Chronic inhaled antibiotic therapy in people with cystic fibrosis with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Germany

BACKGROUND

Several clinical guidelines recommend chronic inhaled therapy for pwCF (people with cystic fibrosis) and chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of the lungs.

METHODS

To demonstrate what kind of therapy regimens are used in Germany, we retrospectively analysed chronic inhaled antibiotic therapy within the cohort of the German CF Registry in 2020. For comparison we also analysed the use of inhaled antibiotics in pwCF with intermittent Pseudomonas or without Pseudomonas infection.

RESULTS

A total of 1960 pwCF had chronic P. aeruginosa infection and were retrospectively evaluated. Almost 90% (n = 1751) received at least one inhaled antibiotic. The most commonly used inhaled antibiotic was colistin solution for inhalation (55.2%), followed by aztreonam solution for inhalation (32.6%) and tobramycin solution for Inhalation (30%). Almost 56% of adults and 44% of children alternated two antibiotics for inhalation. In children, alternating colistin + tobramycin was the most often used regimen. In adults, only 23% used colistin + tobramycin; there was a wide range of treatment regimens among adults using two inhaled antibiotics alternately. 2456 pwCF had no Pseudomonas infection, but almost 24% had a chronic inhaled antibiotic therapy, while 56% of 361 pwCF and intermittent chronic Pseudomonas infection had a chronic inhaled antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSION

In all three groups the most commonly used inhaled antibiotic was colistin solution for inhalation. Almost 56% of adults and 44% of children with chronic Pseudomonas infection alternated two antibiotics for inhalation. It will be interesting to see how the introduction of the highly effective modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor will change the use of inhaled antibiotics.

CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen compared with CEOP as the first-line therapy for newly diagnosed patients with peripheral T cell lymphoma: results from a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (CHOP)/CHOP-like chemotherapy is widely used in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). Here we conducted a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, comparing the efficacy and safety of CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen with CEOP in newly diagnosed PTCL.

METHODS

PTCL patients, except for anaplastic large cell lymphoma-anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive, were 1:1 randomly assigned to receive CEOP/IVE/GDP (CEOP, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, epirubicin 70 mg/m2, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1, and prednisone 60 mg/m2 [maximum 100 mg] on days 1-5 every 21 days, at the first and fourth cycle; IVE, ifosfamide 2000 mg/m2 on days 1-3, epirubicin 70 mg/m2 on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 21 days, at the second and fifth cycle; and GDP, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4 every 21 days, at the third and sixth cycle) and CEOP (every 21 days for 6 cycles). Analysis of efficacy and safety was of the intent-to-treatment population. The primary endpoint was a complete response rate at the end of treatment. Meanwhile, whole exome sequencing and targeted sequencing were performed in 62 patients with available tumor samples to explore prognostic biomarkers in this cohort as an exploratory post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Among 106 patients, 53 each were enrolled to CEOP/IVE/GDP and CEOP. With 51 evaluable patients each in two groups, a complete response rate of the CEOP/IVE/GDP group was similar to that of the CEOP group (37.3% vs. 31.4%, p = 0.532). There was no difference in median progression-free survival (PFS; 15.4 months vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.122) or overall survival (OS; 24.3 months vs. 21.9 months, p = 0.178). Grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological adverse events were comparable. Histone modification genes were most frequently mutated (25/62, 40.3%), namely KMT2D, KMT2A, SETD2, EP300, and CREBBP. Multivariate analysis indicated that CREBBP and IDH2 mutations were independent factors predicting poor PFS and OS (all p < 0.001), while KMT2D predicting poor PFS (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

CEOP/IVE/GDP alternating regimen showed no remission or survival advantage to standard chemotherapy. Future clinical trials should aim to develop alternative regimen targeting disease biology as demonstrated by recurrent mutations in epigenetic factors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02533700) on August 27, 2015.