Outbreak by KPC-62-producing ST307 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol in a university hospital in Madrid, Spain

OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol are two of the latest antibiotics with activity against a wide variety of Gram-negatives, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. We sought to describe the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of ceftazidime/avibactam- and cefiderocol-resistant KPC-Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) detected during an outbreak in 2020 in the medical ICU of our hospital.

METHODS

We collected 11 KPC-Kp isolates (6 clinical; 5 surveillance samples) resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol from four ICU patients (November 2020 to January 2021), without prior exposure to these agents. All patients had a decontamination regimen as part of the standard ICU infection prevention protocol. Additionally, one ceftazidime/avibactam- and cefiderocol-resistant KPC-Kp (June 2019) was retrospectively recovered. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by broth microdilution. β-Lactamases were characterized and confirmed. WGS was also performed.

RESULTS

All KPC-Kp isolates (ceftazidime/avibactam MIC  ≥16/4 mg/L; cefiderocol MIC ≥4 mg/L) were KPC + CTX-M-15 producers and belonged to the ST307 high-risk-clone (ST307-HRC). KPC-62 (L168Q) was detected in all isolates involved in the 2020 outbreak, contained in January 2021. KPC-31 (D179Y) was identified in the KPC-Kp from 2019. Cloning experiments demonstrated that both blaKPC-62 and blaKPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime/avibactam resistance (MIC >16 mg/L) and an increased cefiderocol MIC. Additionally, mutations in OmpA and EnvZ/OmpR porin proteins (in KPC-62-Kp) and in PBP2 (in KPC-31-Kp) were found and may be involved in cefiderocol resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

The emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol in KPC-Kp-HRCs, together with the diversification of novel KPC enzymes displaying different antibiotic resistance phenotypes, is an epidemiological and clinical risk.

Predictors of mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with bloodstream infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: The impact of cytomegalovirus disease and lymphopenia

Treatment of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections in solid organ transplant recipients is challenging. The objective of this study was to develop a specific score to predict mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections. A multinational, retrospective (2004-2016) cohort study (INCREMENT-SOT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02852902) was performed. The main outcome variable was 30-day all-cause mortality. The INCREMENT-SOT-CPE score was developed using logistic regression. The global cohort included 216 patients. The final logistic regression model included the following variables: INCREMENT-CPE mortality score ≥8 (8 points), no source control (3 points), inappropriate empirical therapy (2 points), cytomegalovirus disease (7 points), lymphopenia (4 points), and the interaction between INCREMENT-CPE score ≥8 and CMV disease (minus 7 points). This score showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.88) and classified patients into 3 strata: 0-7 (low mortality), 8-11 (high mortality), and 12-17 (very-high mortality). We performed a stratified analysis of the effect of monotherapy vs combination therapy among 165 patients who received appropriate therapy. Monotherapy was associated with higher mortality only in the very-high (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.82, 95% CI 1.13-7.06, P = .03) and high (HR 9.93, 95% CI 2.08-47.40, P = .004) mortality risk strata. A score-based algorithm is provided for therapy guidance.