Patterns in the Reporting of Aggressive Histologic Subtypes in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The tall cell, columnar, and diffuse sclerosing subtypes are aggressive histologic subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with increasing incidence, yet there is a wide variation in reporting. We aimed to identify and compare factors associated with the reporting of these aggressive subtypes (aPTC) to classic PTC (cPTC) and secondarily identify differences in outcomes.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify cPTC and aPTC from 2004 to 2017. Patient and facility demographics and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed. Independent predictors of aPTC reporting were identified and a survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The majority of aPTC (67%) were reported by academic facilities. Compared to academic facilities, all other facility types were 1.4-2.0 times less likely to report aPTC (P < 0.05). Regional variation in reporting was noted, with more cases reported in the Middle Atlantic, despite there being more total facilities in the South Atlantic and East North Central regions. Compared to the Middle Atlantic, all other regions were 1.4-5 times less likely to report aPTC (P < 0.001). Patient characteristics including race and income were not associated with aPTC reporting. Compared to cPTC, aPTC had higher rates of aggressive features and worse 5-y overall survival (90.5% versus 94.5%, log rank P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive subtypes of PTC are associated with worse outcomes. Academic and other facilities in the Middle Atlantic were more likely to report aPTC. This suggests the need for further evaluation of environmental or geographic factors versus a need for increased awareness and more accurate diagnosis of these subtypes.

Small papillary thyroid carcinoma with minimal extrathyroidal extension should be managed as ATA low-risk tumor

PURPOSE

According to American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline, papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) with minimal extrathyroidal extension (mETE) is classified at "intermediate risk" of persistent/recurrent disease. However, the impact of mETE per se on patients' outcome is not fully understood. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of mETE in patients with PTC not submitted to therapeutic or prophylactic lymph node dissection, according to tumor size and other prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a total of 514 PTC patients: 127 (24.7%) had mETE (pT3Nx) and 387 (75.3%) had negative margins (pT1-2Nx). At a median follow-up of 9.1 years, patients were divided in two groups: patients with "good outcome" (no evidence of disease) and patients with "poor outcome" (persistent structural disease or recurrent disease or tumor-related death).

RESULTS

The rate of patients with "poor outcome" was significantly higher in patients with mETE compared with patients with negative margins (11.8 versus 5.1%; OR 2.4576, 95% CI 1.2178-4.9594, p = 0.01). However, mETE was significantly associated with poor outcome only in patients with tumors larger than 1.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

mETE is an unfavorable prognostic factor in tumors larger than 1.5 cm, suggesting that, in the absence of other unfavorable characteristics, smaller tumors with mETE should be classified and managed as "low risk" tumors.