Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

Download

Total Articles

1040
(from Reference Citation Analysis)

Article PDFs (7)

Cited by > 0 (607)

Searched Name

Y. Furukawa

Ranked By

Results Analysis

Year Published Analysis
Article Type Analysis
Publication Title Analysis
Category Analysis

Results Analysis

Indexed Articles

Year Published

Show more Refine

Article Type

Show more Refine

Article Statistics

Refine

MESH Headings

Show more Refine

First Author

Show more Refine

First Author Affiliations

Show more Refine

Authors

Show more Refine

Publication Titles

Show more Refine

Grant Agencies

Show more Refine

Countries/Regions

Show more Refine

Affiliations

Show more Refine

Corresponding Author Affiliations

Show more Refine

Category

Show more Refine

Number

Citation Analysis

Staplin N, Haynes R, Judge PK, Wanner C, Green JB, Emberson J, Preiss D, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu WJ, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Seidi S, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Herrington WG, Abat S, Abd Rahman R, Abdul Cader R, Abdul Hafidz MI, Abdul Wahab MZ, Abdullah NK, Abdul-Samad T, Abe M, Abraham N, Acheampong S, Achiri P, Acosta JA, Adeleke A, Adell V, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Adnan N, Africano A, Agharazii M, Aguilar F, Aguilera A, Ahmad M, Ahmad MK, Ahmad NA, Ahmad NH, Ahmad NI, Ahmad Miswan N, Ahmad Rosdi H, Ahmed I, Ahmed S, Ahmed S, Aiello J, Aitken A, AitSadi R, Aker S, Akimoto S, Akinfolarin A, Akram S, Alberici F, Albert C, Aldrich L, Alegata M, Alexander L, Alfaress S, Alhadj Ali M, Ali A, Ali A, Alicic R, Aliu A, Almaraz R, Almasarwah R, Almeida J, Aloisi A, Al-Rabadi L, Alscher D, Alvarez P, Al-Zeer B, Amat M, Ambrose C, Ammar H, An Y, Andriaccio L, Ansu K, Apostolidi A, Arai N, Araki H, Araki S, Arbi A, Arechiga O, Armstrong S, Arnold T, Aronoff S, Arriaga W, Arroyo J, Arteaga D, Asahara S, Asai A, Asai N, Asano S, Asawa M, Asmee MF, Aucella F, Augustin M, Avery A, Awad A, Awang IY, Awazawa M, Axler A, Ayub W, Azhari Z, Baccaro R, Badin C, Bagwell B, Bahlmann-Kroll E, Bahtar AZ, Baigent C, Bains D, Bajaj H, Baker R, Baldini E, Banas B, Banerjee D, Banno S, Bansal S, Barberi S, Barnes S, Barnini C, Barot C, Barrett K, Barrios R, Bartolomei Mecatti B, Barton I, Barton J, Basily W, Bavanandan S, Baxter A, Becker L, Beddhu S, Beige J, Beigh S, Bell S, Benck U, Beneat A, Bennett A, Bennett D, Benyon S, Berdeprado J, Bergler T, Bergner A, Berry M, Bevilacqua M, Bhairoo J, Bhandari S, Bhandary N, Bhatt A, Bhattarai M, Bhavsar M, Bian W, Bianchini F, Bianco S, Bilous R, Bilton J, Bilucaglia D, Bird C, Birudaraju D, Biscoveanu M, Blake C, Bleakley N, Bocchicchia K, Bodine S, Bodington R, Boedecker S, Bolduc M, Bolton S, Bond C, Boreky F, Boren K, Bouchi R, Bough L, Bovan D, Bowler C, Bowman L, Brar N, Braun C, Breach A, Breitenfeldt M, Brenner S, Brettschneider B, Brewer A, Brewer G, Brindle V, Brioni E, Brown C, Brown H, Brown L, Brown R, Brown S, Browne D, Bruce K, Brueckmann M, Brunskill N, Bryant M, Brzoska M, Bu Y, Buckman C, Budoff M, Bullen M, Burke A, Burnette S, Burston C, Busch M, Bushnell J, Butler S, Büttner C, Byrne C, Caamano A, Cadorna J, Cafiero C, Cagle M, Cai J, Calabrese K, Calvi C, Camilleri B, Camp S, Campbell D, Campbell R, Cao H, Capelli I, Caple M, Caplin B, Cardone A, Carle J, Carnall V, Caroppo M, Carr S, Carraro G, Carson M, Casares P, Castillo C, Castro C, Caudill B, Cejka V, Ceseri M, Cham L, Chamberlain A, Chambers J, Chan CBT, Chan JYM, Chan YC, Chang E, Chang E, Chant T, Chavagnon T, Chellamuthu P, Chen F, Chen J, Chen P, Chen TM, Chen Y, Chen Y, Cheng C, Cheng H, Cheng MC, Cherney D, Cheung AK, Ching CH, Chitalia N, Choksi R, Chukwu C, Chung K, Cianciolo G, Cipressa L, Clark S, Clarke H, Clarke R, Clarke S, Cleveland B, Cole E, Coles H, Condurache L, Connor A, Convery K, Cooper A, Cooper N, Cooper Z, Cooperman L, Cosgrove L, Coutts P, Cowley A, Craik R, Cui G, Cummins T, Dahl N, Dai H, Dajani L, D'Amelio A, Damian E, Damianik K, Danel L, Daniels C, Daniels T, Darbeau S, Darius H, Dasgupta T, Davies J, Davies L, Davis A, Davis J, Davis L, Dayanandan R, Dayi S, Dayrell R, De Nicola L, Debnath S, Deeb W, Degenhardt S, DeGoursey K, Delaney M, Deo R, DeRaad R, Derebail V, Dev D, Devaux M, Dhall P, Dhillon G, Dienes J, Dobre M, Doctolero E, Dodds V, Domingo D, Donaldson D, Donaldson P, Donhauser C, Donley V, Dorestin S, Dorey S, Doulton T, Draganova D, Draxlbauer K, Driver F, Du H, Dube F, Duck T, Dugal T, Dugas J, Dukka H, Dumann H, Durham W, Dursch M, Dykas R, Easow R, Eckrich E, Eden G, Edmerson E, Edwards H, Ee LW, Eguchi J, Ehrl Y, Eichstadt K, Eid W, Eilerman B, Ejima Y, Eldon H, Ellam T, Elliott L, Ellison R, Emberson J, Epp R, Er A, Espino-Obrero M, Estcourt S, Estienne L, Evans G, Evans J, Evans S, Fabbri G, Fajardo-Moser M, Falcone C, Fani F, Faria-Shayler P, Farnia F, Farrugia D, Fechter M, Fellowes D, Feng F, Fernandez J, Ferraro P, Field A, Fikry S, Finch J, Finn H, Fioretto P, Fish R, Fleischer A, Fleming-Brown D, Fletcher L, Flora R, Foellinger C, Foligno N, Forest S, Forghani Z, Forsyth K, Fottrell-Gould D, Fox P, Frankel A, Fraser D, Frazier R, Frederick K, Freking N, French H, Froment A, Fuchs B, Fuessl L, Fujii H, Fujimoto A, Fujita A, Fujita K, Fujita Y, Fukagawa M, Fukao Y, Fukasawa A, Fuller T, Funayama T, Fung E, Furukawa M, Furukawa Y, Furusho M, Gabel S, Gaidu J, Gaiser S, Gallo K, Galloway C, Gambaro G, Gan CC, Gangemi C, Gao M, Garcia K, Garcia M, Garofalo C, Garrity M, Garza A, Gasko S, Gavrila M, Gebeyehu B, Geddes A, Gentile G, George A, George J, Gesualdo L, Ghalli F, Ghanem A, Ghate T, Ghavampour S, Ghazi A, Gherman A, Giebeln-Hudnell U, Gill B, Gillham S, Girakossyan I, Girndt M, Giuffrida A, Glenwright M, Glider T, Gloria R, Glowski D, Goh BL, Goh CB, Gohda T, Goldenberg R, Goldfaden R, Goldsmith C, Golson B, Gonce V, Gong Q, Goodenough B, Goodwin N, Goonasekera M, Gordon A, Gordon J, Gore A, Goto H, Goto S, Goto S, Gowen D, Grace A, Graham J, Grandaliano G, Gray M, Green JB, Greene T, Greenwood G, Grewal B, Grifa R, Griffin D, Griffin S, Grimmer P, Grobovaite E, Grotjahn S, Guerini A, Guest C, Gunda S, Guo B, Guo Q, Haack S, Haase M, Haaser K, Habuki K, Hadley A, Hagan S, Hagge S, Haller H, Ham S, Hamal S, Hamamoto Y, Hamano N, Hamm M, Hanburry A, Haneda M, Hanf C, Hanif W, Hansen J, Hanson L, Hantel S, Haraguchi T, Harding E, Harding T, Hardy C, Hartner C, Harun Z, Harvill L, Hasan A, Hase H, Hasegawa F, Hasegawa T, Hashimoto A, Hashimoto C, Hashimoto M, Hashimoto S, Haskett S, Hauske SJ, Hawfield A, Hayami T, Hayashi M, Hayashi S, Haynes R, Hazara A, Healy C, Hecktman J, Heine G, Henderson H, Henschel R, Hepditch A, Herfurth K, Hernandez G, Hernandez Pena A, Hernandez-Cassis C, Herrington WG, Herzog C, Hewins S, Hewitt D, Hichkad L, Higashi S, Higuchi C, Hill C, Hill L, Hill M, Himeno T, Hing A, Hirakawa Y, Hirata K, Hirota Y, Hisatake T, Hitchcock S, Hodakowski A, Hodge W, Hogan R, Hohenstatt U, Hohenstein B, Hooi L, Hope S, Hopley M, Horikawa S, Hosein D, Hosooka T, Hou L, Hou W, Howie L, Howson A, Hozak M, Htet Z, Hu X, Hu Y, Huang J, Huda N, Hudig L, Hudson A, Hugo C, Hull R, Hume L, Hundei W, Hunt N, Hunter A, Hurley S, Hurst A, Hutchinson C, Hyo T, Ibrahim FH, Ibrahim S, Ihana N, Ikeda T, Imai A, Imamine R, Inamori A, Inazawa H, Ingell J, Inomata K, Inukai Y, Ioka M, Irtiza-Ali A, Isakova T, Isari W, Iselt M, Ishiguro A, Ishihara K, Ishikawa T, Ishimoto T, Ishizuka K, Ismail R, Itano S, Ito H, Ito K, Ito M, Ito Y, Iwagaitsu S, Iwaita Y, Iwakura T, Iwamoto M, Iwasa M, Iwasaki H, Iwasaki S, Izumi K, Izumi K, Izumi T, Jaafar SM, Jackson C, Jackson Y, Jafari G, Jahangiriesmaili M, Jain N, Jansson K, Jasim H, Jeffers L, Jenkins A, Jesky M, Jesus-Silva J, Jeyarajah D, Jiang Y, Jiao X, Jimenez G, Jin B, Jin Q, Jochims J, Johns B, Johnson C, Johnson T, Jolly S, Jones L, Jones L, Jones S, Jones T, Jones V, Joseph M, Joshi S, Judge P, Junejo N, Junus S, Kachele M, Kadowaki T, Kadoya H, Kaga H, Kai H, Kajio H, Kaluza-Schilling W, Kamaruzaman L, Kamarzarian A, Kamimura Y, Kamiya H, Kamundi C, Kan T, Kanaguchi Y, Kanazawa A, Kanda E, Kanegae S, Kaneko K, Kaneko K, Kang HY, Kano T, Karim M, Karounos D, Karsan W, Kasagi R, Kashihara N, Katagiri H, Katanosaka A, Katayama A, Katayama M, Katiman E, Kato K, Kato M, Kato N, Kato S, Kato T, Kato Y, Katsuda Y, Katsuno T, Kaufeld J, Kavak Y, Kawai I, Kawai M, Kawai M, Kawase A, Kawashima S, Kazory A, Kearney J, Keith B, Kellett J, Kelley S, Kershaw M, Ketteler M, Khai Q, Khairullah Q, Khandwala H, Khoo KKL, Khwaja A, Kidokoro K, Kielstein J, Kihara M, Kimber C, Kimura S, Kinashi H, Kingston H, Kinomura M, Kinsella-Perks E, Kitagawa M, Kitajima M, Kitamura S, Kiyosue A, Kiyota M, Klauser F, Klausmann G, Kmietschak W, Knapp K, Knight C, Knoppe A, Knott C, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi R, Kobayashi T, Koch M, Kodama S, Kodani N, Kogure E, Koizumi M, Kojima H, Kojo T, Kolhe N, Komaba H, Komiya T, Komori H, Kon SP, Kondo M, Kondo M, Kong W, Konishi M, Kono K, Koshino M, Kosugi T, Kothapalli B, Kozlowski T, Kraemer B, Kraemer-Guth A, Krappe J, Kraus D, Kriatselis C, Krieger C, Krish P, Kruger B, Ku Md Razi KR, Kuan Y, Kubota S, Kuhn S, Kumar P, Kume S, Kummer I, Kumuji R, Küpper A, Kuramae T, Kurian L, Kuribayashi C, Kurien R, Kuroda E, Kurose T, Kutschat A, Kuwabara N, Kuwata H, La Manna G, Lacey M, Lafferty K, LaFleur P, Lai V, Laity E, Lambert A, Landray MJ, Langlois M, Latif F, Latore E, Laundy E, Laurienti D, Lawson A, Lay M, Leal I, Leal I, Lee AK, Lee J, Lee KQ, Lee R, Lee SA, Lee YY, Lee-Barkey Y, Leonard N, Leoncini G, Leong CM, Lerario S, Leslie A, Levin A, Lewington A, Li J, Li N, Li X, Li Y, Liberti L, Liberti ME, Liew A, Liew YF, Lilavivat U, Lim SK, Lim YS, Limon E, Lin H, Lioudaki E, Liu H, Liu J, Liu L, Liu Q, Liu WJ, Liu X, Liu Z, Loader D, Lochhead H, Loh CL, Lorimer A, Loudermilk L, Loutan J, Low CK, Low CL, Low YM, Lozon Z, Lu Y, Lucci D, Ludwig U, Luker N, Lund D, Lustig R, Lyle S, Macdonald C, MacDougall I, Machicado R, MacLean D, Macleod P, Madera A, Madore F, Maeda K, Maegawa H, Maeno S, Mafham M, Magee J, Maggioni AP, Mah DY, Mahabadi V, Maiguma M, Makita Y, Makos G, Manco L, Mangiacapra R, Manley J, Mann P, Mano S, Marcotte G, Maris J, Mark P, Markau S, Markovic M, Marshall C, Martin M, Martinez C, Martinez S, Martins G, Maruyama K, Maruyama S, Marx K, Maselli A, Masengu A, Maskill A, Masumoto S, Masutani K, Matsumoto M, Matsunaga T, Matsuoka N, Matsushita M, Matthews M, Matthias S, Matvienko E, Maurer M, Maxwell P, Mayne KJ, Mazlan N, Mazlan SA, Mbuyisa A, McCafferty K, McCarroll F, McCarthy T, McClary-Wright C, McCray K, McDermott P, McDonald C, McDougall R, McHaffie E, McIntosh K, McKinley T, McLaughlin S, McLean N, McNeil L, Measor A, Meek J, Mehta A, Mehta R, Melandri M, Mené P, Meng T, Menne J, Merritt K, Merscher S, Meshykhi C, Messa P, Messinger L, Miftari N, Miller R, Miller Y, Miller-Hodges E, Minatoguchi M, Miners M, Minutolo R, Mita T, Miura Y, Miyaji M, Miyamoto S, Miyatsuka T, Miyazaki M, Miyazawa I, Mizumachi R, Mizuno M, Moffat S, Mohamad Nor FS, Mohamad Zaini SN, Mohamed Affandi FA, Mohandas C, Mohd R, Mohd Fauzi NA, Mohd Sharif NH, Mohd Yusoff Y, Moist L, Moncada A, Montasser M, Moon A, Moran C, Morgan N, Moriarty J, Morig G, Morinaga H, Morino K, Morisaki T, Morishita Y, Morlok S, Morris A, Morris F, Mostafa S, Mostefai Y, Motegi M, Motherwell N, Motta D, Mottl A, Moys R, Mozaffari S, Muir J, Mulhern J, Mulligan S, Munakata Y, Murakami C, Murakoshi M, Murawska A, Murphy K, Murphy L, Murray S, Murtagh H, Musa MA, Mushahar L, Mustafa R, Mustafar R, Muto M, Nadar E, Nagano R, Nagasawa T, Nagashima E, Nagasu H, Nagelberg S, Nair H, Nakagawa Y, Nakahara M, Nakamura J, Nakamura R, Nakamura T, Nakaoka M, Nakashima E, Nakata J, Nakata M, Nakatani S, Nakatsuka A, Nakayama Y, Nakhoul G, Nangaku M, Naverrete G, Navivala A, Nazeer I, Negrea L, Nethaji C, Newman E, Ng SYA, Ng TJ, Ngu LLS, Nimbkar T, Nishi H, Nishi M, Nishi S, Nishida Y, Nishiyama A, Niu J, Niu P, Nobili G, Nohara N, Nojima I, Nolan J, Nosseir H, Nozawa M, Nunn M, Nunokawa S, Oda M, Oe M, Oe Y, Ogane K, Ogawa W, Ogihara T, Oguchi G, Ohsugi M, Oishi K, Okada Y, Okajyo J, Okamoto S, Okamura K, Olufuwa O, Oluyombo R, Omata A, Omori Y, Ong LM, Ong YC, Onyema J, Oomatia A, Oommen A, Oremus R, Orimo Y, Ortalda V, Osaki Y, Osawa Y, Osmond Foster J, O'Sullivan A, Otani T, Othman N, Otomo S, O'Toole J, Owen L, Ozawa T, Padiyar A, Page N, Pajak S, Paliege A, Pandey A, Pandey R, Pariani H, Park J, Parrigon M, Passauer J, Patecki M, Patel M, Patel R, Patel T, Patel Z, Paul R, Paul R, Paulsen L, Pavone L, Peixoto A, Peji J, Peng BC, Peng K, Pennino L, Pereira E, Perez E, Pergola P, Pesce F, Pessolano G, Petchey W, Petr EJ, Pfab T, Phelan P, Phillips R, Phillips T, Phipps M, Piccinni G, Pickett T, Pickworth S, Piemontese M, Pinto D, Piper J, Plummer-Morgan J, Poehler D, Polese L, Poma V, Pontremoli R, Postal A, Pötz C, Power A, Pradhan N, Pradhan R, Preiss D, Preiss E, Preston K, Prib N, Price L, Provenzano C, Pugay C, Pulido R, Putz F, Qiao Y, Quartagno R, Quashie-Akponeware M, Rabara R, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Radhakrishnan D, Radley M, Raff R, Raguwaran S, Rahbari-Oskoui F, Rahman M, Rahmat K, Ramadoss S, Ramanaidu S, Ramasamy S, Ramli R, Ramli S, Ramsey T, Rankin A, Rashidi A, Raymond L, Razali WAFA, Read K, Reiner H, Reisler A, Reith C, Renner J, Rettenmaier B, Richmond L, Rijos D, Rivera R, Rivers V, Robinson H, Rocco M, Rodriguez-Bachiller I, Rodriquez R, Roesch C, Roesch J, Rogers J, Rohnstock M, Rolfsmeier S, Roman M, Romo A, Rosati A, Rosenberg S, Ross T, Rossello X, Roura M, Roussel M, Rovner S, Roy S, Rucker S, Rump L, Ruocco M, Ruse S, Russo F, Russo M, Ryder M, Sabarai A, Saccà C, Sachson R, Sadler E, Safiee NS, Sahani M, Saillant A, Saini J, Saito C, Saito S, Sakaguchi K, Sakai M, Salim H, Salviani C, Sammons E, Sampson A, Samson F, Sandercock P, Sanguila S, Santorelli G, Santoro D, Sarabu N, Saram T, Sardell R, Sasajima H, Sasaki T, Satko S, Sato A, Sato D, Sato H, Sato H, Sato J, Sato T, Sato Y, Satoh M, Sawada K, Schanz M, Scheidemantel F, Schemmelmann M, Schettler E, Schettler V, Schlieper GR, Schmidt C, Schmidt G, Schmidt U, Schmidt-Gurtler H, Schmude M, Schneider A, Schneider I, Schneider-Danwitz C, Schomig M, Schramm T, Schreiber A, Schricker S, Schroppel B, Schulte-Kemna L, Schulz E, Schumacher B, Schuster A, Schwab A, Scolari F, Scott A, Seeger W, Seeger W, Segal M, Seifert L, Seifert M, Sekiya M, Sellars R, Seman MR, Shah S, Shah S, Shainberg L, Shanmuganathan M, Shao F, Sharma K, Sharpe C, Sheikh-Ali M, Sheldon J, Shenton C, Shepherd A, Shepperd M, Sheridan R, Sheriff Z, Shibata Y, Shigehara T, Shikata K, Shimamura K, Shimano H, Shimizu Y, Shimoda H, Shin K, Shivashankar G, Shojima N, Silva R, Sim CSB, Simmons K, Sinha S, Sitter T, Sivanandam S, Skipper M, Sloan K, Sloan L, Smith R, Smyth J, Sobande T, Sobata M, Somalanka S, Song X, Sonntag F, Sood B, Sor SY, Soufer J, Sparks H, Spatoliatore G, Spinola T, Squyres S, Srivastava A, Stanfield J, Staplin N, Staylor K, Steele A, Steen O, Steffl D, Stegbauer J, Stellbrink C, Stellbrink E, Stevens W, Stevenson A, Stewart-Ray V, Stickley J, Stoffler D, Stratmann B, Streitenberger S, Strutz F, Stubbs J, Stumpf J, Suazo N, Suchinda P, Suckling R, Sudin A, Sugamori K, Sugawara H, Sugawara K, Sugimoto D, Sugiyama H, Sugiyama H, Sugiyama T, Sullivan M, Sumi M, Suresh N, Sutton D, Suzuki H, Suzuki R, Suzuki Y, Suzuki Y, Suzuki Y, Swanson E, Swift P, Syed S, Szerlip H, Taal M, Taddeo M, Tailor C, Tajima K, Takagi M, Takahashi K, Takahashi K, Takahashi M, Takahashi T, Takahira E, Takai T, Takaoka M, Takeoka J, Takesada A, Takezawa M, Talbot M, Taliercio J, Talsania T, Tamori Y, Tamura R, Tamura Y, Tan CHH, Tan EZZ, Tanabe A, Tanabe K, Tanaka A, Tanaka A, Tanaka N, Tang S, Tang Z, Tanigaki K, Tarlac M, Tatsuzawa A, Tay JF, Tay LL, Taylor J, Taylor K, Taylor K, Te A, Tenbusch L, Teng KS, Terakawa A, Terry J, Tham ZD, Tholl S, Thomas G, Thong KM, Tietjen D, Timadjer A, Tindall H, Tipper S, Tobin K, Toda N, Tokuyama A, Tolibas M, Tomita A, Tomita T, Tomlinson J, Tonks L, Topf J, Topping S, Torp A, Torres A, Totaro F, Toth P, Toyonaga Y, Tripodi F, Trivedi K, Tropman E, Tschope D, Tse J, Tsuji K, Tsunekawa S, Tsunoda R, Tucky B, Tufail S, Tuffaha A, Turan E, Turner H, Turner J, Turner M, Tuttle KR, Tye YL, Tyler A, Tyler J, Uchi H, Uchida H, Uchida T, Uchida T, Udagawa T, Ueda S, Ueda Y, Ueki K, Ugni S, Ugwu E, Umeno R, Unekawa C, Uozumi K, Urquia K, Valleteau A, Valletta C, van Erp R, Vanhoy C, Varad V, Varma R, Varughese A, Vasquez P, Vasseur A, Veelken R, Velagapudi C, Verdel K, Vettoretti S, Vezzoli G, Vielhauer V, Viera R, Vilar E, Villaruel S, Vinall L, Vinathan J, Visnjic M, Voigt E, von-Eynatten M, Vourvou M, Wada J, Wada J, Wada T, Wada Y, Wakayama K, Wakita Y, Wallendszus K, Walters T, Wan Mohamad WH, Wang L, Wang W, Wang X, Wang X, Wang Y, Wanner C, Wanninayake S, Watada H, Watanabe K, Watanabe K, Watanabe M, Waterfall H, Watkins D, Watson S, Weaving L, Weber B, Webley Y, Webster A, Webster M, Weetman M, Wei W, Weihprecht H, Weiland L, Weinmann-Menke J, Weinreich T, Wendt R, Weng Y, Whalen M, Whalley G, Wheatley R, Wheeler A, Wheeler J, Whelton P, White K, Whitmore B, Whittaker S, Wiebel J, Wiley J, Wilkinson L, Willett M, Williams A, Williams E, Williams K, Williams T, Wilson A, Wilson P, Wincott L, Wines E, Winkelmann B, Winkler M, Winter-Goodwin B, Witczak J, Wittes J, Wittmann M, Wolf G, Wolf L, Wolfling R, Wong C, Wong E, Wong HS, Wong LW, Wong YH, Wonnacott A, Wood A, Wood L, Woodhouse H, Wooding N, Woodman A, Wren K, Wu J, Wu P, Xia S, Xiao H, Xiao X, Xie Y, Xu C, Xu Y, Xue H, Yahaya H, Yalamanchili H, Yamada A, Yamada N, Yamagata K, Yamaguchi M, Yamaji Y, Yamamoto A, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto T, Yamanaka A, Yamano T, Yamanouchi Y, Yamasaki N, Yamasaki Y, Yamasaki Y, Yamashita C, Yamauchi T, Yan Q, Yanagisawa E, Yang F, Yang L, Yano S, Yao S, Yao Y, Yarlagadda S, Yasuda Y, Yiu V, Yokoyama T, Yoshida S, Yoshidome E, Yoshikawa H, Young A, Young T, Yousif V, Yu H, Yu Y, Yuasa K, Yusof N, Zalunardo N, Zander B, Zani R, Zappulo F, Zayed M, Zemann B, Zettergren P, Zhang H, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang N, Zhang X, Zhao J, Zhao L, Zhao S, Zhao Z, Zhong H, Zhou N, Zhou S, Zhu D, Zhu L, Zhu S, Zietz M, Zippo M, Zirino F, Zulkipli FH. Effects of empagliflozin on progression of chronic kidney disease: a prespecified secondary analysis from the empa-kidney trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024;12:39-50. [PMID: 38061371 PMCID: PMC7615591 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00321-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce progression of chronic kidney disease and the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a wide range of patients. However, their effects on kidney disease progression in some patients with chronic kidney disease are unclear because few clinical kidney outcomes occurred among such patients in the completed trials. In particular, some guidelines stratify their level of recommendation about who should be treated with SGLT2 inhibitors based on diabetes status and albuminuria. We aimed to assess the effects of empagliflozin on progression of chronic kidney disease both overall and among specific types of participants in the EMPA-KIDNEY trial.

METHODS

EMPA-KIDNEY, a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 241 centres in eight countries (Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the UK, and the USA), and included individuals aged 18 years or older with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 20 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or with an eGFR of 45 to less than 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) of 200 mg/g or higher. We explored the effects of 10 mg oral empagliflozin once daily versus placebo on the annualised rate of change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR slope), a tertiary outcome. We studied the acute slope (from randomisation to 2 months) and chronic slope (from 2 months onwards) separately, using shared parameter models to estimate the latter. Analyses were done in all randomly assigned participants by intention to treat. EMPA-KIDNEY is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594110.

FINDINGS

Between May 15, 2019, and April 16, 2021, 6609 participants were randomly assigned and then followed up for a median of 2·0 years (IQR 1·5-2·4). Prespecified subgroups of eGFR included 2282 (34·5%) participants with an eGFR of less than 30 mL/min per 1·73 m2, 2928 (44·3%) with an eGFR of 30 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, and 1399 (21·2%) with an eGFR 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2 or higher. Prespecified subgroups of uACR included 1328 (20·1%) with a uACR of less than 30 mg/g, 1864 (28·2%) with a uACR of 30 to 300 mg/g, and 3417 (51·7%) with a uACR of more than 300 mg/g. Overall, allocation to empagliflozin caused an acute 2·12 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (95% CI 1·83-2·41) reduction in eGFR, equivalent to a 6% (5-6) dip in the first 2 months. After this, it halved the chronic slope from -2·75 to -1·37 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (relative difference 50%, 95% CI 42-58). The absolute and relative benefits of empagliflozin on the magnitude of the chronic slope varied significantly depending on diabetes status and baseline levels of eGFR and uACR. In particular, the absolute difference in chronic slopes was lower in patients with lower baseline uACR, but because this group progressed more slowly than those with higher uACR, this translated to a larger relative difference in chronic slopes in this group (86% [36-136] reduction in the chronic slope among those with baseline uACR <30 mg/g compared with a 29% [19-38] reduction for those with baseline uACR ≥2000 mg/g; ptrend<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

Empagliflozin slowed the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease among all types of participant in the EMPA-KIDNEY trial, including those with little albuminuria. Albuminuria alone should not be used to determine whether to treat with an SGLT2 inhibitor.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly.

Collapse

Judge PK, Staplin N, Mayne KJ, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Ng SYA, Roddick AJ, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu WJ, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Massey D, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R, Herrington WG, Abat S, Abd Rahman R, Abdul Cader R, Abdul Hafidz MI, Abdul Wahab MZ, Abdullah NK, Abdul-Samad T, Abe M, Abraham N, Acheampong S, Achiri P, Acosta JA, Adeleke A, Adell V, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Adnan N, Africano A, Agharazii M, Aguilar F, Aguilera A, Ahmad M, Ahmad MK, Ahmad NA, Ahmad NH, Ahmad NI, Ahmad Miswan N, Ahmad Rosdi H, Ahmed I, Ahmed S, Ahmed S, Aiello J, Aitken A, AitSadi R, Aker S, Akimoto S, Akinfolarin A, Akram S, Alberici F, Albert C, Aldrich L, Alegata M, Alexander L, Alfaress S, Alhadj Ali M, Ali A, Ali A, Alicic R, Aliu A, Almaraz R, Almasarwah R, Almeida J, Aloisi A, Al-Rabadi L, Alscher D, Alvarez P, Al-Zeer B, Amat M, Ambrose C, Ammar H, An Y, Andriaccio L, Ansu K, Apostolidi A, Arai N, Araki H, Araki S, Arbi A, Arechiga O, Armstrong S, Arnold T, Aronoff S, Arriaga W, Arroyo J, Arteaga D, Asahara S, Asai A, Asai N, Asano S, Asawa M, Asmee MF, Aucella F, Augustin M, Avery A, Awad A, Awang IY, Awazawa M, Axler A, Ayub W, Azhari Z, Baccaro R, Badin C, Bagwell B, Bahlmann-Kroll E, Bahtar AZ, Baigent C, Bains D, Bajaj H, Baker R, Baldini E, Banas B, Banerjee D, Banno S, Bansal S, Barberi S, Barnes S, Barnini C, Barot C, Barrett K, Barrios R, Bartolomei Mecatti B, Barton I, Barton J, Basily W, Bavanandan S, Baxter A, Becker L, Beddhu S, Beige J, Beigh S, Bell S, Benck U, Beneat A, Bennett A, Bennett D, Benyon S, Berdeprado J, Bergler T, Bergner A, Berry M, Bevilacqua M, Bhairoo J, Bhandari S, Bhandary N, Bhatt A, Bhattarai M, Bhavsar M, Bian W, Bianchini F, Bianco S, Bilous R, Bilton J, Bilucaglia D, Bird C, Birudaraju D, Biscoveanu M, Blake C, Bleakley N, Bocchicchia K, Bodine S, Bodington R, Boedecker S, Bolduc M, Bolton S, Bond C, Boreky F, Boren K, Bouchi R, Bough L, Bovan D, Bowler C, Bowman L, Brar N, Braun C, Breach A, Breitenfeldt M, Brenner S, Brettschneider B, Brewer A, Brewer G, Brindle V, Brioni E, Brown C, Brown H, Brown L, Brown R, Brown S, Browne D, Bruce K, Brueckmann M, Brunskill N, Bryant M, Brzoska M, Bu Y, Buckman C, Budoff M, Bullen M, Burke A, Burnette S, Burston C, Busch M, Bushnell J, Butler S, Büttner C, Byrne C, Caamano A, Cadorna J, Cafiero C, Cagle M, Cai J, Calabrese K, Calvi C, Camilleri B, Camp S, Campbell D, Campbell R, Cao H, Capelli I, Caple M, Caplin B, Cardone A, Carle J, Carnall V, Caroppo M, Carr S, Carraro G, Carson M, Casares P, Castillo C, Castro C, Caudill B, Cejka V, Ceseri M, Cham L, Chamberlain A, Chambers J, Chan CBT, Chan JYM, Chan YC, Chang E, Chang E, Chant T, Chavagnon T, Chellamuthu P, Chen F, Chen J, Chen P, Chen TM, Chen Y, Chen Y, Cheng C, Cheng H, Cheng MC, Cherney D, Cheung AK, Ching CH, Chitalia N, Choksi R, Chukwu C, Chung K, Cianciolo G, Cipressa L, Clark S, Clarke H, Clarke R, Clarke S, Cleveland B, Cole E, Coles H, Condurache L, Connor A, Convery K, Cooper A, Cooper N, Cooper Z, Cooperman L, Cosgrove L, Coutts P, Cowley A, Craik R, Cui G, Cummins T, Dahl N, Dai H, Dajani L, D'Amelio A, Damian E, Damianik K, Danel L, Daniels C, Daniels T, Darbeau S, Darius H, Dasgupta T, Davies J, Davies L, Davis A, Davis J, Davis L, Dayanandan R, Dayi S, Dayrell R, De Nicola L, Debnath S, Deeb W, Degenhardt S, DeGoursey K, Delaney M, Deo R, DeRaad R, Derebail V, Dev D, Devaux M, Dhall P, Dhillon G, Dienes J, Dobre M, Doctolero E, Dodds V, Domingo D, Donaldson D, Donaldson P, Donhauser C, Donley V, Dorestin S, Dorey S, Doulton T, Draganova D, Draxlbauer K, Driver F, Du H, Dube F, Duck T, Dugal T, Dugas J, Dukka H, Dumann H, Durham W, Dursch M, Dykas R, Easow R, Eckrich E, Eden G, Edmerson E, Edwards H, Ee LW, Eguchi J, Ehrl Y, Eichstadt K, Eid W, Eilerman B, Ejima Y, Eldon H, Ellam T, Elliott L, Ellison R, Emberson J, Epp R, Er A, Espino-Obrero M, Estcourt S, Estienne L, Evans G, Evans J, Evans S, Fabbri G, Fajardo-Moser M, Falcone C, Fani F, Faria-Shayler P, Farnia F, Farrugia D, Fechter M, Fellowes D, Feng F, Fernandez J, Ferraro P, Field A, Fikry S, Finch J, Finn H, Fioretto P, Fish R, Fleischer A, Fleming-Brown D, Fletcher L, Flora R, Foellinger C, Foligno N, Forest S, Forghani Z, Forsyth K, Fottrell-Gould D, Fox P, Frankel A, Fraser D, Frazier R, Frederick K, Freking N, French H, Froment A, Fuchs B, Fuessl L, Fujii H, Fujimoto A, Fujita A, Fujita K, Fujita Y, Fukagawa M, Fukao Y, Fukasawa A, Fuller T, Funayama T, Fung E, Furukawa M, Furukawa Y, Furusho M, Gabel S, Gaidu J, Gaiser S, Gallo K, Galloway C, Gambaro G, Gan CC, Gangemi C, Gao M, Garcia K, Garcia M, Garofalo C, Garrity M, Garza A, Gasko S, Gavrila M, Gebeyehu B, Geddes A, Gentile G, George A, George J, Gesualdo L, Ghalli F, Ghanem A, Ghate T, Ghavampour S, Ghazi A, Gherman A, Giebeln-Hudnell U, Gill B, Gillham S, Girakossyan I, Girndt M, Giuffrida A, Glenwright M, Glider T, Gloria R, Glowski D, Goh BL, Goh CB, Gohda T, Goldenberg R, Goldfaden R, Goldsmith C, Golson B, Gonce V, Gong Q, Goodenough B, Goodwin N, Goonasekera M, Gordon A, Gordon J, Gore A, Goto H, Goto S, Goto S, Gowen D, Grace A, Graham J, Grandaliano G, Gray M, Green JB, Greene T, Greenwood G, Grewal B, Grifa R, Griffin D, Griffin S, Grimmer P, Grobovaite E, Grotjahn S, Guerini A, Guest C, Gunda S, Guo B, Guo Q, Haack S, Haase M, Haaser K, Habuki K, Hadley A, Hagan S, Hagge S, Haller H, Ham S, Hamal S, Hamamoto Y, Hamano N, Hamm M, Hanburry A, Haneda M, Hanf C, Hanif W, Hansen J, Hanson L, Hantel S, Haraguchi T, Harding E, Harding T, Hardy C, Hartner C, Harun Z, Harvill L, Hasan A, Hase H, Hasegawa F, Hasegawa T, Hashimoto A, Hashimoto C, Hashimoto M, Hashimoto S, Haskett S, Hauske SJ, Hawfield A, Hayami T, Hayashi M, Hayashi S, Haynes R, Hazara A, Healy C, Hecktman J, Heine G, Henderson H, Henschel R, Hepditch A, Herfurth K, Hernandez G, Hernandez Pena A, Hernandez-Cassis C, Herrington WG, Herzog C, Hewins S, Hewitt D, Hichkad L, Higashi S, Higuchi C, Hill C, Hill L, Hill M, Himeno T, Hing A, Hirakawa Y, Hirata K, Hirota Y, Hisatake T, Hitchcock S, Hodakowski A, Hodge W, Hogan R, Hohenstatt U, Hohenstein B, Hooi L, Hope S, Hopley M, Horikawa S, Hosein D, Hosooka T, Hou L, Hou W, Howie L, Howson A, Hozak M, Htet Z, Hu X, Hu Y, Huang J, Huda N, Hudig L, Hudson A, Hugo C, Hull R, Hume L, Hundei W, Hunt N, Hunter A, Hurley S, Hurst A, Hutchinson C, Hyo T, Ibrahim FH, Ibrahim S, Ihana N, Ikeda T, Imai A, Imamine R, Inamori A, Inazawa H, Ingell J, Inomata K, Inukai Y, Ioka M, Irtiza-Ali A, Isakova T, Isari W, Iselt M, Ishiguro A, Ishihara K, Ishikawa T, Ishimoto T, Ishizuka K, Ismail R, Itano S, Ito H, Ito K, Ito M, Ito Y, Iwagaitsu S, Iwaita Y, Iwakura T, Iwamoto M, Iwasa M, Iwasaki H, Iwasaki S, Izumi K, Izumi K, Izumi T, Jaafar SM, Jackson C, Jackson Y, Jafari G, Jahangiriesmaili M, Jain N, Jansson K, Jasim H, Jeffers L, Jenkins A, Jesky M, Jesus-Silva J, Jeyarajah D, Jiang Y, Jiao X, Jimenez G, Jin B, Jin Q, Jochims J, Johns B, Johnson C, Johnson T, Jolly S, Jones L, Jones L, Jones S, Jones T, Jones V, Joseph M, Joshi S, Judge P, Junejo N, Junus S, Kachele M, Kadowaki T, Kadoya H, Kaga H, Kai H, Kajio H, Kaluza-Schilling W, Kamaruzaman L, Kamarzarian A, Kamimura Y, Kamiya H, Kamundi C, Kan T, Kanaguchi Y, Kanazawa A, Kanda E, Kanegae S, Kaneko K, Kaneko K, Kang HY, Kano T, Karim M, Karounos D, Karsan W, Kasagi R, Kashihara N, Katagiri H, Katanosaka A, Katayama A, Katayama M, Katiman E, Kato K, Kato M, Kato N, Kato S, Kato T, Kato Y, Katsuda Y, Katsuno T, Kaufeld J, Kavak Y, Kawai I, Kawai M, Kawai M, Kawase A, Kawashima S, Kazory A, Kearney J, Keith B, Kellett J, Kelley S, Kershaw M, Ketteler M, Khai Q, Khairullah Q, Khandwala H, Khoo KKL, Khwaja A, Kidokoro K, Kielstein J, Kihara M, Kimber C, Kimura S, Kinashi H, Kingston H, Kinomura M, Kinsella-Perks E, Kitagawa M, Kitajima M, Kitamura S, Kiyosue A, Kiyota M, Klauser F, Klausmann G, Kmietschak W, Knapp K, Knight C, Knoppe A, Knott C, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi R, Kobayashi T, Koch M, Kodama S, Kodani N, Kogure E, Koizumi M, Kojima H, Kojo T, Kolhe N, Komaba H, Komiya T, Komori H, Kon SP, Kondo M, Kondo M, Kong W, Konishi M, Kono K, Koshino M, Kosugi T, Kothapalli B, Kozlowski T, Kraemer B, Kraemer-Guth A, Krappe J, Kraus D, Kriatselis C, Krieger C, Krish P, Kruger B, Ku Md Razi KR, Kuan Y, Kubota S, Kuhn S, Kumar P, Kume S, Kummer I, Kumuji R, Küpper A, Kuramae T, Kurian L, Kuribayashi C, Kurien R, Kuroda E, Kurose T, Kutschat A, Kuwabara N, Kuwata H, La Manna G, Lacey M, Lafferty K, LaFleur P, Lai V, Laity E, Lambert A, Landray MJ, Langlois M, Latif F, Latore E, Laundy E, Laurienti D, Lawson A, Lay M, Leal I, Leal I, Lee AK, Lee J, Lee KQ, Lee R, Lee SA, Lee YY, Lee-Barkey Y, Leonard N, Leoncini G, Leong CM, Lerario S, Leslie A, Levin A, Lewington A, Li J, Li N, Li X, Li Y, Liberti L, Liberti ME, Liew A, Liew YF, Lilavivat U, Lim SK, Lim YS, Limon E, Lin H, Lioudaki E, Liu H, Liu J, Liu L, Liu Q, Liu WJ, Liu X, Liu Z, Loader D, Lochhead H, Loh CL, Lorimer A, Loudermilk L, Loutan J, Low CK, Low CL, Low YM, Lozon Z, Lu Y, Lucci D, Ludwig U, Luker N, Lund D, Lustig R, Lyle S, Macdonald C, MacDougall I, Machicado R, MacLean D, Macleod P, Madera A, Madore F, Maeda K, Maegawa H, Maeno S, Mafham M, Magee J, Maggioni AP, Mah DY, Mahabadi V, Maiguma M, Makita Y, Makos G, Manco L, Mangiacapra R, Manley J, Mann P, Mano S, Marcotte G, Maris J, Mark P, Markau S, Markovic M, Marshall C, Martin M, Martinez C, Martinez S, Martins G, Maruyama K, Maruyama S, Marx K, Maselli A, Masengu A, Maskill A, Masumoto S, Masutani K, Matsumoto M, Matsunaga T, Matsuoka N, Matsushita M, Matthews M, Matthias S, Matvienko E, Maurer M, Maxwell P, Mayne KJ, Mazlan N, Mazlan SA, Mbuyisa A, McCafferty K, McCarroll F, McCarthy T, McClary-Wright C, McCray K, McDermott P, McDonald C, McDougall R, McHaffie E, McIntosh K, McKinley T, McLaughlin S, McLean N, McNeil L, Measor A, Meek J, Mehta A, Mehta R, Melandri M, Mené P, Meng T, Menne J, Merritt K, Merscher S, Meshykhi C, Messa P, Messinger L, Miftari N, Miller R, Miller Y, Miller-Hodges E, Minatoguchi M, Miners M, Minutolo R, Mita T, Miura Y, Miyaji M, Miyamoto S, Miyatsuka T, Miyazaki M, Miyazawa I, Mizumachi R, Mizuno M, Moffat S, Mohamad Nor FS, Mohamad Zaini SN, Mohamed Affandi FA, Mohandas C, Mohd R, Mohd Fauzi NA, Mohd Sharif NH, Mohd Yusoff Y, Moist L, Moncada A, Montasser M, Moon A, Moran C, Morgan N, Moriarty J, Morig G, Morinaga H, Morino K, Morisaki T, Morishita Y, Morlok S, Morris A, Morris F, Mostafa S, Mostefai Y, Motegi M, Motherwell N, Motta D, Mottl A, Moys R, Mozaffari S, Muir J, Mulhern J, Mulligan S, Munakata Y, Murakami C, Murakoshi M, Murawska A, Murphy K, Murphy L, Murray S, Murtagh H, Musa MA, Mushahar L, Mustafa R, Mustafar R, Muto M, Nadar E, Nagano R, Nagasawa T, Nagashima E, Nagasu H, Nagelberg S, Nair H, Nakagawa Y, Nakahara M, Nakamura J, Nakamura R, Nakamura T, Nakaoka M, Nakashima E, Nakata J, Nakata M, Nakatani S, Nakatsuka A, Nakayama Y, Nakhoul G, Nangaku M, Naverrete G, Navivala A, Nazeer I, Negrea L, Nethaji C, Newman E, Ng SYA, Ng TJ, Ngu LLS, Nimbkar T, Nishi H, Nishi M, Nishi S, Nishida Y, Nishiyama A, Niu J, Niu P, Nobili G, Nohara N, Nojima I, Nolan J, Nosseir H, Nozawa M, Nunn M, Nunokawa S, Oda M, Oe M, Oe Y, Ogane K, Ogawa W, Ogihara T, Oguchi G, Ohsugi M, Oishi K, Okada Y, Okajyo J, Okamoto S, Okamura K, Olufuwa O, Oluyombo R, Omata A, Omori Y, Ong LM, Ong YC, Onyema J, Oomatia A, Oommen A, Oremus R, Orimo Y, Ortalda V, Osaki Y, Osawa Y, Osmond Foster J, O'Sullivan A, Otani T, Othman N, Otomo S, O'Toole J, Owen L, Ozawa T, Padiyar A, Page N, Pajak S, Paliege A, Pandey A, Pandey R, Pariani H, Park J, Parrigon M, Passauer J, Patecki M, Patel M, Patel R, Patel T, Patel Z, Paul R, Paul R, Paulsen L, Pavone L, Peixoto A, Peji J, Peng BC, Peng K, Pennino L, Pereira E, Perez E, Pergola P, Pesce F, Pessolano G, Petchey W, Petr EJ, Pfab T, Phelan P, Phillips R, Phillips T, Phipps M, Piccinni G, Pickett T, Pickworth S, Piemontese M, Pinto D, Piper J, Plummer-Morgan J, Poehler D, Polese L, Poma V, Pontremoli R, Postal A, Pötz C, Power A, Pradhan N, Pradhan R, Preiss D, Preiss E, Preston K, Prib N, Price L, Provenzano C, Pugay C, Pulido R, Putz F, Qiao Y, Quartagno R, Quashie-Akponeware M, Rabara R, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Radhakrishnan D, Radley M, Raff R, Raguwaran S, Rahbari-Oskoui F, Rahman M, Rahmat K, Ramadoss S, Ramanaidu S, Ramasamy S, Ramli R, Ramli S, Ramsey T, Rankin A, Rashidi A, Raymond L, Razali WAFA, Read K, Reiner H, Reisler A, Reith C, Renner J, Rettenmaier B, Richmond L, Rijos D, Rivera R, Rivers V, Robinson H, Rocco M, Rodriguez-Bachiller I, Rodriquez R, Roesch C, Roesch J, Rogers J, Rohnstock M, Rolfsmeier S, Roman M, Romo A, Rosati A, Rosenberg S, Ross T, Rossello X, Roura M, Roussel M, Rovner S, Roy S, Rucker S, Rump L, Ruocco M, Ruse S, Russo F, Russo M, Ryder M, Sabarai A, Saccà C, Sachson R, Sadler E, Safiee NS, Sahani M, Saillant A, Saini J, Saito C, Saito S, Sakaguchi K, Sakai M, Salim H, Salviani C, Sammons E, Sampson A, Samson F, Sandercock P, Sanguila S, Santorelli G, Santoro D, Sarabu N, Saram T, Sardell R, Sasajima H, Sasaki T, Satko S, Sato A, Sato D, Sato H, Sato H, Sato J, Sato T, Sato Y, Satoh M, Sawada K, Schanz M, Scheidemantel F, Schemmelmann M, Schettler E, Schettler V, Schlieper GR, Schmidt C, Schmidt G, Schmidt U, Schmidt-Gurtler H, Schmude M, Schneider A, Schneider I, Schneider-Danwitz C, Schomig M, Schramm T, Schreiber A, Schricker S, Schroppel B, Schulte-Kemna L, Schulz E, Schumacher B, Schuster A, Schwab A, Scolari F, Scott A, Seeger W, Seeger W, Segal M, Seifert L, Seifert M, Sekiya M, Sellars R, Seman MR, Shah S, Shah S, Shainberg L, Shanmuganathan M, Shao F, Sharma K, Sharpe C, Sheikh-Ali M, Sheldon J, Shenton C, Shepherd A, Shepperd M, Sheridan R, Sheriff Z, Shibata Y, Shigehara T, Shikata K, Shimamura K, Shimano H, Shimizu Y, Shimoda H, Shin K, Shivashankar G, Shojima N, Silva R, Sim CSB, Simmons K, Sinha S, Sitter T, Sivanandam S, Skipper M, Sloan K, Sloan L, Smith R, Smyth J, Sobande T, Sobata M, Somalanka S, Song X, Sonntag F, Sood B, Sor SY, Soufer J, Sparks H, Spatoliatore G, Spinola T, Squyres S, Srivastava A, Stanfield J, Staplin N, Staylor K, Steele A, Steen O, Steffl D, Stegbauer J, Stellbrink C, Stellbrink E, Stevens W, Stevenson A, Stewart-Ray V, Stickley J, Stoffler D, Stratmann B, Streitenberger S, Strutz F, Stubbs J, Stumpf J, Suazo N, Suchinda P, Suckling R, Sudin A, Sugamori K, Sugawara H, Sugawara K, Sugimoto D, Sugiyama H, Sugiyama H, Sugiyama T, Sullivan M, Sumi M, Suresh N, Sutton D, Suzuki H, Suzuki R, Suzuki Y, Suzuki Y, Suzuki Y, Swanson E, Swift P, Syed S, Szerlip H, Taal M, Taddeo M, Tailor C, Tajima K, Takagi M, Takahashi K, Takahashi K, Takahashi M, Takahashi T, Takahira E, Takai T, Takaoka M, Takeoka J, Takesada A, Takezawa M, Talbot M, Taliercio J, Talsania T, Tamori Y, Tamura R, Tamura Y, Tan CHH, Tan EZZ, Tanabe A, Tanabe K, Tanaka A, Tanaka A, Tanaka N, Tang S, Tang Z, Tanigaki K, Tarlac M, Tatsuzawa A, Tay JF, Tay LL, Taylor J, Taylor K, Taylor K, Te A, Tenbusch L, Teng KS, Terakawa A, Terry J, Tham ZD, Tholl S, Thomas G, Thong KM, Tietjen D, Timadjer A, Tindall H, Tipper S, Tobin K, Toda N, Tokuyama A, Tolibas M, Tomita A, Tomita T, Tomlinson J, Tonks L, Topf J, Topping S, Torp A, Torres A, Totaro F, Toth P, Toyonaga Y, Tripodi F, Trivedi K, Tropman E, Tschope D, Tse J, Tsuji K, Tsunekawa S, Tsunoda R, Tucky B, Tufail S, Tuffaha A, Turan E, Turner H, Turner J, Turner M, Tuttle KR, Tye YL, Tyler A, Tyler J, Uchi H, Uchida H, Uchida T, Uchida T, Udagawa T, Ueda S, Ueda Y, Ueki K, Ugni S, Ugwu E, Umeno R, Unekawa C, Uozumi K, Urquia K, Valleteau A, Valletta C, van Erp R, Vanhoy C, Varad V, Varma R, Varughese A, Vasquez P, Vasseur A, Veelken R, Velagapudi C, Verdel K, Vettoretti S, Vezzoli G, Vielhauer V, Viera R, Vilar E, Villaruel S, Vinall L, Vinathan J, Visnjic M, Voigt E, von-Eynatten M, Vourvou M, Wada J, Wada J, Wada T, Wada Y, Wakayama K, Wakita Y, Wallendszus K, Walters T, Wan Mohamad WH, Wang L, Wang W, Wang X, Wang X, Wang Y, Wanner C, Wanninayake S, Watada H, Watanabe K, Watanabe K, Watanabe M, Waterfall H, Watkins D, Watson S, Weaving L, Weber B, Webley Y, Webster A, Webster M, Weetman M, Wei W, Weihprecht H, Weiland L, Weinmann-Menke J, Weinreich T, Wendt R, Weng Y, Whalen M, Whalley G, Wheatley R, Wheeler A, Wheeler J, Whelton P, White K, Whitmore B, Whittaker S, Wiebel J, Wiley J, Wilkinson L, Willett M, Williams A, Williams E, Williams K, Williams T, Wilson A, Wilson P, Wincott L, Wines E, Winkelmann B, Winkler M, Winter-Goodwin B, Witczak J, Wittes J, Wittmann M, Wolf G, Wolf L, Wolfling R, Wong C, Wong E, Wong HS, Wong LW, Wong YH, Wonnacott A, Wood A, Wood L, Woodhouse H, Wooding N, Woodman A, Wren K, Wu J, Wu P, Xia S, Xiao H, Xiao X, Xie Y, Xu C, Xu Y, Xue H, Yahaya H, Yalamanchili H, Yamada A, Yamada N, Yamagata K, Yamaguchi M, Yamaji Y, Yamamoto A, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto T, Yamanaka A, Yamano T, Yamanouchi Y, Yamasaki N, Yamasaki Y, Yamasaki Y, Yamashita C, Yamauchi T, Yan Q, Yanagisawa E, Yang F, Yang L, Yano S, Yao S, Yao Y, Yarlagadda S, Yasuda Y, Yiu V, Yokoyama T, Yoshida S, Yoshidome E, Yoshikawa H, Young A, Young T, Yousif V, Yu H, Yu Y, Yuasa K, Yusof N, Zalunardo N, Zander B, Zani R, Zappulo F, Zayed M, Zemann B, Zettergren P, Zhang H, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang N, Zhang X, Zhao J, Zhao L, Zhao S, Zhao Z, Zhong H, Zhou N, Zhou S, Zhu D, Zhu L, Zhu S, Zietz M, Zippo M, Zirino F, Zulkipli FH. Impact of primary kidney disease on the effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease: secondary analyses of the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024;12:51-60. [PMID: 38061372 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00322-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The EMPA-KIDNEY trial showed that empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome of kidney disease progression or cardiovascular death in patients with chronic kidney disease mainly through slowing progression. We aimed to assess how effects of empagliflozin might differ by primary kidney disease across its broad population.

METHODS

EMPA-KIDNEY, a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, was conducted at 241 centres in eight countries (Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the UK, and the USA). Patients were eligible if their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 20 to less than 45 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or 45 to less than 90 mL/min per 1·73 m2 with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) of 200 mg/g or higher at screening. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to 10 mg oral empagliflozin once daily or matching placebo. Effects on kidney disease progression (defined as a sustained ≥40% eGFR decline from randomisation, end-stage kidney disease, a sustained eGFR below 10 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or death from kidney failure) were assessed using prespecified Cox models, and eGFR slope analyses used shared parameter models. Subgroup comparisons were performed by including relevant interaction terms in models. EMPA-KIDNEY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594110.

FINDINGS

Between May 15, 2019, and April 16, 2021, 6609 participants were randomly assigned and followed up for a median of 2·0 years (IQR 1·5-2·4). Prespecified subgroupings by primary kidney disease included 2057 (31·1%) participants with diabetic kidney disease, 1669 (25·3%) with glomerular disease, 1445 (21·9%) with hypertensive or renovascular disease, and 1438 (21·8%) with other or unknown causes. Kidney disease progression occurred in 384 (11·6%) of 3304 patients in the empagliflozin group and 504 (15·2%) of 3305 patients in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·62-0·81]), with no evidence that the relative effect size varied significantly by primary kidney disease (pheterogeneity=0·62). The between-group difference in chronic eGFR slopes (ie, from 2 months to final follow-up) was 1·37 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (95% CI 1·16-1·59), representing a 50% (42-58) reduction in the rate of chronic eGFR decline. This relative effect of empagliflozin on chronic eGFR slope was similar in analyses by different primary kidney diseases, including in explorations by type of glomerular disease and diabetes (p values for heterogeneity all >0·1).

INTERPRETATION

In a broad range of patients with chronic kidney disease at risk of progression, including a wide range of non-diabetic causes of chronic kidney disease, empagliflozin reduced risk of kidney disease progression. Relative effect sizes were broadly similar irrespective of the cause of primary kidney disease, suggesting that SGLT2 inhibitors should be part of a standard of care to minimise risk of kidney failure in chronic kidney disease.

FUNDING

Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and UK Medical Research Council.

Collapse

Nadarajah R, Ludman P, Appelman Y, Brugaletta S, Budaj A, Bueno H, Huber K, Kunadian V, Leonardi S, Lettino M, Milasinovic D, Gale CP, Budaj A, Dagres N, Danchin N, Delgado V, Emberson J, Friberg O, Gale CP, Heyndrickx G, Iung B, James S, Kappetein AP, Maggioni AP, Maniadakis N, Nagy KV, Parati G, Petronio AS, Pietila M, Prescott E, Ruschitzka F, Van de Werf F, Weidinger F, Zeymer U, Gale CP, Beleslin B, Budaj A, Chioncel O, Dagres N, Danchin N, Emberson J, Erlinge D, Glikson M, Gray A, Kayikcioglu M, Maggioni AP, Nagy KV, Nedoshivin A, Petronio AP, Roos-Hesselink JW, Wallentin L, Zeymer U, Popescu BA, Adlam D, Caforio ALP, Capodanno D, Dweck M, Erlinge D, Glikson M, Hausleiter J, Iung B, Kayikcioglu M, Ludman P, Lund L, Maggioni AP, Matskeplishvili S, Meder B, Nagy KV, Nedoshivin A, Neglia D, Pasquet AA, Roos-Hesselink JW, Rossello FJ, Shaheen SM, Torbica A, Gale CP, Ludman PF, Lettino M, Bueno H, Huber K, Leonardi S, Budaj A, Milasinovic (Serbia) D, Brugaletta S, Appelman Y, Kunadian V, Al Mahmeed WAR, Kzhdryan H, Dumont C, Geppert A, Bajramovic NS, Cader FA, Beauloye C, Quesada D, Hlinomaz O, Liebetrau C, Marandi T, Shokry K, Bueno H, Kovacevic M, Crnomarkovic B, Cankovic M, Dabovic D, Jarakovic M, Pantic T, Trajkovic M, Pupic L, Ruzicic D, Cvetanovic D, Mansourati J, Obradovic I, Stankovic M, Loh PH, Kong W, Poh KK, Sia CH, Saw K, Liška D, Brozmannová D, Gbur M, Gale CP, Maxian R, Kovacic D, Poznic NG, Keric T, Kotnik G, Cercek M, Steblovnik K, Sustersic M, Cercek AC, Djokic I, Maisuradze D, Drnovsek B, Lipar L, Mocilnik M, Pleskovic A, Lainscak M, Crncic D, Nikojajevic I, Tibaut M, Cigut M, Leskovar B, Sinanis T, Furlan T, Grilj V, Rezun M, Mateo VM, Anguita MJF, Bustinza ICM, Quintana RB, Cimadevilla OCF, Fuertes J, Lopez F, Dharma S, Martin MD, Martinez L, Barrabes JA, Bañeras J, Belahnech Y, Ferreira-Gonzalez I, Jordan P, Lidon RM, Mila L, Sambola A, Orvin K, Sionis A, Bragagnini W, Cambra AD, Simon C, Burdeus MV, Ariza-Solé A, Alegre O, Alsina M, Ferrando JIL, Bosch X, Sinha A, Vidal P, Izquierdo M, Marin F, Esteve-Pastor MA, Tello-Montoliu A, Lopez-Garcia C, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Gil-Pérez P, Nicolas-Franco S, Keituqwa I, Farhan HA, Silva L, Blasco A, Escudier JM, Ortega J, Zamorano JL, Sanmartin M, Pereda DC, Rincon LM, Gonzalez P, Casado T, Sadeghipour P, Lopez-Sendon JL, Manjavacas AMI, Marin LAM, Sotelo LR, Rodriguez SOR, Bueno H, Martin R, Maruri R, Moreno G, Moris C, Gudmundsdottir I, Avanzas P, Ayesta A, Junco-Vicente A, Cubero-Gallego H, Pascual I, Sola NB, Rodriguez OA, Malagon L, Martinez-Basterra J, Arizcuren AM, Indolfi C, Romero J, Calleja AG, Fuertes DG, Crespín Crespín M, Bernal FJC, Ojeda FB, Padron AL, Cabeza MM, Vargas CM, Yanes G, Kitai T, Gonzalez MJG, Gonzalez Gonzalez J, Jorge P, De La Fuente B, Bermúdez MG, Perez-Lopez CMB, Basiero AB, Ruiz AC, Pamias RF, Chamero PS, Mirrakhimov E, Hidalgo-Urbano R, Garcia-Rubira JC, Seoane-Garcia T, Arroyo-Monino DF, Ruiz AB, Sanz-Girgas E, Bonet G, Rodríguez-López J, Scardino C, De Sousa D, Gustiene O, Elbasheer E, Humida A, Mahmoud H, Mohamed A, Hamid E, Hussein S, Abdelhameed M, Ali T, Ali Y, Eltayeb M, Philippe F, Ali M, Almubarak E, Badri M, Altaher S, Alla MD, Dellborg M, Dellborg H, Hultsberg-Olsson G, Marjeh YB, Abdin A, Erglis A, Alhussein F, Mgazeel F, Hammami R, Abid L, Bahloul A, Charfeddine S, Ellouze T, Canpolat U, Oksul M, Muderrisoglu H, Popovici M, Karacaglar E, Akgun A, Ari H, Ari S, Can V, Tuncay B, Kaya H, Dursun L, Kalenderoglu K, Tasar O, Kalpak O, Kilic S, Kucukosmanoglu M, Aytekin V, Baydar O, Demirci Y, Gürsoy E, Kilic A, Yildiz Ö, Arat-Ozkan A, Sinan UY, Dagva M, Gungor B, Sekerci SS, Zeren G, Erturk M, Demir AR, Yildirim C, Can C, Kayikcioglu M, Yagmur B, Oney S, Xuereb RG, Sabanoglu C, Inanc IH, Ziyrek M, Sen T, Astarcioglu MA, Kahraman F, Utku O, Celik A, Surmeli AO, Basaran O, Ahmad WAW, Demirbag R, Besli F, Gungoren F, Ingabire P, Mondo C, Ssemanda S, Semu T, Mulla AA, Atos JS, Wajid I, Appelman Y, Al Mahmeed WAR, Atallah B, Bakr K, Garrod R, Makia F, Eldeeb F, Abdekader R, Gomaa A, Kandasamy S, Maruthanayagam R, Nadar SK, Nakad G, Nair R, Mota P, Prior P, Mcdonald S, Rand J, Schumacher N, Abraheem A, Clark M, Coulding M, Qamar N, Turner V, Negahban AQ, Crew A, Hope S, Howson J, Jones S, Lancaster N, Nicholson A, Wray G, Donnelly P, Gierlotka M, Hammond L, Hammond S, Regan S, Watkin R, Papadopoulos C, Ludman P, Hutton K, Macdonald S, Nilsson A, Roberts S, Monteiro S, Garg S, Balachandran K, Mcdonald J, Singh R, Marsden K, Davies K, Desai H, Goddard W, Iqbal N, Chalil S, Dan GA, Galasko G, Assaf O, Benham L, Brown J, Collins S, Fleming C, Glen J, Mitchell M, Preston S, Uttley A, Radovanovic M, Lindsay S, Akhtar N, Atkinson C, Vinod M, Wilson A, Clifford P, Firoozan S, Yashoman M, Bowers N, Chaplin J, Reznik EV, Harvey S, Kononen M, Lopesdesousa G, Saraiva F, Sharma S, Cruddas E, Law J, Young E, Hoye A, Harper P, Balghith M, Rowe K, Been M, Cummins H, French E, Gibson C, Abraham JA, Hobson S, Kay A, Kent M, Wilkinson A, Mohamed A, Clark S, Duncan L, Ahmed IM, Khatiwada D, Mccarrick A, Wanda I, Read P, Afsar A, Rivers V, Theobald T, Cercek M, Bell S, Buckman C, Francis R, Peters G, Stables R, Morgan M, Noorzadeh M, Taylor B, Twiss S, Widdows P, Brozmannová D, Wilkinson V, Black M, Clark A, Clarkson N, Currie J, George L, Mcgee C, Izzat L, Lewis T, Omar Z, Aytekin V, Phillips S, Ahmed F, Mackie S, Oommen A, Phillips H, Sherwood M, Aleti S, Charles T, Jose M, Kolakaluri L, Ingabire P, Karoudi RA, Deery J, Hazelton T, Knight A, Price C, Turney S, Kardos A, Williams F, Wren L, Bega G, Alyavi B, Scaletta D, Kunadian V, Cullen K, Jones S, Kirkup E, Ripley DP, Matthews IG, Mcleod A, Runnett C, Thomas HE, Cartasegna L, Gunarathne A, Burton J, King R, Quinn J, Sobolewska J, Munt S, Porter J, Christenssen V, Leng K, Peachey T, Gomez VN, Temple N, Wells K, Viswanathan G, Taneja A, Cann E, Eglinton C, Hyams B, Jones E, Reed F, Smith J, Beltrano C, Affleck DC, Turner A, Ward T, Wilmshurst N, Stirrup J, Brunton M, Whyte A, Smith S, Murray V, Walker R, Novas V, Weston C, Brown C, Collier D, Curtis K, Dixon K, Wells T, Trim F, Ghosh J, Mavuri M, Barman L, Dumont C, Elliott K, Harrison R, Mallinson J, Neale T, Smith J, Toohie J, Turnbull A, Parker E, Hossain R, Cheeseman M, Balparda H, Hill J, Hood M, Hutchinson D, Mellows K, Pendlebury C, Storey RF, Barker J, Birchall K, Denney H, Housley K, Cardona M, Middle J, Kukreja N, Gati S, Kirk P, Lynch M, Srinivasan M, Szygula J, Baker P, Cruz C, Derigay J, Cigalini C, Lamb K, Nembhard S, Price A, Mamas M, Massey I, Wain J, Delaney J, Junejo S, Martin K, Obaid D, Hoyle V, Brinkworth E, Davies C, Evans D, Richards S, Thomas C, Williams M, Dayer M, Mills H, Roberts K, Goodchild F, Dámaso ES, Greig N, Kundu S, Donaldson D, Tonks L, Beekes M, Button H, Hurford F, Motherwell N, Summers-Wall J, Felmeden D, Tapia V, Keeling P, Sheikh U, Yonis A, Felmeden L, Hughes D, Micklewright L, Summerhayes A, Sutton J, Panoulas V, Prendergast C, Poghosyan K, Rogers P, Barker LN, Batin P, Conway D, Exley D, Fletcher A, Wright J, Nageh T, Hadebe B, Kunhunny S, Mkhitaryan S, Mshengu E, Karthikeyan VJ, Hamdan H, Cooper J, Dandy C, Parkinson V, Paterson P, Reddington S, Taylor T, Tierney C, Adamyan M, Jones KV, Broadley A, Beesley K, Buckley C, Hellyer C, Pippard L, Pitt-Kerby T, Azam J, Hayes C, Freshwater K, Boyadjian S, Johnson L, Mcgill Y, Redfearn H, Russell M, Alyavi A, Alyavi B, Uzokov J, Hayrapetyan H, Azaryan K, Tadevosyan M, Poghosyan H, Kzhdryan H, Vardanyan A, Huber K, Geppert A, Ahmed A, Weidinger F, Derntl M, Hasun M, Schuh-Eiring T, Riegler L, Haq MM, Cader FA, Dewan MAM, Fatema ME, Hasan AS, Islam MM, Khandoker F, Mayedah R, Nizam SU, Azam MG, Arefin MM, Jahan J, Schelfaut D, De Raedt H, Wouters S, Aerts S, Batjoens H, Beauloye C, Dechamps M, Pierard S, Van Caenegem O, Sinnaeve F, Claeys MJ, Snepvangers M, Somers V, Gevaert S, Schaubroek H, Vervaet P, Buysse M, Renders F, Dumoulein M, Hiltrop N, De Coninck M, Naessens S, Senesael I, Hoffer E, Pourbaix S, Beckers J, Dugauquier C, Jacquet S, Malmendier D, Massoz M, Evrard P, Collard L, Brunner P, Carlier S, Blockmans M, Mayne D, Timiras E, Guédès A, Demeure F, Hanet C, Domange J, Jourdan K, Begic E, Custovic F, Dozic A, Hrvat E, Kurbasic I, Mackic D, Subo A, Durak-Nalbantic A, Dzubur A, Rebic D, Hamzic-Mehmedbasic A, Redzepovic A, Djokic-Vejzovic A, Hodzic E, Hujdur M, Musija E, Gljiva-Gogic Z, Serdarevic N, Bajramovic NS, Brigic L, Halilcevic M, Cibo M, Hadžibegic N, Kukavica N, Begic A, Iglica A, Osmanagic A, Resic N, Grgurevic MV, Zvizdic F, Pojskic B, Mujaric E, Selimovic H, Ejubovic M, Pojskic L, Stimjanin E, Sut M, Zapata PS, Munoz CG, Andrade LAF, Upegui MPT, Perez LE, Chavarria J, Quesada D, Alvarado K, Zaputovic L, Tomulic V, Gobic D, Jakljevic T, Lulic D, Bacic G, Bastiancic L, Avraamides P, Eftychiou C, Eteocleous N, Ioannou A, Lambrianidi C, Drakomathioulakis M, Groch L, Hlinomaz O, Rezek M, Semenka J, Sitar J, Beranova M, Kramarikova P, Pesl L, Sindelarova S, Tousek F, Warda HM, Ghaly I, Habiba S, Habib A, Gergis MN, Bahaa H, Samir A, Taha HSE, Adel M, Algamal HM, Mamdouh M, Shaker AF, Shokry K, Konsoah A, Mostafa AM, Ibrahim A, Imam A, Hafez B, Zahran A, Abdelhamid M, Mahmoud K, Mostafa A, Samir A, Abdrabou M, Kamal A, Sallam S, Ali A, Maghraby K, Atta AR, Saad A, Ali M, Lotman EM, Lubi R, Kaljumäe H, Uuetoa T, Kiitam U, Durier C, Ressencourt O, El Din AA, Guiatni A, Bras ML, Mougenot E, Labeque JN, Banos JL, Capendeguy O, Mansourati J, Fofana A, Augagneur M, Bahon L, Pape AL, Batias-Moreau L, Fluttaz A, Good F, Prieur F, Boiffard E, Derien AS, Drapeau I, Roy N, Perret T, Dubreuil O, Ranc S, Rio S, Bonnet JL, Bonnet G, Cuisset T, Deharo P, Mouret JP, Spychaj JC, Blondelon A, Delarche N, Decalf V, Guillard N, Hakme A, Roger MP, Biron Y, Druelles P, Loubeyre C, Lucon A, Hery P, Nejjari M, Digne F, Huchet F, Neykova A, Tzvetkov B, Larrieu M, Quaino G, Armangau P, Sauguet A, Bonfils L, Dumonteil N, Fajadet J, Farah B, Honton B, Monteil B, Philippart R, Tchetche D, Cottin M, Petit F, Piquart A, Popovic B, Varlot J, Maisuradze D, Sagirashvili E, Kereselidze Z, Totladze L, Ginturi T, Lagvilava D, Hamm C, Liebetrau C, Haas M, Hamm C, Koerschgen T, Weferling M, Wolter JS, Maier K, Nickenig G, Sedaghat A, Zachoval C, Lampropoulos K, Mpatsouli A, Sakellaropoulou A, Tyrovolas K, Zibounoumi N, Argyropoulos K, Toulgaridis F, Kolyviras A, Tzanis G, Tzifos V, Milkas A, Papaioannou S, Kyriazopoulos K, Pylarinou V, Kontonassakis I, Kotakos C, Kourgiannidis G, Ntoliou P, Parzakonis N, Pipertzi A, Sakalidis A, Ververeli CL, Kafkala K, Sinanis T, Diakakis G, Grammatikopoulos K, Papoutsaki E, Patialiatos T, Mamaloukaki M, Papadaki ST, Kanellos IE, Antoniou A, Tsinopoulos G, Goudis C, Giannadaki M, Daios S, Petridou M, Skantzis P, Koukis P, Dimitriadis F, Savvidis M, Styliadis I, Sachpekidis V, Pilalidou A, Stamatiadis N, Fotoglidis A, Karakanas A, Ruzsa Z, Becker D, Nowotta F, Gudmundsdottir I, Libungan B, Skuladottir FB, Halldorsdottir H, Shetty R, Iyengar S, Bs C, G S, Lakshmana S, S R, Tripathy N, Sinha A, Choudhary B, Kumar A, Kumar A, Raj R, Roy RS, Dharma S, Siswanto BB, Farhan HA, Yaseen IF, Al-Zaidi M, Dakhil Z, Amen S, Rasool B, Rajeeb A, Amber K, Ali HH, Al-Kinani T, Almyahi MH, Al-Obaidi F, Masoumi G, Sadeghi M, Heshmat-Ghahdarijani K, Roohafza H, Sarrafzadegan N, Shafeie M, Teimouri-Jervekani Z, Noori F, Kyavar M, Sadeghipour P, Firouzi A, Alemzadeh-Ansari MJ, Ghadrdoost B, Golpira R, Ghorbani A, Ahangari F, Salarifar M, Jenab Y, Biria A, Haghighi S, Mansouri P, Yadangi S, Kornowski R, Orvin K, Eisen A, Oginetz N, Vizel R, Kfir H, Pasquale GD, Casella G, Cardelli LS, Filippini E, Zagnoni S, Donazzan L, Ermacora D, Indolfi C, Polimeni A, Curcio A, Mongiardo A, De Rosa S, Sorrentino S, Spaccarotella C, Landolina M, Marino M, Cacucci M, Vailati L, Bernabò P, Montisci R, Meloni L, Marchetti MF, Biddau M, Garau E, Barbato E, Morisco C, Strisciuglio T, Canciello G, Lorenzoni G, Casu G, Merella P, Novo G, D'Agostino A, Di Lisi D, Di Palermo A, Evola S, Immordino F, Rossetto L, Spica G, Pavan D, Mattia AD, Belfiore R, Grandis U, Vendrametto F, Spagnolo C, Carniel L, Sonego E, Gaudio C, Barillà F, Biccire FG, Bruno N, Ferrari I, Paravati V, Torromeo C, Galasso G, Peluso A, Prota C, Radano I, Benvenga RM, Ferraioli D, Anselmi M, Frigo GM, Sinagra G, Merlo M, Perkan A, Ramani F, Altinier A, Fabris E, Rinaldi M, Usmiani T, Checco L, Frea S, Mussida M, Matsukawa R, Sugi K, Kitai T, Furukawa Y, Masumoto A, Miyoshi Y, Nishino S, Assembekov B, Amirov B, Chernokurova Y, Ibragimova F, Mirrakhimov E, Ibraimova A, Murataliev T, Radzhapova Z, Uulu ES, Zhanyshbekova N, Zventsova V, Erglis A, Bondare L, Zaliunas R, Gustiene O, Dirsiene R, Marcinkeviciene J, Sakalyte G, Virbickiene A, Baksyte G, Bardauskiene L, Gelmaniene R, Salkauskaite A, Ziubryte G, Kupstyte-Kristapone N, Badariene J, Balciute S, Kapleriene L, Lizaitis M, Marinskiene J, Navickaite A, Pilkiene A, Ramanauskaite D, Serpytis R, Silinskiene D, Simbelyte T, Staigyte J, Philippe F, Degrell P, Camus E, Ahmad WAW, Kassim ZA, Xuereb RG, Buttigieg LL, Camilleri W, Pllaha E, Xuereb S, Popovici M, Ivanov V, Plugaru A, Moscalu V, Popovici I, Abras M, Ciobanu L, Litvinenco N, Fuior S, Dumanschi C, Ivanov M, Danila T, Grib L, Filimon S, Cardaniuc L, Batrinac A, Tasnic M, Cozma C, Revenco V, Sorici G, Dagva M, Choijiljav G, Dandar E, Khurelbaatar MU, Tsognemekh B, Appelman Y, Den Hartog A, Kolste HJT, Van Den Buijs D, Van'T Hof A, Pustjens T, Houben V, Kasperski I, Ten Berg J, Azzahhafi J, Bor W, Yin DCP, Mbakwem A, Amadi C, Kushimo O, Kilasho M, Oronsaye E, Bakracheski N, Bashuroska EK, Mojsovska V, Tupare S, Dejan M, Jovanoska J, Razmoski D, Marinoski T, Antovski A, Jovanovski Z, Kocho S, Markovski R, Ristovski V, Samir AB, Biserka S, Kalpak O, Peovska IM, Taleska BZ, Pejkov H, Busljetik O, Zimbakov Z, Grueva E, Bojovski I, Tutic M, Poposka L, Vavlukis M, Al-Riyami A, Nadar SK, Abdelmottaleb W, Ahmed S, Mujtaba MS, Al-Mashari S, Al-Riyami H, Laghari AH, Faheem O, Ahmed SW, Qamar N, Furnaz S, Kazmi K, Saghir T, Aneel A, Asim A, Madiha F, Sobkowicz B, Tycinska A, Kazimierczyk E, Szyszkowska A, Mizia-Stec K, Wybraniec M, Bednarek A, Glowacki K, Prokopczuk J, Babinski W, Blachut A, Kosiak M, Kusinska A, Samborski S, Stachura J, Szastok H, Wester A, Bartoszewska D, Sosnowska-Pasiarska B, Krzysiek M, Legutko J, Nawrotek B, Kasprzak JD, Klosinska M, Wiklo K, Kurpesa M, Rechcinski T, Cieslik-Guerra U, Gierlotka M, Bugajski J, Feusette P, Sacha J, Przybylo P, Krzesinski P, Ryczek R, Karasek A, Kazmierczak-Dziuk A, Mielniczuk M, Betkier-Lipinska K, Roik M, Labyk A, Krakowian M, Machowski M, Paczynska M, Potepa M, Pruszczyk P, Budaj A, Ambroziak M, Omelanczuk-Wiech E, Torun A, Opolski G, Glowczynska R, Fojt A, Kowalik R, Huczek Z, Jedrzejczyk S, Roleder T, Brust K, Gasior M, Desperak P, Hawranek M, Farto-Abreu P, Santos M, Baptista S, Brizida L, Faria D, Loureiro J, Magno P, Monteiro C, Nédio M, Tavares J, Sousa C, Almeida I, Almeida S, Miranda H, Santos H, Santos AP, Goncalves L, Monteiro S, Baptista R, Ferreira C, Ferreira J, Goncalves F, Lourenço C, Monteiro P, Picarra B, Santos AR, Guerreiro RA, Carias M, Carrington M, Pais J, de Figueiredo MP, Rocha AR, Mimoso J, De Jesus I, Fernandes R, Guedes J, Mota T, Mendes M, Ferreira J, Tralhão A, Aguiar CT, Strong C, Da Gama FF, Pais G, Timóteo AT, Rosa SAO, Mano T, Reis J, Selas M, Mendes DE, Satendra M, Pinto P, Queirós C, Oliveira I, Reis L, Cruz I, Fernandes R, Torres S, Luz A, Campinas A, Costa R, Frias A, Oliveira M, Martins V, Castilho B, Coelho C, Moura AR, Cotrim N, Dos Santos RC, Custodio P, Duarte R, Gomes R, Matias F, Mendonca C, Neiva J, Rabacal C, Almeida AR, Caeiro D, Queiroz P, Silva G, Pop-Moldovan AL, Darabantiu D, Mercea S, Dan GA, Dan AR, Dobranici M, Popescu RA, Adam C, Sinescu CJ, Andrei CL, Brezeanu R, Samoila N, Baluta MM, Pop D, Tomoaia R, Istratoaie O, Donoiu I, Cojocaru A, Oprita OC, Rocsoreanu A, Grecu M, Ailoaei S, Popescu MI, Cozma A, Babes EE, Rus M, Ardelean A, Larisa R, Moisi M, Ban E, Buzle A, Filimon G, Dobreanu D, Lupu S, Mitre A, Rudzik R, Sus I, Opris D, Somkereki C, Mornos C, Petrescu L, Betiu A, Volcescu A, Ioan O, Luca C, Maximov D, Mosteoru S, Pascalau L, Roman C, Brie D, Crisan S, Erimescu C, Falnita L, Gaita D, Gheorghiu M, Levashov S, Redkina M, Novitskii N, Dementiev E, Baglikov A, Zateyshchikov D, Zubova E, Rogozhina A, Salikov A, Nikitin I, Reznik EV, Komissarova MS, Shebzukhova M, Shitaya K, Stolbova S, Larina V, Akhmatova F, Chuvarayan G, Arefyev MN, Averkov OV, Volkova AL, Sepkhanyan MS, Vecherko VI, Meray I, Babaeva L, Goreva L, Pisaryuk A, Potapov P, Teterina M, Ageev F, Silvestrova G, Fedulaev Y, Pinchuk T, Staroverov I, Kalimullin D, Sukhinina T, Zhukova N, Ryabov V, Kruchinkina E, Vorobeva D, Shevchenko I, Budyak V, Elistratova O, Fetisova E, Islamov R, Ponomareva E, Khalaf H, Shaimaa AA, Kamal W, Alrahimi J, Elshiekh A, Balghith M, Ahmed A, Attia N, Jamiel AA, Potpara T, Marinkovic M, Mihajlovic M, Mujovic N, Kocijancic A, Mijatovic Z, Radovanovic M, Matic D, Milosevic A, Savic L, Subotic I, Uscumlic A, Zlatic N, Antonijevic J, Vesic O, Vucic R, Martinovic SS, Kostic T, Atanaskovic V, Mitic V, Stanojevic D, Petrovic M. Cohort profile: the ESC EURObservational Research Programme Non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (NSTEMI) Registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2022;9:8-15. [PMID: 36259751 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]

Sano M, Toyota T, Morimoto T, Okada T, Sasaki Y, Taniguchi T, Kim K, Kobori A, Ehara N, Kinoshita M, Doi A, Tomii K, Kihara Y, Furukawa Y. Prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 using high-sensitive troponin I and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.2309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Several comorbidities, including cardiovascular diseases or myocardial injury, are reported to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, detailed prognostic analysis of myocardial injury by various biomarkers in COVID-19 patients is limited. Purpose This study aims to explore the prognostic values of high-sensitive Troponin I (hsTnI) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for COVID-19 patients using Japanese real-world data. Methods The COVID-MI study is a retrospective cohort study that enrolls consecutive laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted to the hospital from July 2020 to September 2021. We collected clinical data, including cardiac biomarker values, by chart review. If the prespecified biomarkers in concern were not available, we measured them using the institutional serum blood bank, which enrolled patients prospectively from July 2020. Patients with available biomarkers were analyzed according to the values of hsTnI or NT-proBNP, using the clinically relevant thresholds (hsTnI: 5 ng/L and 99th percentile of the upper reference limit [99%ile URL], and NT-proBNP: 125 pg/mL and 900 pg/mL). The primary outcome measure was all-cause death. Secondary outcome measures included acute respiratory distress syndrome, myocardial infarction, myocarditis/pericarditis, venous thromboembolism, cerebral infarction, and bleeding events. Results We enrolled 917 patients with COVID-19 confirmed by viral nucleic acid amplification test. The mean age was 61 years, and 591 patients (64%) were men. On admission, the number of patients classified as severe or critical COVID-19 was 515 (56%) and 85 (8.7%), respectively. Among the 544 patients with hsTnI values, 365 (67%) patients had elevated hsTnI of ≥5 ng/L, and 134 patients (25%) had TnI of ≥99%ile URL. Besides, among 546 patients with NT-proBNP values, 295 patients (54%) had elevated NT-pro-BNP of ≥125 pg/mL, and 93 patients (17%) had NT-proBNP of ≥900 pg/mL. The median follow-up period was 31 days (interquartile range: 11–90 days). In cumulative incidence analysis, higher levels of hsTnI and NT-proBNP were associated with significantly higher mortality (hsTnI: <5 ng/L group; 8.8%, 5 ng/L to 99%ile URL group; 19%, and ≥99%ile URL group; 37%, P<0.001, and NT-proBNP: <125 pg/mL group; 7.8%, 125 to 900 pg/mL group; 21%, and ≥900 pg/mL group; 45%, P<0.001). The adjusted risk for all-cause death remained significant for each threshold of cardiac biomarkers (hsTnI ≥99%ile URL: hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–3.54, P=0.02, and NT-proBNP ≥900 pg/mL: HR 3.60, 95% CI 1.86–6.98, P<0.001). Conclusion Elevation of hsTnI or NT-proBNP was associated with poor prognosis in the current relatively severely ill COVID-19 patients. Measuring hsTnI or NT-proBNP can be an attractive option for risk stratification and deciding appropriate management in patients with COVID-19. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Institutional Research Fund at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Collapse

Okada M, Inoue K, Tanaka N, Masuda M, Furukawa Y, Hirata A, Egami Y, Watanabe T, Minamiguchi H, Miyoshi M, Sunaga A, Sotomi Y, Dohi T, Shungo H, Sakata Y. Impact of heart rate reduction on recurrence after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab849.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Johnson & Johnson KK OnBehalf OCVC Arrhythmia Investigators Background Predicting heart rate (HR) after restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) remains one of the challenges when performing catheter ablation (CA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Purpose To evaluate the association between pre-ablation HR during AF and post-ablation HR during SR, and whether the HR reduction is associated with AF recurrence. Methods The analysis was performed from the EARNEST-PVI trial, a randomized controlled trial designed to assess a CA strategy for persistent AF, which was conducted in the Osaka region of Japan. After excluding patients with beta-blocker prescription, a total of 216 patients (median age, 67 years; 20% female; 23% long-standing persistent AF) with AF rhythm at baseline and SR at discharge were enrolled in this study. Baseline HR during AF and post-ablation HR during SR was measured on admission and at discharge using the 12-lead electrocardiograms, respectively. Results There was a mild correlation between baseline HR (median 82 [interquartile range 72-95] bpm) and post-ablation HR (78 [48-117] bpm) (r = 0.27, p <0.001). Reduction in HR was positively associated with baseline HR (r = 0.79, p <0.001) and was negatively associated with post-ablation HR (r = - 0.37, p <0.001). During the follow-up of 1 year, 56 patients (25.9%) experienced AF recurrence. HR reduction had the higher diagnostic accuracy in predicting AF recurrence than HR at baseline and HR after CA (area under the curve, 0.625; 95% confidence interval, 0.557–0.690; p = 0.003). AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in 141 patients with smaller HR reduction (cut-off, <14bpm) than those with larger HR reduction (31.9% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.009). After adjustment of age, gender, long-standing persistent AF, and CA strategy, HR reduction of <14 bpm was a significant predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.20–4.51; p = 0.013). Conclusions There was a mild correlation between HR during AF and HR after restoration of SR in patients underwent CA of persistent AF. HR reduction after restoration of SR predicted AF recurrence. Collapse

Ito S, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Ueda K, Fukunami M. Prognostic value of sarcopenia and malnutrition in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Sarcopenia and malnutrition are associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with chronic heart failure. However, there is little information available on the prognostic significance of the combination of sarcopenia and malnutrition in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), relating to reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF). Methods We prospectively studied 543 consecutive ADHF patients who survived to discharge (HFrEF [LVEF <45%] n=245 and HFpEF [LVEF≥45%] n=298). At the discharge, sarcopenia and malnutrition was evaluated by free-fat mass index (FFMI) and geriatric nutrition risk index (GNRI), respectively. FFMI was calculated as follows: FFMI = (7.38 + 0.02908 × urinary creatinine [mg/day])/ (height in meter)2. Sarcopenia was defined as FFMI <17 kg/m2 in men and <15 kg/m2 in women. GNRI was calculated as follows: 14.89 × serum albumin (g/dl) + 41.7 × BMI/22, and malnutrition was defined as GNRI<92. The endpoint was all-cause death. Results During a follow-up period of 2.8±1.4 years, 161 patients had all-cause death. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that both FFMI and GNRI were independently associated with all-cause death in both HFrEF (p=0.0064 and p<0.0001, respectively) and HFpEF patients (p=0.0140 and p=0.0007, respectively) after adjustment for relevant baseline clinical and study characteristics. In HFrEF, patients with both sarcopenia and malnutrition had a significantly higher risk of the total mortality than those with either or none of them. On the other hand, in HFpEF, patients with both and either sarcopenia or malnutrition had a significantly higher risk of the total mortality than those with none of them, while there was no significant difference in the risk between both and either sarcopenia or malnutrition. Conclusions Sarcopenia or malnutrition at discharge was associated with all-cause death even in ADHF patients, irrespective of reduced or preserved LVEF. The combination of sarcopenia and malnutrition could provide prognostic information in ADHF patients with reduced LVEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1 Collapse

Okada M, Inoue K, Tanaka N, Masuda M, Furukawa Y, Hirata A, Egami Y, Watanabe T, Minamiguchi H, Miyoshi M, Sunaga A, Sotomi Y, Dohi T, Hikoso S, Sakata Y. Reappraising the role of baseline plasma C-reactive protein levels on recurrence after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: insight from EARNEST-PVI trial. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Subclinical inflammation is an important pathogenesis of developing and sustaining atrial fibrillation (AF). Because AF itself contribute to the inflammatory response, the role of baseline subclinical inflammation on AF recurrence after catheter ablation (CA) remains controversial in patients with persistent AF. Purpose To evaluate whether baseline plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, a sensitive marker of inflammation, are associated with AF recurrence following CA. Methods The analysis was performed from the EARNEST-PVI trial, a randomized controlled trial designed to assess a CA strategy for persistent AF, which was conducted in the Osaka region of Japan. A total of 441 patients (median age, 67 years; 26% female; 25% long-standing persistent AF) whose plasma CRP levels were measured at baseline were included in this study. Results At baseline, a median (interquartile range) of plasma CRP level was 0.10 [0.06–0.19] mg/dl. Plasma CRP levels significantly increased at discharge (0.83 [0.21–1.84] mg/dl, p<0.001) and decreased 1 year after CA (0.10 [0.05–0.20] mg/dl, p=0.040) compared to the baseline value. During the follow-up of 1 year, 115 patients (26%) experienced AF recurrence, and the incidence was significantly higher in 124 patients with low CRP levels at baseline (cut-off ≤0.06 mg/dl) than the other 317 patients (33.9% vs. 23.0%, p=0.017). After adjustment of age, gender, body mass index, long-standing persistent AF, CA strategy, and plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels, low plasma CRP levels was a significant predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–2.24; p=0.042). Conclusions Low plasma CRP levels at baseline predicted AF recurrence in the EARNEST-PVI trial. Reappraising the role of CRP on AF recurrence may be needed in patients with persistent AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Johnson & Johnson KK Collapse

Tanaka N, Inoue K, Masuda M, Furukawa Y, Hirata A, Egami Y, Watanabe T, Minamiguchi H, Miyoshi M, Okada M, Sunaga A, Sotomi Y, Dohi T, Hikoso S, Sakata Y. Renal function and arrhythmia outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation patients after catheter ablation: subanalysis of the EARNEST-PVI trial. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces the renal function. Renal dysfunction and AF often coexist. Catheter ablation (CA) of persistent AF can maintain a sinus rhythm and may improve the renal function. Purpose We sought to elucidate whether the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients with persistent AF was increased after CA, especially with the presence of an AF recurrence. Methods We enrolled 487 persistent AF patients whose eGFR data were available both before and 1-year after the CA out of 512 patients in the EARNEST-PVI trial. Results The mean age was 65±9 year and 113 patients (24.8%) had long-standing persistent AF. We compared the eGFR at baseline with that 1-year after the CA. AF recurrences were recognized in 118 patients (25.8%). The eGFR was similar between the group without recurrence and that with recurrence at baseline (without AF recurrence vs. with AF recurrence; 63.8±14.3 vs. 62.7±13.6 mL/min/1.73m2, p=0.46). In patients without AF recurrence, the G1, G2, G3a, G3b, G4, and G5 were 13 (3.8%), 198 (58.4%), 98 (28.9%), 26 (7.7%), 3 (0.9%), and 1 (0.3%), respectively at baseline. In the patients with AF recurrence, the G1, G2, G3a, G3b, G4, and G5 were 3 (2.5%), 68 (57.8%), 38 (32.2%), 6 (5.1%), 3 (2.5%), and 0 (0%), respectively at baseline. The ΔeGFR was significantly higher in the patients without AF recurrence than in those with AF recurrence (without AF recurrence vs. with AF recurrence; 5.1 [−0.3, 10.8] vs. 3.0 [−3.0, 7.6], p=0.0033). In the patients without AF recurrence, a better eGFR class at 1-year after the CA than in those before the CA was recognized in 75 patients (22.1%), while it was recognized in 19 patients (16.1%) with AF recurrences. Conclusion Successful catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF led to a better renal outcome. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was funded by Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Abbott. Collapse

Watanabe T, Yamada T, Tamaki S, Yano M, Hayashi T, Yasumura Y, Hikosou S, Sotomi Y, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Sakata Y, Fukunami M. The impact of substrate and trigger ablation for reduction of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is not uncommon in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Left atrial (LA) substrate remodeling and corresponding mitral valve annulus dilation has been reported as the most possible cause of FMR. Percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) is an effective treatment for AF. Although significant FMR could be improved by sinus restoration, patients with mitral regurgitation were more likely to experience recurrent AF post ablation, especially those with significant mitral regurgitation. There is no information available on the efficacy of CA for persistent AF in patients with FMR. Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the predictors of FMR improvement by CA and to determine the efficacy of substrate and trigger CA for persistent AF in patients with FMR. Methods We prospectively studied 512 consecutive patients admitted for persistent AF ablation from the EARNEST-PVI (Prospective Multicenter Randomized Study of Effect of Extensive Ablation on Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Pulmonary Vein Isolation) trial. On admission, enrolled patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or PVI-plus additional ablation (linear ablation or/and CFAE ablation). Of the 512 patients, we studied 94 patients with preoperative echocardiography showing moderate or greater baseline FMR. FMR grades were classified into 5 grades (0/1/2/3/4). The FMR improvement group (FMRI(+)) was defined as a case in which the FMR was improved by two or more grades compared the preoperative echocardiography and the one year follow-up examination. Results Of the 94 patients, 42 were in the PVI group and 52 were in the PVI-plus additional ablation group. There were 30 cases in the FMRI(+) group and 64 cases in the FMRI(−) group. There were no significant baseline differences in age, sinus rhythm maintenance, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, left ventricular diastolic dimension, or left atrium dimension between the FMRI(+) and FMRI(−) groups. AF duration was significantly shorter in the FMRI(+) group than FMRI(−) groups (5.8±9.4 months vs 12.4±15.4 months, p<0.0001). In addition, significantly more additional ablation cases were observed in the FMRI(+) group than in the FMRI(−) group (73.3% vs 46.8%, p=0.016). In multivariate analyses, only additional ablation was an independent predictor of FMRI (odds ratio 0.226 95% CI 0.081–0.626; p=0.004). Conclusions Catheter ablation is a valid option for the treatment of AF in patients with functional MR and additional substrate and trigger ablation were the only independent predictor of FMR improvement. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Collapse

Kanda T, Masuda M, Inoue K, Furukawa Y, Hirata A, Egami Y, Watanabe T, Minamiguchi H, Miyoshi M, Matsuda Y, Sunaga A, Sotomi Y, Dohi T, Hikoso S, Sakata Y. Differences in quality of life improvement with pulmonary vein isolation alone vs. more extensive ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: insights from the EARNEST-PVI trial. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Improving the quality of life (QoL) is one of the main purposes of catheter ablation (CA) of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). QoL improvement in persistent AF patients has not been fully clarified. The EARNEST-PVI trial was a multi-center randomized trial comparing clinical outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone and more intensive ablation in addition to PVI including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and linear ablation (PVI plus). Purpose To investigate the QoL change after persistent AF ablation and the differences between the PVI-alone strategy and the PVI plus strategy. Methods In the EARNEST-PVI trial, patients with persistent AF who underwent an initial catheter ablation (n=512) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI alone or PVI plus. Quality of life was assessed at baseline and at 12 months after ablation for AF using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. Scores were also converted to a physical health component summary (PCS), a mental health component summary (MCS) and a role/social component summary (RCS). Results In the EARNEST-PVI trial, the PVI alone strategy was associated with higher recurrence rate compared with the PVI plus additional ablation strategy. After excluding 68 patients for whom preoperative or postoperative QoL assessment was not available, 222 patients were evaluated respectively. Overall, significant improvements in PCS (46.2±11.4 to 48.7±11.4]), MCS (50.1±8.8 to 54.3±8.6) and RCS (44.6±13.3 to 48.6±11.3) occurred 12 months after ablation (P<0.001, respectively). Although significant QoL improvement occurred in both PVI alone and PLI plus strategies, the changes in PCS was greater in the PVI-plus than that in PVI-alone (3.5±10.3 vs 1.5±10.6, P=0.04). Conclusions Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation improved both physical and mental quality of life. The PVI-plus strategy showed greater improvement in physical QoL. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. QoL improvement Collapse

Kawamoto A, Furukawa Y, Fujita Y, Kobayashi S, Tobita K, Yamaguchi J, Shimizu W, Takagi G, Matsumura H, Murata N, Nakamura M, Kitano I, Yokoi H, Azuma N, Kozuki A, Obara H, Furukawa M, Sietsema W, Takagi H, Wang J, Bartel R, Losordo D. Honedra® (CLBS12) autologous CD34+ cells improve outcomes in patients with Buerger’s disease. Cytotherapy 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s146532492100390x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]

Kawai T, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Seo M, Nakamura J, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Fukunami M. A prospective, randomized, comparison of the coronary vasomotion associated with drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background It is widely known that even new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) induce coronary vasomotion abnormality. On the other hand, recent studies reported that drug-coated balloon (DCB) for native coronary artery was non-inferior to DES in medium term outcomes. However, there is no available information about vasomotion after treatment with DCB. Purpose The aim of this study was to prospectively compare coronary vasomotion in patients treated with DCB versus new-generation DES. Methods Twenty-seven patients were randomly treated with angioplasty with DCB (n=12) versus implantation of bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (BP-EES, n=15) after successful predilation. At 8 months after treatment, endothelium-dependent and -independent vasomotion were evaluated by intracoronary infusion of incremental doses of acetylcholine (for right coronary artery: low-dose 5μg, high-dose 50μg and for left coronary artery: low-dose 10μg, high-dose 100μg) and nitroglycerine (200μg). Mean luminal diameter of the distal segments, beginning 5 mm and ending 15 mm distal to the edge of the treated segment was quantitatively measured by angiography. Results Clinical and procedural characteristics were not different between two groups. Vasoconstriction after acetylcholine infusion was less pronounced in the DCB group than the BP-EES group (low-dose: 4±13% vs −4±14%, p=0.158, high-dose: −2±14% vs −28±30%, p=0.013). The response to nitroglycerin was not different between two groups (17±13% vs 18±24%, p=0.838). Conclusion Vasoconstriction after acetylcholine infusion in the peri-treated region was more pronounced in the BP-EES group than in the DCB group, which suggests that endothelial function of coronary vessel treated by DCB can be more preserved than new-generation DES. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Furukawa Y, Watanabe T, Yamada T, Morita T, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Fukunami M. Predictors of silent cerebral infarction associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Introduction Cather ablation (CA) has been identified as an effective and safe treatment option for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). One of the serious complications associated AF is cerebral infarction (CI). Recent studies reported that CA was associated with lower incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with AF. However, CA for AF itself has a potential risk of CI. Several previous studies showed that the incidence of silent CI (SCI) assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain occurred 5 to 18% during CA for AF. Recently, CA for AF made a remarkable progress in technology. However, there are few information available that the impact of 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system on the incidence of SCI. This study aimed to clarify the prevalence and predictors of SCI during CA for AF. Methods We enrolled 893 consecutive patients (male 534, age 71±10 years), who underwent CA for AF and MRI of brain 1 day after the procedure. We collected patients data such as physical examinations, blood sampling, echo cardiography, and CA data. A brain MRI was performed the next day following the procedure to identify any CIs. One-hundred and forty-six of patients used the Rhythmia® mapping system catheter, and the other mapping system such as CARTO or EnSite system used in the remaining 747 patients. Results The MRI depicted acute micro-CIs in 144 (16%) patients, but neither symptoms nor abnormal neurological findings were present in these patients. Patients with SCI had significantly higher prevalence of persistent AF (60 vs 43%, p=0.0002), CHADS2 Score (2 (1–3) vs 1 (1–2), p=0.0001), higher prevalence of previous stroke (19 vs 12%, p=0.02), larger left atrial (LA) diameter (43.2±6.4 vs 41.7±6.5mm, p=0.01), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (59.0±13.2 vs 64.2±11.3%, p≤0.0001), higher B-type natriuretic peptide level (221±236 vs 163±225 pg/dl, p≤0.0001), more Rhythmia® mapping system use (30 vs 8%, p<0.0001), and longer procedure time (129±46 vs 108±39 min, p≤0.0001) than those without SCI, while there were no significant differences in age, LA appendage flow velocity, kind of anti-coagulant agent between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis identified Rhythmia® use [odds ratio (OR) 4.26, (95% CI 2.32–7.84), p=0.0001], LVEF (OR 1.02, p=0.0059), CHADS2 score (OR 1.27, p=0.009), and procedure time (OR 1.005, p=0.04) as independent risk factors of acute SCI during CA for AF. Conclusion Acute SCI occurred about 16% after CA for AF. Rhythmia® mapping system use exhibited a higher incidence of acute SCI after catheter ablation for AF than the other mapping system use. Rhythmia® mapping system use, LVEF, CHADS2 score, and procedure time are associated with SCI relating CA for AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Kikuchi A, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kawai T, Seo M, Yasumura Y, Hayashi T, Yano M, Hikoso S, Sakata Y. Impact of simple nutrition index on the long-term mortality of acute decompensated heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: insight from PURSUIT-HFpEF registry. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background The novel nutrition index; triglyceride (TG) × total cholesterol (TG) × body weight (BW) index (TCBI) has been reported to be an easy and useful predictor for patients with coronary artery disease. However, there is no information available on the prognostic value of TCBI in patients with heart failure with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) who admitted with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods and results Data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study. PURSUIT-HFpEF study is a prospective multicenter observational study in which collaborating hospitals recorded clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome data of ADHF pts with HFpEF. We enrolled consecutive 757 HFpEF patients who admitted with ADHF from June 2016 to June 2019. TCBI was calculated by the formula; TG × TC × BW / 1000 at the discharge. After we excluded patients with in-hospital death or without sufficient data, we analyzed 419 patients. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. During a median follow up period of 1.1 (0.9–1.9) years, 59 patients died. ROC analysis revealed that TCBI at discharge was a fair discriminator for predicting all-cause mortality (AUC 0.676, sensitivity 53%, specificity 78%). Multivariate Cox proportional analysis showed that TCBI (p=0.002) was an independent predictor for all cause death after adjustment with major confounders such as age, gender, NT-proBNP, hemoglobin and serum creatinine level. We divided patients into 4 groups according to quartiles of TCBI. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher risk of all-cause death in relation to the decrease in TCBI. Conclusion TCBI, a simple and novel nutrition index, is a useful and strong long-term prognostic indicator in ADHF patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Roche Diagnositics K.K.; Fuji Film Toyoma Chemical Co. Ltd. Collapse

Tamaki S, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Yamamoto K, Fukunami M. Effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on transtubular potassium concentration gradient in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background The transtubular potassium concentration gradient (TTKG) has been reported to be a marker of renal aldosterone bioactivity, and has been shown to be a surrogate of arterial underfilling in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Moreover, high TTKG at discharge has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in ADHF patients. Empagliflozin, one of the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and cardiovascular disease. However, little is known about the effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on TTKG in T2D patients with ADHF. Purpose We sought to elucidate the effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on TTKG in T2D patients with ADHF. Methods We enrolled 58 consecutive T2D patients admitted for ADHF. On admission, enrolled patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either empagliflozin add-on therapy (EMPA(+)) or conventional glucose-lowering therapy (EMPA(−)). All patients in EMPA(+) group received empagliflozin (10 mg/day) throughout the study period. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at baseline using echocardiography. Body weight and vital signs, such as blood pressure and heart rate, were measured, and blood and urine samples were collected at baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 7 days after randomization. The TTKG was measured using the first morning urine samples collected on each day. TTKG was calculated according to the following equation: TTKG = (Ku/Ks)×(plasma osmolality/urine osmolality), where Ku is urine potassium concentration and Ks is serum potassium concentration, as previously reported. Results Thirty patients were assigned to the EMPA(+) group, and 28 patients were assigned to the EMPA(−) group. There were no significant baseline differences in LVEF, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, body mass index, or serum creatinine level between the EMPA(+) and EMPA(−) groups. TTKG did not significantly differ between the two groups at baseline. However, seven days after randomization, plasma BNP level was significantly lower in the EMPA(+) group than in the EMPA(−) group (median 227 [IQR 114–381] pg/mL vs 362 [227–554] pg/mL, p=0.0294). Furthermore, TTKG of the EMPA(+) group was significantly lower at 2, 3 and 7 days after randomization (Figure). Conclusions This study demonstrated that empagliflozin as add-on therapy can lower TTKG in T2D patients with ADHF. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Kawai T, Nakatani D, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Seo M, Nakamura J, Hikoso S, Fukunami M, Sakata Y. Role of diuretics on long-term mortality may differ in volume status in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Diuretics has been reported to have a potential for an activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, leading to a possibility of poor clinical outcome in patients with cardiovascular disease. However, few data are available on clinical impact of diuretics on long-term outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) based on plasma volume status. Methods To address the issue, a total of 3,416 survived patients with AMI who were registered to a large database of the Osaka Acute Coronary Insufficiency Study (OACIS) were studied. Plasma volume status was assessed with the estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) that was calculated at discharge as follows: actual PV = (1 − hematocrit) × [a + (b × body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41.0 in males and b=47.9 in females); ideal PV = c × body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females), and ePVS = [(actual PV − ideal PV)/ideal PV] × 100 (%). Multivariable Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were performed to account for imbalances in covariates. The endpoint was all-cause of death (ACD) within 5 years. Results During a median follow-up period of 855±656 days, 193 patients had ACD. In whole population, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality risk between patients with and without diuretics in both multivariate cox regression model and propensity score matching population. When patients were divided into 2 groups according to ePVS with a median value of 4.2%, 46 and 147 patients had ACD in groups with low ePVS and high ePVS, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that use of diuretics was independently associated with an increased risk of ACD in low ePVS group, (HR: 2.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–5.63, p=0.01), but not in high ePVS group (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.44–1.10, p=0.12). These observations were consistent in the propensity-score matched cohorts; the 5-year mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with diuretics than those without among low ePVS group (4.7% vs 1.7%, p=0.041), but not among high ePVS group (8.0% vs 10.3%, p=0.247). Conclusion Prescription of diuretics at discharge was associated with increased risk of 5-year mortality in patients with AMI without PV expansion, but not with PV expansion. The role of diuretics on long-term mortality may differ in plasma volume status. Therefore, prescription of diuretics after AMI may be considered based on plasma volume status. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Toyota T, Morimoto T, Kitai T, Park M, Sasaki Y, Kim K, Ehara N, Kobori A, Kinoshita M, Kaji S, Furukawa Y, Kimura T. Biodegradable-polymer versus durable-polymer drug eluting stents for coronary artery disease: systematic review and a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) has been developed to overcome the potential drawbacks of the first-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES). However, it is still under debate whether BP-DES is associated with superior efficacy and safety over DP-DES. Purpose We sought to compare the effects of BP-DES and DP-DES in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods We performed systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing BP-DES and DP-DES on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease using CE-mark approved drug-eluting stents (DES) with at least 1-year follow-up. We included 32 studies involving 39,686 patients (BP-DES: 21,439 patients, and DP-DES: 18,247 patients). Primary outcome measure was target vessel failure (TVF; equivalent to the composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). We performed subgroup analysis according to the DP-DES generations (newer-generation DP-DES: 15,179patients, and first-generation DP-DES: 3,068 patients), and the effects of newer-generation DP-DES was compared with the BP-DES according to the BP-DES strut thickness (Ultra-thin strut [<80μm]: 7,572 patients, Thin-strut [80–100μm]: 5,465 patients, and Thick-strut [≥80μm]: 5,876 patients). Results The odds for TVF was not significantly different between the BP-DES group and the DP-DES group in the entire study population (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.90–1.02], P=0.20). The odds for TVF was significantly low in the BP-DES group relative to the first-generation DP-DES group, however the odds were comparable between the BP-DES group and the newer-generation DP-DES group (BP-DES versus first-generation DP-DES: OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.73–0.92], P<0.001, and BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 1.00, 95% CI [0.93–1.08], P=0.99). We also found no significant differences between the BP-DES and newer-generation DP-DES, in all subgroups stratified by the BP-DES strut thickness (Ultra-thin strut BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 0.88, 95% CI [0.76–1.02], P=0.10, Thin-strut BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 1.01, 95% CI [0.90–1.13], P=0.89, and Thick strut BP-DES versus newer-generation DP-DES: OR 1.11, 95% CI [0.99–1.25], P=0.08). Conclusions In this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating clinical outcomes, there was no significant differences between BP-DES and DP-DES. We found beneficial effects of BP-DES relative to the first-generation DP-DES, however, there was no statistical differences between BP-DES and newer-generation DP-DES, irrespective of the BP-DES strut thickness. Pooled odds ratios for clinical outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Kayama K, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Kawahira M, Fukunami M. Comparative prognostic impact of ACCI and AHEAD risk score in heart failure with reduced, mid-range and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction admitted for acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Comorbidities are strongly associated with poor clinical outcome in heart failure patients (pts). The Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), which is well-known widely used comorbidity index, recently has been used as a robust prognostic model in heart failure pts. On the other hand, AHEAD risk score has been recently reported as a useful long-term risk stratification score in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) pts. Recently, a new group of heart failure pts with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been defined, separated from reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We sought to compare the prognostic value of ACCI and AHEAD score in ADHF pts, relating to HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF. Methods We prospectively studied 410 consecutive ADHF pts (HFrEF [n=143], HFmrEF [n=99] and HFpEF [n=168]) with survival discharge. ACCI contains 19 issues which was weighted according to their potential influence on mortality. AHEAD risk score is a simple index, which is range 0–5; atrial fibrillation, hemoglobin <13 mg/dL for men and 12 mg/dL for women, age >70 years, creatinine >130 μmol/L, and diabetes mellitus. The endpoint of this study was all cause death (ACD). Results During a follow-up period of 2.4±1.4 years, 119 pts had ACD (42, 29 and 48 pts in HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF, respectively). At univariate Cox analysis, ACCI and AHEAD risk score were significantly associated with ACD in each subgroup. At multivariate Cox analysis, in HFrEF pts, ACCI, but not AHEAD risk score, showed the significant and independent association with ACD. In HFmrEF, both ACCI and AHEAD risk score was significantly and independently associated with ACD and ROC analysis showed AUC of ACCI was greater than that of AHEAD risk score (0.778 [0.683–0.855] vs 0.637 [0.572–0.764], p=0.07). On the other hand, in HFpEF pts, AHEAD risk score, but not ACCI, showed the significant and independent association ACD. Conclusion ACCI provides more prognostic value in HFrEF pts, and AHEAD risk score has more prognostic value in HFpEF pts. In HFmrEF pts, both ACCI and AHEAD score might have prognostic values, although ACCI tends to be more associated with ACD than AHEAD score. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Seo M, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Fukunami M. Prognostic significance of cardiac 123I-MIBG SPECT imaging in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction, which is assessed by I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging, is associated with the poor outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Most of the literature on the use of 123I-MIBG imaging is based on planar images in patients with chronic HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), because It is technically challenging to conduct precise 123I-MIBG SPECT analysis in globally denervated heart, which is frequently observed in HFrEF patients. There was no information available on cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction evaluated by cardiac MIBG SPECT imaging in acute decompensated HF (ADHF) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFpEF). Purpose We aimed to clarify the prognostic significance of 123I-MIBG SPECT myocardial imaging in ADHF patients with HFpEF. Methods We enrolled 183 patients who were admitted for ADHF with HFpEF, discharged with survival. All patients underwent cardiac MIBG imaging at the timing of discharge. The cardiac MIBG heart to mediastinum ratio (H/M) was calculated on the early image and the delayed image (late H/M). We studied 156 patients after excluding 27 patients whose MIBG SPECT reconstruction was difficult due to too low MIBG uptake or extracardiac accumulation interference. SPECT analysis on the delayed image was conducted by using CardioBull, a fully automated software for the quantification of I-123 MIBG SPECT. All of 17 regional tracer uptake were compared with normal control database. A scoring algorithm for the evaluation of low uptake employs a 5-point scoring system as 0–4 for normal, mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal, severe abnormal, and perfusion defect, respectively. The summed severity (SSS) scores were obtained by summing the score for all segments. SSS could range from 0 to 68. The endpoint of this study is cardiac events defined as the composite of unplanned heart failure hospitalization and cardiac death. Results During a mean follow up period of 2.4±1.6 years, 60 patients reached cardiac events. SSS was significantly high in patients with than without cardiac events (20 [10–27] vs 7 [4–16], p<0.0001). SSS (p<0.0001) was significantly associated with cardiac events after multivariable Cox adjustment of age, sex, creatinine and log-transformed BNP level, although late H/M showed the significant association with the endpoint at the univariate Cox analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with high SSS (>10, defined by median) had significantly greater risk of cardiac event (56% vs 21%, Hazard ratio: 3.56 (2.00–6.33, p<0.0001). ROC curve analysis showed that area under the curve (AUC) of SSS was 0.746 [95% CI:0.670, 0.812], which was significantly higher than that of late H/M (0.618 [95% CI:0.537, 0.695]) (p=0.0159). Conclusion Cardiac MIBG SPECT imaging was useful for risk stratification in ADHF patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Kayama K, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Kawahira M, Fukunami M. Impact of comorbidity on the predictive value of cystatin-C in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure: insights from a prospective study. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Comorbidities are strongly associated with poor clinical outcome in heart failure patients. The Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI), which is well-known widely used comorbidity index, recently has been used as a robust prognostic model in heart failure patients. On the other hand, Cystatin C, as a novel and important biomarker of renal function, has been recently reported as a useful long-term risk stratification score in heart failure patients. However, there is no information available on the impact of comorbidities on the prognostic value of cystatin-C in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods We prospectively studied 458 consecutive ADHF patients with survival discharge. Patients with hemodialysis were excluded. Echocardiography and venous blood sampling were performed just before discharge and serum cystatin-C level was measured. Comorbidity was measured with the Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI). ACCI was commonly used for the evaluation of the comorbid condition which is weighted and scored, with additional points added for age. The endpoint was all-cause death (ACD). Results During a follow-up period of 2.8±1.5 years, 132 patients had ACD. At multivariate Cox analysis, ACCI (p=0.0015) and cystatin-C level (p=0.0145) were significantly and independently associated with ACD. Patients with high ACCI (≥6: determined by ROC analysis) had a significantly greater risk of ACD (37.2% vs 17.8%, p<0.0001, HR 2.45 [1.61–3.70]). In the subgroup of higher ACCI, patients with higher cystatin-C level (≥1.56: determined by ROC analysis) had a significantly higher risk of ACD (50.3% vs 23.4%). Furthermore, in the subgroup of lower ACCI, patients with higher cystatin-C level had also significantly higher risk of ACD (34.2% vs 12.1%). Conclusions The prognostic value of cystatin-C is not affected by comorbidities and cystatin-C provide prognostic information even in patients admitted for ADHF, irrespective of comorbid burden. All-cause death-free rate in ADHF pts Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Kawasaki M, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Fukunami M, Yasumura Y, Hayashi T, Yano M, Hikoso S, Sakata Y. Prognostic value of nutritional status in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with and without atrial fibrillation: insights From PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Malnutrition is one of the most important comorbidities among heart failure (HF) patients, and serum cholinesterase (CHE) has been reported to be a prognostic factor in HF patients. On the other hand, atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently observed in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, there is little information available on the prognostic value of nutritional status in HFpEF patients, with and without AF. We sought to clarify the prognostic value of CHE in HFpEF with and without AF and compare it with that of other nutrition indices such as gastric nutritional risk index (GNRI), controlling nutritional status (CONUT), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI). Methods and results Patients data were extracted from The Prospective mUlticenteR obServational stUdy of patIenTs with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (PURSUIT HFpEF) study, which is a prospective multicenter observational registry for acute decompensated heart failure patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% in Osaka. We analyzed 380 patients (median age: 80 [75–87] years, male: 46%) after exclusion of patients with in-hospital death, missing follow-up data, or missing data to calculate nutritional indices. On admission, 155 patients had AF. Laboratory data were obtained at discharge. During a mean follow up period of 1.1±0.6 years, 131 patients had a composite endpoint (CE) of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening heart failure or cerebrovascular disorder. In multivariate Cox analysis, in patients with AF, CHE was significantly associated with CE independently of age, gender and body mass index after the adjustment with serum albumin, total cholesterol levels and total lymphocyte count, while it was not significantly associated with CE in patients without AF. C-index of CHE (0.708) was higher than that of GNRI (0.555, p=0.0028), CONUT (0.651, p=0.208) and PNI (0.635, p=0.208) in AF patients, while there were no significant differences in those nutritional indices in patients without AF. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that AF patients with lower CHE (<208 U/L = median value) had higher risk of CE than those with higher CHE (44% vs 18%, adjusted HR 3.26 95% CI [1.66–6.67], p=0.0005), while there was no significant difference in the occurrence rate of CE between patients with and without higher CHE in non-AF group (42% vs 31%, adjusted HR 1.28 95% CI [0.78–2.13], p=0.33). Conclusions Prognostic value of CHE would be stronger than other nutritional indices in HFpEF patients with AF, while it would be weak in HFpEF patients without AF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): Roche Diagnostics K.K.; Fuji Film Toyama Chemical Co. Ltd. Collapse

Seo M, Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Fukunami M. Long-term serial changes of cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction in acute decompensated heart failure patients with reduced, mid-range and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction, which is assessed by I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging, is associated with the poor outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Serial evaluation of cardiac MIBG imaging was shown to be useful for predicting adverse outcome in CHF. However, there was no information available on long-term serial changes of cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction after discharge of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) hospitalization. Purpose We aimed to clarify the serial change of cardiac MIBG imaging parameter in long-term after discharge of heart failure hospitalization, especially relating to HFrEF (LVEF<40%), HFmrEF (40%≤LVEF<50%) and HFpEF (LVEF≥50%). Methods We studied 112 patients (HFrEF; n=44, HFmrEF; n=23 and HFpEF; n=45) who were admitted for ADHF, discharged with survival and without heart failure hospitalization during follow-up period. All patients underwent cardiac MIBG imaging at the timing of discharge, in 6–12 months and in 18–24 months after discharge. The cardiac MIBG heart to mediastinum ratio (H/M) was calculated on the early image and the delayed image (late H/M). The cardiac MIBG washout rate (WR) was calculated from the early and delayed planar images after taking radioactive decay of I-123 into consideration. Results In HFrEF patients, late H/M was significantly improved from discharge to 6–12 months data (1.60±0.24 vs 1.75±0.31, p<0.0001). Late H/M of HFmrEF patients was also significantly improved from discharge to 18–24 months data (1.71±0.27 vs 1.84±0.29 p=0.043). On the other hand, late H/M of HFpEF patients was not significantly changed. As for WR, WR in HFrEF and HFmrEF patients was significantly improved from discharge to 18–24 months data, although WR of HFpEF was not significantly changed. Conclusion The improvement in cardiac sympathetic nerve dysfunction was observed in patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF, not in HFpEF, after the discharge of acute heart failure hospitalization. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Yamada T, Watanabe T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Kayama K, Fukunami M. Long-term prognostic value of the combination of malnutrition and pulmonary-systemic pressure ratio in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Malnutrition is associated with increased mortality risk in patients (pts) with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). On the other hand, concomitant presence of pulmonary hypertension in heart failure is associated with increased adverse events and may be related to interventricular uncoupling and impaired cardiac efficiency. It has recently been shown that an increased mean pulmonary artery pressure to mean systemic arterial pressure ratio (MPS ratio), a marker of interventricular coupling and efficiency, is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure. However, there is no information available on the long-term prognostic value of the combination of malnutrition and MPS ratio in pts admitted for ADHF. Methods and results We studied 248 pts admitted for ADHF, who underwent right heart catheterization at the admission and were discharged with survival. Malnutrition was assessed by geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and controlling nutritional status score (CONUT). During a mean follow-up period of 5.2±4.4 yrs, 62 pts had cardiovascular death (CVD). MPS ratio was significantly greater in pts with than without CVD (0.408±0.114 vs 0.347±0.102, p=0.0001). GNRI and PNI were significantly lower, CONUT was significantly greater in pts with than without CVD. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, GNRI and MPS ratio were significantly associated with CVD, independently of prior heart failure hospitalization, eGFR, and serum sodium level and anemia, although PNI and CONUT showed the association with CVD at unvariate analysis. Pts with malnutrition (GNRI≤median value=96.5) and greater MPS ratio (≥median value=0.346) had a significantly higher CVD risk than those with either and none of them (51% vs 20% vs 12%, p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusions The combination of malnutrition and MPS ratio might be useful for stratifying pts at risk for CVD in patients with ADHF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Pak M, Kobori A, Shizuta S, Sasaki Y, Toyota T, Yoshizawa T, Inoue K, Kaitani K, Kurotobi T, Morishima I, Kusano K, Kimura T, Furukawa Y. The impact of catheter ablation for patients with asymptomatic atrial fibrillation: subanalysis of kansai plus atrial fibrillation (kpaf) registry. Eur Heart J 2020. [DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) for symptomatic patients improves the quality of life and prognosis of patients with heart failure. However, the impact of CA for asymptomatic patients is still controversial. Purpose We aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of CA of AF for asymptomatic patients compared to those for symptomatic patients. Methods A total of 5,013 patients from the Kansai Plus Atrial Fibrillation (KPAF) Registry who underwent CA were screened. The patients were divided into three groups by type of AF; paroxysmal (PAF), persistent (PEAF) and long standing (LSAF) and the patients in each type of AF were divided into two groups: asymptomatic and symptomatic. The primary endpoint was recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias lasting for more than 30 seconds during follow-up 4 years after CA. The secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular, cerebral, and gastrointestinal events during follow-up 4 years after CA. The incidence of complications related to CA between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients was also evaluated. Kaplan–Meier analysis was employed to estimate the primary and secondary endpoints. The statistical differences in primary and secondary endpoints between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were evaluated using a log–rank test. The impact of symptom due to AF on the primary and secondary endpoint was evaluated using a Cox hazard analysis. The difference in incidence of complications between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients was evaluated using a chi–square test. Results In this study population, PAF was the most frequent at 64.4%, followed by PEAF (22.7%) and LSAF (13.0%). There were some significant differences in the baseline characteristics between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in each type of AF. The proportion of male was significantly higher in asymptomatic patients than symptomatic patients in PAF (81.2% versus 67.2%, p<0.001) and PEAF (86.4% versus 74.3%, p<0.001). Left atrial diameter was larger in asymptomatic patients than symptomatic patients only in PAF (40±6mm versus 38±6mm, p<0.001). In all types of AF, there was no significant difference in primary endpoint between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients as follows: 37.5% versus 40.6% (p=0.6) in PAF, 45.2% versus 55.1% (p=0.09) in PEAF and 59.3% versus 63.6% (p=1.0) in LSAF. There was also no significant difference in secondary endpoint between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: 7.1% versus 6.8% (p=0.7) in PAF, 5.4% versus 8.7% (p=0.3) in PEAF and 4.4% versus 5.1% (p=0.5) in LSAF. In a Cox hazard analysis, the symptom did not affect both of the primary and secondary endpoints in each type of AF. In regard to the incidence of complications related to CA, there was no significant difference between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in each type of AF. Conclusion CA of AF for asymptomatic patients can be safe and can lead to equivalent outcomes as well as symptomatic patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None Collapse

Igase M, Okada Y, Ochi M, Igase K, Ochi H, Okuyama S, Furukawa Y, Ohyagi Y. Auraptene in the Peels of Citrus Kawachiensis (Kawachibankan) Contributes to the Preservation of Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study in Healthy Volunteers. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2019;5:197-201. [PMID: 29972213 DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2017.47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]

Toyota T, Morimoto T, Iimuro S, Iwata H, Miyauchi K, Inoue T, Nakagawa Y, Daida H, Ozaki Y, Sakuma I, Furukawa Y, Ohashi Y, Matsuzaki M, Nagai R, Kimura T. P832LDL-C levels on statins and cardiovascular event risk in stable coronary artery disease: An observation from the REAL-CAD study. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background The relation between very low on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and the cardiovascular event risk is still unclear in patients receiving the same doses of statins. Methods From the REAL-CAD study comparing high-dose with low-dose pitavastatin therapy in Japanese patients with stable coronary artery disease, 11105 patients without reported non-adherence for the study drug were divided into 3 groups according to the on-treatment LDL-C level at 6-month (<70 mg/dL, 70–100 mg/dL, and ≥100 mg/dL; N=1016, N=3078, and N=1665 in the pitavastatin 1 mg/day stratum; N=2431, N=2524, and N=391 in the pitavastatin 4 mg/day stratum). Primary outcome measure was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring emergent admission. Results In the pitavastatin 1 mg/day stratum, cumulative 4-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was not significantly different across the 3 groups (5.0%, 5.7%, and 5.2%, P=0.51), while in the 4 mg/day stratum, it was significantly higher in the LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group than in other groups (4.5%, 3.4%, and 9.1%, P<0.001). The adjusted risks of the LDL-C <70 mg/dL group relative to the LDL-C 70–100 mg/dL group (reference) remained insignificant for the primary outcome measure in both 1 mg/day and 4 mg/day strata (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58–1.18, P=0.32, and HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.88–1.79, P=0.22). The adjusted risk of LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group relative to the reference group was not significant for the primary outcome measure in the 1 mg/day stratum (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60–1.11, P=0.21), while it was highly significant in the 4 mg/day stratum (HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.08–5.17, P<0.001). In the on-treatment LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group in the 4 mg/day stratum, LDL-C increased by 6.3 mg/dL from baseline to 6-month despite dose escalation of pitavastatin from 1 mg/day to 4 mg/day, suggesting the presence of unreported poor adherence in this small subgroup. Adjusted Effects of On-treatment LDL-C Conclusions Very low on-treatment LDL-C level (<70 mg/dL) was not associated with lower cardiovascular event risk compared with moderately low on-treatment LDL-C level (70–100 mg/dL) in patients receiving the same doses of statins. Too much emphasis on the target LDL-C strategy might mislead the clinical practice. Acknowledgement/Funding The Comprehensive Support Project for Clinical Research of Lifestyle-Related Disease of the Public Health Research Foundation. Collapse

Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Abe M, Yamamoto K, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Tanabe K, Fukunami M. P794Long-term prognostic value of the combination of AHEAD score and wasting syndrome in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure with reduced or preserved LV ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Comorbidities are associated with poor clinical outcome in heart failure patients (pts). AHEAD (A: atrial fibrillation; H: hemoglobin; E: elderly; A: abnormal renal parameters; D: diabetes mellitus) score has been related to clinical outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) pts. On the other hand, heart failure is one of a number of disorders associated with the development of wasting syndrome. Previous studies have reported reduced mortality rates in heart failure patients with increased body mass index (BMI), so-called, obesity paradox. We sought to investigate the prognostic value of the combination of AHEAD score and the cachectic state in ADHF pts, relating to reduced or preserved LVEF (HFrEF or HFpEF). Methods and results We studied 303 pts admitted for ADHF and discharged with survival (HFrEF (LVEF <50%); n=163, HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%; n=140). We evaluated AHEAD score (range 0–5, atrial fibrillation, hemoglobin <13 mg/dL for men and 12 mg/dL for women, age >70 years, creatinine >130 μmol/L, and diabetes mellitus) and wasting syndrome was defined as BMI <20 kg/m2 and serum albumin level (Alb) <3.2 g/dl at the discharge. During a follow-up period of 5.1±4.2 years, 121 pts died. At multivariate Cox analysis, AHEAD score and wasting syndrome was significantly and independently associated with the total mortality, in pts with not only HFrEF but also HFpEF. Pts with both high AHEAD score (≥3: AUC 0.625 [0.542–0.709] in HFrEF and ≥3: AUC 0.611 [0514–0.708] in HFpEF, by ROC curve analysis) and wasting syndrome had a higher risk of mortality than those with either and none of them in HFrEF (71% vs 51% vs 40%, p<0.0001, respectively) and HFpEF (78% vs 33% vs 24%, p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusion The combination of AHEAD score and wasting syndrome would be useful for stratifying patients at risk for the mortality in ADHF pts, regardless of HFrEF or HFpEF. Collapse

Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Abe M, Yamamoto K, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Tanabe K, Fukunami M. P787Long-term prognostic value of the combination of fibrosis-4 index and acute kidney injury in patients with admitted for acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Liver dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) is caused by liver congestion, which is related to liver stiffness. It was reported that liver stiffness assessed by non-invasive fibrosis marker such as Fibrosis-4 (FIB4) index (based on age, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] levels, and platelet counts) predicts mortality in HF pts. Acute kidney injury (AKI) during HF treatment is associated with poor outcome in pts admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, there is no information available on the long-term prognostic significance of the combination of FIB4 index and AKI in ADHF pts. Methods and results We studied 299 ADHF pts with survival discharge. FIB4 index was calculated by the formula: age (yrs) × AST[U/L]/(platelets [103/μL] × (ALT[U/L])1/2). AKI during ADHF treatment was defined according to AKI Network criteria (stage 1: mild, stage 2: moderate, stage 3: severe). During a follow-up period of 4.3±3.3 yrs, 94 pts died. At multivariate Cox analysis, FIB4 index and stage2/3 AKI, but not stage1 AKI, significantly associated with total mortality, independently of prior HF hospitalization and serum sodium and blood urea nitrogen levels after adjustment with BMI, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, serum creatinine and albumin levels, left ventricular end-diastolic and left atrial dimension indexes. Pts with both greater FIB4 index (>2.674: median) and stage 2/3 AKI had a significantly higher risk of total mortality than those with none of them. Adjusted hazard ratio in pts with both greater FIB4 index and stage 2/3 AKI was 3.5 (95% CI 1.6–7.7), which was two-fold of that in pts with either of them (1.7 [95% CI 1.1–2.7]). Conclusion The combination of FIB4 index and moderate to severe AKI might identify higher risk subset for total mortality in ADHF pts. Collapse

Tamaki S, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Yamamoto K, Fukunami M. P762Usefulness of 2-year iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine-based risk model for the post-discharge risk stratification in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background A four-parameter risk model including cardiac iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and readily available clinical parameters has been recently developed for the prediction of 2-year cardiac mortality risk in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) using a Japanese CHF database consisting of 1322 patients. On the other hand, the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) and Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure (GWTG-HF) risk scores, simple tools to predict risk of in-hospital mortality, have been reported to be predictive of post-discharge outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, there is no information available on the usefulness of 2-year MIBG-based cardiac mortality risk score for the prediction of post-discharge prognosis in ADHF patients and its comparison with the ADHERE and GWTG-HF risk scores. Purpose We sought to validate the predictability of the 2-year MIBG-based cardiac mortality risk score for post-discharge clinical outcome in ADHF patients, and to compare its prognostic value with those of ADHERE and GWTG-HF risk scores. Methods We studied 297 consecutive patients who were admitted for ADHF, survived to discharge, and had definitive 2-year outcomes. Venous blood sampling was performed on admission, and echocardiography and cardiac MIBG imaging were performed just before discharge. In cardiac MIBG imaging, the cardiac MIBG heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) was measured from the chest anterior view images obtained at 20 and 200 min after isotope injection. The 2-year cardiac mortality risk score was calculated using four parameters, including age, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class, and HMR on delayed image. The patients were stratified into three groups based on the 2-year cardiac mortality risk score: low- (<4%), intermediate- (4–12%), and high-risk (>12%) groups. The ADHERE and GWTG-HF risk scores were also calculated from admission data as previously reported. The predictive ability of the scores was compared using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Results During a follow-up period, 110 patients reached the primary endpoint. There was significant difference in the rate of primary endpoint among the three groups stratified by 2-year cardiac mortality risk score (low-risk group: 18%, intermediate-risk group: 36%, high-risk group: 64%, Figure 1A). The 2-year cardiac mortality risk score demonstrated a greater area under the curve for the primary endpoint compared to the ADHERE and the GWTG-HF risk scores (Figure 1B). Figure 1 Conclusions The 2-year MIBG-based cardiac mortality risk score is also useful for the prediction of post-discharge clinical outcome in ADHF patients, and its prognostic value is superior to those of the ADHERE and the GWTG-HF risk scores. Collapse

Tamaki S, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Fukunami M, Yasumura Y, Abe H, Uematsu M, Higuchi Y, Hikoso S, Nakatani D, Sakata Y. P786Plasma volume status is associated with the change in nutritional status during hospitalization in acute decompensated heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Introduction Plasma volume (PV) expansion has an essential role in heart failure (HF). PV can be estimated by a simple formula using hematocrit and body weight, and PV status (PVS) provides prognostic information in patients (pts) with chronic HF. Nutritional status (NS) based on the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and NS change during hospitalization have been shown to predict prognosis in pts admitted with acute decompensated HF (ADHF). Purpose We sought to assess the hypothesis that PVS is associated with NS change during hospitalization in pts with HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF) who are admitted with ADHF. Methods We prospectively studied 411 pts who were admitted for ADHF with LVEF ≥50% and survived to discharge. Body weight measurement and venous blood sampling were performed on admission and at discharge. PVS was defined as follows: actual PV = (1 − hematocrit) × [a + (b × body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41.0 in males and b=47.9 in females); ideal PV = c × body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females); and PVS = [(actual PV − ideal PV)/ideal PV] × 100 (%). PNI was calculated as 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3). The pts were divided into 3 groups by PNI: normal (>38), moderate malnutrition (35–38), and severe malnutrition (<35). During admission, pts who remained in the moderate or severe malnutrition group or whose NS worsened were defined as no improvement in NS. Follow-up data was obtained in 203 cases. They were followed for up to 18 months, and the incidence of all-cause death was evaluated. Results On admission, PVS in the moderate (n=71, 13.3±13.9%) or severe malnutrition group (n=69, 14.8±10.8%) was significantly higher than in the normal PNI group (n=271, 5.4±10.8%, p<0.001). During hospitalization, 123 pts had no NS improvement. Admission PVS was significantly higher in pts with no NS improvement than in pts with improved NS (13.9±11.2% vs 5.9±12.8%, p<0.0001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, admission PVS was independently associated with no NS improvement during hospitalization (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03–1.08, p<0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value of admission PVS for predicting no NS improvement was 9.4% (sensitivity: 72%, specificity: 63%). The area under the curve for predicting no NS improvement using admission PVS was significantly greater than for other independent factors (Figure 1A). During the follow-up period (median 12.4 months), 68 of 203 patients had all-cause death. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the patients with no NS improvement had a significantly higher risk of all-cause death (Figure 1B). Figure 1 Conclusions In this multicenter study, admission PVS was shown to be associated with poor improvement in NS during hospitalization in HFpEF pts admitted for ADHF. Acknowledgement/Funding Roche diagnostics, FUJIFILM Toyama Chemical Collapse

Kawai T, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Seo M, Fukunami M. P4552The prognostic impact of worsening and improved renal function in acute decompensated heart failure with and without plasma volume expansion. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Recent studies showed that both worsening renal function (WRF) and improved renal function (IRF) during hospitalization are associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute decompensate heart failure (ADHF). On the other hand, plasma volume (PV) expansion plays an essential role in ADHF. However, there is little information about the difference of prognostic impact of WRF and IRF in ADHF patients, relating to PV status (PVS). Methods We prospectively studied 348 patients admitted for ADHF. PVS was defined as follows: actual PV = (1 - hematocrit) × [a + (b × body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41.0 in males and b=47.9 in females); ideal PV = c × body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females); and PVS = [(actual PV - ideal PV)/ideal PV] × 100 (%). WRF and IRF were defined as an increase and a decrease in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dl from admission to discharge, respectively. The endpoint was readmission for worsening heart failure (WHF) within 1 year. Result Median PVS was 6.7% (IQR: −4.1%–16.7%). 43 and 21 patients had WHF in groups with high PVS (PVS ≥ median) and low PVS (PVS > median), respectively. In high PVS group, multivariate Cox analysis showed that IRF was independently and significantly associated with WHF (p=0.016, HR: 2.4 [1.2–4.8]), but WRF was not (p=0.55, HR: 0.7 [0.3–2.1]). On the other hand, in low PVS group, WRF was independently associated with WHF (p=0.035, HR: 3.0 [1.1–8.1]), but IRF was not (p=0.27, HR: 2.1 [0.6–8.0]). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that only patients with IRF had a significantly higher risk of WHF than those with stable renal function (SRF) in high PVS group, while patients with WRF had a significantly higher risk of WHF than those with SRF in low PVS group. Worsening heart failure-free rate curves Conclusion In ADHF patients with PV expansion, IRF during hospitalization could predict poor outcomes, but WRF could not. On the other hand, in ADHF patients without PV expansion, not IRF but WRF could predict poor outcomes. PVS guided-therapy may be considered in secondary prevention for WHF. Collapse

Abe M, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Yamamoto K, Fukunami M. P793Prediction of prognosis using combined objective nutritional score in the patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background It has been reported that the objective nutritional indices such as the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) are useful for the prediction of prognosis in patients with heart failure. However, there is no information available on the prognostic value of the combination of these objective nutritional indices in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Purpose We sought to assess the usefulness of the Combined Objective Nutritional Score for the prediction of post-discharge clinical outcome in ADHF patients. Methods We studied 361 consecutive patients who were admitted for ADHF and survived to discharge. Venous blood sampling, echocardiography, and measurement of body weight were performed just before discharge. CONUT score, GNRI and PNI were calculated as previously reported. We determined the Combined Objective Nutritional Score by assigning 1 point each for high CONUT score (2–12), low GNRI (≤98) or low PNI (≤38). Patients were followed-up for up to 5 years. The study endpoint was all-cause death. Results During a follow-up period of 2.4±1.3 years, 106 patients had all-cause death. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the Combined Objective Nutritional Score was independently associated with all-cause death after adjustment for age, gender, history of coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide level and estimate glomerular filtration rate (p<0.0001). When the patients were stratified into the three groups based on the Combined Objective Nutritional Score (normal nutritional status: 0 point, mild-to-moderate malnutrition: 1–2 points, severe malnutrition: 3 points), the incidence of all-cause death appeared to increase in relation to the Combined Objective Nutritional Score (normal: 0%, mild-to moderate: 23%, severe: 52%, p<0.0001, Figure). Patients with severe malnutrition showed 2.9 fold (95% CI 1.8–4.6) increase in the total mortality in comparison to patients with mild-to-moderate malnutrition. Figure 1 Conclusion This study showed that the Combined Objective Nutritional Score is a useful tool to risk stratify the patients hospitalized with ADHF. Collapse

Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Abe M, Yamamoto K, Kiyomi K, Kawahira M, Tanabe K, Fukunami M. P791Long-term prognostic value of pulmonary-systemic pressure ratio in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure with reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Concomitant presence of pulmonary hypertension in heart failure is associated with increased adverse events and may be related to interventricular uncoupling and impaired cardiac efficiency. It has recently been shown that an increased mean pulmonary artery pressure to mean systemic arterial pressure ratio (MPS ratio), a marker of interventricular coupling and efficiency, is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure. However, there is little information available on the long-term prognostic value of MPS ratio in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), relating to reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF or HFpEF). Methods and results We studied 240 patients admitted for ADHF, who underwent right heart catheterization and were discharged with survival (HFrEF (LVEF≤40%); n=110, HFpEF (LVEF>40%); n=130). MPS ratio was obtained at the admission. During a mean follow-up period of 5.2±4.4 yrs, 59 patients had cardiovascular death (CVD). In both groups with HFrEF and HFpEF, MPS ratio was significantly greater in patients with than without CVD (HFrEF; 0.453±0.101 vs 0.382±0.116, p=0.0035, HFpEF; 0.374±0.118 vs 0.323±0.083, p=0.0091). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, MPS ratio was significantly associated with CVD, independently of eGFR and serum sodium level in HFrEF and HFpEF groups. Patients with high MPS ratio (>0.386 in HFrEF and >0.415 in HFpEF determined by ROC curve analysis) had a significantly increased risk of CVD than those with low MPS ratio in both groups. Conclusions MPS ratio could provide the long-term prognostic information in patients admitted for ADHF, regardless of reduced or preserved LVEF. Collapse

Yamamoto K, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Fukunami M. P5406Impact of the albumin level on the prognostic value of diuretic response in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure: a prospective study. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background The reduced diuretic response (DR) has been shown to be associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). In addition, hypoalbuminemia, which is related to DR, has been also reported to predict poor prognosis in ADHF patients. However, there is no information available on the impact of albumin level on the prognostic value of DR in patients with ADHF. Methods We prospectively studied 296 consecutive patients who were admitted for ADHF and survived to discharge. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of hypoalbuminemia at the admission, defined as the serum level of albumin at admission <3.5g/dl, and DR was defined as weight loss per 40mg intravenous dose and 80mg oral dose of furosemide up to day 4. The endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure. Results There were 144 patients with hypoalbuminemia and 152 patients without hypoalbuminemia. During a mean follow-up period of 2.2±1.5 years, 88 patients with hypoalbuminemia and 53 patients without hypoalbuminemia reached the endpoint. In group with hypoalbuminemia, DR was significantly smaller in patients with than without the endpoint (0.85 [0.50–1.50] vs 1.60 [0.76–2.70] kg/40mg furosemide, p=0.003), while there was no significant difference in DR between them in group without hypoalbuminemia (1.17 [0.59–1.66] vs 1.07 [0.75–1.88] kg/40mg furosemide, p=0.381). At multivariate Cox analysis, in group with hypoalbuminemia, DR was significantly associated with the endpoint, independently of age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and serum creatinine and plasma BNP levels. On the other hand, in group without hypoalbuminemia, DR showed no significant association with the endpoint at univariate Cox analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with poor DR (≤1.08 kg/40mg furosemide: median value) had a significantly higher risk of the endpoint in group with hypoalbuminemia, but not in group without hypoalbuminemia (Figure). Figure 1 Conclusion Our results suggested that prognostic value of DR in ADHF patients is affected by the presence or absence of hypoalbuminemia. Collapse

Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Abe M, Yamamoto K, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Tanabe K, Fukunami M. P5409Plasma volume status provides the additional prognostic information to the Get With the Guidelines-Heart Failure risk score in acute decompensated heart failure patients. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background The Get with The Guidelines (GWTG) heart failure (HF) risk score was developed in the GWTG inpatient HF registry to predict in-hospital mortality and also reported to be associated with post-discharge long-term outcomes. Plasma volume (PV) expansion plays an essential role in HF. Recently, it has been reported that PV is estimated by a simple formula based on hematocrit and body weight, not using radioisotope assays, and PV status provides prognostic information in patients (pts) with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, there is no information available on the long-term prognostic value of the combination of PV status and GWTG-HF risk score in pts admitted for ADHF. Methods and results We studied 301 ADHF pts discharged with survival. Variables required for the GWTG-HF risk score were race, age, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, serum levels of blood urea nitrogen and sodium, and the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PV status was calculated as the following: Actual PV = (1 − hematocrit) x [a + (b x body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41 in males and b=47.9 in females), Ideal PV = c x body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females), and PV status = [(actual PV − ideal PV)/ideal PV] x 100(%). During a follow-up period of 4.3±3.2 yrs, 95 pts had all-cause death (ACD). At multivariate Cox analysis, GWTG-HF risk score and PV status were significantly associated with the total mortality, independently of eGFR and the prior history of heart failure hospitalization, after the adjustment with serum albumin level and anemia. Pts with both high GWTG-HF risk score (≥39 by ROC analysis; AUC 0.655 [0.586–0.724]) and greater PV status (≥8.1% by ROC analysis; AUC 0.624 [0.566–0.692]) had a significantly higher risk of ACD than those with either or none of them (58% vs 30% vs 21%, p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusion PV status would provide the additional long-term prognostic information to GWTG-HF risk score in ADHF pts. Collapse

Kayama K, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Fukunami M. P4523Impact of comorbiditity on the predictive value of acute kidney injury in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure: a prospective study. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Comorbidities are associated with poor clinical outcome in patients with chronic heart failure, and acute kidney injury (AKI) also provides prognostic information in patients with heart failure. However, there is no information available on the impact of comorbidities on the prognostic value of AKI in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Methods We prospectively studied 357 consecutive ADHF patients with survival discharge. Patients with hemodialysis were excluded. Comorbidity was measured with the Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (ACCI) which is commonly used for the evaluation of the comorbid condition which is weighted and scored, with additional points added for age. AKI was defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine of 0.3mg/dl or more during hospitalization. The endpoint was all-cause death (ACD). Results During a follow-up period of 2.2±1.4 years, 97 patients had ACD. At multivariate Cox analysis, ACCI (p<0.0001) and AKI (p=0.0061) were significantly and independently associated with ACD. Patients with high ACCI (≥5: determined by ROC analysis) had a significantly greater risk of ACD (39% vs 16%). In the subgroup of high ACCI, patients with AKI had a significantly higher risk of ACD (60% vs 35%), whereas there was no significant difference in the risk of ACD between with and without AKI (15% vs 16%) in the subgroup of low ACCI. Conclusions The presence of AKI was associated with the increased risk of mortality in ADHF patients with higher comorbidity burden but not in those without them. Collapse

Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Nakamura J, Abe M, Yamamoto K, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Tanabe K, Fukunami M. P795Long-term prognostic value of the combination of plasma volume status and pulmonary-systemic pressure ratio in patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Plasma volume (PV) expansion plays an essential role in heart failure and PV status provides prognostic information in patients (pts) with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). On the other hand, concomitant presence of pulmonary hypertension in heart failure is associated with increased adverse events and may be related to interventricular uncoupling and impaired cardiac efficiency. It has recently been shown that an increased mean pulmonary artery pressure to mean systemic arterial pressure ratio (MPS ratio), a marker of interventricular coupling and efficiency, is associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure. However, there is no information available on the long-term prognostic value of the combination of PV status and MPS ratio in pts admitted for ADHF. Methods We studied 248 pts admitted for ADHF, who underwent right heart catheterization at the admission and were discharged with survival. PV status and MPS ratio were obtained at the admission. PV status was calculated as the following: Actual PV = (1 − hematocrit) x [a + (b x body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41 in males and b=47.9 in females), Ideal PV = c x body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females), and PV status = [(actual PV − ideal PV)/ideal PV] x 100(%). The study endpoint was cardiovascular death (CVD). Results During a mean follow-up period of 5.2±4.4 yrs, 62 pts had CVD. PV status (10.0±16.2 vs 5.0±15.3%, p=0.03) and MPS ratio (0.408±0.114 vs 0.347±0.102, p=0.0001) were significantly greater in patients with than without CVD. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, PV status and MPS ratio were significantly associated with CVD, independently of prior heart failure hospitalization, eGFR, and serum sodium level and anemia. Patients with greater PV status (> median value = 4.6%) and MPS ratio (> median value = 0.346) had a significantly higher CVD risk than those with either and none of them (44% vs 22% vs 14%, p<0.0001, respectively). Conclusions The combination of PV status and MPS ratio might be useful for stratifying patients at risk for CVD in patients with ADHF. Collapse

Kawai T, Nakatani D, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Seo M, Hikoso S, Sakata Y, Fukunami M. P842Calculated plasma volume status provides additional prognostic value to global registry of acute coronary event (GRACE) score in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Plasma volume status (PVS) has been shown to be a well-validated prognostic indicator which relate to morbidity and mortality in heart failure. However, it remains unclear whether PVS would have the prognostic significance in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) risk score is a powerful predictor of prognosis after acute coronary event, but there is no information available on the additional prognostic value of PVS to GRACE in AMI patients. Methods We retrospectively studied 3930 AMI patients. GRACE score and PVS was obtained on the admission. PVS was calculated as follows: actual PV = (1 - hematocrit) × [a + (b × body weight)] (a=1530 in males and a=864 in females, b=41.0 in males and b=47.9 in females); ideal PV = c × body weight (c=39 in males and c=40 in females); and PVS = [(actual PV - ideal PV)/ideal PV] × 100 (%). The endpoint was All cause of death (ACD) within 5 years. Results During a mean follow-up period of 2.4±1.9 years, 406 patients had ACD. PVS was significantly greater in patients with ACD than without ACD (8.1±14.9% vs −1.7±13.3%, p<0.001). Each 5% increase in PVS was linked to a 27% estimated risk of 5-year mortality (p<0.001, HR: 1.05 [1.03–1.08]). PVS was still independently associated with ACD, after adjustment with GRACE score as a potential confounding factor. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with PV expansion (PVS>0%) were significantly higher risk of ACD than those without PV expansion in patients both with high risk in GRACE score (>140) (28% (225/803) vs 19% (78/412), p=0.01, HR: 7.5) and with low risk in GRACE score (≤140) (6% (52/894) vs 3% (51/1821), p=0.009, HR: 6.2). Survival rate curves Conclusion PVS, which represents intravascular compartment and congestion, could identify poor prognosis in patients with AMI. In addition, PVS would provide additional prognostic information to GRACE score. Collapse

Furukawa Y, Yamada T, Morita T, Tamaki S, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Kayama K, Kawahira M, Tanabe K, Fukunami M. P1031The impact of the duration of atrial fibrillation persistence for arrhythmia free survival in patients undergoing catheter ablation. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a curable treatment option. However, AF recurrence after CA remains an important problem. Although the success rate has been improved after catheter ablation (CA) in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), outcome data after CA for persistent AF (PeAF) are highly variable. Previous studies showed the PeAF is one of independent predictors for AF recurrence in comparison to PAF. However, there are little information available on the prognostic significance of AF duration after CA for AF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of AF duration on long-term outcomes of AF ablation in patients with PeAF compared with PAF. Methods We enrolled 778 consecutive patients, who were referred our institution between August 2015 and December 2017 for undergoing the first time CA for AF. We divided 5 groups (Group 1; PAF (n=442), Group 2; PeAF duration ≤6 months (n=198), Group 3; PeAF duration of 6 months to 2 years (n=87), Group 4; PeAF duration of 2–5 years (n=30) and Group 5; PeAF duration ≥5 years (n=21)). All patients followed up for at least 1 year. Outcome data on recurrence of AF after ablation were collected. Results There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics before CA among 5 groups, except for the prevalence of congestive heart failure, left atrial diameter and left ventricular ejection fraction. During a mean follow-up period of 511±298 days, 217 patients had AF recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that AF recurrence was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (31% vs 20%, p=0.002) and in group 4 compared to group 3 (83% vs 30%, p<0.0001). However, AF recurrence was no significantly differences between groups 2 and 3 (31% vs 30%, p=0.76) and between groups 4 and 5 (83% vs 81%, p=0.45). Of 217 patients with AF recurrence, 154 patients had undergone multiple procedures. After last procedures, during a mean follow-up period of 546±279 days, 61 patients had AF recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that AF recurrence was significantly higher in group 2 compared to group 1 (10% vs 3%, P=0.0005) and in group 4 compared with group 3 (35% vs 10%, p=0.0001). However, AF recurrence was no significantly difference between groups 2 and 3 (10% vs 10%, p=0.91) and between groups 4 and 5 (47% vs 35%, p=0.47). AF Free Survival Curve Conclusion Although patients with PeAF within 2 years had significantly higher AF recurrence compared to PAF, AF ablation might still be a good contributor as the first line approach to improve outcomes in patient with PeAF within 2 years. Collapse

Tamaki S, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Yamamoto K, Fukunami M. P5413Effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on serum uric acid level in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure: a prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz746.0371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background Elevated serum uric acid (UA) level has been shown to be associated with reduced survival among patients (pts) with heart failure. Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been reported to lower serum uric acid level in pts with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Empagliflozin, one of the SGLT2 inhibitors, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality in T2D pts with cardiovascular disease, and involvement of UA lowering effect by empagliflozin in the reduction of cardiovascular mortality has been suggested. However, little is known about the effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on serum UA level in T2D pts with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Purpose We sought to elucidate the effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on serum UA level in T2D pts with ADHF. Methods We enrolled 38 consecutive T2D pts admitted for ADHF. On admission, enrolled pts were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either empagliflozin add-on therapy (EMPA(+)) or conventional glucose-lowering therapy (EMPA(−)). All pts in EMPA(+) group received empagliflozin (10 mg/day) throughout the study period. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at baseline using echocardiography. Body weight and vital signs, such as blood pressure and heart rate, were measured, and blood and urine samples were collected at baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 7 days after randomization. Renal handling of UA was evaluated by fractional excretion of UA (FEUA). Results Twenty pts were assigned to the EMPA(+) group, and 18 pts were assigned to the EMPA(−) group. There were no significant baseline differences in LVEF, plasma brain natriuretic peptide level, body mass index, or serum creatinine level between the EMPA(+) and EMPA(−) groups. In addition, prevalence rate of hyperuricemia, serum UA level, and FEUA did not significantly differ between the two groups at baseline. However, there was significant difference in the change in serum UA level from baseline at 2, 3 and 7 days after randomization between the two groups (Figure A). As a result, serum UA level was significantly lower in the EMPA(+) group than in the EMPA(−) group at 7 days after randomization (6.2±1.8 mg/dL vs 7.8±1.8 mg/dL, p=0.0127). Moreover, FEUN of the EMPA(+) group was significantly higher at 1, 2 and 7 days after randomization (Figure B), which suggested that serum UA level was lowered in the EMPA(+) group by increased urinary excretion of UA. Figure 1 Conclusions This study demonstrated that empagliflozin as add-on therapy can lower serum UA level in T2D pts with ADHF through the effect on the urinary excretion rate of UA. Collapse

Iwasa K, Yoshikawa H, Furukawa Y, Yamada M. Upregulation of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression in the skeletal muscle of patients with myasthenia gravis. J Neurol Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.10.1383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]

Tamaki S, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Abe M, Nakamura J, Yamamoto K, Fukunami M. 4330Effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on decongestion and renal function in diabetic patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure: a prospective randomized controlled study. Eur Heart J 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Abstract Abstract Background The mainstay of treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is decongestion by diuretic therapy. Empagliflozin has been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients (pts) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and cardiovascular disease. This may be explained by natriuresis and osmotic diuresis caused by empagliflozin, leading to plasma volume (PV) contraction and decongestion. However, little is known about the therapeutic effect of empagliflozin on decongestion and its association with renal function in T2D pts with ADHF. Purpose We sought to elucidate the effect of empagliflozin as add-on therapy on plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, hemoconcentration, PV contraction and renal function in T2D pts with ADHF. Methods We enrolled 38 consecutive T2D pts admitted for ADHF. On admission, enrolled pts were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either empagliflozin add-on therapy (EMPA(+)) or conventional glucose-lowering therapy (EMPA(−)). All pts in EMPA(+) group received empagliflozin (10mg/day) throughout the study period. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at baseline using echocardiography. Body weight and vital signs, such as blood pressure and heart rate, were measured, and blood and urine samples were collected at baseline and 1, 2, 3 and 7 days after randomization. Hemoconcentration was defined as a ≥3% absolute increase in hematocrit (Hct). Percent change in PV between admission and subsequent timepoints (%ΔPV) was calculated using the Strauss formula as follows: %ΔPV = ([(Hb1/Hb2) × ((100 − Hct2)/(100 − Hct1))] − 1) × 100 (%), where 1 = baseline values and 2 = subsequent values. Worsening renal function (WRF) was defined as an increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL above baseline within 7 days of randomization. Results Twenty pts were assigned to the EMPA(+) group, and 18 pts were assigned to the EMPA(−) group. There were no significant baseline differences in LVEF, plasma BNP level, Hct or serum creatinine level between the EMPA(+) and EMPA(−) groups. Seven days after randomization, plasma BNP level was significantly lower in the EMPA(+) group than in the EMPA(−) group (median 213 [IQR 116–360] pg/mL vs 362 [226–776] pg/mL, p=0.0437) and hemoconcentration was more frequently observed in the EMPA(+) group than in the EMPA(−) group (53% vs 12%, p=0.0105). The decrease in %ΔPV was larger in the EMPA(+) group than in the EMPA(−) group 2 days (−8.74±9.92% vs 1.14±14.71%, p=0.0228), 3 days (−11.28±10.65% vs −0.02±14.70%, p=0.0121) and 7 days after randomization (−10.62±14.89% vs 0.97±13.72%, p=0.0211). The incidence of WRF did not significantly differ between the EMPA(+) and EMPA(−) groups (15% vs 22%). Conclusions This study demonstrated that empagliflozin as add-on therapy can achieve effective decongestion without an increased risk of WRF in T2D pts with ADHF. Collapse

Kikuta S, Furukawa Y, Hino K, Nakamura M, Kusukawa J. Huge ameloblastic carcinoma of the mandible with metastases treated in several different ways. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;57:182-184. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]

Innocenti F, Jiang C, Sibley A, Denning S, Etheridge A, Watson D, Niedzwiecki D, Hatch A, Hurwitz H, Nixon A, Furukawa Y, Kubo M, Crona D, Kindler H, McLeod H, Ratain M, Owzar K. A genetic analysis of gemcitabine-induced high-grade neutropenia in pancreatic cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy303.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Ding QP, Meier WR, Cui J, Xu M, Böhmer AE, Bud'ko SL, Canfield PC, Furukawa Y. Hedgehog Spin-Vortex Crystal Antiferromagnetic Quantum Criticality in CaK(Fe_{1-x}Ni_{x})_{4}As_{4} Revealed by NMR. Phys Rev Lett 2018;121:137204. [PMID: 30312082 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.137204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]

Seo M, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Ikeda I, Fukuhara E, Nakamura J, Abe M, Fukunami M. P589Prognostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy564.p589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open

Seo M, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Ikeda I, Fukuhara E, Nakamura J, Abe M, Fukunami M. P6215Prognostic value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with chronic heart failure: a prospective comparative study with cardiac I-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging. Eur Heart J 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy566.p6215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open

Kawahira M, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuti A, Kawai T, Seo M, Ikeda I, Fukuhara E, Makoto M, Nakamura J, Fukunami M. P4748Prognostic value of Fibrosis-4 index in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure with reduced or preserved LVEF: a comparative study with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score. Eur Heart J 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy563.p4748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Furukawa Y, Yamada T, Morita T, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Ikeda I, Fukuhara E, Abe M, Nakamura J, Fukunami M. P6610The effect of maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation on renal function in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy566.p6610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open

Kayama K, Yamada T, Morita T, Furukawa Y, Tamaki S, Iwasaki Y, Kawasaki M, Kikuchi A, Kawai T, Seo M, Fukunami M. P1819Impact of comorbidities on the predictive value of cardiac MIBG imaging in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure: a prospective comparative study. Eur Heart J 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy565.p1819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open