Creation of a Psychotic Disorders Research Advisory Board as a Shared Resource

Community engagement is important for research, yet many researchers do not routinely seek feedback from people with lived experience. A key barrier to this engagement is that the resources required to create an advisory board may be unavailable to individual investigators, and creating an advisory board for a single study may often be impractical. In this column, the authors describe how to create a standing research advisory board that can serve as a shared resource for researchers and community members and provide a psychosis research advisory board example to aid discussion.

Recommendations for the use of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies in the diagnosis and follow-up of systemic lupus erythematosus - A proposal from an expert panel

Anti-dsDNA autoantibodies are listed as one of the classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are relatively effective indicators for monitoring disease activity and treatment response. Therefore, clinicians rely on them to diagnose and adjust medication and treatment strategies for SLE patients. However, the use of anti-dsDNA antibodies is not free from controversy. Part of this controversy stems from the fact that anti-dsDNA antibodies are found in several disorders, besides SLE. In addition to this, anti-dsDNA antibodies are a heterogeneous group of antibodies, and their determination still lacks proper standardization. Moreover, anti-dsDNA testing specificity and diagnostic performance change depending on the population under study. These and other issues result in inconsistency and encumber the clinical use of anti-dsDNA antibodies. A panel of medical laboratory and clinical experts on SLE discussed such issues based on their clinical experience in a first meeting, establishing a series of recommendations. The proceedings of this first meeting, plus an exhaustive review of the literature, were used to compose a paper draft. The panel subsequently discussed and refined this draft in a second meeting, the result of which is this paper. This document is relevant to clinical laboratories as it guides to improving diagnosis and monitoring of SLE. Simultaneously, it will help laboratories compile more informative reports, not limited to a mere number. It is also relevant to clinical doctors who wish to better understand laboratory methods so that they can do a more efficient, better-aimed laboratory test ordering.

Establishing and Leveraging the Expertise of Advisory Boards

The advisory board's makeup tends to consist of professionals with domains of expertise relevant to the organization they serve. Organizations invite advisory board members to guide the organization's efforts over an extended period. Still, they do not have fiduciary, operational, or decision-making responsibilities for the organization in the way that a board of directors does. This article provides a framework for a behavior-analytic organization to (a) identify whether an advisory board would be feasible and beneficial, (b) establish an advisory board, and (c) engage and manage an advisory board to best leverage the unique skills and interests of the members. The article includes 2 examples of advisory boards to illustrate the suggested framework and recommendations.

The Canadian retinoblastoma research advisory board: a framework for patient engagement

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY

Retinoblastoma is a rare eye cancer that occurs in one or both eyes of infants and young children as a result of errors in the RB1 gene. There are approximately 2000 retinoblastoma survivors in Canada. Those with the heritable form of the disease are at risk of passing the gene to the next generation and developing a second cancer. Many retinoblastoma survivors and families therefore interact with the healthcare system throughout their lives.The retinoblastoma community has a longstanding history of engaging patients in research, however without any formal process. The literature establishes benefits to patient engagement such as research results which are more applicable, credible, and transparent. Building on the established interest among stakeholders, the Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board (CRRAB) was established in 2016 to foster sustainable and meaningful collaboration between patients (survivors and family members), advocacy groups, healthcare professionals, and researchers in the retinoblastoma community.The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of CRRAB in fostering patient engagement in research. Members of CRRAB were surveyed to uncover their attitudes towards and experience with patient engagement in research. Participants perceived CRRAB to provide diverse and accessible opportunities for patient engagement in research and perceived their participation to have a meaningful impact. The results suggest that CRRAB promotes patient engagement in retinoblastoma research, and provides direction to sustain and enhance future patient engagement.

ABSTRACT

Background The Canadian Retinoblastoma Research Advisory Board (CRRAB) is a multidisciplinary group, including patients (survivors and family members), advocacy groups, healthcare professionals, and researchers, which aims to establish and sustain patient engagement in retinoblastoma research. The purpose of this study was to describe the development of CRRAB and to uncover members' understanding of and attitudes towards patient engagement in research. As well, to determine their level of engagement.Methods Retinoblastoma patients, healthcare professionals, and researchers provided leadership to co-develop CRRAB. CRRAB members were surveyed by pre- and post-test questionnaire at the 2016 Annual General Meeting to assess experience with, understanding of, and attitudes towards patient engagement in research. A second questionnaire was administered before the 2017 CRRAB meeting to assess awareness and perceived impact of CRRAB activities, and individual engagement in research. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and paired t-test (for pre/post-test). Thematic analysis of chart board discussions at both meetings revealed the joint goals of CRRAB and reasons for and barriers to patient engagement.Results In 2016, 21 individuals participated and self-identified as patients (11, 52%), healthcare professionals (6, 29%), and/or researchers (7, 33%) (participants could overlap stakeholder groups). Overall, participants believed that research is relevant to all stakeholders and that patients can have meaningful impact on research. In 2017, 35 individuals participated and identified as patients (21, 60%), healthcare professionals (9, 26%), and/or researchers (8, 23%). 94% of participants were aware of CRRAB initiatives and 67% had participated in at least one over the previous year. Participants perceived that CRRAB provides diverse opportunities and increases accessibility for patient engagement in research, and perceived patient engagement to have meaningful impact on retinoblastoma research. Chart board discussions revealed that participants wanted to be part of CRRAB to increase knowledge, support innovation and patient engagement, and be part of a community. Members most commonly faced barriers including time and cost restraints.Conclusions The results of this study suggest that CRRAB has supported the engagement needs of patients affected by retinoblastoma, and has provided an opportunity for engaging patients in retinoblastoma research. CRRAB will continue to be used as a framework for patient engagement, with improvements based on participant feedback.