Targeting effect of microRNA on CD133 and its impact analysis on proliferation and invasion of glioma cells

MiR-200b, a member of the microRNA-200 family, has been identified to be capable of suppressing glioma cell growth through targeting CREB1 or CD133. However, whether miR-200b affects the biological behavior (proliferation, invasion, and migration) of glioma cells is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of miR-200b on the biological behavior of glioma cells in vitro. MiRNA-200b mimics, miRNA-200b inhibitor, and mimic control were transfected into conventionally cultured glioma U251 cells, followed by measuring the expression of miR-200b and CD133 in transfected cells by RT-PCR; effect of miR-200b on CD133 mRNA 3'-UTR luciferase activity by luciferase reporter assay; proliferation activity of transfected U251 cells by MTT method; and changes in U251 cell invasion and migration by Transwell method after transfection. Compared to that in the miRNA-200b inhibitor, mimic control, and blank control groups, miRNA-200b expression was significantly increased and CD133 mRNA expression was significantly decreased in the mimic miRNA-200b group in a time-dependent manner (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, dual luciferase reporter assay showed that miR-200b could inhibit CD133 activity through binding to the 3'-UTR of CD133 mRNA (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the proliferation activity and invasion and migration abilities of U251 cells transfected with miRNA-200b mimic were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). In conclusion, overexpression of miR-200b inhibited the proliferation, invasion, and migration of glioma cells possibly through targeting CD133.

Thromboelastographic study of thrombosis in the implantable central venous access device

BACKGROUND

In the present study thromboelastography (TEG) was to study whether or not hypercoagulopathy might contribute to the thrombosis of implantable central venous access device (Port-A-Cath, Pharmacia) in cancer patients.

METHODS

All 76 oncological patients who were enrolled in this study had their R time, alpha angle and MA value measured before Port-A-Cath implantation, of whom 11 patients received re-implantation because of thrombotic device. We compared the measurements of these 11 patients (thrombotic group) with that of 65 patients (control group) who received Port-A-Cath implantation for the first time. According to TEG values the hemostatic status in these patients was classified as hypercoagulable, normal or hypocoagulable for comparison. All patients in the control group were followed up for 3 months for occurrence of thrombosis.

RESULTS

It was found that no patient in the thrombotic group was associated with hypercoagulopathy. Five patients (7.5%) in the control group was found in hypercoagulable status at the time of catheter insertion but none of them developed clinical thrombosis during three months of observation. There was no significant difference between the two groups for R time, alpha angle but a higher MA value was found in the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the hypercoagulability (7.5% for the control vs. none for the thrombotic group), hypocoagulability (1.5% vs. 9.1%) and normocoagulability (91.0% vs. 90.9%) were not statistically different between the two groups (Fisher exact test, P = 0.229).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that hypercoagulopathy in cancer patients has little, if any, contribution in thrombosis of the implantable central venous access device.