Insulin Glargine in Critically ill Patients: Once/Day versus Twice/Day Dosing

OBJECTIVE

Twice/day dosing of insulin glargine has been used to treat hyperglycemia in clinical practice; however, data supporting its use in the critically ill population are lacking. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of twice/day insulin glargine in critically ill patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in adult patients admitted to the intensive care units between February 2013 and June 2017 who received insulin glargine twice/day or 40 units or more once/day for 48 hours or longer. Post cardiovascular surgery patients were excluded. Data were collected for up to 14 patient-days. The efficacy outcomes included the incidence of hyperglycemia (blood glucose [BG] above 180 mg/dl), predose hyperglycemia rate (BG above 180 mg/dl within 4 hrs before the dose), and BG variability (standard deviation). The safety outcome was assessed by the development of hypoglycemia (BG below 70 mg/dl).

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients (twice/day = 23; once/day = 35) were included in the analysis. Demographics were similar between the groups including history of diabetes mellitus, baseline hemoglobin A_1C , and home insulin use. No difference was observed between the twice/day and once/day groups in the mean BG (153 vs 154 mg/dl, p=0.95, respectively), and BG variability (46 vs 44 mg/dl, p=0.29, respectively). Although the overall incidence of hyperglycemia was similar between twice/day and once/day groups (96% vs 97%, p=1.00, respectively), the twice/day group had a significantly lower predose hyperglycemia rate (twice/day 0.27 vs once/day 0.43, p=0.02). Additionally, the twice/day group did not experience an increased incidence of hypoglycemia (twice/day 23% vs once/day 34%, p=0.57) or hypoglycemia without having anything by mouth (twice/day 0% vs once/day 9%, p=0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study demonstrating that twice/day insulin glargine reduced the rate of predose hyperglycemia without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia in critically ill patients. A large randomized study is needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of twice/day glargine in the critically ill.

Hypocalcemia in trauma patients receiving massive transfusion

BACKGROUND

Massive transfusion protocol (MTP) is increasingly used in civilian trauma resuscitation. Calcium is vital for coagulation, but hypocalcemia commonly occurs during massive transfusion due to citrate and serum calcium chelation. This study was conducted to determine the incidence of hypocalcemia and severe hypocalcemia in trauma patients who receive massive transfusion and to compare characteristics of patients with severe versus nonsevere hypocalcemia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of trauma patients who received massive transfusion between January 2009 and November 2013. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypocalcemia (ionized calcium [iCa] < 1.12 mmol/L) and severe hypocalcemia (iCa < 0.90 mmol/L). Secondary outcomes included calcium monitoring, calcium replacement, and correction of coagulopathy.

RESULTS

There were 156 patients included; 152 (97%) experienced hypocalcemia, and 111 (71%) had severe hypocalcemia. Patients were stratified into iCa ≥ 0.90 (n = 45) and iCa < 0.90 (n = 111). There were no differences in demographics or baseline laboratories except the severe hypocalcemia group had higher baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (29.7 [23.7-50.9] versus 25.8 [22.3-35.9], P = 0.003), higher lactic acid (5.8 [4.1-9.8] versus 4.0 [3.1-7.8], P = 0.019), lower platelets (176 [108-237] versus 208 [169-272], P = 0.003), and lower pH (7.14 [6.98-7.28] versus 7.23 [7.14-7.33], P = 0.019). Mortality was higher in the severe hypocalcemia group (49% versus 24%, P = 0.007). Patients in the iCa < 0.90 group received more blood products (34 [23-58] versus 22 [18-30] units, P < 0.001), and calcium chloride (4 [2-7] versus 3 [1-4] g, P = 0.002), but there was no difference in duration of MTP or final iCa. Neither group reached a median iCa > 1.12.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypocalcemia is common during MTP, and vigilant monitoring is warranted. Research is needed to effectively manage hypocalcemia during massive transfusion.

Hyponatremia in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Hyponatremia is the most frequently encountered electrolyte abnormality in critically ill patients. Hyponatremia on admission has been identified as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). However, the incidence and etiology of hyponatremia (HN) during hospitalization in a neurointensive care unit following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) remains unknown. This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients admitted to Detroit Receiving Hospital for sICH between January 2006 and July 2009. All serum Na levels were recorded for patients during the ICU stay. HN was defined as Na <135 mmol/L. A total of 99 patients were analyzed with HN developing in 24% of sICH patients. Patients with HN had an average sodium nadir of 130 ± 3 mmol/L and an average time from admission to sodium <135 mmol/L of 3.9 ± 5.7 days. The most common cause of hyponatremia was syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (90% of HN patients). Patients with HN were more likely to have fever (50% vs. 23%; p = 0.01), infection (58% vs. 28%; p = 0.007) as well as a longer hospital length of stay (14 (8–25) vs. 6 (3–9) days; p < 0.001). Of the patients who developed HN, fifteen (62.5%) patients developed HN in the first week following sICH. This shows HN has a fairly high incidence following sICH. The presence of HN is associated with longer hospital length of stays and higher rates of patient complications, which may result in worse patient outcomes. Further study is necessary to characterize the clinical relevance and treatment of HN in this population.

Temperature management in acute neurologic injury: to cool or not to cool

Therapeutic hypothermia is becoming an important intervention following acute neurologic injury despite inconclusive results concerning efficacy. This enthusiasm primarily stems from a lack of other effective interventions in this population. With the increase in the use of therapeutic hypothermia, several practical issues must be considered when initiating this intervention. Clinical pharmacists can play an important role in anticipating and addressing some complications such as shivering, slow drug metabolism, and infection. This review will discuss the available literature concerning the efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia in various neurologic injuries, as well as the most common adverse events associated with it.

Current and future treatment considerations in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a type of hemorrhagic stroke that can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Although guidelines have been published to help direct the care of these patients, there is insufficient quality literature regarding the medical and pharmacological management of patients with aSAH. Treatment is divided into 3 categories: supportive therapy, prevention of complications, and treatment of complications. There are numerous pharmacological therapies that are targeted at prevention and treatment of the neurological and medical complications that may arise. Rebleeding, hydrocephalus, cerebral vasospasm, and seizures are the most common neurological complications while the most common medical complications include hyponatremia, pulmonary edema, cardiac arrhythmias, neurogenic stunned myocardium, fever, anemia, infection, hyperglycemia, and venous thromboembolism. Risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, pathophysiology, as well as initial management, prevention, and treatment of complications will be the focus of this discussion.

Management of spontaneous nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is one of the most devastating subtypes of stroke and is characterized by spontaneous extravasation into the parenchymal tissue of the brain. Although advances in critical care have improved, there is no intervention currently available that has shown to alter the outcome of patients who have suffered acute ICH. Therefore, management is largely supportive. Treatment strategies are aimed at limiting hematoma enlargement, seizures, and cerebral edema, as well as other ICU-related complications such as deep venous thrombosis, hyperglycemia, and fever. This review will outline the key pharmacological management strategies in patients with ICH and highlight the most current American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) guidelines for management published in 2007.

Medical management of variceal hemorrhage

Gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage is a major complication of portal hypertension in 50% to 60% of patients with liver cirrhosis and is a frequent cause of mortality in these patients. The prevalence of variceal hemorrhage is approximately 5% to 15% yearly, and early variceal rebleeding has a rate of occurrence of 30% to 40% within the first 6 weeks. More than 50% of patients who survive after the first bleeding episode will experience recurrent bleeding within 1 year. Management of gastroesophageal varices should include prevention of initial and recurrent bleeding episodes and control of active hemorrhage. Therapies used in the management of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage may include pharmacologic therapy (vasoactive agents, nonselective b-blockers, and antibiotic prophylaxis), endoscopic therapy, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and shunt surgery. This article focuses primarily on pharmacologic management of acute variceal hemorrhage.

Possible removal of topiramate by continuous renal replacement therapy

BACKGROUND

Topiramate is primarily renally eliminated and requires dosage adjustment based upon renal function. While there is data to suggest drug removal during intermittent hemodialysis (IHD), little is known regarding its clearance and dosing during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

CASE DESCRIPTION

We describe a 59-year-old man with refractory status epilepticus who was started on continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) for acute renal failure while receiving topiramate with a series of serum concentrations to assess for removal during CVVHDF.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest clinically important amounts of topiramate are removed by CRRT, and higher topiramate dosage may be needed for these patients instead of the current recommended 50% of normal dosage. Unfortunately, there is no antiepileptic drug dosing recommendation when used during CRRT due to the paucity of data. This case highlights a need for research evaluating the effect of CRRT on AED elimination in order to optimize therapy for seizure control.

Hemostatic therapy for the treatment of intracranial hemorrhage

Intracranial hemorrhage results in poor neurologic outcomes and high mortality. Current management is limited to supportive care. In addition to the initial bleeding event, rebleeding and hematoma expansion have been identified as major risk factors for poor outcomes in these patients. The antifibrinolytic agents tranexamic acid, aminocaproic acid, and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) have been studied with the hopes of achieving early hemostasis and improving outcomes. Available data suggest that tranexamic acid and aminocaproic acid are more harmful than beneficial for this indication; therefore, they have no role in the treatment of intracranial bleeding. Alternatively, rFVIIa, has shown promising results in the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Clinicians should be aware of the available evidence regarding the use of these hemostatic agents in the management of intracranial hemorrhage, including traumatic brain injury, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Effect of Vasoactive Therapy on Cerebral Circulation

Many questions regarding blood pressure management after acute stroke remain unanswered, resulting in an ongoing debate about whether to treat hypertension acutely and how aggressively blood pressure should be lowered. This review discusses normal and altered cerebrophysiology and provides evidence supporting and opposing the active management of blood pressure within the first 24 hours after stroke. Commonly used intravenous antihypertensive agents and their cerebrovascular effects are reviewed, and therapeutic recommendations are given based on the available evidence.