Evaluation of renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD) by mDIXON-Quant and Amide Proton Transfer weighted (APTw) imaging

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term condition that affects >10% of the adult population worldwide. Noninvasive assessment of renal function has important clinical significance for disease diagnosis and prognosis evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the value of mDIXON-Quant combined with amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging for accessing renal function in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two healthy volunteers (HVs) and 30 CKD patients were included in this study, and the CKD patients were divided into the mild CKD (mCKD) group (14 cases) and moderate-to-severe CKD (msCKD) group (16 cases) according to glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The cortex APT (cAPT), medulla APT (mAPT), cortex R2⁎ (cR2⁎), medulla R2⁎ (mR2⁎), cortex FF (cFF) and medulla FF (mFF) values of the right renal were independently measured by two radiologists. Intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) test was used to test the inter-observer consistency. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the difference among three groups. Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences of R2⁎, FF and APT values among the patient and HV groups. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to analyze the diagnostic efficiency. The corresponding threshold, sensitivity, and specificity were obtained according to the maximum approximate index. The combined diagnostic efficacy of R2⁎, FF, and APT values was analyzed by binary Logistic regression, and the AUC of combined diagnosis was compared with the AUC of the single parameter by the Delong test.

RESULTS

The cAPT value of the HV, mCKD and msCKD groups increased gradually. The mAPT value and cR2⁎ values of the mCKD and msCKD groups were higher than those of the HV group, while the mFF value of the mCKD group was lower than HV group (all P < 0.05). The cAPT and mAPT values showed good diagnostic efficacy in evaluating different degrees of renal damage, while cR2⁎ and mFF values showed moderate diagnostic efficacy. When combining the APT, R2⁎, and FF values, the diagnostic efficiency was significantly improved.

CONCLUSION

mDIXON-Quant combined APTw imaging can be used for improved diagnosis of CKD.

Improved differentiation between endometrial carcinoma and endometrial polyp with combination of APTw and IVIM MR imaging

PURPOSE

To assess the value of amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) combined with intra-voxel-incoherent-motion (IVIM) imaging in differential diagnosis of stage I-II endometrial carcinoma (EC) and endometrial polyp (EP).

METHODS

A total of 53 female patients (37 cases with EC and 16 cases with EP) confirmed by surgical resection or biopsy from June 2019 to Jan. 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), APTw and IVIM scans. The pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D^⁎), perfusion fraction (f), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and APT values were independently measured by two observers. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to test the consistency of measurements by the two observers. Mann-Whitney U test was performed to analyze the difference of each parameter between EC and EP groups. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the Delong test was used for ROC curve comparison. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between APTw and IVIM parameters.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in clinical manifestations between the two groups (P > 0.05). APT and D^⁎ values of the EC group were significantly higher than those of the EP group [APT: 2.64 ± 0.50% vs. 2.05 ± 0.58%; and D^⁎: (54.06 ± 36.06) × 10^-3 mm²/s vs. (30.54 ± 16.67) × 10^-3 mm²/s]. D, f and ADC values of EC group were significantly lower than those of EP group [D: 0.62(0.53,0.76) × 10^-3 mm²/s vs. (1.45 ± 0.48) × 10^-3 mm²/s; f: 22.18 ± 8.08% vs. 30.80 ± 8.92%; and ADC: (0.88 ± 0.16) × 10^-3 mm²/s vs. (1.57 ± 0.43) × 10^-3 mm²/s]. The area under ROC curves were observed as: AUC (IVIM+APT) > AUC (D) > AUC (ADC) > AUC (APT) > AUC (f) > AUC (D^⁎). Delong test suggested statistical significance between AUC by APT and D, D and D^⁎, D and f, D^⁎ and ADC, APT and com(IVIM+APT), D^⁎ and com(IVIM+APT), as well as f and com(IVIM+APT). No significant correlation between the APT and IVIM parameters was observed in either EC or EP group.

CONCLUSION

Both APT and IVIM parameters showed statistical differences between EC and EP. With combination of APT and IVIM parameters, the diagnostic accuracy between EC and EP can be significantly improved.