Investigation of liver-targeted peripheral focused ultrasound stimulation (pFUS) and its effect on glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a proof of concept, phase 1 trial

BACKGROUND

Mechanical waves produced by ultrasound pulses have been shown to activate mechanosensitive ion channels and modulate peripheral nerves. However, while peripheral ultrasound neuromodulation has been demonstrated in vitro and in pre-clinical models, there have been few reports of clinical tests.

AIM

We modified a diagnostic imaging system for ultrasound neuromodulation in human subjects. We report the first safety and feasibility outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus and discuss these outcomes in relation to previous pre-clinical results.

DESIGN

The study was performed as an open label feasibility study to assess the effects of hepatic ultrasound (targeted to the porta hepatis) on glucometabolic parameters in subjects with T2D. Stimulation (peripheral focused ultrasound stimulation treatment) was performed for 3 days (i.e. 15 min per day), preceded by a baseline examination and followed by a 2-week observation period.

METHODS

Multiple metabolic assays were employed including measures of fasting glucose and insulin, insulin resistance and glucose metabolism. The safety and tolerability were also assessed by monitoring adverse events, changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram parameters and clinical laboratory measures.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We report post-pFUS trends in several outcomes that were consistent with previous pre-clinical findings. Fasting insulin was lowered, resulting in a reduction of HOMA-IR scores (P-value 0.01; corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Additional safety and exploratory markers demonstrated no device-related adverse impact of pFUS. Our findings demonstrate that pFUS represents a promising new treatment modality that could be used as a non-pharmaceutical adjunct or even alternative to current drug treatments in diabetes.

Effect of fibrosis regionality on atrial fibrillation recurrence: insights from DECAAF II

AIMS

The amount of fibrosis in the left atrium (LA) predicts atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation (CA). We aim to identify whether regional variations in LA fibrosis affect AF recurrence.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This post hoc analysis of the DECAAF II trial includes 734 patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time CA who underwent late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI) within 1 month prior to ablation and were randomized to MRI-guided fibrosis ablation in addition to standard pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or standard PVI only. The LA wall was divided into seven regions: anterior, posterior, septal, lateral, right pulmonary vein (PV) antrum, left PV antrum, and left atrial appendage (LAA) ostium. Regional fibrosis percentage was defined as a region's fibrosis prior to ablation divided by total LA fibrosis. Regional surface area percentage was defined as an area's surface area divided by the total LA wall surface area before ablation. Patients were followed up for a year with single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices. The left PV had the highest regional fibrosis percentage (29.30 ± 14.04%), followed by the lateral wall (23.23 ± 13.56%), and the posterior wall (19.80 ± 10.85%). The regional fibrosis percentage of the LAA was a significant predictor of AF recurrence post-ablation (odds ratio = 1.017, P = 0.021), and this finding was only preserved in patients receiving MRI-guided fibrosis ablation. Regional surface area percentages did not significantly affect the primary outcome.

CONCLUSION

We have confirmed that atrial cardiomyopathy and remodelling are not a homogenous process, with variations in different regions of the LA. Atrial fibrosis does not uniformly affect the LA, and the left PV antral region has more fibrosis than the rest of the wall. Furthermore, we identified regional fibrosis of the LAA as a significant predictor of AF recurrence post-ablation in patients receiving MRI-guided fibrosis ablation in addition to standard PVI.

Identifying the prognostic significance of early arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period and the optimal blanking period duration: insights from the DECAAF II study

OBJECTIVE

Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is common. Current guidelines promulgate a 3-month blanking period. We hypothesize that early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period may predict longer-term ablation outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 688 patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation were included in the DECAAF II trial database. The primary endpoint of the study was the first confirmed recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Recurrence was also monitored during the 90-day blanking period. A total of 287 patients experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmia during the blanking period, while 401 remained in sinus rhythm. Rates of longer-term arrhythmia recurrence were substantially higher among those who developed recurrence during the blanking period compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm throughout the blanking period (68% vs. 32%, P < 0.001). The study cohort was divided into three groups according to the timing of arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period. Of those who had recurrent arrhythmia during the first month of the blanking period (Group 1), 43.9% experienced longer-term recurrence, compared to 61.6% who recurred during the second month of the blanking period (Group 2), and 93.3% of those who had arrhythmia recurrence during the third month (Group 3, P < 0.001). The risk of recurrent arrhythmia was highest in Group 3 (HR = 10.15), followed by Group 2 (HR = 2.35) and Group 1 (HR = 1.5). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the timing of arrhythmia recurrence and the primary outcome (AUC = 0.746, P < 0.001). The optimal blanking period duration was identified as 34 days. Atrial fibrillation burden determined by smartphone electrocardiogram technology over the 18 months follow-up period was significantly higher in Group 3 (29%) compared to Groups 1 (6%) and 2 (7%) and in patients who stayed in sinus rhythm during the blanking period (5%) (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Early atrial arrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period, particularly during the third month, is significantly associated with later recurrence. Although a blanking period is warranted, it should be abbreviated.