A population-based analysis of the impact of 1 vs. 2 doses of mitomycin on patterns of failure of anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

We report the impact of 1 vs. 2 doses of mitomycin-C (MMC) based chemoradiation (CRT) on patterns of treatment failure and long-term patient outcomes in anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) and the predictors for locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis (DM).

METHODS

In this population-based study, we identified all patients with anal cancer in our province treated radically with radiation and concurrent 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) and 1 vs. 2 doses of MMC between the years 2000-2019. The primary outcomes analyzed were locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease free survival (DFS), ASCC cancer-specific survival (ASCC-CSS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

451 patients were identified. 272 (60%) patients received 1 cycle of MMC (MMC1) and 179 (40%) received 2 cycles (MMC2) as part of the CRT regimen. The median follow-up was 57 (36-252) and 97 (38-239) months for MMC1 and MMC2, respectively. Cox Regression analysis showed stage IIIb and IIIc were associated with worse locoregional recurrence free survival (RFS) (HR=2.851, p=<0.001) and distant RFS (HR=3.391, p=<0.001). Similarly, stage IIIb and IIIc patients had poorer DFS (HR 3.439, p=<0.001), ASCC-SS (HR 3.729, p=<0.001) and OS (2.230, p=<0.001). The use of MMC2 showed a positive impact on improved ASCC-SS (HR 0.569, p=0.029) and distant RFS (HR 0.555, p=0.040) in patients with stage IIIb and IIIc.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed that 1 vs. 2 cycles of MMC along with 5FU and radiation is associated with comparable treatment outcomes in general. However, in patients with stage IIIb and IIIc cancer, 2 doses of MMC were associated with improved ASCC-SS and distant DFS.

A multicentre study of the precision and accuracy of the TruSlice and TruSlice Digital histological dissection devices

BACKGROUND

Five key factors enabling a good surgical grossing technique include a flat uniformly perpendicular specimen cutting face, appropriate immobilisation of the tissue specimen during grossing, good visualisation of the cutting tissue face, sharp cutting knives and the grossing knife action. TruSlice and TruSlice Digital are new innovative tools based on a guillotine configuration. The TruSlice has plastic inserts whilst the TruSlice Digital has an electronic micrometre attached: both features enable these dissection factors to be controlled. The devices were assessed in five hospitals in the UK.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 267 fixed tissue samples from 23 tissue types were analysed, principally the breast (n = 32) skin (30), rectum (28), colon (27) and cervix (17). Precision and accuracy were evaluated by measuring the defined thickness, and the consistency of achieving the defined thickness of tissue samples taken respectively. Both parameters were expressed as a total percentage of compliance for the cohort of samples accessed.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean (standard deviation) score for precision was 81 (11) % whilst the accuracy score was 82 (11) % (both p < 0.05, chi-squared test), although this varied with type of tissue. Accuracy and precision were strongly correlated (r_p = 0.83, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The TruSlice Digital devices offer an assured precision and accuracy performance which is reproducible across an assortment of tissue types. The use of a micrometre to set tissue slice thickness is innovative and should comply with laboratory accreditation requirements, alleviating concerns of how to tackle issues such as the 'measurement of uncertainty' at the grossing bench.