Motility of the Ocular Prosthesis in Anophthalmic Patients: Objective and Patient-perceived Findings

AIM

To study the impact of the prosthesis motility on the Quality of Life (QoL) in anophthalmic patients.

METHODS

Cross-sectional, observational study of 100 anophthalmic patients, of whom 64% had an acryl implant, 6% an Allen implant, 1% a hydroxyapatite implant, 4% a dermis fat graft, 16% no implant, and 9% an unknown implant. We quantitatively assessed the motility of the prosthesis with Kestenbaum glasses and the QoL with a validated questionnaire covering five domains: General functional abilities and care, wearing comfort, physical appearance, psychological and social functioning. Associations between measured prosthetic eye motility, patient-perceived motility, and satisfaction were made.

RESULTS

Motility of the prosthesis was impaired with an average loss of 76%, and correlated with Cosmetic satisfaction (adduction P = .02, abduction P = .008, elevation P = .04) and Social satisfaction (adduction P = .03, abduction P = .003). The patient-perceived motility of the prosthesis correlated with General functioning abilities (horizontal P = .0004, vertical P = .0004), Comfort (horizontal P = .001, vertical P = .003), Cosmetic satisfaction (horizontal P = .0002, vertical P = .0002), Psychological satisfaction (horizontal P = .001, vertical P = .001), and Social satisfaction (horizontal P = .002, vertical P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular prosthetic motility has a significant impact on patient-perceived satisfaction and physical appearance, and predicts coping with the prosthetic condition on the psychosocial level. This highlights the need of introducing patient-reported outcome measures in the prosthetic rehabilitation of the anophthalmic patient.

Measuring quality of care and life in patients with an ocular prosthesis

PURPOSE

In patients with an anophthalmic condition, the primary determinants of success of ocular prosthetic rehabilitation are satisfaction with care and quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to develop a condition-specific questionnaire as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with an ocular prosthesis.

METHODS

Observational cross-sectional prospective study. We included 100 patients (52 female, 48 male, > 18 years old) with an anophthalmic and ocular prosthetic condition existing for 2 years or more. The patients completed a pre-tested 72-item questionnaire regarding their experience on living with an ocular prosthesis in four domains of QoL: single vision and care, wearing comfort, physical appearance and motility, and psychosocial functioning. Associations with demographic factors and condition- and prosthesis-related variables were investigated with multivariate analysis. The questionnaire was reduced with principal component analysis to obtain the Global Ocular Prosthesis Score (GOPS).

RESULTS

Satisfaction scores for each QoL domain were high with a mean visual analogue score between 7.2 and 7.6. Patients were generally satisfied with the physical appearance of the artificial eye and reported adequate psychosocial functioning. Patients described the reduced peripheral visual field and socket discharge as chief complaints. The test was reduced to a 20-item questionnaire. The mean GOPS was 70.87 (median 75.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with longstanding ocular prosthetic wear are satisfied with their physical appearance and report adequate psychosocial functioning. A concise 20-item questionnaire for the anophthalmic condition is a valuable tool to quantitatively measure patient-reported outcome of ocular prosthetic rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04321382, 03/2020, retrospectively registered.