Type-O Blood Is Not Associated With Elevated Mortality After Trauma: A North American Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have presented contradictory findings on the relationship between blood type and mortality in trauma patients. Using the largest population in a study of this type to date, we hypothesized that ABO genotype and Rhesus status would influence trauma-related mortality and morbidity given the relationship between blood type and hemostasis.

METHODS

Data from all trauma patients admitted to level I and level II trauma centers in one city over a five-year period was retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified by ABO type. Patient demographics and outcomes were then assessed. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. Continuous variables were analyzed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate. Logistic regression was used to determine independent associations for 28-day mortality and complications.

RESULTS

Of 5249 patients, severe injury (ISS >15) was present in 1469. Approximately one-quarter of patients with severe injury received blood products within the first 24 hours. There were no significant variations in demographics or complications between patients of different blood types. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis showed no association between blood type and mortality. However, penetrating injury, lower GCS, higher ISS, blood transfusion within 24 hours, and Asian descent were associated with higher overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to previous studies, we found no evidence of an association between blood type and mortality. However, our findings suggest that patients of Asian descent may be at higher risk for mortality following trauma. Further research is warranted to explore this observation.

Comparison of the growth performance of available layer strains in Bangladesh

Various factors have been reported that affect the growth performance of layers, such as genetics, nutrition, environment, and disease. Attaining appropriate growth is essential to ensure profit. The present study was conducted to make comparative analyses of the growth performance of four commonly available layer strains in Bangladesh. A total number of 400-layer day-old chicks (DOCs), 100 from each of NOVOgen brown, ISA brown, Hy-Line brown and Bovans brown were used for the experiment. The birds were equally divided and randomly assigned to 4 treatments having 4 replications in each treatment comprising 25 birds per replication. All birds fed diet with similar composition and provided with the identical care and management up to 16 weeks of age. The results from this study revealed that there were no significant differences among the growth performances (weekly body weight, feed intake, uniformity and survivability) of four commonly available layer strains and all the strains followed the standard very closely. There were also no statistical differences based on the economic parameters of the strains compared in this study. Taken together, it may be concluded that the layer strains available in Bangladesh are highly competitive and suitable for local climatic conditions and the farmers can rely any of them. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science 51 (4): 163-168  

Early US experience with cardiac donation after circulatory death (DCD) using normothermic regional perfusion

BACKGROUND

Given the shortage of suitable donor hearts for cardiac transplantation and the growing interest in donation after circulatory death (DCD), our institution recently began procuring cardiac allografts from DCD donors.

METHODS

Between October 2020 and March 2021, 15 patients with heart failure underwent cardiac transplantation using DCD allografts. Allografts were procured using a modified extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit for thoracic normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) and were subsequently transported using cold static storage. Data collection and analysis were performed with institutional review board approval.

RESULTS

The mean age of the DCD donors was 23 ± 7 years and average time on TA-NRP was 56 ± 8 minutes. Total ischemic time was 183 ± 31 minutes and distance from transplant center was 373 ± 203 nautical miles. Recipient age was 55 ± 14 years, with 8 (55.3%) recipients on durable left ventricular assist device support. Post-transplant, 6 (40%) recipients experienced mild left ventricle primary graft dysfunction (PGD-LV), 3 (20%) recipients experienced moderate PGD-LV, and no recipients experienced severe PGD-LV. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated left ventricular ejection fraction >55% in all recipients. One recipient (6.6%) developed International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2R acute cellular rejection on first biopsy. At last follow-up, all 15 recipients were alive past 30-days.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac DCD provides an opportunity to increase the availability of donor hearts for transplantation. Utilizing TA-NRP with cold static storage, we have extended the cold ischemic time of DCD allografts to almost 3 hours, allowing for inter-hospital organ transport.

Impact of increased donor distances following adult heart allocation system changes: A single center review of 1-year outcomes

BACKGROUND

On October 18, 2018, several changes to the donor heart allocation system were enacted. We hypothesize that patients undergoing orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) under the new allocation system will see an increase in ischemic times, rates of primary graft dysfunction, and 1-year mortality due to these changes.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we reviewed the charts of all OHT patients from October 2017 through October 2019. Pre- and postallocation recipient demographics were compared. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

A total of 184 patients underwent OHT. Recipient demographics were similar between cohorts. The average distance from donor increased by more than 150 km (p = .006). Patients in the postallocation change cohort demonstrated a significant increase in the rate of severe left ventricle primary graft dysfunction from 5.4% to 18.7% (p = .005). There were no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality or 1-year survival. Time on the waitlist was reduced from 203.8 to 103.7 days (p = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in heart allocation resulted in shorter waitlist times at the expense of longer donor distances and ischemic times, with an associated negative impact on early post-transplantation outcomes. No significant differences in 30-day or 1-year mortality were observed.

Prioritizing heart transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) has significantly impacted the healthcare landscape in the United States in a variety of ways including a nation‐wide reduction in operative volume. The impact of COVID‐19 on the availability of donor organs and the impact on solid organ transplant remains unclear. We examine the impact of COVID‐19 on a single, large‐volume heart transplant program.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed examining all adult heart transplants performed at a single institution between March 2020 and June 2020. This was compared to the same time frame in 2019. We examined incidence of primary graft dysfunction, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and 30‐day survival.

Results

From March to June 2020, 43 orthotopic heart transplants were performed compared to 31 performed during 2019. Donor and recipient demographics demonstrated no differences. There was no difference in 30‐day survival. There was a statistically significant difference in incidence of postoperative CRRT (9/31 vs. 3/43; p = .01). There was a statistically significant difference in race (23 W/8B/1AA vs. 30 W/13B; p = .029).

Conclusion

We demonstrate that a single, large‐volume transplant program was able to grow volume with little difference in donor variables and clinical outcomes following transplant. While multiple reasons are possible, most likely the reduction of volume at other programs allowed us to utilize organs to which we would not have previously had access. More significantly, our growth in volume was coupled with no instances of COVID‐19 infection or transmission amongst patients or staff due to an aggressive testing and surveillance program.