g. BMI, albumin) in this pt cohort. 2) Despite having more adverse baseline PGSGA scores, PERT pts were statistically superior to non PERT pts with respect to both frequency of disease control and magnitude of PGSGA response during initial Rx 3) Further investigation of the detail involving PERT usage and clinical outcomes in nonresected PC is warranted from these data.

A Phase II, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Bayesian Adaptive Efficacy and Safety Study of PBI-05204 in Patients with Stage IV Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

LESSONS LEARNED

This trial evaluating a novel plant extract, PBI-05204, did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival but did show signals of efficacy in heavily pretreated mPDA. PBI-05204 was generally well tolerated, with the most common side effects related to treatment being vomiting (23.7%), nausea (18.4%), decreased appetite (18.4%), and diarrhea (15.8%). Additional trials are needed to explore the role of PBI-05204 in cancer treatment.

BACKGROUND

Survival for metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDA) is dismal, and novel agents are needed. PBI-05204 is a modified supercritical carbon dioxide extract of Nerium oleander leaves. Oleandrin, the extract's major cytotoxic component, is a cardiac glycoside that has demonstrated antitumor activity in various tumor cell lines with a mechanism involving inhibition of Akt phosphorylation and through downregulation of mTOR.

METHODS

A phase II, single-arm, open-label study to determine the efficacy of PBI-05204 in patients with refractory mPDA therapy was conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with the hypothesis that 50% of patients would be alive at 4.5 months. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. Patients received oral PBI-05204 daily until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. Radiographic response was assessed every two cycles.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled, and 38 were analyzed. Ten patients were alive at 4.5 months (26.3%) with a median PFS of 56 days. One objective response (2.6%) was observed for 162 days. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 63.2% of patients with the most common being fatigue, vomiting, nausea, decreased appetite, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

PBI-05204 did not meet its primary endpoint for OS in this study. Recent preclinical data indicate a role for PBI-05204 against glioblastoma multiforme when combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. A randomized phase II trial is currently being designed.

Value-based estimate of market size and opportunity for economic benefit through innovative pancreatic cancer (PC) therapies

e16790

Background: Over the past 20 years, cancer drugs have contributed to increased life expectancy, reduced mortality, decreased hospitalization and decreased use of medical services. The economic value of these improvements is about as large as the value of the increase in the US gross domestic product during that time period. Recently, a health economic study presented at ASCO GI 2020 cited that every $1 (adjusted for inflation) spent on innovative PC treatments reduced non-drug expenditures by $9, thereby lowering the total cost of care for PC patients. Accordingly, the commercial opportunity of a new therapy should be measured by some combination of the clinical, economic and social value generated. We demonstrate the value of a novel PC drug from this perspective. Methods: Analysis of SEER survival and incidence data between 2008 and 2016 shows the introduction of new medicines for PC of all stages was associated with a cumulative increase of 26,456 life years, or 2.52 life years per patient. It was also associated with quality of life improvements, measured by a decline in hospitalizations rates and emergency room visits that can also lead to more days at work, at school and with family. Several studies have suggested the average value of an additional year of life, for the age of a typical patient diagnosed with PC, is at least $250,000. Using this figure, the value of 26,456 life years gained from 2008-2016 is $6.61 billion (26,456*$250,000) to patients, the healthcare system and society, as a result of advancing medical innovation for patients with PC. Results: The median annual list price of a life-enhancing cancer therapy is $150,000 per patient. Using the NCI treatment prevalence estimator (holding incidence constant), we estimate that between 2020-2025, there will be an additional 10,728 advanced PC patients requiring treatment who could benefit from innovative drugs. The total cost of these drugs for these patients would be $1.61 billion. However, the economic value of the life years saved would be $6.76 billion (10,728*2.52 life years*$250,000 = $6.76 billion). A review of cancer medicine payor coverage suggests a new PC therapy that produces such value would be able to obtain coverage from US payors given this value-based price. Conclusions: A value-based approach to estimating the opportunity for clinical and economic benefit reveals significant potential for new PC medicines.

Sustained Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Predicts Progression and Survival

BACKGROUND

As neoadjuvant therapy of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is becoming more widely used, better indicators of progression are needed to help guide therapeutic decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients with BRPC who received 24 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with chemotoxicity or medical comorbidities limiting treatment completion and nonexpressors of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) were excluded. Serum CA19-9 response was analyzed as a predictor of disease progression, recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were included; 39 (37%) progressed on treatment (18 local and 21 distant) and 65 (63%) were resected (68% R0). Multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that the percent decrease in CA19-9 from baseline to minimum value (odds ratio [OR] 0.947, p ≤ .0001) and the percent increase from minimum value to final restaging CA19-9 (OR 1.030, p ≤ .0001) were predictive of progression. A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis determined cutoff values predictive of progression, which were used to create four prognostic groups. CA19-9 responses were categorized as follows: (1) always normal (n = 6); (2) poor response (n = 31); (3) unsustained response (n = 19); and (4) sustained response (n = 48). Median overall survival for Groups 1-4 was 58, 16, 20, and 38 months, respectively (p ≤ .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with initially elevated CA19-9 levels who do not have a decline to a sustained low level are at risk for progression, recurrence, and poor survival. Alternative treatment strategies prior to an attempt at curative resection should be considered in this cohort.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study identified percent changes in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 blood levels while on chemotherapy that predict tumor growth in patients with advanced pancreas cancer. These changes could be used to better select patients who would benefit from surgical removal of their tumors and improve survival.

Prognostic utility of inflammation biomarkers in a PDAC trial involving the human anti-CTGF antibody pamrevlumab

752

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) often exhibit desmoplasia, elevated CTGF (connective tissue growth factor) expression and inflammation. The influence of inflammation on patient outcomes was examined in a dose-ranging trial of the anti-CTGF antibody pamrevlumab in combination with a fixed regimen of gemcitabine and erlotinib in locally advanced or metastatic PDAC patients (NCT01181245; Picozzi et al. J Cancer Clin Trials 2017 2:123; n = 75). Methods: The prognostic utility of pre-treatment plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1), albumin, CTGF and CA 19-9 were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. Demographic parameters, treatment cohort, and pamrevlumab exposure determined on treatment day 15 were also evaluated, as were changes in biomarker levels over the first four weeks of treatment. Results: Elevated baseline CTGF and CRP were prognostic for shorter overall survival (OS) by univariate analysis (HR = 3.2 for CRP > 10 mg/L, p= 0.00002 and HR = 1.6 for CTGF > 10 ng/mL, p= 0.045). In a five-factor multivariate Cox model that included CRP and TGFβ1 as continuous Ln-transformed variables, performance status, age, and pamrevlumab treatment cohort, cohort assignments associated with increasing pamrevlumab exposure predicted improved OS (HR = 0.87, p= 0.03). Removing CRP from this model reduced the prognostic utility of pamrevlumab cohort assignment and exposure, indicating an important contribution of inflammation to interpretation of treatment outcome. Changes in inflammation biomarkers over the course of treatment were also evaluated, but were not prognostic in this study. Conclusions: In multivariate Cox models, assessment of pre-treatment CRP levels improved ability to detect significant differences in PDAC patient survival outcomes associated with pamrevlumab treatment. Our results emphasize the utility of accounting for pre-treatment CRP levels as an independent prognostic factor in PDAC treatment effect models.

Prognostic value (PV) of pathologic response (PR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) alone in resected pancreatic cancer (PDAC): Initial analysis

771

Background: As neoadjuvant Rx for resected PDAC often includes chemoradiation, the PV of PR includes its impact. We began analysis of the impact of NC alone in this setting. Methods: Patients (pts) were identified from the Virginia Mason Pancreaticobiliary Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria: 1) Dx 1/2010 - 3/2019; 2) Path dx PDAC stage I-III; 3) NC ( any type) as sole neoadjuvant Rx; 4) complete surg path data; 5) longitudinal OS known. Exclusion criteria: 1) neoadjuvant chemoradiation; 2) unknown NC (outside providers only). Histologic response was scored as follows: ( 0=complete response, 1 ≥95% response, 2=50-95% response, 3<50% response). Results: Results for 134 pts are in Table. Median (med) f/u was 33 months (mo). In univariate analysis, all path features examined were statistically significant re med/5-yr OS. In multivariate analysis, risk increased with tumor size (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2) and tumor differentiation (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1 ) independent of other variables. Conclusions: 1) In univariate analysis, all PR features after NC had PV for med/5-yr OS, especially tumor size and histologic response score. NC type was not significant. 2) In multivariate analysis, risk increased with tumor size and tumor differentiation.3) This data needs extension to a bigger pt base/correlation with other variables (Ca 19.9, postop Rx, recurrence pattern etc.) for greater utility ( now underway). 4) This approach may aid postop Rx decision -making in this setting. [Table: see text]

Tyme-88-Panc Part 2: A randomized phase II/III of SM-88 with MPS as third-line in metastatic PDAC

TPS789

Background: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer who have progressed on two prior lines of therapy have a poor prognosis with an overall survival in the range of 2-2.5 months. (Manax, et al. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 suppl 4; abstr 226). There is currently no standard of care for these patients that has demonstrated improved outcomes. SM-88 (D,L-alpha-metyrosine; racemetyrosine [USAN]) is a proprietary dysfunctional tyrosine derivative and is the backbone of SM-88 used with MPS (Methoxsalen 10mg, Phenytoin 50mg and Sirolimus 0.5mg; all administered daily). SM-88 monotherapy was relatively well tolerated, with improvement in survival in select patients with heavily pretreated PDAC who achieved stable disease on therapy (HR 0.08, p = 0.02). Circulating tumor cells (CTC’s) were prognostic and decreased on therapy with SM-88 potentially identifying a subgroup of PDAC that may be most likely to benefit from therapy (Noel et al. Annal Oncol V30, Suppl 4, 2019). Preliminary radiomic analysis of the largest metastases at baseline suggested the same benefits including a correlation with baseline CTCs, changes in CTCs on therapy and OS (Ocean et al, Annal Oncol, V30, Suppl 5, 2019). Here, we describe a randomized, open-label, phase 2/3 trial evaluating the efficacy of SM-88 + MPS vs physician’s choice treatment as third line therapy for patients with metastatic PDAC. Methods: This is a multi-center Phase 3 study of patients ≥18 years with metastatic PDAC that progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy (gemcitabine [gem] and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] based) with an ECOG <2. Randomization will be 1:1 with 250 patients being stratified by site, ECOG, and choice of chemotherapy. SM-88 will be administered at a dose of 460mg twice daily (920 mg/day). Primary end point is Overall Survival (OS). Secondary end points include progression free survival, response rate, duration of response, pharmacokinetics, safety and CTCs. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.

An assessment of the total cost of pancreatic cancer using real-world evidence

773

Background: The aggregate health economic implications of pancreatic cancer are poorly understood, especially from the patient perspective. As a preliminary effort, we sought to better understand changes in type and quantity of medical expenditures over time, along with quality of life related costs, from this perspective. This preliminary research is part of a larger effort to understand how the introduction of new treatments affect both the outcome and costs of pancreatic cancer associated with care, patients, survivors, their families, and their communities. Methods: We analyzed patient-level data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS, 1996- 2017). All analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1 on Ubuntu 19.04. Averages were computed for the total health care costs, including prescription drug costs. Average individual annual cost estimates for the second year excluded individuals that were identified as having died prior to the first round of data collection in the second year. The individual patient level ratios of prescription drug cost to other medical expenses was also computed. All expenditures are adjusted for inflation using 2017 US dollars. Included subjects, N= 80 had a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and available prescription data. Individual age and employment status were accounted for as covariates. Results: Between 1997 and 2017 inflation adjusted first and second year non-medication spending on pancreatic cancer care averaged $66,999.96 and $105,308.60 respectively. However, inflation-adjusted first and second year charges for hospitalizations and emergency visits fell between 2007-2017. Prescription drug as a proportion of total spending prescription drugs increased during the same time period. Lost work/school days declined between 2007 and 2017. Conclusions: Total inflation adjusted pancreatic cancer care expenses declined over the past decade even as drug costs increased. Quality of life costs declined as well. Further analysis is needed to evaluate the relationship between drug spending, total cost of care and quality of life.

Phase II clinical trial of novel agent PBI-05204 in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDA)

698

Background: Survival statistics for mPDA are dismal and with limited treatment options novel agents are needed to improve disease outcomes. PBI-05204 (Phoenix Biotechnology, Inc., San Antonio, TX) is a modified supercritical carbon dioxide extract of Nerium oleander leaves. Oleandrin, the extract’s major cytotoxic component, has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in various tumor cell lines. In a human PDA orthotopic model, this preparation reduced tumor burden as monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic studies suggest that PBI-05204’s mechanism of action is through inhibition of the PI3k/Akt/mTOR pathway. Methods: A phase II single-arm, open-label study to determine the efficacy of PBI-05204 in patients (pts) with mPDA refractory to standard therapy was conducted. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with the hypothesis that 50% of pts would be alive at 4.5 months. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. Pts received oral PBI-05204 daily until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, or pt withdrawal. Radiographic response was assessed every two cycles. Results: Forty-one pts were enrolled; two never received treatment and one was found to have a neuroendocrine tumor after pathological re-evaluation, leaving 38 pts for analysis. Median age at time of enrollment was 65.0 years. The median time from initial diagnosis to treatment was 16.9 months. The primary reason for withdrawal was PD (45.2%). Ten pts were alive at 4.5 months (26.3%) with a mPFS of 56 days (corresponding to first restaging). One objective response (2.6%) was observed for 162 days. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 63.2% of pts with the most common attributed to drug (all grades) being fatigue (36.8%), vomiting (23.7%), nausea (18.4%), decreased appetite (18.4%), and diarrhea (15.8%). Conclusions: PBI-05204 did not meet its primary endpoint for OS in this study. Recent preclinical data indicate an efficacious role for PBI-05204 against glioblastoma multiforme when combined with chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, and radiotherapy. A randomized Phase II trial is currently being designed. Clinical trial information: NCT02329717.

PANOVA-3: A phase III study of tumor treating fields with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine for front-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC)

TPS792

Background: Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a non-invasive, regional antimitotic treatment modality, which has been approved for the treatment of glioblastoma. TTFields at specific frequency (150-200 kHz) are delivered via transducer arrays placed on the skin in proximity to the tumor site. TTFields predominantly act by disrupting the formation of the mitotic spindle during metaphase. TTFields were effective in multiple preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. The Phase 2 PANOVA study, the first trial testing TTFields in pancreatic cancer patients, demonstrated the safety and preliminary efficacy of TTFields when combined with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in both metastatic and LAPC. The Phase 3 PANOVA-3 trial (NCT03377491) is designed to test the efficacy and safety of adding TTFields to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in LAPC. Methods: Patients (N = 556) with unresectable, LAPC (per NCCN guidelines) will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized trial. Patients should have an ECOG score of 0-2 and no prior progression or treatment. Patients will be stratified based on their performance status and geographical region, and will be randomized 1:1 to TTFields plus nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine or to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine alone. Chemotherapy will be administered at standard dose of nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 once weekly). TTFields (150 kHz) will be delivered at least 18 hours/day until local disease progression per RECIST Criteria V1.1. Follow up will be performed q8w, including a CT scan of the chest and abdomen. Following local disease progression, patients will be followed monthly for survival. Overall survival will be the primary endpoint and progression-free survival, objective response rate, rate of resectability, quality of life and toxicity will all be secondary endpoints. Sample size was calculated using a log-rank test comparing time to event in patients treated with TTFields plus chemotherapy with control patients on chemotherapy alone. PANOVA-3 is designed to detect a hazard ratio 0.75 in overall survival. Type I error is set to 0.05 (two-sided) and power to 80%. Clinical trial information: NCT03377491.

Clinical Assessment of 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRABRAX) in Untreated Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Using UGT1A1 Genotype-Guided Dosing

PURPOSE

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, irinotecan, and nab-paclitaxel are all active agents in gastrointestinal cancers; the combination, FOLFIRABRAX, has not been previously evaluated. UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) clears SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism reduces UGT1A1 enzymatic activity and predisposes to toxicity. We performed a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of FOLFIRABRAX with UGT1A1 genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, advanced gastrointestinal cancers received FOLFIRABRAX with prophylactic pegfilgrastim every 14 days. UGT1A1 *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients received initial irinotecan doses of 180, 135, and 90 mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 hours, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 were administered. Doses were deemed tolerable if the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate during cycle 1 was ≤35% in each genotype group. DLTs were monitored using a sequential procedure.

RESULTS

Fifty patients enrolled, 30 pancreatic, 9 biliary tract, 6 gastroesophageal, and 5 others. DLTs occurred in 5 of 23 (22%) *1/*1 patients, 1 of 19 (5%) *1/*28 patients, and 0 of 7 *28/*28 patients. DLTs were all grade 3: diarrhea (3 patients), nausea (2 patients), and febrile neutropenia (1 patient). The overall response rate was 31%. Response rates in pancreatic, gastroesophageal, and biliary tract cancers were 34%, 50%, and 11%, respectively. Eighteen patients (36%) received therapy for at least 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

FOLFIRABRAX with genotype-guided dosing of irinotecan is tolerable in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer and UGT1A1*1*1 or UGT1A1*1*28 genotypes. Too few *28/*28 patients were enrolled to provide conclusive results. Responses occurred across multiple tumor types.

Predictive proteomic signatures for response of pancreatic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal cancer that is characterized by its poor prognosis, rapid progression and development of drug resistance. Chemotherapy is a vital treatment option for most of PDAC patients. Stratification of PDAC patients, who would have a higher likelihood of responding to chemotherapy, could facilitate treatment selection and patient management.

METHODS

A quantitative proteomic study was performed to characterize the protein profiles in the plasma of PDAC patients undergoing chemotherapy to determine if specific biomarkers could be used to predict likelihood of therapeutic response.

RESULTS

By comparing the plasma proteome of the PDAC patients with positive therapeutic response and longer overall survival (Good-responders) to those who did not respond as well with shorter survival time (Limited-responders), we identified differential proteins and protein variants that could effectively segregate Good-responders from Limited-responders. Functional clustering and pathway analysis further suggested that many of these differential proteins were involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis. Four proteins, including vitamin-K dependent protein Z (PZ), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), von Willebrand factor (VWF) and zinc-alpha-2-glycoprotein (AZGP1), were further evaluated as single or composite predictive biomarker with/without inclusion of CA 19-9. A composite biomarker panel that consists of PZ, SHBG, VWF and CA 19-9 demonstrated the best performance in distinguishing Good-responders from Limited-responders.

CONCLUSION

Based on the cohort investigated, our data suggested that systemic proteome alterations involved in pathways associated with inflammation, immunoresponse, coagulation and complement cascades may be reporters of chemo-treatment outcome in PDAC patients. For the majority of the patients involved, the panel consisting of PZ, SHBG, VWF and CA 19-9 was able to segregate Good-responders from Limited-responders effectively. Our data also showed that dramatic fluctuations of biomarker concentration in the circulating system of a PDAC patient, which might result from biological heterogeneity or confounding complications, could diminish the performance of a biomarker. Categorization of PDAC patients in terms of their tumor stages and histological types could potentially facilitate patient stratification for treatment.

Results from a Phase IIb, Randomized, Multicenter Study of GVAX Pancreas and CRS-207 Compared with Chemotherapy in Adults with Previously Treated Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (ECLIPSE Study)

PURPOSE

Limited options exist for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer progressing after 1 or more lines of therapy. A phase II study in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic cancer showed that combining GVAX pancreas (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-secreting allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells) with cyclophosphamide (Cy) and CRS-207 (live, attenuated Listeria monocytogenes expressing mesothelin) resulted in median overall survival (OS) of 6.1 months, which compares favorably with historical OS achieved with chemotherapy. In the current study, we compared Cy/GVAX + CRS-207, CRS-207 alone, and standard chemotherapy in a three-arm, randomized, controlled phase IIb trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to receive Cy/GVAX + CRS-207 (arm A), CRS-207 (arm B), or physician's choice of single-agent chemotherapy (arm C). The primary cohort included patients who had failed ≥2 prior lines of therapy, including gemcitabine. The primary objective compared OS between arms A and C in the primary cohort. The second-line cohort included patients who had received 1 prior line of therapy. Additional objectives included OS between all treatment arms, safety, and tumor responses.

RESULTS

The study did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint. At the final study analysis, median OS [95% confidence interval (CI)] in the primary cohort (N = 213) was 3.7 (2.9-5.3), 5.4 (4.2-6.4), and 4.6 (4.2-5.7) months in arms A, B, and C, respectively, showing no significant difference between arm A and arm C [P = not significant (NS), HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.84-1.64]. The most frequently reported adverse events in all treatment groups were chills, pyrexia, fatigue, and nausea. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Cy/GVAX + CRS-207 did not improve survival over chemotherapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02004262)See related commentary by Salas-Benito et al., p. 5435.

SM-88 therapy in high risk poor prognosis pancreatic cancer (PDAC)

e15714

Background: Refractory PDAC has no established therapy (JCO 37, 2019 supp 4; 226). SM-88 (D,L-alpha-metyrosine) is a novel oral therapy used with low doses of sirolimus, phenytoin and methoxsalen. Previous studies show safety and efficacy in compromised patients (JCO 37, 2019 supp 4; 200. JCO 37, 2019 supp 4; 310). We now report the dose optimization phase (NCT03512756). Methods: Randomized Phase 2 with dose optimization and expansion cohort of PDAC after 1 prior line, ECOG PS ≤2 and radiographic PD. Subjects randomized to 460 or 920 mg/d SM-88; all received phenytoin 50 mg, methoxsalen 10 mg and sirolimus 0.5 mg. Results: As of Jan 2019, 85 subjects consented, 41 ineligible, 38 randomized and 28 evaluable (1 cycle dosed). Average age 66.9 yrs, BMI 24.1, CA-19.9 median 2,562 (1.2 – 700,000), 2 prior lines 50%, 3 prior 14.3%, > 4 prior 21.4%; 85.7% had prior 5FU, 89.3% Gem, 71.4% taxanes, and 71.4% platinums. In both SM-88 doses, toxicity did not increase on treatment. AEs were not increased among high risk groups (age, sex, low BMI, low albumin, high CA-19.9 and prior radiotherapy). AEs increased with more prior lines of therapy, but were not dose dependent. There were 21 SAEs prior to dosing including 5 deaths among 14 patients. Two SAEs (rash and hypotension) were considered possibly related to SM-88 Therapy. No deaths were drug-related. 9 subjects had either a CEA or CA-19.9 decrease with 2 having both; 96.5% of subjects had CTCs detectable at baseline with 70% experiencing > 30% decline for at least 1 cycle with a median CTC best response decrease of 73%. Prior Lines of Therapy Subjects (n) Current Median OS 2-month Target Lesion Response CTCs Median Best OR % Alive 1 4 +5.7m 1 PR, 2 SD, 1 n/a* -74% 75% 2 14 +4.7m 6 SD, 3 PD, 5 n/a* -84% 79% 3+ 10 +3.5m 1 PR, 4 PD, 5 n/a* -55% 50% Total 28 +4.3m 2 PR, 8 SD, 7 PD, 11 n/a* -73% 68% *Not available RECIST clinical benefit (SD + PR) was 47.1% (8/17). 68% of subjects were alive at a median follow up of +4.3 months. EORTC global health and QOL measures did not deteriorate on treatment. Conclusions: Both doses of SM-88 were well tolerated without clinically significant toxicity. Anti-tumor activity was observed in this heavily pretreated population warranting expansion of the study for further efficacy evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.

Improved overall survival (OS) for advanced pancreatic cancer (PDAC) patients (pts) enrolled in the Know Your Tumor (KYT) program whose tumors harbored highly actionable molecular alterations and who received molecularly-matched therapies (tx)

4138

Background: Initial results from the KYT program demonstrated that 27% of PDACs harbor highly actionable molecular alterations (herein labelled “actionable biomarkers”), defined as biomarkers that predict for a high response rate to appropriately targeted tx, in any cancer type. Within this cohort, the median progression-free survival on molecularly-matched tx was 2 months longer than unmatched tx. Here, we present OS data emphasizing the 125 pts with “actionable biomarkers” who did or did not receive molecularly-matched tx. Methods: PanCAN and Perthera have coordinated tumor molecular profiling through commercial labs (NGS/IHC panels) for PDAC pts since 2014. Results are reviewed by a molecular tumor board, and tx options are prioritized based on the actionable biomarkers, in the context of the pt’s tx history. Pts are followed longitudinally to track physician tx choices and survival outcomes. Cox regression was used to assess differences in OS (measured from date of diagnosis until death). Results: Of 1053 pts who received a Perthera Report, 25% had “actionable biomarkers”. OS analyses across 454 pts with adequate tx history are shown in the Table below. Notably, pts with “actionable biomarkers” who received a molecularly-matched tx had a significantly increased OS compared to those with “actionable biomarkers” but who did not receive molecularly-matched tx. Subgroup analyses related to tx history and specific molecular pathways that warrant further investigation will be discussed. Conclusions: When the ~25% of PDAC pts whose tumors harbored “actionable biomarkers” received molecularly-matched tx, they had a better OS. These findings support the need to test all pts with PDAC, and just as importantly, to maximize access to molecularly-matched tx for appropriate pts, to achieve the best pt outcomes. [Table: see text]

Pancreas Cancer-Associated Weight Loss

Unintentional weight loss in patients with pancreatic cancer is highly prevalent and contributes to low therapeutic tolerance, reduced quality of life, and overall mortality. Weight loss in pancreatic cancer can be due to anorexia, malabsorption, and/or cachexia. Proper supportive care can stabilize or reverse weight loss in patients and improve outcomes. We review the literature on supportive care relevant to pancreatic cancer patients, and offer evidence-based recommendations that include expert nutritional assessment, counseling, supportive measures to ensure adequate caloric intake, pancreatic enzyme supplementation, nutritional supplement replacement, orexigenic agents, and exercise. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network-supported initiatives will spearhead the dissemination and adoption of these best supportive care practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Weight loss in pancreatic cancer patients is endemic, as 85% of pancreatic cancer patients meet the classic definition of cancer cachexia. Despite its significant prevalence and associated morbidity, there is no established approach to this disease entity. It is believed that this is due to an important knowledge gap in understanding the underlying biology and lack of optimal treatment approaches. This article reviews the literature regarding pancreas cancer-associated weight loss and establishes a new framework from which to view this complex clinical problem. An improved approach and understanding will help educate clinicians, improve clinical care, and provide more clarity for future clinical investigation.

Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G/A) alternating with 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in first-line metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC): Updated results

314

Background: Both gemcitabine- and 5-FU-based chemotherapy (chemoRx) have demonstrated efficacy in MPC. Alternating these two regimens may 1) decrease toxicity 2) slow emergence of resistant cancer biology, and 3) provide a broader platform for addition of other (non)chemotherapeutic (CT) agents to the base regimen. The strategy using alternating G/A and FOLFIRI in MPC was first tested in the SEENA-1 trial (Picozzi et.al. GI Cancer Symposium 2017) and further suggested to be of benefit both at our own institution (Picozzi et.al. ASCO 2018 ) and elsewhere (Assenat et.al. ASCO 2018). We extend and update our observations here. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had the following characteristics: 1) bx proven de novo MPC, 2) chemoRx naive, 3) ECOG PS 0/1, and 4) bi-dimensionally measurable disease. Treatment (Rx) consisted of 1) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/2d 1,(8),15 alternating every 8 weeks (2 cycles) with FOLFIRI. Pts were radiographically restaged every 8 weeks. Rx was continued for up to 48 weeks, at which time additional Rx was given per physician/patient decision. Results: As of 9/2018, 61 pts have been treated at our institution via this method. Median age is 67; ECOG PS 0/1 58/42%. Disease site involvement included liver, lung, peritoneum 79%, 39%, and 23% respectively. Toxicity is less than typical with either individual regimen (e.g. no ≥ grade 3 neuropathy or diarrhea has been seen to date). Of pts followed for ≥ 4 months , 45/51 (88%) received ≥ 4 cycles Rx. Median number Rx cycles received was 9; 15/34 (44%) pts followed for > 1 year completed 48 weeks Rx. Disease control rate at 16 weeks in 45 evaluable patients is 89% (47% PR, 42% SD, 11% PD). 27/61 pts (44%) are currently on Rx (4 transferred care from region, 30 deceased). Currently, median f/u is 11.8 mo; median OS is 14.1 mo ( 95% CI 10.6-20.3 mo) 6,12, 18 and 24 mo OS are 88%,57 %, 34%, and 15% respectively. Conclusions: 1) Alternating G/A and FOLFIRI in MPC appears to have a more favorable toxicity profile than either individual regimen. 2) Median OS in MPC using this Rx is at least competitive with other reports. 3) The above method has potential to integrate other therapeutic agents/ treatment approaches.

Phase II trial of SM-88 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of the first stage

200

Background: SM-88 (tyrosine derivative [Td], mTOR inhibitor, CYP3a4 inducer and oxidative stress catalyst) is a relatively non-toxic, targeted therapy that utilizes the Warburg Effect in combination with oxidative stress to cause tumor cell death. It is well suited for pancreas cancer because of its ability to penetrate tumors and be tolerated by debilitated patients. Methods: Patients progressed on at least one line of chemotherapy are eligible for either low versus high dose single agent SM-88 in the dose selecting first stage of this trial. The primary endpoint of the study is response rate by BICR (NCT03512756). Results: As of Sept 23, 36 subjects with initial stage II 26%, III 33%, or IV 41%, were randomized between an active Td dose (430 mg/d) and 920 mg/d. Mean age was 64.9 (45.6 - 84.1); BMI 24.2 (16.8 - 36.7); female 45.5%, white 93.1%, black 4.5%; median of 3 prior lines (range 1 - 6); baseline median albumin, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, alk phos and 19.9 were 3.8 g/dl (2.6 - 9.6), 4 (1 - 141), 179.5 (54 - 661) and 5089 (4 - 651, 696) respectively. The regimen was well tolerated with no treatment related grade 4 or 5 events; 55.6% of treated subjects (20/36) had 94 AEs, with 18.0% (17/94) being at least possibly treatment related, of which three were grade 3 (arthralgia, fatigue and asthenia). CTCs at baseline were detected in 97% (mean 93.1 cells/4 ml) and fell in 69% (11/16) evaluable subjects from 141.4 to a nadir of 30.7/4 ml (median reduction 77% [3% - 97%]). 22.2% (2/9) evaluable subjects showed CA19.9 declines, both of which also showed CTC declines. 83% of subjects have remained on treatment a median of 4.7 wks (1 - 18.7); 6 were eligible for the initial scheduled assessment at 2 months; 3 of 4 evaluable subjects (75%) had RECIST or PET SUV responses. Lesion SUVs decreased an average of 24.1% (8.3 - 35.7%). EORTC QLQ-C30, -PAN26 and correlative assays were obtained including IGF, leptin, genomics, NLR, and others. Conclusions: SM-88 has demonstrated unconfirmed monotherapy efficacy signals with no meaningful toxicity in a preliminary assessment of this ongoing trial. With additional follow up a dose will be selected for expansion Clinical trial information: NCT03512756.

Feasibility of SM-88 in PC after multiple prior lines and ECOG < 2

310

Background: Advanced PC patients with ≥ 3Ls of chemo or ECOG PS 2 are generally excluded from clinical trials. SM88 demonstrated no drug related AEs > grade 2 in an interim prostate phase 2 (JCO 2018 36:6S P 175). We sought to determine the feasibility of a trial in this vulnerable population using SM88. Methods: Prospective randomized phase 2 of SM-88 (tyrosine derivative, CYP3a4 inducer, mTOR and oxidative stress catalyst) in patients with locally PD or mPC, ECOG PS < 2 and ≥ 2 weeks from prior therapy. Results: Mean age = 64.9 (range 45.6-84.1); 45.5% female, 93.1% white, 6.9% other; median prior lines = 3 (range 1-6); 12% had prior RT and 17% surgery. Median ECOG PS was 1 with 36.6% 0, 63.3% 1 and 0% ECOG PS 2. From April 2018 to this abstract deadline, 72 patients at 24 sites have consented; 36 patients initiated therapy, 19 failed screening and 17 remained in screening. Time from opening trial to first patient consented = 5.1 wks; median time last regimen to consent = 6.7 wks; from consent to drug administration (C1D1) = 1.7 wks. Subjects traveled up to 2600 miles to enroll at a site with an open slot. Median number of subjects/site = 3 (1-15). Median time on trial is 52 days (1-22 wks). There were 15 unrelated SAEs among 36 randomized subjects; three subjects died after consenting but before receiving study drug (table). Grade 4 and 5 SAEs∗ were more common before receiving drug or unrelated to drug (26/94) than at least possibly drug related (0/17) (Fisher p < 0.05). Efficacy using RECIST, PERCIST and BICR along with CTCs, 19.9, NLR, PROs and other outcomes are being collected with high compliance. Conclusions: This prospective SM88 trial suggests that heavily pretreated PC patients with criteria that includes less than ideal ECOG can participate and gain access to novel therapies. This trial plans to enroll 99 additional subjects in under a year. Although ECOG 2 was allowed none have been consented to date and may reflect investigator bias on enrollment or PS assessment. Investigators can meet the needs of this patient population by considering them for inclusion in future drug development trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03512756. [Table: see text]

Does mesenteric venous imaging assessment accurately predict pathologic invasion in localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of mesenteric venous involvement in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is necessary for adequate staging and treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in PDAC patients at a single institution. All patients with resected PDAC and staging CT and EUS between 2003 and 2014 were included and sub-divided into "upfront resected" and "neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)" groups. Independent imaging re-review was correlated to venous resection and venous invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were then calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients underwent analysis, 60 received upfront resection, and 49 NAC. Venous resection (30%) and vein invasion (13%) was less common in patients resected upfront than those who received NAC (53% and 16%, respectively). Both CT and EUS had poor sensitivity (14-44%) but high specificity (75-95%) for detecting venous resection and vein invasion in patients resected upfront, whereas sensitivity was high (84-100%) and specificity was low (27-44%) after NAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative CT and EUS in PDAC have similar efficacy but different predictive capacity in assessing mesenteric venous involvement depending on whether patients are resected upfront or received NAC. Both modalities appear to significantly overestimate true vascular involvement and should be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context.

Molecular Profiling of Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Initial Results from the Know Your Tumor Initiative

Purpose: To broaden access to and implementation of precision medicine in the care of patients with pancreatic cancer, the Know Your Tumor (KYT) program was initiated using a turn-key precision medicine system. Patients undergo commercially available multiomic profiling to determine molecularly rationalized clinical trials and off-label therapies.Experimental Design: Tumor samples were obtained for 640 patients from 287 academic and community practices covering 44 states. College of American Pathologists/Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-accredited laboratories were used for genomic, proteomic, and phosphoprotein-based molecular profiling.Results: Tumor samples were adequate for next-generation sequencing in 96% and IHC in 91% of patients. A tumor board reviewed the results for every patient and found actionable genomic alterations in 50% of patients (with 27% highly actionable) and actionable proteomic alterations (excluding chemopredictive markers) in 5%. Actionable alterations commonly found were in DNA repair genes (BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations, 8.4%) and cell-cycle genes (CCND1/2/3 or CDK4/6 alterations, 8.1%). A subset of samples was assessed for actionable phosphoprotein markers. Among patients with highly actionable biomarkers, those who received matched therapy (n = 17) had a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than those who received unmatched therapy [n = 18; PFS = 4.1 vs. 1.9 months; HR, 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-0.94; P _adj = 0.03].Conclusions: A comprehensive precision medicine system can be implemented in community and academic settings, with highly actionable findings observed in over 25% of pancreatic cancers. Patients whose tumors have highly actionable alterations and receive matched therapy demonstrated significantly increased PFS. Our findings support further prospective evaluation of precision oncology in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 24(20); 5018-27. ©2018 AACR.

Multiomic molecular comparison of primary versus metastatic pancreatic tumors

213

Background: Pancreatic cancer metastasizes very early, as evidenced by the fact that > 70% of patients with operable disease ultimately develop metastases. Thus, it is likely that the molecular characteristics of primary pancreatic tumors are similar to metastatic lesions. We compared the frequency of genetic alterations and protein expression from primary vs. metastatic pancreatic tumors, and from metastases from different sites. By focusing on actionable genetic and proteomic information, we sought to explore whether targeted therapies could be tailored to patients at metastatic progression based on primary surgical material. Methods: Next generation DNA sequencing (NGS) data of 208 genes and a limited set of protein markers were analyzed from pancreatic tumors of 431 patients enrolled in the Know Your Tumor initiative. Of the 208 genes tested, mutations in 70 were considered potentially actionable based on preclinical and clinical evidence. We compared 146 primary pancreatic tumors against 285 metastatic lesions, and examined subgroups for liver vs. lung vs. other metastatic lesions. Molecular alterations were compared between independent groups for each gene/protein using Fisher’s exact test. Significance was assessed using a false discovery rate adjusted q-value threshold of 0.05. Results: No differences in the specific mutation or expression pattern were observed between primary vs. metastatic lesions, nor across the site of metastasis after correcting for multiple hypotheses. Even the proportion of actionable alterations (including mutations in the homologous recombination DNA repair pathway) was similar across subgroups. Conclusions: Comparison of the muli-omic profile of primary vs. metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma reveals that the molecular architecture is very similar, and that actionable alterations are identified at the same frequency. This is unlike the data observed from other solid tumors, (e.g. colon and breast cancer), in which substantial molecular discordance and heterogeneity exists between primary tumors and metastatic sites, but is consistent with the belief that primary pancreatic cancers metastasize early and thus are molecularly indistinguishable from metastatic lesions.

Safety and tolerability of 5-FU, irinotecan (IRI), and nab-paclitaxel (FOLFIRABRAX) with genotype-guided dosing of IRI in previously untreated patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies

423

Background: 5-FU, IRI, and nab-paclitaxel (NP) are active in advanced GI cancers; the combination (FOLFIRABRAX) has not been evaluated. UGT1A1 clears SN-38, the active metabolite of IRI. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism reduces enzymatic activity and predisposes to severe IRI toxicity. Dose adjustment in patients with this allele may be warranted. Primary objective: to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of FOLFIRABRAX with genotype-guided dosing of IRI. Secondary objectives included determining objective response rates (ORR) in GI cancers. Methods: Pts with previously untreated GI cancers and ECOG performance status 0/1 received FOLFIRABRAX with prophylactic pegfilgrastim Q14 days. CT scans were obtained Q8 weeks. UGT1A1 *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients (pts) received initial IRI doses of 180, 135, and 90mg/m2, respectively. 5-FU 2400mg/m2 over 46 hours (no bolus), leucovorin 400mg/m2, and NP 125mg/m2 were given IV Q14 days. DLT during cycle 1 was defined as Grade (Gr) 3/4 febrile neutropenia (FN), Gr 4 neutropenia ≥ 5 days, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity despite medical management, or treatment delay > 14 days due to toxicity. Doses were tolerable if DLT rate during cycle 1 was ≤ 35%. Enrollment of 17 pts per genotype would allow for an α level of 0.05 with 80% power under a sequential toxicity monitoring procedure, with 6 or fewer DLTs being tolerable. Results: 39 pts are evaluable for toxicity: 23 pancreatic cancer (PC), 6 gastroesophageal cancer (GE), 9 biliary tract cancer (BTC), 1 neuroendocrine. DLTs were observed in 4/20 (20%) *1/*1 pts, 1/15 (7%) *1/*28 pts, and 0/4 *28/*28 pts. DLTs were Gr 3 diarrhea (2 pts), Gr 3 nausea (2), and Gr 3 FN (1). ORR is 6/29 (21%), with responses in PC (3/17 evaluable pts, 18%) and GE (3/5 pts, 60%), but no responses in BTC (0/7 pts). Conclusions: FOLFIRABRAX with genotype-guided dosing of IRI is tolerable in pts with advanced GI cancers and UGT1A1*1*1 or UGT1A1*1*28 genotypes. There is activity in PC and GE but not in BTC. Accrual is ongoing to the 3 genotype cohorts to a goal of 51 pts. Study conducted by the University of Chicago Personalized Cancer Care Consortium Clinical trial information: NCT02333188.

Metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC): Contrast of short- (STS) and long-term (LTS) survivor characteristics

415

Background: MPC is associated with 6-12 month (mo) median overall survival (OS) in published clinical series. However, there is wide variability in OS using standard chemotherapy (CTX) regimens (e.g. gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX). 10-20% of patients (pts) live ≤ 3 mo (STS); conversely 5-10% pts live ≥ 24 mo (LTS). We examined pretreatment characteristics of our institutional MPC population for their association with STS/LTS. Methods: From our institutional database, we identified over 400 pts with MPC who received CTX between the years 2003 and 2015. Pts who 1) received all of their CTX at our institution 2) had complete longitudinal follow- up available and 3) lived either ≤ 3 or ≥ 24 mo were further analyzed. A number of pretreatment characteristics were considered, including A) patient and B) disease-related factors. Results: To date,37 pts (median OS 2.0 mo)/ 41 pts (median 28.2 mo) have been identified as STS/LTS respectively. In univariate analysis factors significantly associated with STS/LTS ( p < 0.0001) were ECOG ≥2 and neutrophil /lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 5. Age at dx, pain at dx, BMI > 30, albumin < 4.0 g/dL, Ca19.9 > 500U/mL, ascites at dx and liver involvement also were statistically significant (all p≤ 0.05 or greater). Among factors not statistically different between STS/LTS were sex, race, yr of dx, presence of diabetes or biliary obstruction at dx. A multivariate model that included ECOG ≥2 and NLR ≥5 along with other of the above factors correctly discriminated between STS and LTS with 90% accuracy (95% CI 83-97%) . Conclusions: 1) Examination of pretreatment characteristics in MPC can aid in identification of pts more likely to be STS / LTS. 2) For STS and LTS these data may aid in identifying candidates for new initial and new consolidation treatment strategies, respectively. 3) Prognostics models for STS/LTS require additional validation in independent data sets. 4) Integrating additional pretreatment information (e.g. molecular, clinical, therapeutic) may further improve OS prognostication in MPC.

Gemcitabine and Taxane Adjuvant Therapy with Chemoradiation in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Novel Strategy for Improved Survival?

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine-taxane combination chemotherapy has demonstrated a survival benefit clinically in metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). The authors present their experience with gemcitabine and docetaxel (gem/tax)-based adjuvant treatment (Rx) after surgery with curative intent.

METHODS

Patients with de novo resectable PC from January 2010 to December 2015 were identified from the authors' institutional database and registry. The study included only patients who received gem/tax as their initial Rx administered exclusively at the authors' institution with or without chemoradiation (CRTx). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods, and prognostic factors were investigated by Cox proportional hazard modeling.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients identified, 58 met the study criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 65 years, with 55% of the patients undergoing an R1 resection (margin ≤ 1 mm). Tumor characteristics included a median tumor size of 28 mm, a poor differentiation rate of 54%, and a lymph node positivity of 67%. Most of the patients (90%, 52/58) completed 80% or more of the 24 week Rx. Of these patients, 71% received post-gem/tax CRTx Rx. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was observed in 52% of the patients. The median follow-up period was 51.2 months, and the observed median overall survival (OS) was 52 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.4-not reached]. The actuarial 5-year OS was 49% (95% CI 33.7-63.4%). In the multivariate analysis, an R1 resection and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage 2 versus stage 1 disease were negatively associated with OS, whereas administration of CRTx was positively associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant gem/tax with or without CRTx is feasible, with a favorable OS. Future prospective studies of gem/taxane-based adjuvant Rx for PC are warranted.

Abstract 3734: Pharmacokinetics of sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting Trop-2, in patients with diverse advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an ADC targeting Trop-2, an antigen present in many solid tumors, uses SN-38, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has nanomolar potency derived from irinotecan (IRI), and a pH sensitive linker that releases SN-38 gradually (in vitro, 50% released per 1 day in serum). Clinical studies in patients (pts) with diverse solid tumors have shown manageable toxicity (dose-limiting neutropenia, diarrhea but lower incidence than IRI) and encouraging efficacy.

METHODS: Conjugate and IgG were monitored in pts given 8 (N = 24) or 10 mg/kg (N = 29) by ELISA. SN-38 and glucuronidated SN-38 (SN-38G) were measured by reversed-phase HPLC. SN-38 and SN-38G levels are expressed as the amount of drug dissociated from the conjugate (i.e., Free SN-38) and the amount bound to the IgG (Total SN-38). UGT1A1 status was determined in baseline blood sample from 146 pts.

RESULTS: IMMU-132 cleared with a half-life of 11.7-18.9 h, depending on the assay, while the IgG half-life was 4-5 days, which agrees with in vitro drug-release data. Levels of Free SN-38 at 30 min or 1 d after injection were &lt;2% and ~ 5% of Total SN-38, respectively, indicating most SN-38 in serum is bound to the conjugate. Free SN-38 clears with a half-life of ~20 h, which is consistent with SN-38 clearance in IRI therapy. No correlation was found between Free SN-38 in serum at 30 min and the incidence of severe neutropenia. Total and Free levels of SN-38G were similar, supporting in vitro results indicating that SN-38 is not glucuronidated while bound to the IgG. Free SN-38G levels were lower than Free SN-38 (SN-38G/SN-38 AUC ratio = 0.52), explaining the lower incidence of severe diarrhea. PK parameters for 8 and 10 mg/kg group were similar; no major differences in toxicity. UGT1A1 status showed 43% and 44% with *1*1 and *1*28 haplotype, respectively, and 13% with *28*28 haplotype, which is associated with higher risk of severe neutropenia and diarrhea for IRI therapy. With IMMU-132, 58% of the *28*28 pts had severe neutropenia compared to ~40% of the *1*1 and *1*28 pts, and 16% of the *28*28 pts had grade 3 diarrhea compared to 5-8% of the *1*1 and *1*28. In 3 of 4 cancer indications, objective response rate and clinical benefit ratio favored the 10 mg/kg group.

CONCLUSION: IMMU-132 cleared as predicted from in vitro serum stability data, with no difference between the 8 and 10 mg/kg groups. Current data show neutropenia did not correlate with Free SN-38 levels in serum at 30 min, and low SN-38G levels support the lower incidence of severe diarrhea. While pts with the *28*28 haplotype had a somewhat higher incidence of severe neutropenia or diarrhea than *1*1 and *1*28 pts, the overall incidence of each is small, suggesting toxicity management rather than screening is appropriate. With no major difference in safety and PK, but improved responses with 10 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg is selected for future clinical studies.

Citation Format: Robert M. Sharkey, Allyson J. Ocean, Alexander N. Starodub, Aditya Bardia, Michael Guarino, Wells A. Messersmith, Jordan D. Berlin, Vincent J. Picozzi, Rebecca Moroose, William A. Wegener, Pius Maliakal, Serengulam V. Govindan, David M. Goldenberg. Pharmacokinetics of sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132), an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting Trop-2, in patients with diverse advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3734. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3734

Extended neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC): Updated results

e15771

Background: Optimum therapy (Rx) for BRPC is unknown. Since 2008, we have used neoadjuvant Rx with extended course chemotherapy (CT) but not routine neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). Initial results were presented in 2013 (Rose et.al. J Clin Oncolabstr 4043). We present updated findings here. Methods: Patients (pts) were prospectively identified in our institutional PC database. Inclusion criteria: 1) bx-proven PC; 2) radiographic staging per AHPBA/NCCN criteria; 3) no prior Rx; 4) negative staging laparoscopy whenever feasible; 5) all neoadjuvant Rx at our institution, 6) followup ≥ 24 weeks (wks) from initial Rx . Unless disease progression or Rx intolerance noted, pts received gemcitabine/docetaxel (G/D) as neoadjuvant CT x 24 weeks . At that time, all pts felt likely to achieve R0 resection offered surgery; other pts offered 5FU –based CRT if medically fit. Results evaluated by "intent to treat". Results: Among 129 pts, characteristics include median age 66 yrs (range 33-88 yrs), ECOG PS 0/1/2+ 86/36/7, 97%/43% venous /arterial involvement. 78% (101/129) pts completed ≥80% intended CT; 38% (6/16) pts age > 80 and /or ECOG 2+ (p < 0.01) 51% (66/129) pts were resected (44 R0, 22 R1 ≤ 1 mm margin ). 49% (63/129) pts were not (24 disease progression, 17 surgeon decision (anatomy/safety), 11 Rx toxicity/ comorbidity, 6 unresectable at surgery, 5 pt withdrawal). 45% (31/66) and 23% (16/66) resected pts received postop CRT/CT respectively. Median f/u is 47 months (mo). 58% (38/66) resected pts recurred: 18% (12/66) local, 41% (27/66) systemic. For resected pts, median PFS is 25.0 (95% CI: 16.2-32.7) mo, median OS is 37.6 (95% CI: 27.4-58.5) mo. 5-yr OS is 28% ( 95% CI :14-44%). Median OS for non-resected pts is 13.1 (95% CI 10.9-16.9) mo .Median OS for all pts is 22.1 (95% CI: 18.7-28.4) mo. Conclusions: 1.Our series is distinctive with respect to size, use of laparoscopic staging and neoadjuvant G/D CT as standards,and median f/u 2. Pt selection is key; e.g.approach suboptimal for pts > 80 yrs/ ECOG PS 2+ 3. Reported OS compares favorably with other BRPC and de novo resectable PC cooperative group results 4. Detailed analysis of our study (e.g. prognostic factors) will aid future clinical research in BRPC.

Molecular biomarkers as predictors of patient survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDA): An analysis of the Know Your Tumor initiative (KYT)

278

Background: Recent studies have expanded our knowledge of the genomic landscape of PDA. While critical and in some cases, potentially actionable alterations are being identified, limited outcomes data have thus far made it difficult to validate the relevance of these observations. Methods: The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) and Perthera have facilitated commercial tumor molecular profiling for over 400 PDA pts since 2014 through KYT, and have developed a database of molecular and clinical information useful for data mining of biomarker-survival correlations. The survival significance of biomarkers was assessed using standard statistical methodology including Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Linked molecular and outcomes data were available for 360 pts, of which 173 had treatment (tx) information available. Pathogenic mutations from targeted NGS, protein expression from IHC, and protein phosphorylation from RPPA were screened for correlations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) independent of tx received. As shown in the table, mutations in 3 genes were associated with a better OS; while mutations in 8 genes were associated with poorer OS. Only two mutations were correlated with PFS in 1st or 2nd-line tx ( BRCA2 and KDM6A, worse PFS). Positive expression of 7 proteins, including TS, TOP1, and RRM1, were associated with reduced OS but were not correlated with PFS. High levels of phospho-ribosomal protein S6 were associated with both poor OS (HR=10.3, p=0.001) and poor PFS (HR=9.6, p=0.006). Conclusions: Multiple biomarkers had significant correlations with OS in PDA, while fewer were correlated with PFS. Growth of this registry database will further validate tx-specific predictive biomarkers for use in pts with multi-omic profiling data. [Table: see text]

Results of a randomized phase II trial of an anti-notch 2/3, tarextumab (OMP-59R5, TRXT, anti-Notch2/3), in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine (Nab-P+Gem) in patients (pts) with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC)

279

Background: Tarextumab (TRXT), fully human IgG2 antibody inhibits signaling of Notch2/ 3 receptors. Tumor regression seen in Notch3 (N3) expressing pt-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts when TRXT combined with Nab-P+Gem. Phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted to evaluate efficacy, safety of combination in mPC. Methods: Pts randomized 1:1 to TRXT or placebo (PL). TRXT given IV at 15 mg/kg q 2wks (D 1, 15), nab-P 125 mg/m2, GEM 1000mg/m2 on D1, 8, 15 q 28 days. Tissue for N3 gene expression determination was required. Primary endpoints: overall survival (OS) in all and in 3 subgroups determined by Notch 3 gene expression. Secondary: safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Results: N = 177 pts randomized. Performance status (0 or 1), CA19-9 stratum (0 – ULN, > ULN – 59ULN, ≥ 59ULN) balanced. Clinical trial information: NCT01647828. .  Conclusions: Addition of TRXT to Nab-P+Gem did not improve OS in 1st line mPC. A potential detrimental effect on PFS and ORR was seen in subjects with N3 < 25%ile.[Table: see text]