1
|
P269 Mid-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents: a propensity-matched study. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehz872.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Introduction: Several studies have reported that durable polymer drug-eluting stents could cause delayed healing and late catch-up. Although biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) might solve these problems, there is few data about mid-term clinical outcomes of BP-EES compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES).
Purpose
This study aimed to compare mid-term clinical outcomes between BP-EES and DP-EES.
Methods
Between January to December 2016, 206 consecutive patients were treated with BP-EES and 177 consecutive patients were treated with DP-EES in our Heart Center. The primary endpoint was 3-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction and clinical-driven target lesion revascularization. Moreover, clinical-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) and definite stent thrombosis (ST) were also evaluated.
Results
After propensity score matching, 160 patients were selected in each group. At 3 years, the cumulative incidences of TLF were 4.1% in BP-EES group vs. 7.9% in DP-EES (p = 0.12). Similarly, those of clinical-driven TVR were not different between the 2 groups (10.9% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.39). The incidence of definite ST in BP-EES tended to be higher than in that of DP-EES (BP-EES vs. DP-EES; 0% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.06).
Conclusions
There were no significant differences of TLF between BP-EES and DP-EES within 3 years. In this study, BP-EES seems to prevent definite ST and be safer than DP-EES in mid-term.
Abstract P269 Figure.
Collapse
|
2
|
P2796Biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in diabetic patients: a 3-year propensity-matched study. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz748.1109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background and introduction
Diabetic patients are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) even with durable polymer drug-eluting stents. A biodegradable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) might improve clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Purpose
This study aimed to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes between BP-EES and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EES) in diabetic patients.
Methods
We investigated consecutive 383 patients treated with BP-EES or DP-EES at our Heart Center between January and December 2016. Among these patients, 155 (40.5%) patients had diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was 3-year cumulative incidence of target lesion failure (TLF) defined as target vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI) and clinical-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). Moreover, the incidence of definite stent thrombosis (ST) was also evaluated.
Results
After propensity score matching, 148 patients were divided into 2 groups (BP-EES; N=74, DP-EES; N=74). The 3-year cumulative incidences of TLF were significantly lower in BP-EES group than in DP-EES group (BP-EES vs. DP-EES; 1.4% vs. 11.4%, p=0.01). The incidence of cardiac death, target vessel-related MI, and definite ST were none in the both group.
Figure 1
Conclusions
In diabetic patients, the incidence of TLR within 3 years was significantly lower in BP-EES than in DP-EES. In PCI for diabetic patients, BP-EES might improve clinical outcomes compared to DP-EES.
Collapse
|
3
|
P6085Prevalence and clinical impact of tissue protrusion after stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx493.p6085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
4
|
[Clinical significance of 67Ga-citrate lung scanning in cases of sarcoidosis]. RINSHO HOSHASEN. CLINICAL RADIOGRAPHY 1974; 19:43-50. [PMID: 4856218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|